World needs 'aggressive' approach to control novel coronavirus
News update for 15 April 2020: REVEALED: Dr. Fauci's NIAID Gave $3.7 Million To Wuhan Lab To Create Mutant Coronavirus
What is notable is "Kung Fu" Chan was awarded as a Dame in the OBE (Order of the British Empire), so that is where allegiance resides. Allegiance: born in Hong Kong; Chinese-Canadian; ancestors go back to Guangdong, China; CCP. For her business acumen - that's what vaccines are - on health, Forbes (business as usual) gave her the privilege of being the "30th most powerful woman in the world." What this below article actually means is that the world needs vaccines not more of an "aggressive approach to control the coronavirus." The plan: "global testing for coronavirus so that all DNA can be ran through supercomputers." Right now, China leads the world in vaccine research as Chinese sources claim there are now more than 2 million people "infected with coronavirus" as the "world becomes more desperate by the day." The only recourse? Testing and vaccines.
Tianhe 2-A (Milky Way 2A)
Sunway TaihuLight
There are four serious allegations against Margaret Chan: 1) to prevent Taiwan's entry into the WHO; 2) to steal for the Chinese Communists the world's most advanced biotechnology and intellectual property rights; 3) to monitor the Western hygiene dynamic and to collect relevant information for the Chinese Communists; 4) to conceal and keep confidential for the Chinese Communists any domestic disease outbreak. What we see here is the CCP probably in concurrence with the British using Margaret Chan as a proxy to get inside WHO. Margaret Chan made her appearance five days ago saying that "the world needs to take a more aggressive approach to control the novel coronavirus." WHO has a history of conflict of interests: scientists advising WHO being paid off by pharmaceutical cartels:
WHO and the pandemic flu "conspiracies"
That is really something how Margaret "Kung Fu" Chan called "COVID-19 (Certificate Of Vaccination ID) just another example of humans disrupting the ecological balance by showing no respect for wild animals and nature." What's the cure? Vaccinate the little pests. Now consider for a moment China's massive industrial pig farms and China's notorious open air meat markets and that's some comment there by "Kung Fu" Chan. So what we have here are two competing powers, the US and China," in a struggle to develop a coronavirus vaccine. Do readers suspect what we suspect? That there is cooperation between the globalists both in the US and in China while President Trump might be pacifying the Americans for what is about to come down on them?
President Trump Revokes WHO Funding - "Covering For China" - China Covets Taiwan's High Tech Sector
________
Source: Time
HOW BUSH AND OBAMA CEDED THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION TO CHINA, INCREASING RISK OF PANDEMICS LIKE CORONAVIRUS
BY BILL POWELL | April 14, 2020
A pedestrian walks by a bus stop screen showing a video clip of of Chinese president Xi Jinping wearing a protective mask on February 29, 2020 in Shanghai, China. YIFAN DING/GETTY IMAGES
The first time a China-backed candidate was named Director General of the World Health Organization, the president of the United States had other things on his mind. China had just a few years earlier botched its response to the outbreak of a flu-like disease, first covering it up and then underreporting the results. No matter. The president wanted stable relations with Beijing, and no one in his administration raised any particular objections to the selection for the top job at the WHO.
On November 9, 2006, Dr. Margaret Chan, a physician from Hong Kong, was appointed to her first five year term, having garnered majority of support from the World Health Association—the nations who vote on top appointments to the WHO. Just two days earlier, George W. Bush's Republican party had been hammered in midterm elections, losing both houses of Congress for the time since 1992. The Iraq war was heading south quickly, and in response Bush threw controversial Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld over the side, an acknowledgment that Iraq was a debacle. Who was going to run the WHO? In Washington the answer was simple: who cares?
The same was true five years later, when the Obama administration stood by as the pro-Beijing Chan—who appointed a slew of pro-Beijing bureaucrats during her tenure—was reappointed to another term. And when Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the now-controversial WHO director general, stood for election in the spring of 2017, the Trump administration paid little mind. Trump's agenda when it came to China, as he had made clear during the 2016 campaign, was all about trade. "No one was particularly focused on [the WHO] at the time," says a National Security Council staffer not authorized to speak on the record.
Tedros, an Ethiopian strongly backed by Beijing, easily won the directorship. The first non-physician ever elected to the post, he defeated David Nabarro of the UK, who had been nominally supported by Washington, 133 votes to 50 on the final ballot. The New York Times ran a bland story focusing on the fact that Tedros was the first African ever to become the WHO's director.
China's dissembling and opacity about the COVID-19 outbreak in the huge, central city of Wuhan—aided and abetted by the WHO in the critical early stages of the outbreak—is a scandal whose reverberations will be felt for years. As former Food and Drug Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said over the weekend, "There is some evidence to suggest that as late as January 20, Chinese officials were still saying there was no human-to-human transmission of the virus, and the WHO was validating those claims [as late as] January 14, sort of enabling the obfuscation from China."
Please go to Time to read the entire article.
________
COVID-19: Certificate of Vaccination ID
Related:
COVID: The Chinese regime, Sun Tzu and The Art of War
Who is WHO...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.