Nefarious Rothschild Family Crafts Hillary's Globalist Economic Policy - Insidious and Overwhelming Rothschild Influence in Global Geopolitics and Finance - It's Not the Rothschilds to Whom You Owe Penance, Hillary

Wikileaks Show Rothschilds Grooming Clinton for Presidency – Months Before She Launched Candidacy

Claire Bernish | October 19, 2016 | The Free Thought Project

Lynn de Rothschild's party for Hillary Clinton

Paris attacks: who warned Éric de Rothschild?

Source: Panamza

INFO PANAMZA – The man supposed to have been "warned Friday morning" – according to an Israeli media outlet – of the "impending" attacks is none other than Baron Éric de Rothschild, multimillionaire businessman and president of France's "Jewish Community Security Service" (SPCJ). Revelations.

2015.11.19 at 19h48

"A Rothschild who is not rich, not Jewish, not a philanthropist, not a banker, not industrious, and who does not lead a certain lifestyle is not a Rothschild"

The author – deceased in 1997 – of this frank declaration?

Edmond de Rothschild, banker, member of the Bilderberg steering committee, and grandson of a historic patron of Zionism.

Evelyn de Rothschild on CNBC (Dec. 10, 2008) – Unlimited Attitude – Neglecting Basic Principles – Action Must Be Taken – Hang Onto Your Gold Bars

British Banking Giant 
Wed 10 Dec 08 | 04:22 PM ET
Sir Evelyn de Rothschild shares his thoughts on the international financial system and the world economy.
Financial Services

Maria Bartiromo (CNBC): And welcome back. Joining us now in another CNBC exclusive to share his thoughts on the international financial system – what's right, what needs to change – Sir Evelyn de Rothschild. Evelyn, nice to have you on the program; thanks so much for joining us.

Evelyn de Rothschild: Well, thank you for having me.

Maria Bartiromo: You know, I read your op-ed and I thought it was so apropos in this period, and you went through all of the people who are to blame for what has gone on, and this is a broad group. Can you take us through your observations, given the fact that we've seen this global situation – of course, Gordon Brown in Britain was very quick to take a stand and try and offer solutions.

November 2010: Bloomberg Interviews Evelyn de Rothschild - Geared Up Beyond Rational Thinking - Downfall of the Euro and the European Union

Nov. 23, 2010 (Bloomberg) -- Financier Evelyn de Rothschild talks about the outlook for Ireland's banking industry and the spread of the European sovereign debt crisis. He speaks with Bloomberg's Mark Barton during the Bloomberg Businessweek European Leadership Forum in London. (Source: Bloomberg)

Patriarch of Europe’s Rothschild Banking Family - Corporate Responsibility - Unifying Holdings - Family Control - Finance Dynasty

Source: Outlook Business

'Auditors haven’t done a good job’
Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, chairman, Concordia BV

01 Dec 2007

His considerable wealth and lifestyle lends an old-world halo to Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, patriarch of Europe’s Rothschild banking family. The Chairman of Concordia BV spoke to Naren Karunakaran on corporate responsibility but was reticent on the Rothschild involvement in the Russian oil giant Rosneft’s controversial $10.7-billion IPO in 2006. Sections of the financial community had railed against it on ethical grounds, for Rosneft’s principal asset, Yuganskneftegaz, was allegedly acquired in a forced auction by the Russian government.

Debates on corporate responsibility are gaining in decibels. Why?

It goes in waves. A change in government may bring about more regulation or less regulation. You see that in the US with Sarbanes Oxley. In the UK, we split responsibilities between the Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority. These moves reinforce corporate responsibility. I think, shareholders have to be well cared for.




Evelyn de Rothschild,
Chairman, Concordia BV

There is an accusation that corporates are obsessed with shareholder value and tend to look away at hard, societal aspects of doing business.

Investor groups, like hedge funds, are moving in. They are only keen on quick returns and aren’t particularly interested in the company per se. Their focus is on capital gains. To me, it is rather difficult to understand. It’s a question of the type of investors a company has.

The key to modern corporate responsibility, therefore, is the appointment of independent directors on the board, those who understand the business and issues, like competence of auditing. I think, the auditors worldwide have failed to do a good job.

How does one rectify the situation?

