Elite Technocrats in Silicon Valley Working With Newsom Would Never Relinquish Their Own Children - "Equity": Building a Slave Class

Editor's note: Once the parents are removed and big tech steps in to create what Zuckerberg calls the "Metaverse", children will be trained and augmented to program games for their own eventual obliteration. This is happening in California because California's governor Newsom is linked closely to Silicon Valley. "Equity" means getting children programmed into these virtual reality systems by reducing children to the lowest common denominator, rather than striving for excellence in education with extremely high standards void of big tech. It is the creation of a slave class. The education of children is being taken over by big tech for global investment markets. Newsom wants to transform early childhood into a global investment pool. Parents would interfere with "Pay-for-Success Initiatives." Parents giving away their children? To who? Silicon Valley big tech? Zuckerberg's Metaverse? Wall Street's social impact bonds so children can be virtually monitored for performance on global investment markets for social impact investors? This guy at USA Today doesn't have his head screwed on entirely. Call this what it is: slavery.

A Letter to Our Children 

________  

Source: USA Today

Column: California should abolish parenthood, in the name of equity

By Joe Mathews Zócalo | January 13, 2022

If California is ever going to achieve true equity, the state must require parents to give away their children.

Today's Californians often hold up equity — the goal of a just society completely free from bias — as our greatest value. Gov. Gavin Newsom makes decisions through "an equity lens." Institutions from dance ensembles to tech companies have publicly pledged themselves to equity.

But their promises are no match for the power of parents.

Fathers and mothers with greater wealth and education are more likely to transfer these advantages to their children, compounding privilege over generations. As a result, children of less advantaged parents face an uphill struggle, social mobility has stalled, and democracy has been corrupted. More Californians are abandoning the dream; a recent Public Policy Institute of California poll found declining belief in the notion that you can get ahead through hard work.

My solution — making raising your own children illegal — is simple, and while we wait for the legislation to pass, we can act now: the rich and poor should trade kids, and homeowners might swap children with their homeless neighbors.

Now, I recognize that some naysayers will dismiss such a policy as ghastly, even totalitarian. But my proposal is quite modest, a fusion of traditional philosophy and today’s most common political obsessions.

In his "Republic," Plato adopted Socrates' sage advice — that children "be possessed in common, so that no parent will know his own offspring or any child his parents" — in order to defeat nepotism, and create citizens loyal not to their sons but to society.

Today, a policy of universal orphanhood aligns with powerful social trends that point to less interest in family. Californians are slower to marry, and are having fewer children — our birth rate is at an all-time low.

My proposal also should be politically unifying, fitting hand-in-glove with the most cherished policies of progressives and Trumpians alike.

The left's introduction of anti-racism and gender identity in schools faces a bitter backlash from parents. Ending parenthood would end the backlash, helping dismantle white supremacy and outdated gender norms. Democrats also would have the opportunity to build a new pillar of the safety net — a child-raising system called "Foster Care for All."

Please go to USA Today to read more.