Sunday, October 27, 2024

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf: The FDA is under scrutiny

Editor's note: After the November 5 presidential election and Donald Trump occupies the White House in January, 2025 the FDA (commercial corporation masquerading as government) is going to be placed on notice: reform or get defunded. Nobody expects reform least of all Robert F. Kennedy in his assertion this is the end of the FDA. The FDA is a drug cartel (kickback schemes) owned by the pharmaceutical cartels with the federal regulatory agencies neutralized. Atrocity is best defined by: "221 million prescriptions written for millions of Americans between the ages 12 to 25, and from 2016 to 2022." The FDA's allegiance is to drug profits and and that is all this federally subcontracted corporation is concerned about. The FDA rubber-stamped the drug Remdesivir (forced by Fauci) for treatment of Covid and as it turned out Remdesivir ended up killing people.

RFK Jr Tells FDA To Pack Its Bags Its War On Public Health Is About To End
________

The FDA's War Against DMSO and America

The Forgotten History That Led to the FDA Again and Again Keeping the Things We Most Desperately Need Away From Us

By Midwest Doctor | October 28, 2024

Over the last month, I have been diligently working to alert the public to the decades of evidence demonstrating the remarkable therapeutic potential of DMSO. In turn, quite a few of my colleagues have shared patients are now asking them about DMSO, and a few are shifting their practice to focus on it (e.g., Pierre Kory has done so and is already having numerous amazing results).

Likewise, I've now received hundreds (often unbelievable) reports of it it being life changing for people (which can be read here), and it now seems there is a temporary supply shortage of DMSO because so many people (and their friends) have been buying the brands I recommended.

For those who have not read the series, thus far I have made the case that:
• DMSO treats many circulatory and neurological disorders (e.g., Reynaud's and varicose veins) and profoundly transforms the outcomes of some of the most challenging conditions in medicine (e.g., strokes and spinal cord injuries)—to the point millions would have been spared from a life of disability or paralysis had it been adopted (discussed here).

• DMSO is a miraculous therapy for chronic pain, wounds (e.g., burns or surgical incisions), injuries (e.g., sports injuries) and all types of chronic pain (discussed here).

• DMSO is highly effective for treating a variety of challenging autoimmune disorders (discussed here).

• DMSO is highly effective for treating a variety of connective tissue issues such as scars and adhesions, collagen contractures, scleroderma, FOP (discussed here).

• DMSO is able to treat a variety of protein misfolding diseases (e.g., amyloidosis) including genetic disorders (e.g., Down Syndrome) which are classically considered to untreatable (discussed here).

DMSO is incredibly safe, having only a limited number of known and manageable side effects alongside no risk of toxicity or death (provided it is used appropriately).

• There are thousands of studies that demonstrate both the safety and efficacy of DMSO (making it one of the most researched medical substances in history).
In contrast, most of the previously mentioned diseases have lackluster conventional options available for treating them, many of which are highly toxic, kill tens of thousands of Americans each year and simultaneously cause far more non-fatal injuries. Worse still, many of them simply are "untreatable" and have no option for what can be done with them.

In short, if what I've said so far is true, the fact that DMSO has been kept from us is so egregious, it's understandably hard to believe. It’s specifically for this reason, that despite the fact I knew it could help a lot of people I really wanted to help by broaching this subject sooner, I had to wait until I had built a decent degree of credibility here before I spent hundreds of hours to begin trying to put the case for DMSO together, then once I did so, do so in a very specific order. Nonetheless, I still do not think anyone would have believed me or had the courage to try DMSO had they not just witnessed almost every medical authority in the world collude to suppress safe and widely used drugs (e.g., ivermectin and hydroxycholoroquine) so that dangerous and ineffective (but incredibly lucrative) pharmaceutical products could monopolize the COVID-19 market.

In turn, while I still desperately want to cover DMSO's utility for a variety of other challenging conditions (e.g., vision loss, tinnitus, cancer, chronic infections, shingles, and a wide range of skin disorders), I feel I first must touch upon another question—why did the FDA keep it from us, and how were they able to do it to something so much of the public and the scientific community demanded they legalize?

In my eyes, this story is critically important to understand because it:
• Helps us to understand the origins of the mentality within the FDA that to this day continues to ruin people's lives by burying promising therapeutics that compete with the medical industrial complex. Despite my best efforts over the last two years (e.g., with ultraviolet blood irradiation, AIDS treatments, or GHB for insomnia), I've still only scratched the surface of this (e.g., what's been done with cancer is really depressing).

• Provides a window into the remarkable dedication of a group of Americans which illustrates what our scientific apparatus could be capable of doing for us if it was not shackled by politics.

• Provides some context to why this recent statement from RFK Jr. is so, so, important:

Note: a significant portion of the first half of this article is an abridged version of the history detailed within DMSO the Persecuted Drug (internet archive link here)
The Discovery of DMSO

The simple compound dimethyl sulfoxide can be found throughout nature, and is present in many fruits and vegetables. It was first synthesized by Russian chemist Alexander Zaytsev in 1866. It was essentially forgotten until the 1940s, when industrial chemists, looking for more solvents were curious if this waste product from producing paper could be used instead of being thrown away.

Note: this chronology has been compared to how fluoride (an industrial waste product from aluminum and phosphate production) entered the water supply. The critical difference was that disposing of fluoride (due to its toxic and corrosive nature) was a major expense and liability for these industries (e.g., it regularly severely injured workers). As such, the desire to get it into the water supply was done to absolve the industries from their liability (e.g., “How could it have injured a worker if it's safe enough to put in the drinking water”). Initially, due to its evident toxicity, the government opposed this. Still, due to fluoride being necessary to produce original atomic bombs and destructive leaks of it creating immense damage to the surrounding areas, for national security purposes, the government relented (all of which is detailed here). In contrast, DMSO was simply looked at as a potential source of revenue that was being erroneously thrown away.

In the 1950s, Crown Zellerbach, a large American paper manufacturing company, began producing DMSO and soon became the world's largest producer. Curious if uses existed for DMSO besides being a highly effective solvent, Zellerbach assigned Chemist Robert J. Herschler to research it and other tree derived chemicals. Through a lab accident, he discovered that DMSO mixed with a dye would bring the dye into the skin, and before long verified it could be used to bring antibiotics and antifungals into plants.

Please go to Midwest Doctor to continue reading.
________


Related to the FDA:



This is an atrocity:

The number of vaccinations required at the two-month doctor's appointment is breathtaking

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...