This is where the City of London Worshipful Companies (Livery Companies) originated formed by royal charter to form private mercenary armies. This is the origin of fascism and all empires have this component. The American empire has exposed its fangs and we are seeing this daily. This is EXTREMELY dangerous because the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) now see themselves as the great civilizing force in the world just as the British did with their "white man's burden" conquering of the world "civilizing" it. The irony is the British monarchy are similar in many respects to the CCP. A "moral endeavor" to go pillage the world of its resources. That moral imperative is the difference between defeat and victory in war. America does not have a legitimate moral imperative to wage war and it's getting its ass kicked.
The City of London: livery companies the heart of its foundation - magic ritual impacts physical reality - 'freeman' to freemason
Worshipful Company of Scriveners - Karl Marx - ten planks of Communism - 'One World Family Office' - One Canada Square
________
Source: The Unz Review
The New Monarchy: Wokeness as a Survival Strategy
BY GREGORY HOOD • NOVEMBER 5, 2021 • 27 COMMENTS
In 1947, then-Princess Elizabeth pledged her life to the service of her subjects and "our great imperial family to which we belong." This included “all the peoples in the British Commonwealth and Empire, wherever they live, whatever race they come from, and whatever language they speak." She also spoke fondly of her travels in the "lovely lands of South Africa and Rhodesia."
The British Empire was built by men with a strong racial identity, but as the princess's words show, by 1947, she was trying to be "colorblind." The United Kingdom wasn’t the only European power that tried to keep its empire that way. Charles de Gaulle built the "French Union," which later was replaced with the even more watered-down "French Community." They failed because non-white people did not see themselves as French and withdrew. Antonio Salazar tried to keep the Portuguese Empire in Africa (the "Ultramar") and the regime promoted itself as a multiracial state with a single culture. This also failed, and the wars to suppress African independence led to a military coup that overthrew Salazar's Estado Novo (New State) four years after he died.
The British Commonwealth endures, but barely. It has little value other than symbolism. Queen Elizabeth II's reference to Rhodesia is especially tragic. The British government fiercely opposed white rule and instead helped Robert Mugabe gain power and establish "Zimbabwe." British opposition was based on Rhodesia's supposedly illegal Unilateral Declaration of Independence. The United Kingdom gained nothing from supporting black radicals rather than Anglo-Saxons in Rhodesia. Today, Zimbabwe is one of the worst countries on Earth and is no longer even in the Commonwealth. Ian Smith, a hero who fought for the United Kingdom in the Second World War, was right to call the Mother Country's action "The Great Betrayal."
Support for the Crown is weak in nations outside Britain. A 2019 poll showed that just 51% of Australians want to keep the Queen as Head of State. A 2021 poll found that Canadian support for republicanism is higher than ever, with just under half wanting to ditch the Queen. A poll from two months ago shows that older New Zealanders support the monarchy, while those under 60 want a republic. The United Kingdom itself has separatist movements. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn says another referendum for Scottish independence is "inevitable." Just under half of Scots want to leave the Union. "Brexit" has increased support for separation.
Still, the Queen is popular. About 70 percent of people in Scotland, Wales and England support her. Far fewer support the heir, Prince Charles. Only 31 percent of Britons aged 18–24 want a monarch. Support for royalty is overwhelming among older voters who will, of course, die off.
Unlike Queen Elizabeth II, whose life can be described in one word — service — Prince Charles is more political. He recently called for a "war-like footing" to fight "climate change." The future head of state is taking a controversial political position, but does not defend the British people against mass immigration. He is also reportedly planning to change his title to "Defender of Faith" rather than "Defender of the Faith." After all, contemporary Britain is no longer a Christian country. By 2050, less than half the population in Western nations including France, the Netherlands, Australia, and New Zealand will be Christian.
We will thus have the spectacle of a man who owes his position to God and birthright lecturing the world on religious universalism and cutting carbon emissions. The Duke of Orleans, who supported the French Revolution, changed his name to Philippe Égalité, but was beheaded anyway.
