McConnell claims Romney and Obama’s partners embed FADEC devices in the Federal Bridge to generate e-licenses to kill carbon-cap violators including Navy Seals (Chinook helicopters), Captain Chic Burlingame (Boeing 757 9/11) and Princess Di (Mercedes).
Prequel 1:
Presidential Field Links Harper’s Pilot and BAE Bridge To F-35 FADEC Sabotage
Prequel 2:
Federal Bridge Certification Authority - JonBenét Ramsey Ransom Note - Extorting Tacit Support for 9/11 Attack - Norman Mineta - Lockheed Martin
Prequel 3:
Presidential Field Links Lockheed Martin's Federal Bridge To Harper F-35 Fraud
Erstwhile terrorist partners of Obama’s Sidley Austin clients
Automated FADEC license to kill for carbon cap violators
“Rare Pentagon 9-11 Surveillance Camera Video of [FADEC-managed] Impact”
Rare Pentagon 9-11 Surveillance Camera Video of Impact
“Fox News Reports On The Death Of Princess Diana Being An Inside Job [FADEC modified Mercedes]
“The 1994 Scotland RAF Chinook crash occurred on 2 June 1994 at about 18:00 hours when a Royal Air Force (RAF) Chinook helicopter (serial number ZD576, callsign F4J40) crashed on the Mull of Kintyre, Scotland, killing all twenty-five passengers and four crew on board. Among the passengers were almost all the United Kingdom's senior Northern Ireland intelligence experts. It was the RAF's worst peacetime disaster. An RAF board of inquiry in 1995 ruled that the cause was pilot error; on 13 July 2011 a new report cleared both pilots. At the time of the crash, new FADEC (Full Authority Digital Engine Control) equipment was being integrated onto all RAF Chinooks, as part of an upgrade from the Chinook HC.1 standard to the newer Chinook HC.2 variant. The Ministry of Defence was given a £3 million settlement from Textron, the manufacturers of the system, after a ground-test of the FADEC systems on a Chinook in 1989 resulted in severe airframe damage. Contractors, including Textron, had agreed that FADEC had been the cause of the 1989 incident and that the system needed to be redesigned. EDS-SCICON was given the task of independently evaluating the software on the Chinook HC.2 in 1993. According to the House of Commons report: "After examining only 18 per cent of the code they found 486 anomalies and stopped the review... intermittent engine failure captions were being regularly experienced by aircrew of Chinook Mk 2s and there were instances of uncommanded run up and run down of the engines and undemanded flight control movements". Tests upon the Chinooks performed by the MOD at Boscombe Down in 1994 reported the FADEC software to be "unverifiable and ... therefore unsuitable for its purpose". In June 1994, the MoD test pilots at Boscombe Down had refused to fly the Chinook HC.2 until the engines, engine control systems and FADEC software had undergone revision. In October 2001, Computer Weekly reported that three fellows of the Royal Aeronautical Society had said that issues with either control or FADEC systems could have led to the crash.”
