Source: ArmstrongEconomics
CO2 = 0.04% of the Atmosphere – It's All Propaganda for Socialism
July 10, 2020 | by Martin Armstrong
COMMENT: If all of these scientists claim that CO2 will fry us in a few years, how can you argue against this 97%?
ANSWER: You are buying into an agenda that is really not about climate change/global warming. If you look at NASA's own site, you will find that CO2 only makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere. Please explain how CO2 is so dangerous that it will "fry" us all to death in a few short years? I would prefer to be dead than to live in the world these people are trying to create — the third attempt to seize the world with Marxism.
As for your 97%, that too is a very clever fraud. You accept whatever they say, and because of you, we will lose all our liberties since you question me but not them. I will not take your liberty; they will because they seek power!
_________
Source: big.lies.com
How the Global Warming Scare was Generated
Summary: A very obviously inadequate computer model, which took no account of cloud formation, ocean currents, the Brazilian rain forest, volcanic eruptions, and other matters, 'predicted' quite large rises in temperature. These predictions were taken up and became the basis of a huge multi-billion-dollar industry. One conclusion is that expensive equipment is useful for dishonest research, because outsiders can't check it. I taped the following interesting, well-delivered, and optimistic public lecture with permission; this is pretty much verbatim, though slightly rearranged to remove redundancies and loosenesses of speech. So far as I recall, Mason spoke without notes, though he had slides. I had intended to put this on Internet several years ago, but I fear never quite managed to arrange it, for which I'm apologetic —Rae West
"Sir John Mason is famous internationally for work on clouds, rain, snow, lightning. Director-General Meteorological Office 1965-1983. Senior adviser to Imperial College in problems of environmental change. Was professor of cloud physics at Imperial College. Now Chancellor of UMIST. Many honorary degrees, awards, distinctions, medals. Elected FRS at an early age. Senior Vice-President of 'the Royal' [Royal Society] and treasurer. Work on climate modelling and change."—Prof Lambert, Chairman.
Click to hear original tape recording of Sir John Mason
Review of a typical 'think-tank' funded alarmist talk on 28th Jan 2000:
Review of a talk As If There's No Tomorrow by Mayer Hillman, 28th Jan 2000
Mayer Hillman is the brother of Harold Hillman (elsewhere on this site) of whom I have a high opinion, so I was interested to hear this talk, delivered to a miscellaneous, rather elderly, local group of people. (Mayer Hillman told me that his views usually leave his audience shell-shocked; I told him he'd be doing well to keep them awake.)
This Hillman was billed as 'Senior Fellow Emeritus of the Policy Studies Institute', which appears to be a quasi-non-governmental organisation (or QUANGO) with the usual semi-secret funding. So this title is a good deal less impressive than it sounds. (I subsequently found the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust is one of its sources of money. Also that the global warming part of it seems to have been tacked on to the political part, and appears to be run by someone called Prof Jim Skea, though Jim was not polite enough to reply to a letter of mine). Hillman seems to have been head, or part, of the environmental part for about a decade. His previous work has dealt with such subjects as the uses of walking, and the drawbacks of 'daylight saving' time. He has co-authored many books.
I think I'm right in saying he has, himself, no evidence whatsoever; he is completely reliant on the views of 'climate scientists'. He says things like 'This is the biggest problem we have ever faced' and 'Evidence of its consequences [i.e. fuel consumption] in the form of exceptional weather patterns is accumulating at an alarming rate..' (It's necessary to talk about 'increasing evidence' of course because, for example, despite the industrial revolution many low-lying islands have evidently not been inundated. Hillman also has to fail to notice that, if his claims are true, it's absurd to talk of 'increasing evidence': he was saying there's no doubt he's right).
If there is global warming, and if it's linked with CO2 , then we must consider the impact on everyday life. (He means in industrialised countries, although there are occasional swipes at China). His solution is to have some system for adding up peoples' allocation of carbon—perhaps swipe cards with a credit limit. So that jet travel, for example, according to him a principal menace, would use up a lot of allocation. If you fly, you'd then freeze through lack of room heating. He seems to like draconian rationing—he was an evacuee to the countryside from London during the Second World War of which he is an admirer. He seems to like the thought of overall control: people in 1939 might not have voted for war with Germany. But the government knew it was necessary—this is an analogy he drew.
Like many non-scientific people, he confuses pollution with emissions, and temperature change with the ozone 'hole', and resource destruction with any use of resources.
An odd aspect of his talk was his attitude that God, or perhaps G-d, was coming to the help of the planet. Hillman looks forward to droughts in the American midwest, as this means the earth is fighting back. 'Global warming' is like the cavalry coming to the rescue of the earth. It's 'of near-Biblical import'.
