A trillionaire isn't going to want East LA, is he?

Editor's note: Why the Pacific Palisades area where wealthy people lived? Because the very wealthy seem to be eating the rich in this predator and prey ecosphere. For a more technical description of what caused the fires in Los Angeles, Theoria Apophasis (wrote a book on electrical theory) goes through the "chain of causation" on these fires. Theoria Apophasis suggests all three fires occurred at the exact same time and that would be impossible to naturally occur. 
________

Palisades Fire

by Miles Mathis

January 10, 2025

First of all, I am in California but nowhere near Los Angeles, so everything here is just speculation. Of course it would be speculation even if I were living in Palisades, like Henry Winkler or someone. I don't think anyone knows for sure what happened here, except those who are responsible for it. I waited a few days to collect data and get a lay of the land, unlike some who seemed to arrive with their conspiracy theories in the first hour—which is also suspicious, of course. Like the mainstream patter, the alternative site/conspiracy site patter looks scripted, as you would expect. Both are trying to cover the truth.

That's right, my usual warning here applies: don't trust either the mainstream account or the alternative/conspiracy account. They are always planted to keep you off the scent.

I will take you in the same way I got in. I saw the first reports Tuesday evening, then followed it over the next few hours. Before I went to sleep I checked overnight wind predictions from Weather Underground, since the mainstream was saying wind would remain high overnight. That would be extremely rare, since wind normally dies down at night. Weather is not completely predictable, of course, but they are very accurate just a few hours out, and the professionals were confirming to me winds would drop down to about 5mph overnight. That would last at least 14 hours, so I assumed hotshot teams would fly in from all over the state and knock this thing down overnight. There are no other fires in the state, since northern California has gotten a lot of rain in the past two months. Where I am we have gotten a thorough soaking since November. So all the planes and helicopters across the entire state should have been free to assist. Besides, this was Pacific Palisades, home of the rich, so you would expect the response to be at maximum. No expense would be spared.

But of course we all know that isn't what happened. When I woke up about noon, I checked both Calfire and Wunderground first thing. Wunderground confirmed the winds overnight had been very calm all across the LA area, and wouldn't be as strong on Wednesday as they had been on Tuesday. Tuesday peaked about 25mph, and Wednesday was supposed to peak at about 15mph. Brisk, but not too strong to fight fires very successfully. But when I went to Calfire, I was in for a shock: zero containment. Not only that, but the mainstream and alternative reports were both full of downright lies, trying to push 100mph winds on me, high overnight winds, and no fall-off on Wednesday. So I knew immediately the usual mischief was afoot, mischief that had to be something like we saw in Lahaina.

Not only that, but Calfire was now ablaze with many other fires, including one other large one and about thirty smaller ones across LA that had popped up overnight while wind was down. Most of those smaller ones were quickly tamped down, but this indicated to me that we had a team of arsonists working LA, paid off by someone. Since the media was full of lies on winds, number of houses lost*, and other things, I quickly reached the conclusion that whoever was paying the arsonists was also paying the media to lie. So this event must be scripted from the top, as usual. This was quickly confirmed by other stories, such as fire hydrants in Palisades being dry, reports of too few firefighters, and teams being ordered out due to conditions that were too dangerous. 5mph overnight winds were too dangerous for professional teams? Really? And conditions were too dangerous for professional hotshot teams, but not too dangerous for Governor Newsom?

What about all we hear about not trying to outrun a fire, since they travel faster than a car? Despite strong winds, that fire is barely moving, and Newsom is obviously in no fear of it. You will say he is in the street, and so is safe because fires can't burn pavement. Except that the fire in Palisades jumped hundreds of wide streets like that with no problem, despite no towering pines in the area to help it.

