Wednesday, February 15, 2023

ChatGPT isn't "scary good", it is scary fake

Editor's note: A monthly subscription to use ChatGPT is $20 (Professional Plan: $24 per month) for the upgraded paid version. Millions of people have plowed into ChatGPT. Elon Musk stated: "ChatGPT is scary good." Consider for a moment though there is no AI that can compare to ancient knowledge gleaned from old books and ancient manuscripts not even ChatGPT. If people are relying on you for accurate information because of your job, if you rely on data for your job, or if you are a student who decides to use ChatGPT to improve your research our recommendation is don't. Using ChatGPT will ruin your hopes and aspirations as a researcher, student or professional who relies on ChatGPT. It is now coming to light that ChatGPT is inventing requests and using sources that are entirely fake. If there are mistakes contributable to ChatGPT, consider for a moment those "mistakes" might be inventions. If anyone else did this you would probably be considered a liar. The deceit here is that ChatGPT is weaving together fact and fiction and nobody will know the difference while real knowledge about history for example is lost - permanently. What this means is that ChatGPT is feeding users information they want to receive. Is ChatGPT ascertaining thoughts and then putting users on a trajectory of what they want to hear and read? Fake AI is producing fake data with fake sources to produce incorrect information. Musk, ChatGPT isn't "scary good," it is scary fake.
________  

Bing's new ChatGPT Libels Miles Mathis

by Miles Mathis

First published February 7, 2023

My war with the mainstream just went to another level today, as I noticed BING debuting its new ChatGPT bot, where you can "ask it anything". So I asked it "who is Miles Mathis?" Rather than return an honest answer based on real internet traffic, it top-listed and side-listed several false and libelous blurbs from CIA-front RationalWiki, along with a fact-free attack from anonymous blogger Fauxlex (fake law).

In the top-listed answer, you are told I was born in 1964. But the all-knowing ChatGPT forgot to scrape the internet for confirmation of that, although it is out there in many places. So the computer is wrong even about something as basic as that. I was born September 17, 1963, at 2am.

You would expect a large computer to be programmed to be unbiassed, but that is not what we find. Anyone can check webtraffic sites, finding my sites have far more hits than that page on me at RationalWiki or anything fauxlex has ever written—even with superheavy promotion—so why wouldn't any search or question send you first to my own sites? If you want to know who I am, go to my sites and make up your own mind. That's who I am, like it or not. If you don't, fine.

But no, the governors can't have that. They can't have citizen searchers just straight-up reading anything anymore. They need to hit you with the heaviest possible dose of pre-screening and bald propaganda before you ever arrive on my site, claiming I am a pseudo-scientist, a conspiracy theorist, and a deluded crank, all based on nothing. Who says I am and why? No answer to that, just anonymous attacks from people who seem VERY VERY afraid of me.

And why are they relying only on slander and censorship? Because it is all they have. Head-to-head, I am waxing them, each and all, no matter how many people they bring against me or add to their committees.

As we have seen, even with all this, they still can't seem to find my jugular. Here is one thing that comes up even today very quickly in these attacks on me:
So … here's a claim that keeps coming up again and again. In Taos, New Mexico there is a man with a mind greater than all the greatest thinkers in history. This man single-handedly is solving puzzles in physics and astronomy and mathematics and world history that no one else has ever solved before, and at a pace that seems superhuman. This man has accomplished these tremendous intellectual feats. . .
Hmmm. Given that we know the governors, agents, internet bigwigs, mainstream scientists, and other academics hate me with the white-hot passion of a thousand suns, how does this "claim keep coming up again and again?" Where could I be getting this promotion? Any search on Google, Bing, Yahoo, Duck, Ecosia, or anywhere else finds I am anti-promoted and censored at levels that would astonish Edward Bernays himself, so how is it that a pseudo-scientist, conspiracy theorist, and all-round whackjob ends up getting promoted not just as an interesting oddity, but as “a man with a mind greater than all the greatest thinkers in history"? Doesn't really add up, does it? Has any other deluded narcissist ever "solved puzzles in physics and astronomy and mathematics and world history that no one else has ever solved before, at a pace that seems superhuman”? Not that I can think of. Is any other crazy person posting tens of thousands of pages of papers on serious subjects, with in-depth research, photoanalysis, advanced math, and millions of links in and out? Is any other "complete fraud" going headon against the smartest living people, including top prize winners in several fields, and winning? Nope, not now and never did. So a rational person might think this would merit a response beyond character assassination and outright censorship.

The only way that claim that I am the smartest person in history can keep coming up is if it is my readers who are making it. Which is interesting, no matter how you look at it. Is there anyone else alive that anyone is saying that about? No. Hawking and Feynman had a lot of fans, but none of them thought either one was the smartest person in history. That claim wasn't even made for Einstein. So something unprecedented is happening here, and my enemies are admitting that even while they are trying to tear me down. This hasn't happened before. . . EVER. And I mean that both positively and negatively. Even if you think I am wrong about everything, it still hasn't happened that
1) One single solitary guy living in the wild alone has done this amount of work, on anything.
2) That guy has managed to convince millions of people worldwide, including some high-placed people, that he is onto something.
3) That same guy has managed to convince many of them, without making the claim himself, that he is the smartest guy in the world or even the smartest guy in history!
As I say, that alone should be front-page news, and the authorities should wish to get to the bottom of it one way or another.

But it goes well beyond that, because it should be easy for this ChatGPT bot to scrape the information that I have made major predictions about the Solar Cycles that are now coming true. That has happened and no one is even trying to say it didn't happen, including RationalWiki, NASA, or the Air Force. No one has even begun to try to debunk my claims there, since it simply can't be done. I offered the physical mechanism, showed the math and diagrams, made the incredibly bold and detailed prediction, and it happened exactly like I said it would.

So let's ask the second smartest entity in history, ChatGPT, "did Miles Mathis just predict the Solar Cycle?" Chat can't even come to grips with that one, it being outside her paygrade. So she just sends you to my own papers on that, as she should.

In her scraping, Chat should also have found that the Daily Mail in London reprinted my theory that Hawking was replaced by a body double, agreeing with me. That has also never before happened in the history of the world: a mainstream newspaper has agreed with a top conspiracy theorist on something most other places are calling "outlandish".

How about this: a mainstream physicist with a degree from Oxford, working for NASA and Johns Hopkins, with dozens of first-author publications, wrote the introduction for my first book. It was his idea. He has told me he thinks I am right about many things. So, even if you disagree, that would still be major news: it would make me the first artist in history to be recommended by a top mainstream physicist. THAT HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. What does Chat have to say about it? Nothing, same as the rats at RationalWiki.

What about the fact that before Google began censoring me across the board, I was outranking Wikipedia and the dictionary on many general searches, including searches for "Canada's Gravity Deficit", "Cosmic Mass Deficit", "Equatorial Anomaly", "C-orbit Asteroids", "Hollow Neon Atoms", and "Specific Heat Problem of Electrons". My paper on Lift on a Wing still comes up first at Yahoo on a general search, ahead of NASA.

Please go to Updates to continue reading.
________


It's "incredibly entertaining":



Chips are required to run all this technology including the hardware. What is the price?



Sure thing, Schwab, anything you want.

Watch: Klaus Schwab Calls For Global Government To "Master" AI Technologies


More:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...