________
How Mattis Betrayed His Fellow Marines at the Behest of the Deep State
How the Pentagon's top-brass generals burned the careers of subordinates but then pivoted to lucrative careers all while losing the wars they were supposed to be winning
Jul 20, 2022 | By Major Fred Galvin (USMC-Ret)
My new book, A Few Bad Men, details the mendacity and mad dishonesty of retired Marine General James "Mad Dog" Mattis. The fact that it was written by a Marine once under his command, whom he betrayed for the sake of politics and getting to slap on another star, says volumes about this once-lionized figure.
It all goes back to an incident in Afghanistan in 2007, and the Court of Inquiry trial of innocent Marines that followed, which Mattis himself instigated.
Lt. Colonel Steve Morgan, USMC (retired) and jury member of the 2008 Marine Special Operations Command's Court of Inquiry says in the foreword to A Few Bad Men, "This is a case of a perfect storm of toxic leadership."
The most legendary Marine of all time, Lieutenant General John A. Lejeune, the 13th commandant of the Marine Corps, laid out clearly how to effectively nurture and lead Marines: "Make every effort by means of historical, educational, and patriotic addresses to cultivate in their hearts a deep abiding love of the Corps and Country" and "the key to combat effectiveness is unity and esprit that characterizes itself in complete irrevocable mutual trust."
If only General Mattis had taken this to heart.
On February 3, 2005, when Lieutenant General Mattis was attending the Armed Forces Communications and Electronic Associations forum in San Diego, he said: "You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn't wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them. It’s fun to shoot some people. I'll be right up there with you. I like brawling."
He also likes hearing the sound of his own voice.
During this same time, Mattis partnered with General David Petraeus to develop the joint counterinsurgency doctrine of winning hearts and minds. Mattis hijacked the phrase from the Hippocratic oath for his Marines to follow, "First do no harm." This sounded good to the media and politicians in Washington, but Marines are not physicians and Afghanistan was no sterile operating room. It was a hellscape in which Marines constantly faced threats and the possibility of betrayal from 360 degrees. Mattis' Marine Hippocratic oath sent mixed signals for his Marines, who had it on his good authority that "It's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot . . . some people."
Just over two years later, I led the First Marine Special Operations Task Force. We landed in Afghanistan on February 12, 2007. Before long the First was involved in a complex ambush near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, on March 4, 2007. We were attacked by a suicide car-bomb, waves of Taliban fighters on both sides of the road, a sniper, and a mob that placed an obstacle to trap us in an ambush kill box. We successfully counterattacked, killed the Taliban terrorists, avoided civilian casualties, and returned to base within 20 minutes, where we learned of the Taliban's swift information operations campaign that was already underway, accusing us of mass-murdering Afghan civilians. The Taliban's version of events went out within 20 minutes through the BBC followed by countless others. Ultimately, the president of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, condemned our actions and the Army generals kicked us out of Afghanistan within five days. Crushing the Taliban in battle morphed into a PR victory for the extremists in the media and a weakening of the allied forces in country. Due process went right out the window.
Ironically, Mattis was assigned as the convening authority by the commandant of the Marine Corps in August 2007, to be responsible for the investigation and a Court of Inquiry into our March 4 battle. Mattis received the results of my polygraph test and the sworn testimony of all the Marines involved in the firefight, confirming that on that morning no Marines said they killed any civilians or saw any civilians killed.
Unlike Lejeune's comments of "cultivating a deep abiding love of Country and Corps in the hearts of your Marines and that the key to combat effectiveness is unity and esprit that characterizes itself in complete irrevocable mutual trust," Mattis unleashed an unprecedented 45 criminal investigators and four prosecuting attorneys against the seven Marines falsely accused by the Taliban of mass murder. It would become the longest war crimes trial in Marine Corps history.
Mattis placed a "protective order" (a.k.a. gag order) prohibiting the two Marine officers who he named as codefendants from making any statements to the press or face punishment. Our attorneys would face disbarment. The already unlevel playing field was tilted hard against the Marines who had won a battlefield victory under fire.
Additionally, Mattis' prosecution team found perceived vulnerabilities in the Marine commandos and commenced "ethnic targeting" of two Hispanic Marines. Mad Dog's prosecutors continuously interrogated one of them, and the government manufactured a statement from him that our fire was out of control during the March 4 ambush.
The prosecution then threatened to deport the Marine's mother back to Mexico unless he signed the statement. That Marine testified he was coerced into signing the prosecution's false statement. Another Hispanic Marine also testified he was repeatedly threatened by the prosecution to take a polygraph, which was not a legal order, but the prosecution ordered him to anyway. None of the other Marines were subjected to these strongarm Gestapo tactics.
Please go to substack to read the entire article.
________
Lt. Colonel Steve Morgan, USMC (retired) and jury member of the 2008 Marine Special Operations Command's Court of Inquiry says in the foreword to A Few Bad Men, "This is a case of a perfect storm of toxic leadership."
The most legendary Marine of all time, Lieutenant General John A. Lejeune, the 13th commandant of the Marine Corps, laid out clearly how to effectively nurture and lead Marines: "Make every effort by means of historical, educational, and patriotic addresses to cultivate in their hearts a deep abiding love of the Corps and Country" and "the key to combat effectiveness is unity and esprit that characterizes itself in complete irrevocable mutual trust."
If only General Mattis had taken this to heart.
On February 3, 2005, when Lieutenant General Mattis was attending the Armed Forces Communications and Electronic Associations forum in San Diego, he said: "You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn't wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them. It’s fun to shoot some people. I'll be right up there with you. I like brawling."