"The chances are that if software caused any of these accidents, we would never know. This is because when software fails, or it contains coding or design flaws... only the manufacturer will understand its system well enough to identify any flaws... Step forward the vulnerable equipment operators: the pilots... who cannot prove their innocence. That is why the loss of Chinook ZD576 is so much more than a helicopter crash. To accept the verdict against the pilots is to accept that it is reasonable to blame the operators if the cause of a disaster is not known." Karl Schneider, Editor of Computer Weekly, 2002”
“August 7, 2011 The wiping out of 30 US special forces in the Chinook helicopter crash in Afghanistan comes at a time when Washington’s official version of how it carried out the assassination of Osama bin Laden was falling apart from incredulity. Among the 38 dead in the helicopter disaster – the biggest single loss of American lives in the 10-year Afghanistan war of occupation – are believed to have been 17 US Navy Seals. The dead also include other members of US special forces and Afghan commandos. Early Western news media reports indicated that the Chinook may have been involved in a significant military operation against Afghan militants when it went down in Wardak Province, not far west from the capital, Kabul, early Saturday. Taliban sources are reported to have claimed that its militants shot down the Chinook with rocket fire. US military officials say they are investigating the cause of the crash. However, significantly, unnamed US sources have told media outlets that they believe the helicopter was shot down. This unofficial US briefing seems a bit odd. Why would US military sources want to hand enemy combatants a stunning propaganda coup? Perhaps, it serves US interests to divert from the real motive and cause of the helicopter crash, whether it was it hit by a rocket or not. US officials have admitted that the dead Navy Seals were part of the Team Six unit that allegedly carried out the assassination in May of the supposed 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. From the outset, Washington’s account of how its special forces murdered Bin Laden in his residential compound in Abbottabad, northern Pakistan, has been riven with contradictions. Why was the liquidated Bin Laden buried hurriedly at sea? How could the world’s “No 1 Terrorist” have resided inconspicuously only miles from the Pakistani military headquarters in Rawalpindi? Most glaringly, several informed sources are convinced that Bin Laden died from natural causes years ago. Author Ralph Schoenman dismissed the alleged Navy Seal execution as “a big lie”. Schoenman cited evidence on this subject from former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, among others, for their confirmation that Bin Laden had died from kidney failure years earlier. More recently, as Paul Craig Roberts reports, Pakistani locals have claimed that the Navy Seal operation in Abbottabad ended in disaster, with one of three US helicopters exploding as it took off from the ground near the compound. The other two choppers had not landed and, according to witnesses, they flew from the scene immediately after the explosion. As Roberts points out, that means there was no Bin Laden corpse to dispose of at sea, as Washington maintains. The key people who would know the truth about Washington’s incredible Bin Laden assassination are now unavailable for comment. Case sealed.”
“Full Authority Digital Engine (or Electronics) Control (FADEC) is a system consisting of a digital computer, called an electronic engine controller (EEC) or engine control unit (ECU), and its related accessories that control all aspects of aircraft engine
performance. FADECs have been produced for both piston engines and jet engines .. Following analog electronic control, the logical progression was to digital electronic control systems. Later in the 1970s, NASA and Pratt and Whitney experimented with the first experimental FADEC, first flown on an F-111 fitted with a highly modified Pratt & Whitney TF30 left engine. The experiments led to Pratt & Whitney F100 and Pratt & Whitney PW2000 being the first military and civil engines, respectively, fitted with FADEC, and later the Pratt & Whitney PW4000 as the first commercial "dual FADEC" engine. The first FADEC in service was developed for the Harrier II Pegasus engine by Dowty & Smiths Industries Controls. DISADVANTAGE Full authority digital engine controls have no form of manual override available, placing full authority over the operating parameters of the engine in the hands of the computer. [CO2 cap can be adjusted over the Romney Obama Bridge to trigger a violation and automate the generation of an ELtK – Electronic License to Kill] If a total FADEC failure occurs, the engine fails. In the event of a total FADEC failure, pilots have no way of manually controlling the engines for a restart, or to otherwise control the engine. As with any single point of failure, the risk can be mitigated with redundant FADECs. High system complexity compared to hydromechanical, analogue or manual control systems High system development and validation effort due to the complexity”
“[BAE is driving EU development of HISVESTA to generate FADEC CO2 and TCAS signals to automate license to kill violators] State of the Art – Background HISVESTA is the next step in solving the remaining research and technological development challenges after the successful HASTAC project in the EC Framework Programme Six (www.sintef.no/hastac). The project will develop a new generation of barometric altimetry modules, suitable for fixed-wing and helicopter applications, which will provide significantly improved capabilities for altitude accuracy. Altitude transducers, air data computers and meteorological testing performed in the project will demonstrate the effectiveness of the performance improvement. A key HISVESTA target is for the European avionic system industry to regain the market lead in altimetry and automatic air traffic control (ATC) solutions, as well as to manufacture altitude pressure transducers with the best long-term stability. The strategic objective of the project is to increase the safety in all in-flight situations, particularly in low visibility, by improving the barometric altimetry transducers used in air data computers and auto pilot systems for aircraft. The project is particularly relevant in situations in the reduced vertical separation minima legislation of 1 000ft (RVSM), as well as in demanding manual flying situations such as darkness and low visibility. Used in enhanced transponder applications, the project will contribute to significantly increased reliability in altitude information for manual and automated air traffic control systems. Aircraft Traffic Collision Avoidance Systems will also benefit from more accurate and reliable altitude information, which will allow the automated avoidance instructions to be more accurate and effective. Another project objective is to contribute towards reducing CO2 and NOx emissions in the next generation aero engines, by improving accuracy in the multifunctional pressure control system in the Full Authority Digital Engine Control systems (FADECS). The HISVESTA project will develop a range of high temperature micro-machined silicon structure (MEMS) pressure sensors, designed for accurate pressure measurements in multistage FADECS.”