There are two sides to auditing. One is actually doing the accounting procedures; and the other is to be absolutely upfront and tell the management that the people running the accounts in the company are not doing it satisfactorily. Auditing firms have to engage in staff assessment. However, these firms are so keen to keep the business that they tend to go soft on the company. They have to be tougher.

You see this happening in the short-term?

I don’t know whether it will happen. But it should happen. Three or four companies control the entire audit world. That’s wrong. There is little to choose from. Frankly, the whole standard of ethics is the key criteria to good business. The government also has to put in tougher systems. Basically, we have to train people to behave correctly.

"Today, the key to modern corporate responsibility is the appointment of independent directors on the board"

You’ve had a close association with the global metal and mining industry.

I was director of De Beers and was close to Rio Tinto and others. I am familiar with the issues — environment and resettlement of the displaced. The shareholder has to be protected. A company cannot spend large amounts of money on the environment if it is detrimental to the value of the company.

Did it worry you when controversy hit the Rosneft IPO? ABN Amro-Rothschild was joint bookrunner to the IPO, which investor George Soros and others described as facilitating the sale of stolen goods.

Was there a controversy? I can’t remember, my memory is bad, it was a while ago.

Evelyn de Rothschild, Chairman, Concordia BV










Rothschild banking family to unify holdings

Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:00am EDT

PARIS, July 17 (Reuters) - The Rothschild banking family have struck a 446 million-euro ($615 million) deal to unify the shareholdings of the English and French branches of the family, one of their holding companies said on Tuesday.

The Paris Orleans (PROR.PA) holding company said it would now own 100 percent of Concordia BV, the ultimate holding company of the Rothschild banking group.

Paris Orleans said it would buy a remaining 50 percent stake in Concordia BV for 446 million euros in shares and in cash.

"It enables us to simplify further the shareholding structure of the group and to unify the shareholding of the French and English branches of the family for a new generation," David de Rothschild, who heads up the French part of the Rothschild family, said in a statement.

($1=.7250 Euro) ((Reporting by Sudip Kar-Gupta; editing by Greg Mahlich; Reuters Messaging: sudip.kargupta.reuters.com@reuters.net; tel +33 1 49 49 54 52)) Keywords: ROTHSCHILD HOLDING

Rothschild in China – Investing in China's Weather – E.L. Rothschild Captures Weather Central, Launches MyWeather.com – 'Helping' Farmers

Evelyn de Rothschild: China’s Growth a 'Remarkable' Story

June 7, 2011 (Bloomberg) — Evelyn de Rothschild, chairman of EL Rothschild Ltd., talks about China’s economic development and outlook for the country’s financial services industry. De Rothschild speaks from Beijing with Rishaad Salamat on Bloomberg Television’s “On the Move Asia.”

Wikileaks: Rothschild Operation - Swiss Banking Rivals - A Bankers' Turf War - Trademarks of a Covert Operation - Worth of One Family: $100 Trillion

Source: Puppetworld Post

Wikileaks Is A Rothschild Operation: Rothschilds Use Wikileaks To Wound Rival Bank, Julian Assange’s Bail Posted By Rothschilds’ Sister-in-law, Many Other Links

Puppetworld Post Exclusive
Jan 18 2011

After being made famous, Julian Assange’s first task is to wound a rival bank of the Rothschild Bank in Switzerland. The rival is Bank Julius Baer, the top Swiss bank for centuries: the competing Rothschild Bank opened in Switzerland in 1968.

On January 17, 2011, Assange held a press conference at the Frontline Club where Rudolf Elmer, a former employee of Bank Julius Baer, gave Assange private files from the bank’s Cayman Islands’ operation. Elmer said he wanted to expose mass tax evasion before he flies back to Switzerland to stand trial for stealing information from a bank. Although Elmer has not named the tax evaders, he claims the CD files contain information about 40 politicians, many business people, multinational conglomerates and “people who have made their living in the arts.”

Wikileaks' leader Julian Assange accepts a CD from Rudolph Elmer which reveals tax evasion by wealthy clients of Swiss Bank Julius Baer, a rival of the Rothschild Bank in Switzerland.

