News update on the IRS for 9 August 2022: Biden increases IRS agents to almost 170,000—70,000 will be armed—to target middle class Americans
IRS gets $80B to 'rebuild' its capacity under Senate reconciliation deal
________
How Inflation Plus Taxation Equals a Housing Bust
August 2, 2022 | By Anna Von Reitz
A hundred and fifty years ago people didn't use credit to buy things. Transactions were "cash on the barrelhead". So, if you had a house, you worked for it, earned it, and then lived in it. If you had children you fell in love, got married, and supported the children that resulted. If you had food, you or someone quite close to you, raised it and brought it to market.
There was a simplicity and logic to everything.
Indiana congresswoman Jackie Walorski and two staffers die in car crash
IRS gets $80B to 'rebuild' its capacity under Senate reconciliation deal
________
How Inflation Plus Taxation Equals a Housing Bust
August 2, 2022 | By Anna Von Reitz
A hundred and fifty years ago people didn't use credit to buy things. Transactions were "cash on the barrelhead". So, if you had a house, you worked for it, earned it, and then lived in it. If you had children you fell in love, got married, and supported the children that resulted. If you had food, you or someone quite close to you, raised it and brought it to market.
There was a simplicity and logic to everything.
You didn't use someone else's money to buy your house and then pay them back with interest, which is a practice that developed after the civil war when "credit markets" opened up to "individuals"--- that is, franchises of the government corporations.
Under our Forefathers' simple cash-based system, the banks and merchants were curtailed as to what they could sell you, because your own means limited the size and number of sales they could expect. From the perspective of the banks and merchants, "lack of credit" was seen as an obstacle standing between them and profit that they could otherwise make from selling stuff to you "on ticket".
Credit at that time was something that governments and banks dealt in and as a result, average people had very little contact with or understanding of credit and the commercial paper underwriting it, but if you read any version of Constitution, you will notice that the Federal Government contractors are obligated to function on credit, while the States of the Union are obligated to pay in silver or gold.
Their preoccupation with credit arises from their inability to function on anything else.
This original arrangement threw a sop to the banks and merchants, and stimulated the economy via government purchases on credit, but at the same time, this system presumed that the members of our Congress would be acting as Fiduciary Deputies bound by The Prudent Man Standard, which would naturally keep government spending in check and make the members of Congress accountable.
In the system our Forefathers created, the government had the ability to borrow money and "exercise the nation's credit" when needed, but the people held the purse-strings and decided what the money was spent on and how much was "extended" as credit for future repayment. As you can see, the government was placed in the permanent role of a debtor, because it could only operate on credit --- and the government's creditors were always the people underwriting it.
Please also note that the government raises funds from you via taxation, service fees, and tariffs. It sells you services, and to a limited degree sells you products (paper money and postage stamps and licenses, for example) and so, was in the same position as the other merchants and the banks. Your lack of credit and your pesky members of Congress acting as Fiduciary Deputies limited their sales to you--- and that limited their profits and spending, too.
By the mid-1800's the then-Queen and her advisors hit upon a scheme of "enfranchisement" which would vastly enrich the Queen and the amount of collateral she had access to borrow against, and all without Parliamentary oversight. All she had to do was create a corporation and encourage the British people to buy into it as franchisees--- that is, get them to enfranchise themselves (and their property) voluntarily, and voila, she could borrow all she wanted based on their assets --- their homes, their businesses, and their labor.
In exchange, she would give them a vote as shareholders --- but their vote wouldn't count for much. They could elect the members of Parliament, as usual, but the Parliament would only control the budgeted portion of the corporation receipts. The rest, the entire wealth of the nation and the commonwealth, would be the Queen's to invest or not invest, in whatever opportunities appealed to her.
Queen Victoria used this "new arrangement" to fund the conquest and subjugation of India. And the British Public, including quite a few members of Parliament, were none the wiser.
What, you may ask, does this have to do with a housing bust 150 years later?
While the Queen and her Finance Ministers were busy purloining private assets to pay for their public debts and to finance a virulent new era of "public investment" using private assets as collateral for credit extended to the government --- mostly bypassing Parliament --- the banks were busy introducing the victims of this con game to the concept of buying on credit.
Even though the victims of this scheme had unwittingly lost the ownership of their land, bodies, homes, businesses, minds, and souls--- they still had a portion of their labor and creativity that could be used as excess earnings pledged to pay off additional debts for consumer goods. Soon the banks were offering a dizzying array of "consumer loans" and there were pawn shops, rent-to-own establishments, credit unions, insurance agents, real estate agents, and debt collection agencies in every small town.
Stop a moment and think: less than a hundred years ago, these things didn't exist in America, because consumer credit didn't exist.
As you can see, the government had transformed itself into a commercial corporation and begun operations as such using the people's assets as collateral and all they gave the people in "equitable exchange" for their "investment" was a vote that the people were already owed. All the privately owned assets of millions of people were quietly transferred to the Queen, including the value of the people's lives, labor, and the products of their unions --- ownership of their children.
