Sir Oliver Klosov
The Peter Principle states that people are promoted until they reach a position where they are no longer competent; the Dilbert Principle states that they are promoted because of their incompetence.
Nato? Dilbert Principle. Let's have a look see shall we?
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg proclaiming like a madman: "Some worry that our support to Ukraine risks triggering escalation…Let me be clear: there are no risk-free options, but the biggest risk of all is if Putin wins...This will make the world more dangerous and us more vulnerable"
Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev: "Well, how did they screw up there in NATO…Stoltenberg said that the risk of Russia's victory is much higher than the risk of an escalation of the conflict in Ukraine…I translate into understandable Russian: the risk of starting a third world war is significantly less than the risk of our country winning…Freaks…They hate and fear."
The Peter Principle
The New York Times (a channel for the US State Department with Anthony Blinken running this operation) and The Washington Post (a channel for the CIA) report endlessly about how Russian plans have failed, about how incompetent they are about how the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) have pushed back Russians in the Donbass, and how NATO weapons such as U.S. Abrams tanks, U.K. Challenger tanks and German Leopard tanks will turn the tide against Russia soon.
James Rickards - CIA wargame strategist and author"
This is all nonsense. None of that is true! I've written extensively about two facets of the war in Ukraine that you don't hear from legacy media in the United States or U.K. The first is that Russia is actually winning the war. The U.S. is the leader in reckless escalation by supplying long-range artillery, Patriot anti-missile batteries, intelligence, surveillance, and now the tanks. Russia responds at each step.
By the way, Russia has every legal right to attack those NATO countries supplying arms to Ukraine. By supplying arms to a party to the conflict, they've given up their neutrality and have become, in effect, combatants. Russia hasn't done this because it doesn't want to bring NATO directly into the fight. But legally, it can. And Victoria Nuland? Her irrational hatred for Russia and her total warmongers (wonk tanks) forces us to add a new danger, resulting from desperation. This is the fact that the U.S. itself may be the biggest loser in the war.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha HA!
-Klosov
________
James Rickards - CIA wargame strategist and author"
This is all nonsense. None of that is true! I've written extensively about two facets of the war in Ukraine that you don't hear from legacy media in the United States or U.K. The first is that Russia is actually winning the war. The U.S. is the leader in reckless escalation by supplying long-range artillery, Patriot anti-missile batteries, intelligence, surveillance, and now the tanks. Russia responds at each step.
By the way, Russia has every legal right to attack those NATO countries supplying arms to Ukraine. By supplying arms to a party to the conflict, they've given up their neutrality and have become, in effect, combatants. Russia hasn't done this because it doesn't want to bring NATO directly into the fight. But legally, it can. And Victoria Nuland? Her irrational hatred for Russia and her total warmongers (wonk tanks) forces us to add a new danger, resulting from desperation. This is the fact that the U.S. itself may be the biggest loser in the war.
-Klosov
________
Now, about these Kinzhal hypersonic missiles...since we know the Kalibr missiles are in full production and are very accurate...it was a very nice Kalibr morning in Kiev yesterday and the surrounding target rich environment. Maybe the residents of Kiev were sitting at their favorite outdoor cafe sipping a coffee watching the incoming Kalibr missiles while in Ugledar those thermoberic weapons really pack a punch.
The Russian Federation has increased the production of the Kinzhal hypersonic missile system, said the head of Rostec Sergey Chemezov.
— Donbass Devushka (@PeImeniPusha) February 18, 2023
"I got into production a long time ago, initially there was no need for such a quantity. We are now increasing it," Chemezov said in an… https://t.co/xFTPfB4kdS pic.twitter.com/LQz1jZVmiP
"Justice will be served?" How so? What about any justice to the victims in Iraq and Afghanistan after the US military rampaged through those two countries killing how many thousands of civilians? How so easily we forget. Doesn't she look stern?
As @VP said, the U.S. will continue to support Ukraine as Russia’s full-scale invasion nears the one-year mark. We honor Ukraine’s sacrifices, continue our Allied unity, and encourage stalwart support for the people of Ukraine as they fight for their country. #UnitedWithUkraine https://t.co/QYBsCspwnV
— Secretary Antony Blinken (@SecBlinken) February 19, 2023
So let's throw this RAND Corp. wonk tank's piece on Russian propaganda against the wall on what it refers to as "firehose of falsehood" to see if it sticks. The amazing thing is if you replace "Russian" with the "US" and the "UK" in this Rand piece, there would probably be very little difference between Russian propaganda and US-UK propaganda. All regimes indulge in it; some are more sophisticated.
The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.