Rothschilds’ Swiss Bank Battles: Assange’s press conference was actually a public threat to Bank Julius Baer: Wikileaks first disclosed some of Elmer’s Julius Baer material in 2008, naming ten clients. At the time, Julius Baer sued and got a court injunction to effectively shut down Wikileaks.org at its web host in California. Subsequently, the law firm Fox Rothschild represented Wikileaks, got the injunction overturned, and got Wikileaks.org back online. Immediately, WL commenced leaking more of Elmer’s documents, which was damaging to Bank Julius Baer.

Bank JB got a lot of negative publicity from its attempt to censor the Internet. When JB lost the suit, their super-elite clients became fearful of being exposed and prosecuted for tax evasion and money laundering. Julius Baer shares dropped 60% during the next ten months. On Dec. 4, 2008, the 52-year-old CEO of Julius Baer, Alex Widmer, was unexpectedly found dead.

“He was the most important person in private banking,” said a Zurich-based trader.

“This is a setback for the bank (Julius Baer),” a Swiss trading analyst said.

Reports of the cause of death were contradictory and vague, and an autopsy was never released.

Wikileaks' Julian Assange filming a video for The Economist (a Rothschild publication) which gave him its New Media Award

Wikileaks’ many other links to Rothschilds

The recent imprisonment of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange strains credulity. His arrest by Interpol and his incarceration under draconian conditions for breaking a condom are in themselves highly unlikely events; but the timing of his imprisonment with the release of classified US cables and the campaign against Wikileaks’ funding and website host bear the trademarks of a covert operation.

The Puppetworld Post has uncovered many links between Wikileaks and the international Rothschild network:

- a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange (Puppetworld Post exclusive)
- The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008
- Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site
- The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds (PwP exclusive)
- the owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds
- Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer
- US Senator Joe Lieberman, who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)

[The Rothschilds are an international family of bankers at the centre of a web of wealthy families who control most of the countries through a worldwide network of: privately-owned central banks (masquerading as federal banks), major news chains, trusts, councils, etcetera. An unnamed source has put their monetary worth near $100 trillion—dwarfing the net worth of the likes of Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, etc.]

Zac Goldsmith (married to Kate Rothschild) winning the election with sister, Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith)(right), and mother, Annabel Goldsmith

Socialite, heiress Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith) posted 20 000 pounds ($32 000) for the bail of Wikileaks’ leader Julian Assange. She’s genetically related to the Rothschilds and she is a sister-in-law (Daily Mail Online, 10 May 2010). Her father, the late James Goldsmith - British banker, publisher - is a cousin to the Rothschilds. James’ grandfather Adolphe Goldschmidt came to London as a multi-millionaire in 1895 and changed the family name from the German Goldschmidt to the English Goldsmith. The Goldschmidts, like their neighbors and relatives the Rothschilds, had been prosperous merchant bankers in Frankfurt, Germany since the 16th century.

Following the Rothschilds' centuries-old edict to interbreed, Jemima Khan’s brother, Ben, wed Kate Rothschild in 2003; and recently, her other brother, Zac, a new MP in the British parliament, had been having an affair with his brother’s sister-in-law, Alice Rothschild (Kate’s sister), up until he divorced his wife four days after he was elected MP. Zac and Alice are presently living together. Khan’s brothers are marrying into Rothschild wealth.

The Rothschilds began grooming Julian Assange in 2008, when Wikileaks was awarded The Economist’s New Media Award. The Economist is the voice of Britain’s establishment (led by the British Rothschilds) which has, for example, on balance, supported Britain’s involvement in the Iraq war. Sir Evelyn Robert Adrian de Rothschild was chairman of The Economist from 1972 to 1989. His wife Lynn Forester de Rothschild currently sits on The Economist’s board. The Rothschild family also has a large shareholder interest in The Economist.

At first blush, it is incredible that the The Economist, the pinnacle of the establishment, would give their award to Assange - knowing full well that he was releasing classified government documents, and being acutely aware of the havoc this would create in the world. The Rothschilds’ oft-stated goal (over the centuries) is for a One World Government (i.e. the New World Order). To this end, they engineer conflict between nations, to create crises that will then be utilized to increase the power of international entities – the UN, World Bank, IMF, etcetera. For example, they (and other closely-related families like the Schiffs) financed the Bolsheviks [and, through other channels, financed the Nazis]. In the past, the Rothschild empire has profited by bankrolling both sides of war.