Please go here to read more.
Credit at that time was something that governments and banks dealt in and as a result, average people had very little contact with or understanding of credit and the commercial paper underwriting it, but if you read any version of Constitution, you will notice that the Federal Government contractors are obligated to function on credit, while the States of the Union are obligated to pay in silver or gold.
Their preoccupation with credit arises from their inability to function on anything else.
This original arrangement threw a sop to the banks and merchants, and stimulated the economy via government purchases on credit, but at the same time, this system presumed that the members of our Congress would be acting as Fiduciary Deputies bound by The Prudent Man Standard, which would naturally keep government spending in check and make the members of Congress accountable.
In the system our Forefathers created, the government had the ability to borrow money and "exercise the nation's credit" when needed, but the people held the purse-strings and decided what the money was spent on and how much was "extended" as credit for future repayment. As you can see, the government was placed in the permanent role of a debtor, because it could only operate on credit --- and the government's creditors were always the people underwriting it.
Please also note that the government raises funds from you via taxation, service fees, and tariffs. It sells you services, and to a limited degree sells you products (paper money and postage stamps and licenses, for example) and so, was in the same position as the other merchants and the banks. Your lack of credit and your pesky members of Congress acting as Fiduciary Deputies limited their sales to you--- and that limited their profits and spending, too.
By the mid-1800's the then-Queen and her advisors hit upon a scheme of "enfranchisement" which would vastly enrich the Queen and the amount of collateral she had access to borrow against, and all without Parliamentary oversight. All she had to do was create a corporation and encourage the British people to buy into it as franchisees--- that is, get them to enfranchise themselves (and their property) voluntarily, and voila, she could borrow all she wanted based on their assets --- their homes, their businesses, and their labor.
In exchange, she would give them a vote as shareholders --- but their vote wouldn't count for much. They could elect the members of Parliament, as usual, but the Parliament would only control the budgeted portion of the corporation receipts. The rest, the entire wealth of the nation and the commonwealth, would be the Queen's to invest or not invest, in whatever opportunities appealed to her.
Queen Victoria used this "new arrangement" to fund the conquest and subjugation of India. And the British Public, including quite a few members of Parliament, were none the wiser.
What, you may ask, does this have to do with a housing bust 150 years later?
While the Queen and her Finance Ministers were busy purloining private assets to pay for their public debts and to finance a virulent new era of "public investment" using private assets as collateral for credit extended to the government --- mostly bypassing Parliament --- the banks were busy introducing the victims of this con game to the concept of buying on credit.
Even though the victims of this scheme had unwittingly lost the ownership of their land, bodies, homes, businesses, minds, and souls--- they still had a portion of their labor and creativity that could be used as excess earnings pledged to pay off additional debts for consumer goods. Soon the banks were offering a dizzying array of "consumer loans" and there were pawn shops, rent-to-own establishments, credit unions, insurance agents, real estate agents, and debt collection agencies in every small town.
Stop a moment and think: less than a hundred years ago, these things didn't exist in America, because consumer credit didn't exist.
As you can see, the government had transformed itself into a commercial corporation and begun operations as such using the people's assets as collateral and all they gave the people in "equitable exchange" for their "investment" was a vote that the people were already owed. All the privately owned assets of millions of people were quietly transferred to the Queen, including the value of the people's lives, labor, and the products of their unions --- ownership of their children.
Please go here to read more.
________
Memorandum of Law: The Legality Of Income Taxation In The "50 States" Of The Union
By 2nd Smartest Guy in the World | August 3, 2022
"Nemo agit in seipsum."
No man acts against himself.
Under color of law, blatant fraud, and ignorance of law the unconstitutional imposition of direct and un-apportioned taxation (i.e. "income" taxes) was foisted upon We the People.
This is not "anti-government" conspiracy theory. This is legal fact.
The illegitimate Federal government operating out of the foreign nation of Washington, D.C. is waging a full spectrum soft-war against its citizenry, actively diminishing its subjects by threat of violence through counterfeit laws, with taxation having always been an especially potent control knob.
This substack has previously exposed taxation as illicit social engineering through the Death and Taxes" meme which paved and paid the way for other criminal ideological State programming such as Trust the Science":
Original Social Engineering Sin
"...the socio-psychological foundations of socialism is identical to that of the foundations of a state, if there were no institution enforcing socialistic ideas of property, there would be no room for a state, as a state is nothing else than an institution built on taxation and unsolicited, noncontractual interference with the use that private people c…
7 months ago · 90 likes · 46 comments · 2nd Smartest Guy in the World Since the passing of the unconstitutional and some argue unratified 16th Amendment in 1913, with the associated Title 26 U.S.C. of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) complied in 1939, Congress has been engaged in the willful subversion of its duties and as such legislating against the very citizenry they pretend to represent.