Let's pause on that thing about the dry hydrants. That is a huge clue here because there is no way that was just an oversight. It is such extravagant incompetence it can't be incompetence. One of the largest cities in the world, known to be constantly in danger of burning, but they forgot to be sure the fire hydrants had water? No way that is true. This was a planned fail, ordered from on high. We have seen it a million times with events in the past, where they try to sell us the idea everything went wrong simultaneously by accident. They left the lifejackets onshore, the lifeboats wouldn't lower, the radio went dead and all the backup batteries failed. The police cars wouldn't start and the inflatable raft had a hole. The security cameras all went dark simultaneously. The FBI had everyone under surveillance but suddenly the computers went down and all contact was lost. All documentation was lost in a fire and the tapes have been misplaced in the archives. The guy who knew that hit his head and lost all memory.

So it doesn't take much collation of data and genius to see that these fires were set on purpose and ordered to let burn. Even more, if they burned as we are told, they must have been assisted on the ground.

Which means all the chatter about incompetence, DEI, lady firefighters, lady mayors, chickens coming home to roost and so on is just misdirection. It may be true as far as it goes, but it doesn't explain what happened here. With targeted fires set on purpose and a stand down order, you don't need all these other causes to explain it.

But why would anyone target Pacific Palisades? If some Nero is going to burn down LA on purpose to gentrify it, due to Smart cities, the upcoming Olympics, or any other reason, you would think he would target low-income areas, to drive those undesirables out. He wouldn't target Pacific Palisades and Malibu. And yet he did.

It makes perfect sense, though, if you think about it. A trillionaire isn't going to want East LA, is he? It would take way too much effort to clean it up and then you still have East LA. No, what you want if you have infinite amounts of money is the most prime of prime real estate in the area, which is Palisades and Malibu. That is why the rich are there to start with: mountains behind you and ocean in front, with a constant cool breeze and low traffic. But buying out all those already-rich people there would be inconvenient. It could be done, but it would cost way too much. Better to burn them out.

I have told you many times before of this war between the very rich and the super rich, and how it has gotten much worse in the past 50 years. Why? Because the super rich have already stolen almost everything they can from the middle class. We are tapped out. The only target they have left for pillage is the very rich. So you have the billionaires and trillionaires now eating the hundred millionaires. It was bound to happen.

We know it happens with companies, it is called monopolization. Over the long term, all money tends to flow up and congregate in fewer hands. But it also happens with families and individuals, and it happens with increasing speed as the middle class dies.

It will be interesting to see if some of these Hollywood millionaires figure out this is what just happened, and if they have the guts to admit it. My guess is that even those who figure it out won't say anything, because they got where they are by sucking up to big money. If they hope to continue to be taken care of as part of the families, they will have to keep their mouths shut and move on. They will buy a slightly smaller huge house in some other slightly less rich neighborhood and live out their quiet lives there.

Another thing that tends to confirm this reading is the lack of deaths in Palisades. If this event were a total accident, you would expect a quickly running fire in a densely packed neighborhood with thousands of buildings destroyed to have a number of casualties. In the first two days they reported zero, though there was one reported in the Eaton fire. Today the mainstream is reporting five, but Calfire contradicts that, reporting three including firefighters. I believe the civilian deaths are in Eaton, not Palisades.* So it appears to me that whoever ordered this event didn't mind destroying a lot of property, but didn't want any deaths of his rich cousins. So they were careful in only one way: getting everyone out.

Please go to Updates to continue reading.

________

More:

California fire fighters need recognition not DEI

To California's Governor Newsom: Please Resign Now

California burns like a sacrifice on the altar of the agenda.

Coincidences keep piling up?

LA fires clear the way for SmartLA 2028 and 2028 LA Olympics

You're not wrong Mel Gibson, in your assertion, "It's like someone did it on purpose to really destroy every aspect of it."

NEW – Mel Gibson's Malibu Mansion Burned Down While He Was Filming Joe Rogan's Podcast

"I was doing the Rogan podcast and I was kind of ill at ease while we were talking because I knew my neighborhood was on fire. So I thought, I wonder if my place is still there. When I got… pic.twitter.com/TvknivxywB

— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) January 10, 2025