Prince Charles will also become king at a time when the late Princess Diana is getting more media exposure. Regime Media outlet CNN is celebrating the "People's Princess" with a new special. A new film, Spencer, sympathetically portrays her and seems to celebrate flouting of tradition and protocol. Princess Diana's break with the royals is partly explained by the palace's insistence on controlling her to avoid media scandals. This suggests that the press itself is the institution with real power. The sovereign plays defense.
While Princess Diana spent her last moments literally fleeing the press, another royal, Meghan Markle, runs towards it. The Duchess of Sussex, whose husband Prince Harry has been reduced to a fashion accessory, gave an interview to Oprah Winfrey in March. She and her husband claimed the royal family is bigoted. This began a debate in the press that reduced Prince William to pleading that his family wasn't racist.
According to Sir Ken Olisa, the first black Lord-Lieutenant for London, the "answer is easily yes" that the royal family supports the Black Lives Matter movement. The Queen is also going to appoint a "diversity czar" to "modernize" the monarchy. Somehow, few, if any observers regard this as "political." It's taken for granted, like being head for the Church of England.
However, the Duchess of Sussex herself shows that adding diversity to a traditional institution doesn’t "modernize" it; it rots it from within. It breeds resentment and more demands.
Being associated with the Duchess doesn’t help. Meghan Markle's supposed best friend, Jessica Mulroney, was "suicidal" after being accused of white privilege by a black social media "influencer." Miss Mulroney wasn't sufficiently enthusiastic about Black Lives Matter. She apologized and said she would leave her platform to "Black voices." Meghan Markle reportedly did nothing to help her friend.
Mr. Markle and Meghan are essentially leaving the monarchy. They know the true source of power lies in media. Thus, they signed a media agreement with Netflix that will let them "share impactful content that unlocks action." They have a deal with Spotify for a podcast.
Other media are rallying around the couple. A new film, Harry & Meghan: Escaping the Palace, contains a scene in which Meghan Markle dies like Princess Diana. The film also discusses the Oprah interview and the accusations of racism. There's also a campaign to prevent criticism of Meghan Markle on social media. Lèse–majesté lives on.
Please go to The Unz Review to read more.
Source: The Unz Review
The New Monarchy: Wokeness as a Survival Strategy
BY GREGORY HOOD • NOVEMBER 5, 2021 • 27 COMMENTS
Queen Elizabeth II is reportedly ill and may not last until her Platinum Jubilee on February 6, 2022. Saying that her death would be the "end of an era" is a cliché, but it understates her importance. When she dies, Great Britain and the Commonwealth could fragment. It will be a blow to British identity.
In 1947, then-Princess Elizabeth pledged her life to the service of her subjects and "our great imperial family to which we belong." This included “all the peoples in the British Commonwealth and Empire, wherever they live, whatever race they come from, and whatever language they speak." She also spoke fondly of her travels in the "lovely lands of South Africa and Rhodesia."
Queen Elizabeth at her coronation.
The British Empire was built by men with a strong racial identity, but as the princess's words show, by 1947, she was trying to be "colorblind." The United Kingdom wasn’t the only European power that tried to keep its empire that way. Charles de Gaulle built the "French Union," which later was replaced with the even more watered-down "French Community." They failed because non-white people did not see themselves as French and withdrew. Antonio Salazar tried to keep the Portuguese Empire in Africa (the "Ultramar") and the regime promoted itself as a multiracial state with a single culture. This also failed, and the wars to suppress African independence led to a military coup that overthrew Salazar's Estado Novo (New State) four years after he died.
The British Commonwealth endures, but barely. It has little value other than symbolism. Queen Elizabeth II's reference to Rhodesia is especially tragic. The British government fiercely opposed white rule and instead helped Robert Mugabe gain power and establish "Zimbabwe." British opposition was based on Rhodesia's supposedly illegal Unilateral Declaration of Independence. The United Kingdom gained nothing from supporting black radicals rather than Anglo-Saxons in Rhodesia. Today, Zimbabwe is one of the worst countries on Earth and is no longer even in the Commonwealth. Ian Smith, a hero who fought for the United Kingdom in the Second World War, was right to call the Mother Country's action "The Great Betrayal."