The unlawful IRC is currently 3,837 pages long. The average person would be so daunted and overwhelmed to even think of perusing such an overlong and byzantine document, let alone questioning its legalities. Add in the lifelong indoctrination and the crescendoing Death and Taxes fears heading into each and every every tax season and we end up with an ignorant majority of compliant citizens. The fact that the judicial system is also indoctrinated to not uphold the Constitution allows for a hopelessly corrupt system that reinforces its own slow death spiral.
If one were to actually parse the IRC tax code, then they would realize that it is nothing more than an exercise in sleight of word and purposely deceptive terms with the aim and purpose to confound the citizenry such that they undermine their own best interests.
But what exactly is being paid in these "income" taxes, and to whom?
Nature of Federal income tax.
Therefore, income taxes are gifts to a privately owned central bank that attenuates the inflation (stealth tax) that it purposely generates through monetary policies which serve to enrich their owners at the expense of the increasingly impoverished populace.
Please go to substack to learn more.
Why Is the IRS Stockpiling Weapons and Ammunition?
Memorandum of Law: The Legality Of Income Taxation In The "50 States" Of The Union
By 2nd Smartest Guy in the World | August 3, 2022
"Nemo agit in seipsum."
No man acts against himself.
Under color of law, blatant fraud, and ignorance of law the unconstitutional imposition of direct and un-apportioned taxation (i.e. "income" taxes) was foisted upon We the People.
This is not "anti-government" conspiracy theory. This is legal fact.
The illegitimate Federal government operating out of the foreign nation of Washington, D.C. is waging a full spectrum soft-war against its citizenry, actively diminishing its subjects by threat of violence through counterfeit laws, with taxation having always been an especially potent control knob.
This substack has previously exposed taxation as illicit social engineering through the Death and Taxes" meme which paved and paid the way for other criminal ideological State programming such as Trust the Science":
Original Social Engineering Sin
"...the socio-psychological foundations of socialism is identical to that of the foundations of a state, if there were no institution enforcing socialistic ideas of property, there would be no room for a state, as a state is nothing else than an institution built on taxation and unsolicited, noncontractual interference with the use that private people c…
7 months ago · 90 likes · 46 comments · 2nd Smartest Guy in the World Since the passing of the unconstitutional and some argue unratified 16th Amendment in 1913, with the associated Title 26 U.S.C. of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) complied in 1939, Congress has been engaged in the willful subversion of its duties and as such legislating against the very citizenry they pretend to represent.
The unlawful IRC is currently 3,837 pages long. The average person would be so daunted and overwhelmed to even think of perusing such an overlong and byzantine document, let alone questioning its legalities. Add in the lifelong indoctrination and the crescendoing Death and Taxes fears heading into each and every every tax season and we end up with an ignorant majority of compliant citizens. The fact that the judicial system is also indoctrinated to not uphold the Constitution allows for a hopelessly corrupt system that reinforces its own slow death spiral.
If one were to actually parse the IRC tax code, then they would realize that it is nothing more than an exercise in sleight of word and purposely deceptive terms with the aim and purpose to confound the citizenry such that they undermine their own best interests.
But what exactly is being paid in these "income" taxes, and to whom?
Nature of Federal income tax.
56. Every payment of Federal income tax is classified as a gift and 100% of all collections of income tax are used by the Secretary of the Treasury to make payments of interest on the debt owed by the Federal government to the private Federal Reserve Bank; to wit:A gift is by definition voluntary, and this is further corroborated in the actual tax return forms; to wit:
(1) The Secretary of the Treasury may accept, hold, administer, and use gifts and bequests of property, both real and personal, for the purpose of aiding or facilitating the work of the Department of the Treasury. . . .
(2) For purposes of the Federal income, estate, and gift taxes, property accepted under paragraph (1) shall be considered as a gift or bequest to or for the use of the United States. Title 31 U.S.C. § 321(d).
BEQUEST. A gift by will of personal property. [p. 339] . . . GIFT. . . . A voluntary, immediate, and absolute transfer of property without consideration. . . . [p. 1352] BOUVIER'S, pp. 339 and 1352, respectively.
Resistance to additional income taxes would be even more widespread if people were aware that . . . 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt . . . In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government. J. Peter Grace, "President's Private Sector Survey on Cost Control: A Report to the President," Vol. I, January 12, 1984, p. 3.
The Federal Reserve is not an agency of government. It is a private banking monopoly. . . . [T]he policies of the monarch are always those of his creditors. Rep. John R. Rarick, "Deficit Financing," Congressional Record (House of Representatives), 92nd Congress, First Session, Vol. 117—Part 1, February 1, 1971, pp. 1260-1261.
Please go to substack to learn more.
________
More:
$80 Billion Army Of New IRS Agents Unleashed On The Middle Class & Poor To Steal Even More Of The Fruits Of Their Labors
More:
$80 Billion Army Of New IRS Agents Unleashed On The Middle Class & Poor To Steal Even More Of The Fruits Of Their Labors
Remedies:
She was against a car tax:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.