by Miles Mathis
First published August 5, 2022
Wow, even I didn't expect this. The CIA writers are really bottoming out, after a long slow decline from nowhere. Meaning, it was bad before but this is end-of-the-world, spit-in-your-face awful. The trial was actually televised and is now on Youtube, so you can go watch it for yourself and see all the ways it is fake.
As a start, just remember rule one of what I have taught you about these things:
Rule 1: If it is televised, it is fake. Only fake CIA trials are televised. None of the televised trials have ever been real. NONE.
But we knew it was fake going in for another reason, since there ARE no Sandy Hook parents. Who is Jones supposed to be paying $4 million to? The Actors Equity Trust Fund?
I really can't believe Jones agreed to do this, or that his bosses asked him to. It is a guaranteed fail. A huge slice of his audience will, or should, abandon him immediately and permanently, and the timing couldn't be worse because before this fake trial came along, his popularity was peaking. Due to his pushback on Covid, Biden, Jan. 6, CRT, and other hot topics, he was riding the same wave as Tucker Carlson—though on slightly different beaches. And both were being used to promote the planned tanking of the Democratic Party and the promoted rise of the Republican Party. Tanking—or even risking tanking—Jones right now is horrible timing for them, since he is such an important part of selling the hard push hard right.
There have always been a lot of people wondering if Jones was controlling the opposition. We have to imagine that question has crossed the minds of most of his listeners and readers, one because that audience is fairly savvy and is the among the most "conspiratorial" out there. They have been schooled on that by Jones himself, so how could they not be? Two because Jones has already given thousands of smaller clues he is doing exactly that. Some of those clues are not that small, I grant you, and I have listed some for you in the past. But none compare to this clue, which is so monstrous it isn't even fair to call it a clue. It is like that scene in The Wizard of Oz, when Toto pulls open the curtain and we see Frank Morgan back there pulling levers and creating smoke and noises. Except that scene was amusing, while this is just sickening.
Not only has Jones now admitted Sandy Hook was real—as part of his punishment—he actually sucked up to the fake actors playing the parents and invited them on his show, to talk about how to stop school shootings. I guess he will be touting gun control next. Maybe he will devote a portion of Infowars proceeds to the Department of Homeland Security. He and Matthew McConaughey can do joint press conferences in Uvalde and practice fake-crying together.
But I guess I should be happy. I won't have to visit his site ever again, or address anything there, since he just did all my work for me. What a strange suicide it was, though. RIP Alex Jones.
And remember, all those who have worked with Jones should go down with him, never to rise again. Do you really think any of them were innocent, and didn't know they were working for or with an actor?
Another thing this does is prove once again I was right about the need to drive around BOTH parties. Do not let anyone drive you into the open arms of the Republican Party. Do not let anyone convince you you are that sort of conservative. Do not imagine anyone is going to save you, or that any institution, party, or famous person is your buddy. This will not be solved by voting Republican. It will not be solved by the old yoyoing from one party to another. It will not be solved by Kari Lake or Donald Trump or Rick DeSantis or anyone else. It will only be solved by you waking up and saying no to the whole nasty future they have planned for you. It will be solved by you seeing through the entire web of lies you have been caught up in your entire life, and breaking free of it. To do that, you have to learn to spot a lie, and if you believe any of the stories in the media—on either side, left or right, mainstream or alternative—you aren't there yet. The "news" is manufactured from top to bottom, left to right, front to back, and I no longer believe anything, down to the weather report or the hockey scores.
If you aren't there yet, I suggest you practice on this fake trial. It is not up to me to circle all the red flags there. Do it yourself. Follow my method and read my old papers on fake trials. This one has all the same tells, and then some. Watch the videos over and over until the whole thing unwinds in your lap, until every frame of it offends your intelligence. Then you will be where I am.
PS: I'll give you a couple of freebies, to get you started:
I love the judge's black hexagram earrings, with lots of internal pyramids.
I also like the part about the judge "scolding" Jones for lying under oath. Ridiculous, since it is called perjury, which is a crime. You don't get "scolded" for perjury, you get cited, fined, or jailed for perjury. But there has to be clear evidence for that, and a finding. Without clear evidence of it, the judge would not be able to mention it during trial, since it is prejudicial. It tells the jury Jones is a liar.
As it is, the judge just entered the claim of perjury into the record without an actual finding of perjury. Which is itself illegal, which shows up the trial as fake.
Jones' defense team supplied the appearance of perjury themselves when they "accidentally" sent years of Jones' cellphone communications to the prosecutors. Whoops! So, as we have seen in all the other most famous trials of the past century, Jones was actually being prosecuted from both tables. Jones used that to claim he was railroaded, and others have called this a kangaroo court, but both fall far short of the truth: this was all staged. Even when people are being railroaded by kangaroo courts, nothing like this ever happens. This kind of stuff only happens in CIA trials, when the trial is scripted by people who nothing of the law for people who know nothing of the law. It looks like Langley could hire a lawyer to give these things some continuity, but I guess they figure why bother. Neatness has never been their strong suit, since before I came along they never needed it. In the past, people would buy anything, and the scriptwriters are obviously still working from that playbook.