“[Romney’s erstwhile partners] At Bain, we realize that gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) employees have unique needs. That's why we created the Bain GLBT Association for Diversity (BGLAD), now over a decade ago.” .. “[Jens] My perspective on diversity at Bain I am very involved with Bain's LGBT network BGLAD, and coordinate the group's worldwide recruiting outreach. I've also been spearheading our local chapter in Boston. Through these activities I have had a lot of interactions with our senior leadership around diversity, and it keeps amazing me how committed the firm is to have a diverse workforce, and to provide an environment where everyone feels welcomed.” .. “Bain's GLBT-related policies have created a culture of acceptance that's winning outside recognition. In 2007, the Human Rights Campaign first awarded a perfect score in its Corporate Equality Index to Bain and the Bridgespan Group. We were among the first consulting firms ever to receive this distinction, and have obtained a perfect score ever since. The firm is also rated first in Vault's GLBT diversity ranking in Europe and second in North America, well ahead of its competitors.”
“[Obama’s erstwhile partners] Sidley’s commitment to diversity includes issues affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people. Sidley was one of the first large law firms to provide health insurance benefits to employees’ same-sex domestic partners, and our nondiscrimination policy explicitly forbids discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender expression/identity. Openly LGBT lawyers currently practice in each of the firm’s domestic offices, serve on the Diversity Committee and are actively involved in legal organizations such as the National Lesbian and Gay Law Association. Sidley is and has been a national sponsor of the Lambda Legal Defense Fund, and participates each year in the Lavender Law Career Fair. Sidley’s pro bono commitment included bidding on and being awarded all of the outside counsel work for Gay Games VII, held in Chicago in the summer of 2006. Sidley also received a ‘perfect’ 100 score on the Human Rights Campaign’s 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 Corporate Equality Index (CEI) reports. The CEI evaluates companies based on their policies and programs which provide parity and support for their LGBT employees. The firm was also named to Human Rights Campaign’s annual list of “Best Places to Work for LGBT Equality,” a distinction that is awarded to businesses that scored 100% on the CEI report. Sidley was also named to Equality Illinois’ 2010 list of the ten most “LGBT-friendly” law firms doing business in Illinois, in recognition of the firm’s achievements toward LGBT workplace equality.”
“[Spoliation inference Obama’s erstwhile partners at Sidley Austin control the Lockheed Martin patent pool for the Federal Bridge with embedded FADEC devices for carbon] Demarron A. Berkley Associate Dallas 214.981.3482 214.981.3400 Fax dberkley@sidley.com Vcard DEMARRON BERKLEY litigates complex commercial matters, with a particular focus on patent cases. As a result of spending years as a computer engineer and then as a patent prosecutor, he brings technical depth in several areas including electronics, digital signal processing, telecommunications, software, and networking. Mr. Berkley has also litigated a wide range of commercial disputes involving trade secrets, unfair competition, business torts, breaches of contract, copyrights, and trademarks, having had substantial responsibility for managing the day-to-day aspect of many of those cases, including successfully briefing and arguing motions in court and deposing witnesses. Mr. Berkley began his legal career as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Charles R. Wilson of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The judgment gained during his clerkship experience forms the core of his results-oriented litigation approach. Before going to law school, Mr. Berkley worked as an engineer in Lockheed Martin's highly selective Leadership Development Program and as a Senior Technical Analyst for FedEx. He also occasionally moonlighted at a local college teaching Java programming classes. MEMBERSHIPS & AFFILIATIONS Dallas Bar Association JL Turner Legal Association”
In the light of a recent death threat, Presidential Field McConnell is now asking for FBI and Secret Service protection to give himself time to neutralize the threat to national security of the FADEC flaws on the Romney Obama Federal Bridge.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.