Saturday, July 25, 2020

Climate Change: Scientific Psychological Warfare for Population Reduction

Source: Technocratic Tyranny


By Vicky Davis | July 16, 2020

The Climate Change revolution began with a focus on chemicals that some ethically challenged scientists proclaimed to be a global problem that required a global collective action. To coordinate and lead a global collective action requires a global governing system. Cross-border chemicals is a logical extension of atomic weapons research with fallout being the starting point. It doesn't matter that the science on Climate Change was wrong because the objective was political.

This stage of building global governance began with scientists determining that CFCs in aerosols were destroying the ozone layer of the atmosphere. (The hole in the ozone is naturally occurring and it gets bigger and then shrinks at different times and has done so forever. That fact is in the geologic record of rocks).

The following is from an article about the scientists who supposedly demonstrated that CFCs reduce the ozone layer. You will also find their names in the UN Environmental Programme's timeline, 1977 World Plan of Action for the Ozone Layer.

Frank Sherwood Rowland, a US scientist, and his collaborator Mario Molina, a Mexican scientist, demonstrated that chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) reduce the ozone layer. CFCs are gases used in refrigerators, air conditioners and atomizer thrusters. The National Academy of Sciences of the United States, in 1976 granted credibility to this hypothesis. As a result of this, Canada, Sweden, Norway and the United States took the first initiatives for the elimination of CFCs in aerosols.
The two scientists – one being an American and one being a Mexican is significant. As the history of international agreements is followed, we find that the La Paz treaty with Mexico signed in 1983 was for the purpose of creating an international zone on the border with the objective being cooperative environmental clean-up and management of the border region led by the EPA and overseen by the State Department. It was the first step towards disintegration of the United States government (borders and authority) in favor of international scientific management of a regional economic and social governing structure (i.e. North American Union aka North American Community.)

Vienna Convention In 1985, the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer was signed and came into force in 1988.


To the right, are excerpts from the Convention that show that the convention was the beginning of a set-up. It had a political objective of movement towards science-based, regional governing system.
The timeline of "trade agreements" signed by the U.S. supports that thesis. The full timeline can be viewed HERE.

Montreal Protocol

Protocols contain the details for the implementation of a Convention. In 1987, the U.S. agreed to the Montreal Protocol of the Vienna Convention on Ozone. The video at the top write of this article explains the significance of the Montreal Protocol. The protocol defines the amount of allowable production of different chemicals, the percentage of use reduction by given target dates and it includes references to cross border trade in chemical substances.

Soviet Union

In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union signed a treaty for environmental cooperation and an agreement was signed in London to establish the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. The IIASA was for the purpose of Soviet scientists and U.S. scientists to work together on environmental issues with the initial focus being on carbon dioxide. While that might sound nice, it serves to remember that we were still in a Cold War with the Soviets and the discussions with the Soviets to establish the IIASA began in secrecy in the 1960s with funding for it hidden. The following is from Article 2 of the treaty:
ARTICLE 2

This cooperation will be aimed at solving the most important aspects of the problems of the environment and will be devoted to working out measures to prevent pollution, to study pollution and its effect on the environment, and to develop the basis for controlling the impact of human activities on nature.

It will be implemented, in particular, in the following areas:
• air pollution
• water pollution;
• environmental pollution associated with agricultural production;
• enhancement of the urban environment 
• preservation of nature and the organization of preserves;
• marine pollution;
• biological and genetic consequences of environmental pollution;
• influence of environmental changes on climate;
• earthquake prediction;
• arctic and subarctic ecological systems;
• legal and administrative measures for protecting environmental quality.
In the years before the planned demolition of the Soviet Union, George Shultz was working with Mikhail Gorbachev. According to Shultz, the Soviets would not be able to maintain control through isolation because satellites, telecommunications and information systems wouldn't allow it. Gorbachev understood.

In the late 80s, with the threat of nuclear war ending, a new vehicle of terror was needed by the globalists. Climate Change as a function of cross-border pollution filled the bill. It became the marketing approach for selling an environmental holocaust as the new global terror.

In 1987, the World Commission on Environment and Development submitted their report on the global problematique to the year 2000 and beyond including strategies for sustainable development to the United Nations. The title of the report, Our Common Future which described: Our common concerns, our common challenges, and our common endeavors to manage the commons and implicitly, the commoners using a new paradigm of "anticipate and prevent". Sustainable Development became the concept label for anticipating and preventing (controlling) humans from destroying the "global habitat" supposedly to preserve the resources for future generations.

The World Commission on Environment and Development was led by Gro Harlem Brundtland, Prime Minister of Norway. Brundtland was also a physician and she became the Director General (1998-2003) of the World Health Organization (WHO). Her focus at WHO was on Public Health and the Environment.

Please go to Technocratic Tyranny to read the entire article.
________


Related:

The Dark Past Of The Bank For International Settlements


WEF continues to pile on erroneous official policy studies on climate change from selected organization to support WEF's official climate change position.

Why climate change increases gender inequality


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...