I Have a Lot of Questions About Kenosha

International Asymmetric Biowarfare Correspondent - With a Big Question Mark Over My Head

Sir Oliver Klosov

It was revealed in the Kyle Rittenhouse court case that there was an FBI drone directly over the shooting. showing Kyle was under attack and pursued before he exercised his second amendment right to protect himself. The drone videos provided its own unique view of…wait…go back a minute…what's that part about an FBI drone? 

Why in the hell was there an FBI drone directly over the shooting? I'm glad it was only for the reason it proves Kyle is not guilty but have we even considered the ramifications of what this actually means? Simply, our government, for any reason that they perceive to be a threat, can conduct mass surveillance of you without a warrant! Certainly, this was a public place and the courts have ruled that surveillance can be conducted in public without a warrant, however, there were local police resources. Why would the FBI be conducting this surveillance if they had no way of stopping or preventing what was happening, from occurring? Regardless of the legality of it, should we as citizens become comfortable with the idea that this is normal? Out of an abundance of generosity, let's just say they were somehow justified with having a drone overhead, why this specific area? Kenosha riots covered several dozen square blocks of town, so if they were conducting surveillance, were they doing so with multiple drones? And were they expecting this to happen and were recording their agents on the ground trying to kill Kyle?

How did the drone end up directly over this shooting that night, despite all the other areas in the city where bad things were happening? I can't be the only one here thinking that's awfully damn convenient.

Why did the FBI decide on so many drones? How many in each area? Why those areas? Was there some specific threat posed in those areas? Was local law enforcement involved? Were they aware? Was this a coordinated action with an expected outcome that didn't go the way they planned?

They certainly would have railroaded Rittenhouse into a jail cell he didn't deserve if it wasn’t obtained by his defense attorney. But it leads to more questions...

How many people have been prosecuted as a result of the multiple FBI drone videos?

None.

How many of the business owners have specific suspects they can pursue civil remedies against?

None.

Can we see the video from all of the drones from that night?

No.

What's that?

The FBI says it has "lost" video from that night in this case. We do know with certainly that means the FBI is on the side of darkness and needs to be dealt with with extreme prejudice in the near future.

I have a lot of questions and so do a lot of other Americans.

_________


More:

How the Rittenhouse Trial Will Unfold

Call For State Militias to Maintain Domestic Tranquility

Kenosha, Wisconsin: Took a 17 Year Old To Show How It's Done - Kyle Fired Three Shots; Rosenbaum Had Five Bullet Holes in Him - Antioch, Illinois Police: Release Kyle Rittenhouse - Daily Caller Posts Childish Smileys (and Deception) - Antifa Shot Rosenbaum - Antifa: Incompetent Snowflakes - What Entity Is Paying for Antifa Mercenaries?

Antifa Agitators Are Being Funded by the Ford Foundation - Those Responsible Must be Held Accountable - DO NOT Trespass - Arrest and Interrogate Antifa Maoist Revolutionaries to Verify Receipts - Lawyers Are Your Worst Enemy - Democratic Party: Party of Subversion - Ford Foundation: Value Theft

The prosecuting attorney in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial is a Democrat so you know what that means: a political show trial.

Thomas Binger: 5 things you need to know about prosecutor in Kyle Rittenhouse trial

Related:

White Owned Furniture Store in Wisconsin Burned to Ground by Black Rioters

One solution would be to revoke the commercial militias corporate charter and return those law enforcement and associated responsibilities over to respective state police in order to maintain "domestic tranquility": 

FBI