US senator Joe Lieberman is the Rothschilds' point man in America. During the last presidential election, he took his friend, Republican candidate John McCain, to Jacob Rothschild’s house for a fund-raiser for McCain. Lieberman is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (a Rothschild cabal which is essentially the shadow government of the US). Lieberman’s recent actions resulted in cutting off the money supply of Wikileaks: Paypal, Mastercard, Visa, stopped accepting donations for Wikileaks. Lieberman publicly took credit for censoring Wikileaks’ website by pressuring Amazon to stop hosting the website. The result was that Anonymous hacktivists launched attacks on the websites of companies (above) which had discontinued service to Wikileaks. Lieberman’s campaign against Wikileaks had the effect of increasing the martyrdom and hence the popularity of Assange and Wikileaks. Lieberman made Assange a star; Assange nearly became Time magazine’s Man of the Year.

Julian Assange’s lawyer is Mark Stephens of Finers Stephens Innocent, a major London elite law firm. They are the legal adviser to the Rothschilds' prestigious Waddesdon Trust.

Assange’s main media partner is The Guardian. The Guardian has been infiltrated by Rothschilds. The Guardian is controlled by Guardian Media Group, whose chairman is Paul Myners, a past employee of N M Rothschild & Sons Limited. Guardian Media Group is owned by the Scott Trust, which became a limited private company in 2008, with all trustees becoming directors of the Scott Trust. Anthony Salz was appointed as a trustee of the Scott Trust in 2009; he is currently executive vice-chairman of the investment bank Rothschild.

The Guardian gave the US cables to The New York Times. The chairman of the NYT is Arthur Sulzberger Jr., a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is the son of Arthur Ochs Sulzberger and grandson of Arthur Hays Sulzberger who served as a Trustee for the Rockefeller Foundation (in cahoots with Rothschilds for One World Government).

After a time in a real prison, Assange was “imprisoned” in a countryside mansion at the home of Vaughan Smith, the owner of Frontline Trust, a news organization that seeks to influence TV journalists. Frontline is funded by George Soros’ organization, Open Society Institute, and George Soros is intimately intertwined with the Rothschilds. George Soros has been a frequent business partner with James Goldsmith (father of Jemima Khan and cousin of the Rothschilds). The director of Soros’ Open Society Institute, Richard Katz, was director of N M Rothschild & Sons for 16 years. Other board members like Nils Taube also hold positions in Rothschild banks, etcetera. On July 27, 2010, and again on October 25, 2010, Assange was a speaker at Vaughan Smith’s Frontline Trust.

Most people seem to believe that current events just happen, that events in the news are chain reactions of accidents, and that people with money and power sit idly by, watching events unfold. However, the Rothschilds thrive on manipulating the markets by having insider information while propagating contrary misinformation. In this way, they make huge profits. Assange has already said that damaging information on one US bank will be released. In this fragile recovery, the crisis could be pivotal. The Guardian and The New York Times have this information; so it is available to Rothschilds in order to “short” the bank before the information is released. Wikileaks is an invaluable tool for the Rothschilds to manipulate the financial markets, the whole monetary system, the future of nations, and the public.

The information (or misinformation) from Wikileaks also serves the Rothschilds' aim to increase conflict among nations in order to further their goal of One World Government.

http://www.puppet99.com/?p=1
______

Further reading:

Egypt and Tunisia: NGO 'Soft War' - Islamic Banks Competing Against Western Banks - Motive: Follow the Money - Islamic Law

Egypt and Tunisia: NGO 'Soft War' - Islamic Banks Competing Against Western Banks - Motive: Follow the Money - Islamic Law

Source: Puppetworld Post

Rothschilds Stage Revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt to Kill Islamic Banks in Emerging North African Markets

Background: Tunisia has undergone increasing economic liberalization over the last decade: In the 2010-2011 World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report, it was ranked as the most competitive country in Africa, as well as the 32nd most economically competitive country globally. North Africa’s large Muslim populations are a vast business opportunity for Islamic banking and other businesses.

