Growth of Eucalyptus In California Plantations
________
No controlled burns, no thinning out the forest—THAT’S when the fires are catastrophic—the canyons of Los Angeles
The high crime, the tragedy
By Jon Rappoport | January 14, 2024
Everyone knows about CONTROLLED BURNS. That's how you keep fires from spreading in heavily forested areas. By burning, you create "empty channels"—large spaces where fires won't spread. Fire breaks.
Well, Los Angeles has a whole bunch of these areas. CANYONS.
Here we go. Buckle up.
…they [California as a whole, but primarily in the south] need to burn 4 to 11 million acres every year just to keep the forest in check because there's so much growing every year. They [California] only burned 36,000 acres last year. And five years ago, four and a half years ago, Gavin Newsom, he had all this fanfare with this press conference where he pledged to burn a million acres every year. It's not enough, but it's a start. That'd be great. They're only burning 36,000. Here we are five years later. They still can't get their act together. And you wonder... and people are wondering, oh why is there so much fuel it's because they're not doing the work...That's from podcast host Isaac Simpson and guest and documentary film-maker Gabriel Kirkpatrick-Mann (link to podcast via Tom Kudla's substack post, here).
And Malibu in particular is Fire Alley… So this series of canyons from Santa Clarita through Malibu Canyon out into the ocean is where those Santa Ana winds get channeled. So that's the outflow boundary. And so you go back every 25 years, since the beginning of time, you will see articles about Malibu burning to the ground in one of these fires…
Newsom promised he'd deal with this. He didn't. Neither did previous Governors.
See, big parts of LA ARE canyons. Mandeville, Benedict, Coldwater, Topanga, Tuna, Beverly Glen, etc. There are streets and homes all over the canyons.
And then in certain places, like the famous elite Bel Air, there are three canyons. I once lived in a tiny one-room annex next to a house at the top northern end of Bel Air.
________
January 13 2025 | By Jim Stone Journalist
IF THAT IS NOT SO, THEN TRY TO EXPLAIN HIS ZEAL IN THIS VIDEO where he references the Hawaii fires and talks about buying up properties. That video is a DAMNING INDICTMENT that might get censored.
100 PERCENT SPOT ON: CALIFORNIA FIRES AN OVERT ACT OF WAR BY CALIFORNIA'S GOVERNMENT.
I was skeptical until I came across that video of Gavin Newsom, which I top posted. FACT: Fires lit on purpose by California's government for the sole purpose of a land grab. If that is not an act of war, I don't know what is.
As of January 13 at 2 PM California time, all the fires were out.
If suddenly, with the new winds there are more fires, it is arson.
As of 2 PM in California, the fires burned 36 square miles, which equals about 7 percent of LA. That's a LOT. Without question the worst fire in American history, this would top the Chicago fire which burned 3.3 square miles. Granted, the Chicago fire happened in a more densely settled area but so much more of LA burned (11x more) that there is a LOT more damage. Some are saying that it was an act of war, and in that regard, I am suspicious also. We will get the answer if suddenly everything is burning again.
FACT: NEWSOM ALREADY CALLED AND CHATTED WITH LAHAINA, DISCUSSING HOW TO ACQUIRE THE BURNED PROPERTIES. That is NOT rumor, Newsom already did that. Very suspicious, in fact, more than suspicious, I'd say damning.
CLICK THIS AND WATCH THE VIDEO, IT IS OBVIOUS NEWSOM DID THESE FIRES. I AM CERTAIN HIS ATTITUDE IS NOT DUE TO A RECENT SHOT OF HEROIN.
CLICK THIS AND WATCH THE VIDEO, IT IS OBVIOUS NEWSOM DID THESE FIRES. I AM CERTAIN HIS ATTITUDE IS NOT DUE TO A RECENT SHOT OF HEROIN.
Notice Gavin Newsom's body language discussing 'land grabs' https://t.co/XibAV6OpCt
— TaraBull (@TaraBull808) January 13, 2025
BOOOM!!! The entire burned area was recently planned out as a 15 minute city, for which it would need to be torn down and rebuilt!!!
________
Very interesting discussion:
Political class? Try criminal class. Those fires in Los Angeles were the culmination of California's state government:
It has been stated Newsom is "unfit to run the state of California" but from the perspective outlined in this post maybe that's because Newsom is perfectly situated to "run the state" - into the ground?
Related:
Is this legitimate satellite imagery of when and where the fires were allegedly ignited?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.