Another problem is that in a trial for slander or libel, there would be no need to look at Jones' private conversations, since you can say anything you like in private. This should have been limited to Jones' public reporting, which was all aired. You would study the tapes and written reports, which were published online and should be in the Wayback Machine. So all the talk of discovery has been absurd from the beginning. It was never up to Jones to present evidence against himself, it was up to the plaintiffs to enter that evidence, from his shows that were publicly aired and his pieces which were published online. So as I have said before, from a legal standpoint none if this ever made any sense. Trapping Jones in contradictions was all staged, since he had no reason to respond to any of those questions. Any such question of what Jones said in conversations on his cell, or said anywhere else, were outside the purview of the court, and his attorney could just object to any line of questioning of that sort. The only question was, did he slander them in public statements, in reports sold as fact, not as opinion. Did he baldly claim Sandy Hook was a hoax with no evidence it was? No, so the case never should have gone to trial.
There have always been a lot of people wondering if Jones was controlling the opposition. We have to imagine that question has crossed the minds of most of his listeners and readers, one because that audience is fairly savvy and is the among the most "conspiratorial" out there. They have been schooled on that by Jones himself, so how could they not be? Two because Jones has already given thousands of smaller clues he is doing exactly that. Some of those clues are not that small, I grant you, and I have listed some for you in the past. But none compare to this clue, which is so monstrous it isn't even fair to call it a clue. It is like that scene in The Wizard of Oz, when Toto pulls open the curtain and we see Frank Morgan back there pulling levers and creating smoke and noises. Except that scene was amusing, while this is just sickening.
Not only has Jones now admitted Sandy Hook was real—as part of his punishment—he actually sucked up to the fake actors playing the parents and invited them on his show, to talk about how to stop school shootings. I guess he will be touting gun control next. Maybe he will devote a portion of Infowars proceeds to the Department of Homeland Security. He and Matthew McConaughey can do joint press conferences in Uvalde and practice fake-crying together.
But I guess I should be happy. I won't have to visit his site ever again, or address anything there, since he just did all my work for me. What a strange suicide it was, though. RIP Alex Jones.
And remember, all those who have worked with Jones should go down with him, never to rise again. Do you really think any of them were innocent, and didn't know they were working for or with an actor?
Another thing this does is prove once again I was right about the need to drive around BOTH parties. Do not let anyone drive you into the open arms of the Republican Party. Do not let anyone convince you you are that sort of conservative. Do not imagine anyone is going to save you, or that any institution, party, or famous person is your buddy. This will not be solved by voting Republican. It will not be solved by the old yoyoing from one party to another. It will not be solved by Kari Lake or Donald Trump or Rick DeSantis or anyone else. It will only be solved by you waking up and saying no to the whole nasty future they have planned for you. It will be solved by you seeing through the entire web of lies you have been caught up in your entire life, and breaking free of it. To do that, you have to learn to spot a lie, and if you believe any of the stories in the media—on either side, left or right, mainstream or alternative—you aren't there yet. The "news" is manufactured from top to bottom, left to right, front to back, and I no longer believe anything, down to the weather report or the hockey scores.
If you aren't there yet, I suggest you practice on this fake trial. It is not up to me to circle all the red flags there. Do it yourself. Follow my method and read my old papers on fake trials. This one has all the same tells, and then some. Watch the videos over and over until the whole thing unwinds in your lap, until every frame of it offends your intelligence. Then you will be where I am.
PS: I'll give you a couple of freebies, to get you started:
I love the judge's black hexagram earrings, with lots of internal pyramids.
I also like the part about the judge "scolding" Jones for lying under oath. Ridiculous, since it is called perjury, which is a crime. You don't get "scolded" for perjury, you get cited, fined, or jailed for perjury. But there has to be clear evidence for that, and a finding. Without clear evidence of it, the judge would not be able to mention it during trial, since it is prejudicial. It tells the jury Jones is a liar.
As it is, the judge just entered the claim of perjury into the record without an actual finding of perjury. Which is itself illegal, which shows up the trial as fake.
Jones' defense team supplied the appearance of perjury themselves when they "accidentally" sent years of Jones' cellphone communications to the prosecutors. Whoops! So, as we have seen in all the other most famous trials of the past century, Jones was actually being prosecuted from both tables. Jones used that to claim he was railroaded, and others have called this a kangaroo court, but both fall far short of the truth: this was all staged. Even when people are being railroaded by kangaroo courts, nothing like this ever happens. This kind of stuff only happens in CIA trials, when the trial is scripted by people who nothing of the law for people who know nothing of the law. It looks like Langley could hire a lawyer to give these things some continuity, but I guess they figure why bother. Neatness has never been their strong suit, since before I came along they never needed it. In the past, people would buy anything, and the scriptwriters are obviously still working from that playbook.
Another problem is that in a trial for slander or libel, there would be no need to look at Jones' private conversations, since you can say anything you like in private. This should have been limited to Jones' public reporting, which was all aired. You would study the tapes and written reports, which were published online and should be in the Wayback Machine. So all the talk of discovery has been absurd from the beginning. It was never up to Jones to present evidence against himself, it was up to the plaintiffs to enter that evidence, from his shows that were publicly aired and his pieces which were published online. So as I have said before, from a legal standpoint none if this ever made any sense. Trapping Jones in contradictions was all staged, since he had no reason to respond to any of those questions. Any such question of what Jones said in conversations on his cell, or said anywhere else, were outside the purview of the court, and his attorney could just object to any line of questioning of that sort. The only question was, did he slander them in public statements, in reports sold as fact, not as opinion. Did he baldly claim Sandy Hook was a hoax with no evidence it was? No, so the case never should have gone to trial.
Please go to Updates to continue reading.
________
And this is precisely what it was designed to do: illicit all kinds of responses, opinions and comments about Alex Jones and the intent of this alleged staged defamation trial:
Here is another possible ulterior motive for this apparently staged defamation trial:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.