Robert Mugabe
Support for the Crown is weak in nations outside Britain. A 2019 poll showed that just 51% of Australians want to keep the Queen as Head of State. A 2021 poll found that Canadian support for republicanism is higher than ever, with just under half wanting to ditch the Queen. A poll from two months ago shows that older New Zealanders support the monarchy, while those under 60 want a republic. The United Kingdom itself has separatist movements. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn says another referendum for Scottish independence is "inevitable." Just under half of Scots want to leave the Union. "Brexit" has increased support for separation.
Still, the Queen is popular. About 70 percent of people in Scotland, Wales and England support her. Far fewer support the heir, Prince Charles. Only 31 percent of Britons aged 18–24 want a monarch. Support for royalty is overwhelming among older voters who will, of course, die off.
Unlike Queen Elizabeth II, whose life can be described in one word — service — Prince Charles is more political. He recently called for a "war-like footing" to fight "climate change." The future head of state is taking a controversial political position, but does not defend the British people against mass immigration. He is also reportedly planning to change his title to "Defender of Faith" rather than "Defender of the Faith." After all, contemporary Britain is no longer a Christian country. By 2050, less than half the population in Western nations including France, the Netherlands, Australia, and New Zealand will be Christian.
We will thus have the spectacle of a man who owes his position to God and birthright lecturing the world on religious universalism and cutting carbon emissions. The Duke of Orleans, who supported the French Revolution, changed his name to Philippe Égalité, but was beheaded anyway.
Prince Charles will also become king at a time when the late Princess Diana is getting more media exposure. Regime Media outlet CNN is celebrating the "People's Princess" with a new special. A new film, Spencer, sympathetically portrays her and seems to celebrate flouting of tradition and protocol. Princess Diana's break with the royals is partly explained by the palace's insistence on controlling her to avoid media scandals. This suggests that the press itself is the institution with real power. The sovereign plays defense.
While Princess Diana spent her last moments literally fleeing the press, another royal, Meghan Markle, runs towards it. The Duchess of Sussex, whose husband Prince Harry has been reduced to a fashion accessory, gave an interview to Oprah Winfrey in March. She and her husband claimed the royal family is bigoted. This began a debate in the press that reduced Prince William to pleading that his family wasn't racist.
According to Sir Ken Olisa, the first black Lord-Lieutenant for London, the "answer is easily yes" that the royal family supports the Black Lives Matter movement. The Queen is also going to appoint a "diversity czar" to "modernize" the monarchy. Somehow, few, if any observers regard this as "political." It's taken for granted, like being head for the Church of England.
However, the Duchess of Sussex herself shows that adding diversity to a traditional institution doesn’t "modernize" it; it rots it from within. It breeds resentment and more demands.
Being associated with the Duchess doesn’t help. Meghan Markle's supposed best friend, Jessica Mulroney, was "suicidal" after being accused of white privilege by a black social media "influencer." Miss Mulroney wasn't sufficiently enthusiastic about Black Lives Matter. She apologized and said she would leave her platform to "Black voices." Meghan Markle reportedly did nothing to help her friend.
Mr. Markle and Meghan are essentially leaving the monarchy. They know the true source of power lies in media. Thus, they signed a media agreement with Netflix that will let them "share impactful content that unlocks action." They have a deal with Spotify for a podcast.
Mr. Markle and Meghan
Other media are rallying around the couple. A new film, Harry & Meghan: Escaping the Palace, contains a scene in which Meghan Markle dies like Princess Diana. The film also discusses the Oprah interview and the accusations of racism. There's also a campaign to prevent criticism of Meghan Markle on social media. Lèse–majesté lives on.
Please go to The Unz Review to read more.
________
More:
Have a look at what was the "white man's burden" reconstituted into being "woke" at Microsoft:
Woke on the beaches. "White man's burden" in reverse:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.