Sunday, May 5, 2024

We're in a "pickle" now with H.R. 6090

Editor's note: Who the hell is running America? The British or the Americans? The British are extremely adept at this: "Government by media." It's an Act: H.R. 6090 (a British Trojan horse). Pull this Act up and read it and you will come across a group referenced in H.R. 6090 known as the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) when enforcing anti-discrimination laws. The IHRA is run out of the City of London headed up by Lord Eric Pickles. H.R. 6090 has no penalties or consequences written into this "law" if you don't "obey" it. It is vagary with nothing in this "law" accurately defined and would be extremely difficult to use in a court of law. It is propaganda the British are extremely adept at. H.R. 6090 relies on the IHRA for its defintion. The British are now defining terms written into US law?! Is this why Trump didn't "violate" this "law?" Note Trump mentioned that he thinks Israel did one thing very badly: "Public relations." Well, you don't say? The bill "sailed through" by a 320-91 bipartisan vote, with 70 House Democrats and 21 House Republicans voting against it. These US executives who voted against this Act did so becuase they felt the wording wasn't strong enough. Those who voted for this Act are traitors. The US corporation now has instructed the federally subcontracted Department of Education corporation "to use definitions of antisemitism proposed by the IHRA when enforcing anti-discrimination laws" with British definitions. Why is America being sacrificed for Israel and the British? Why not Americans simply tell the British and Israel to piss off? Then go after internal traitors.
_________

Source: Promethean Action

Did Donald Trump Violate the "AntiSemitism Awareness Act" by Criticizing Israel?
Trump: "I think that Israel has done one thing very badly: public relations."

On Wednesday, May 1, by a vote of 320 to 91, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the AntiSemitism Awareness Act of 2032 (H.R. 6090). Voting against it were 70 House Democrats, including Jerald Nadler (NY) the longest-serving Jewish House Democrat and 21 Republicans, mostly members of the Freedom Caucus. Both the Democrats and Republicans opposing the bill warned that it constituted an anti-Constitutional threat to free speech. Even hard-core pro-Israel commentators like Steve Bannon and Charlie Kirk took a breath and recognized that danger.

Nadler's floor speech opposing the bill included the following warning:
"This definition, adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, or IHRA, includes "contemporary examples of antisemitism". The problem is that these examples may include protected speech, in some contexts, particularly with respect to criticism of the State of Israel…. this bill threatens to chill constitutionally protected speech. Speech that is critical of Israel—alone—does not constitute unlawful discrimination. By encompassing purely political speech about Israel into Title VI's ambit, the bill sweeps too broadly."
The bill was pushed through in the super-charged atmosphere of campus demonstrations, riots, wall to wall media hysteria, and a widening war in Southwest Asia in which women and children have been the major casualties. As we have noted a classic British gang/countergang operation is taking place here.

This works as follows. You are supposed to pick a side: pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian, and if you are pro-Isreal you are a genocidalist; if you are pro-Palestinian, you a Hamas-loving terrorist and you are antisemitic. There is no doubt the elites intend to use this conflict in manifold ways to affect the 2024 election and hang on to control of the United States. As it stands, RINOs in the House and their accomplices in the Senate appear to be mounting a replay of Richard Nixon's 1972 campaign in a desperate attempt to justify their continued legitimacy while joining with Democratic Party fascists to jettison the First Amendment.

One day earlier, Time Magazine released an interview with Donald Trump in which he made clear, once again, that he doesn't play the oligarchy's games. Asked a series of questions on Israel, Trump did not give unconditional support to the policies of Israel and its current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (unlike Bannon and Kirk.) As was clear in Trump's historic Abraham Accords (which have been tragically disrupted by the Biden Administration's policies), President Trump did not and will not play Britain's geopolitical games. In his Abraham Accords negotiations, he treated the nations and peoples of the region as having legitimate self-interests which could be brought together under a higher conception.

Please go to Promethean Action to continue reading. 
________



Related:



In the above republished article it was stated "he [Trump] made it clear, once again, he doesn't play the oligarchy's games." Here is a little nuance to that statement:

Gaza Shows Britain Is an Oligarchy: Let's Stop Pretending It Isn't


Anyone requiring a refresher course on Israel 1.0? And Nick, get a grip on the British angle here would you please?



Han Solo telling Jabba - Lord Eric Pickles - to piss off...



What number of deaths constitutes "genocide?" Estimates are 10,000 Palestinian women have been killed by US-manufactured weapons released from pylons off Israeli-flown Lockheed Martin F35s by Israeli pilots some trained in the UK flying sorties over Gaza turning buildings into powdered concrete. What the fuck? Do Americans want the British-based IHRA and Israel defining what "genocide" and "antisemitism" is?



Americans better detach themselves from this becuase unless they do the British are going to shove them into this termoil through the British forward fire base in Israel

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...