He also likes hearing the sound of his own voice.
During this same time, Mattis partnered with General David Petraeus to develop the joint counterinsurgency doctrine of winning hearts and minds. Mattis hijacked the phrase from the Hippocratic oath for his Marines to follow, "First do no harm." This sounded good to the media and politicians in Washington, but Marines are not physicians and Afghanistan was no sterile operating room. It was a hellscape in which Marines constantly faced threats and the possibility of betrayal from 360 degrees. Mattis' Marine Hippocratic oath sent mixed signals for his Marines, who had it on his good authority that "It's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot . . . some people."
Just over two years later, I led the First Marine Special Operations Task Force. We landed in Afghanistan on February 12, 2007. Before long the First was involved in a complex ambush near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, on March 4, 2007. We were attacked by a suicide car-bomb, waves of Taliban fighters on both sides of the road, a sniper, and a mob that placed an obstacle to trap us in an ambush kill box. We successfully counterattacked, killed the Taliban terrorists, avoided civilian casualties, and returned to base within 20 minutes, where we learned of the Taliban's swift information operations campaign that was already underway, accusing us of mass-murdering Afghan civilians. The Taliban's version of events went out within 20 minutes through the BBC followed by countless others. Ultimately, the president of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, condemned our actions and the Army generals kicked us out of Afghanistan within five days. Crushing the Taliban in battle morphed into a PR victory for the extremists in the media and a weakening of the allied forces in country. Due process went right out the window.
Ironically, Mattis was assigned as the convening authority by the commandant of the Marine Corps in August 2007, to be responsible for the investigation and a Court of Inquiry into our March 4 battle. Mattis received the results of my polygraph test and the sworn testimony of all the Marines involved in the firefight, confirming that on that morning no Marines said they killed any civilians or saw any civilians killed.
Unlike Lejeune's comments of "cultivating a deep abiding love of Country and Corps in the hearts of your Marines and that the key to combat effectiveness is unity and esprit that characterizes itself in complete irrevocable mutual trust," Mattis unleashed an unprecedented 45 criminal investigators and four prosecuting attorneys against the seven Marines falsely accused by the Taliban of mass murder. It would become the longest war crimes trial in Marine Corps history.
Mattis placed a "protective order" (a.k.a. gag order) prohibiting the two Marine officers who he named as codefendants from making any statements to the press or face punishment. Our attorneys would face disbarment. The already unlevel playing field was tilted hard against the Marines who had won a battlefield victory under fire.
Additionally, Mattis' prosecution team found perceived vulnerabilities in the Marine commandos and commenced "ethnic targeting" of two Hispanic Marines. Mad Dog's prosecutors continuously interrogated one of them, and the government manufactured a statement from him that our fire was out of control during the March 4 ambush.
The prosecution then threatened to deport the Marine's mother back to Mexico unless he signed the statement. That Marine testified he was coerced into signing the prosecution's false statement. Another Hispanic Marine also testified he was repeatedly threatened by the prosecution to take a polygraph, which was not a legal order, but the prosecution ordered him to anyway. None of the other Marines were subjected to these strongarm Gestapo tactics.
Please go to substack to read the entire article.
________
What inquiring minds have always wanted to know is, was Mattis aware that Israeli snipers were killing US marines in Fallujah, Iraq in order to piss off the marines enough so that they would go into Fallujah and level the entire city and damn near kill everyone in it?
To elaborate further on a "few bad men", the interviews with Kay Griggs some years ago were pretty mind blowing at the time. Instead of a "few bad men," the title would have been correct had it been "a lot of bad men."
In memory of USMC Col. James Sabow. Ambushed and murdered on 22 January 1991:
Commodity Backing US$: Drugs - The "War on Drugs" Continues - USMC Cocaine Delivery Services via US Military Aircraft - The Fourth Reich Embedded Deeply in America's Military - The New Semper Fi Code: Marine Colonel James Sabow Ambushed In His Backyard by IRT Team - Estimated Global Trade in Cocaine: US$88 Billion - Need Help Defending That Trade? - Call the Marines
Commodity Backing US$: Drugs - The "War on Drugs" Continues - USMC Cocaine Delivery Services via US Military Aircraft - The Fourth Reich Embedded Deeply in America's Military - The New Semper Fi Code: Marine Colonel James Sabow Ambushed In His Backyard by IRT Team - Estimated Global Trade in Cocaine: US$88 Billion - Need Help Defending That Trade? - Call the Marines
In memory of US Army Col. Ted Westhusing. Assassinated in Iraq on 5 June 2005. Don't delude yourselves. If you think going into the military is to "serve your country" or some other altruistic belief, you are going to be sadly mistaken.
If you are an investigative journalist and you go poking around the Pentagon you're going to get yourself killed.
As Anna Von Reitz keeps reminding us, those (for-profit) government services corporations function under the color of law "jurisdiction" of a British-run U.S. territorial government overlay. And the Vatican oversees a U.S. municipal government overlay. The color of law "jurisdiction" of Washington D.C. is highly problematic, as a child of the City of London corporation, that was grafted onto the original American federal government following some Civil War shenanigans. This is a study in the basics of the fraud 101.
The US empire (United States of Lockheed Martin) run out of the Pentagon has no respect for life. The empire is concerned about one thing and one thing only: survival. If a serious mistake or an error is made it doesn't matter in the least if you get in the way by no fault of your own.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.