I was interested to listen to the question and answer session; I counted the questioners showing awareness of science vs those who didn't, and arrived at nil awareness vs nine non-awareness. All the nine assumed that what he said was true—or perhaps they pretended too, overwhelmed by the colourful diagram Hillman had shown them, which showed some lines going up, and then down. I wondered whether, though possibly this impression is far-fetched, in a similar way, the inevitabilities of 'scientific Marxism' were expounded to rather dim-witted audiences, who were unable to examine the roots of the orthodoxy presented to them: what could be more important than global warming (or the oppression of workers?) My impression was strengthened by Hillman's attack on 'capitalism', which he claims will soon die out, because, presumably following Marx in an unthinking way, 'it must always expand'. He confidently predicts that in just a few years rationing will be introduced and 'capitalism' fall.
Source: NoTricksZone
Climate Science Humiliated…Earlier Model Prognoses Of Warmer Winters Now Today's Laughingstocks
By P Gosselin on 4. April 2013
"The Earth has a fever," we were told. "The science is settled and the debate is over. Scientists are unanimous – 97% of them agree: climate change is real, and is happening now, and we've got to act quickly."
Over more than two decades we were told again and again that everywhere was warming faster than everywhere else – especially winters were warming up quickly. Snow was becoming a thing of the past and children soon weren't going to know what it is. "The warm winters that we are seeing are just a harbinger of what's to come," the media declared just a couple of years ago. The scientists were cock-sure.
Today we are finding that precisely the exact opposite is happening. Winters in Europe have turned colder and more severe. Central Europe has seen its 5th consecutive colder than normal winter in a row – a record since measurements began in the 19th century.
Climate scientists first reacted by claiming, "One winter does not make a trend“. Then they said that the cold winters were a local phenomenon. Finally they were forced to recently claim, "Cold winters now fit the picture of global warming!"
List of failed predictions
What follows are dozens of predictions for warmer winters made not long ago during the 2000s, many by leading scientists. What started as a simple Google search, turned into a list of false winter predictions for Central Europe, particularly Germany. By sheer coincidence reader Jimbo sent over his own list of false wintertime predictions made by "experts" in the US and Great Britain. I’ve combined the two lists and present one long list to you. Of course we still have to wait (90 years in some cases) to see how some of the predictions inevitably turn out, but current trends do not bode well for them.
Unfortunately, many of these predictions were passed on as reliable predictions to various sectors of industry, so that they could prepare for the new future that awaited. Many of these industries, like tourism, skiing, agriculture, highway maintenance, etc. based their investment decisions in part on these forecasts. As we now know, they turned out to be false – completely false – and the costs will be billions. Readers are welcome to suggest other false wintertime predictions, which we will gladly add to the list.
Failed winter climate predictions
(The first 33 concern mostly Germany and Central Europe)
1. "Due to global warming, the coming winters in the local regions will become milder." Stefan Rahmstorf, Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Research, University of Potsdam, 8 Feb 2006
****
2. "Milder winters, drier summers: Climate study shows a need to adapt in Saxony Anhalt." Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Press Release, 10 Jan 2010.
****
3. "More heat waves, no snow in the winter" … "Climate models… over 20 times more precise than the UN IPCC global models. In no other country do we have more precise calculations of climate consequences. They should form the basis for political planning. … Temperatures in the wintertime will rise the most … there will be less cold air coming to Central Europe from the east. …In the Alps winters will be 2°C warmer already between 2021 and 2050." Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, 2 Sept 2008.
****
4. "The new Germany will be characterized by dry-hot summers and warm-wet winters." Wilhelm Gerstengarbe and Peter Werner, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), 2 March 2007
****
5. "Clear climate trends are seen from the computer simulations. Foremost the winter months will be warmer all over Germany. Depending of CO2 emissions, temperatures will rise by up to 4°C, in the Alps by up to 5°C. "Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, 7 Dec 2009.
****
Please go to NoTricksZone to read the entire article.
________
Read the entire file:
What is the Greenhouse Effect? Carbon Dioxide, Water in the Air, and Climate
Try this on for bunk (coming from "modern science"):
2020 Is Our Last, Best Chance to Save the Planet
Coronavirus and climate change: How to deal with converging crises
Read how "modern science" is being dismantled for what it is: a fraud as modern science is being exploded. Are you honestly going to put your faith in modern science concerning "climate change?"
THE GREATEST STANDING ERRORS IN PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS
More on the Church of COVID:
The Great Covid-19 Deception and What You Need to Know to Survive
More bulls*t from the New York Times:
NY Times Fakes a Climate Change Debate
Earlier (2010) material on Al Gore that certainly is amusing...and to think he is still around now connected to WEF:
Global Warming - Culture of Greed - Envy - Narcissism - Green Economy - Blood and Gore of it all
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.