Jacob Rothschild, senior member of the British branch of the Rothschild dynasty

Contrary to popular belief, the world’s finances are controlled by privately-owned “central banks” masquerading as federal government banks in nearly every country (except three) in the world (http://www.businessinsider.com/is-america-really-free-if-a-privately-owned-central-bank-controls-our-currency-and-runs-our-economy-2010-7). [The U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, ruled that the Federal Reserve (U.S. central bank) was privately owned in 680 F.2d 1239, LEWIS v. UNITED STATES of America, No. 80-5905.]

Though it is a carefully guarded secret, the Rothschilds and their associates own most of the shares in the central banks (Eustace Mullins: Secrets of the Federal Reserve, 1983, pp. 47-48) (Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence, Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, 1976, Charts 1-5) (Louis McFadden, U.S. Congressman in the 1930s and Chairman of the Banking and Currency Committee for 10 years). With extremely little government input, the economies of Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Jordan, and Algeria are strictly controlled by the Rothschilds’ central banks and their International Monetary Fund.
————————————————————————————————————————–

THE MOTIVE: FOLLOW THE MONEY

Islamic banks have been eating into Rothschild profits in the Middle East because: they don’t charge interest (Shariah Law), they are growing very rapidly among the world’s exploding Muslim populations, and (in these catastrophic economic times) they are more stable than western banks.

While it is a very good thing that people are freed from the tyranny of dictators, they also need to be freed from the tyranny of economic serfdom. The relevant moral question is: Do the means justify the end?

Ben Ali's son-in-law El Materi at the opening of his Zitouna Bank, North Africa's first Islamic bank, last May

Deposed Tunisian President Ben Ali’s son-in-law, Sakher El Materi, opened Tunisia’s first Islamic bank, Zitouna Bank, on May 26, 2010. Zitouna Bank is the first Islamic bank in the Maghreb region [North Africa]. The bank was a first step toward Ben Ali’s new program of extensive reforms, “Tunisia, a Pole for Banking Services and a Regional Financial Centre”, which would have undermined the power and the profits of the Central Bank of Tunisia (privately-owned by the Rothschilds and their associates).

Tunis Financial Harbour opened last October 19. It’s the first offshore finance centre in North Africa.

The Telegraph (Oct. 19, 2010) reported on the opening of the megaproject Tunis Financial Harbour – President Ben Ali’s bid to make Tunisia the regional financial centre of North Africa and beyond: “Islamic investment bank Gulf Finance House (GFH) and the Tunisian government have created the first offshore finance centre in North Africa. The centre will be part of Tunis Financial Harbour, a $3 billion waterfront development in Tunis.... GFH, which is based in Bahrain, hopes the centre will allow Tunisia to take advantage of its strategic position on the Mediterranean Sea, and operate as a bridge between the EU and the rapidly growing economies of North Africa [and sub-Saharan Africa].”

Executive Magazine (June, 2008) reported: “Despite the current poor climate, the potential for Islamic banking in Egypt is huge, and one should expect more moves from Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank into Egypt, possibly in the form of a buyout. A recent Middle East Business Intelligence report said it best, when it opined, “If Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank can make a success of offering Islamic products, the whole market will open up. We have already seen some of the local banks start to advertise their Islamic products in view of the competition for customers they see about to begin. Clearly, Islamic banks in the Gulf are already anticipating the day when their home markets are saturated. And it appears that Egypt will be on the next front-line in the development of regional Islamic banking and finance.”

In 2008, International Financing Review (Reuters) reported: “African countries such as Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia and Sudan are keen on future sukuk exercises [issuing Islamic bonds]. Gambia debuted with a US$166m sukuk deal, privately sold in the US in 2006.”

October 2008: 'Testing Times' for Financiers - BBC Interviews Evelyn de Rothschild - Ethics in the Financial World? - Failures of Leadership

 

BBC News: But now on to matters of the economy – not just here, but in America. All eyes are on Washington as the amended version of the Bush Administration's bank rescue plan is put to another vote in the House of Representatives tomorrow. Financial markets around the world have been waiting on the bill with bated breath this past few days; and these are very testing times for financiers. Joining us is one of the City's most experienced and most respected bankers, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild: he's chairman of the investment company E.L. Rothschild, and ran the merchant bank N.M. Rothschild for more than twenty years. Thank you very much indeed for joining us.