________
Source: The Daily Skeptic
A public sector trade union in Cyprus has called for the suspension of rapid lateral flow tests after analysis found multiple times the permissible trace level of ethylene oxide.
The analysis by Cyprus-based Food Allergens Lab found 0.36 mg/kg of ethylene oxide in one swab, over seven times the limit of 0.05 mg/kg imposed by E.U. regulations.
According to the European Chemicals Agency, ethylene oxide is toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic, including when inhaled. It is used to coat and sterilise PCR and rapid test nasal swabs.
A separate analysis by A-D Research Foundation in California found aluminum and silicon at concentrations as high as 7.25% and 14.06% respectively in some spots on PCR test swabs. The author, Peter Grandics, explains that aluminum and silicon can both be hazardous to health, and suggests this may explain the “rapid-onset nasal bleed and strong and lasting adverse reactions reported by the tested individuals”.
It follows concerns about why the bristles in LFT swabs so easily break away and remain in the body, as shown in this video.
As reported in the Daily Sceptic in August, Professor Anthony Brookes and Dr Kees Straatman from the University of Leicester put some material from a LFT swab under a powerful laser microscope and sent us the videos showing what they found. They explained:
According to the European Chemicals Agency, ethylene oxide is toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic, including when inhaled. It is used to coat and sterilise PCR and rapid test nasal swabs.
A separate analysis by A-D Research Foundation in California found aluminum and silicon at concentrations as high as 7.25% and 14.06% respectively in some spots on PCR test swabs. The author, Peter Grandics, explains that aluminum and silicon can both be hazardous to health, and suggests this may explain the “rapid-onset nasal bleed and strong and lasting adverse reactions reported by the tested individuals”.
It follows concerns about why the bristles in LFT swabs so easily break away and remain in the body, as shown in this video.
LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ABOUT THE SWAB TEST
— Wake Up From COVID (@wakeupfromcovid) April 9, 2021
The test might be, for whatever technical reason, the best that a lab might desire, but I WANT IT TO LEAVE NO TRACE IN MY BODY. Is that too much to ask? pic.twitter.com/zoMdnufIUm
As reported in the Daily Sceptic in August, Professor Anthony Brookes and Dr Kees Straatman from the University of Leicester put some material from a LFT swab under a powerful laser microscope and sent us the videos showing what they found. They explained:
To shed further light on the bristle structure of the swabs provided in LFD testing kits, we examined examples via confocal microscopy. The bristles were easy to separate from the swab itself, about 15 micrometres in diameter (the size of a large nucleus in a human cell), and clearly comprised an outer tube layer with an inner filling. The inner material does not seem to exude or flow or deviate from a cylindrical shape when the bristles are dissected, and so we would provisionally conclude this inner material is solid or semi-solid in nature.In his paper, Peter Grandics is scathing about the standards of the manufacturers:
Our results revealed a disturbing pattern of noncompliance with regulatory requirements, combined with the lack of concern for the well-being of test subjects. It is ironic that the medical establishment that now strives to control human health is incapable of producing a safe and simple product in conformance with current regulatory standards.Considering how widely these tests are being used and how often, Government ought to be taking much greater interest in how safe they are for human use.
________
Source: Popular Rationalism
PCR Proven An Unmitigated Disaster: Italy Reduces its COVID-19 Death Number by 97%. We Tried to Warn You
The US is hellbent toward chronic worklosses of historic proportions.
By James Lyons-Weiler | November 3, 2021
Since March, 2020, I've been sounding the alarm on the misuse of PCR test results as a proxy for a diagnosis of COVID-19, the disease caused by a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on first principles, it was clear to me then that the false positive rate of PCR conducted at high cycle threshold values would lead to far more false positive than true positive test results, leading to the lockdown that eventually happened.
OSHA is about to drop a rule that requires employees in companies with more than 100 workers to submit to a vaccination, or to tested and to mask in the workplace - and there will undoubtedly be a fourth wave when people start testing en masse.
Now, due to the realization that the "died with = died from" paradigm is dependent on the accuracy of the "with" part - which depends largely on PCR test kits. Given the use of high threshold values for "diagnosis" of COVID-19, the rates of cases and deaths have been grossly exaggerated. The evidence is so overwhelming - and coming in from all sources (except the US CDC) that Italy has revised its estimated number of deaths from COVID-19 from over 130,000* to less than 4,000 - overnight.
This means the US is poised for mayhem and chaos.
Fact checkers criticized IPAK for publishing information on the utterly flawed paradigm - and they were proven wrong.
Now, unless OSHA backs down from requiring vaccination or testing, which of course presumes (a) the safety of the vaccine (very much in question), (b) that only unvaccinated persons can spread COVID-19 in the workplace (absolutely false), and (c) that routine, repeated, widespread asymptomatic testing won't lead to a flood of chronic false positives (impossible), the OSHA rule will lead to workloss at companies that follow their directive - and the worklosses will be of historic proportion.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD points out that this is not the first time reliance on PCR test results as a proxy for medical diagnosis has led to disastrous results.
Mark Schiffman of the NCI on PCR HPV testing, which leads to >95% unnecessary colposcopic biopsies on hundreds of thousands of healthy women each year. Lee pointed out (personal communication) this passage from Schiffman and colleague:
I cannot convey the urgency with which we all must act to stop the OSHA rule from dropping. CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW.
Also, what you can do:
Help fund the IPAK NAATEC Consortium Study. It's IRB Approved. We've done our part. Now it's time for you to do your. Click here for details.
Source: Popular Rationalism
PCR Proven An Unmitigated Disaster: Italy Reduces its COVID-19 Death Number by 97%. We Tried to Warn You
The US is hellbent toward chronic worklosses of historic proportions.
By James Lyons-Weiler | November 3, 2021
Since March, 2020, I've been sounding the alarm on the misuse of PCR test results as a proxy for a diagnosis of COVID-19, the disease caused by a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on first principles, it was clear to me then that the false positive rate of PCR conducted at high cycle threshold values would lead to far more false positive than true positive test results, leading to the lockdown that eventually happened.
OSHA is about to drop a rule that requires employees in companies with more than 100 workers to submit to a vaccination, or to tested and to mask in the workplace - and there will undoubtedly be a fourth wave when people start testing en masse.
Now, due to the realization that the "died with = died from" paradigm is dependent on the accuracy of the "with" part - which depends largely on PCR test kits. Given the use of high threshold values for "diagnosis" of COVID-19, the rates of cases and deaths have been grossly exaggerated. The evidence is so overwhelming - and coming in from all sources (except the US CDC) that Italy has revised its estimated number of deaths from COVID-19 from over 130,000* to less than 4,000 - overnight.
Fact checkers criticized IPAK for publishing information on the utterly flawed paradigm - and they were proven wrong.
Now, unless OSHA backs down from requiring vaccination or testing, which of course presumes (a) the safety of the vaccine (very much in question), (b) that only unvaccinated persons can spread COVID-19 in the workplace (absolutely false), and (c) that routine, repeated, widespread asymptomatic testing won't lead to a flood of chronic false positives (impossible), the OSHA rule will lead to workloss at companies that follow their directive - and the worklosses will be of historic proportion.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD points out that this is not the first time reliance on PCR test results as a proxy for medical diagnosis has led to disastrous results.
Mark Schiffman of the NCI on PCR HPV testing, which leads to >95% unnecessary colposcopic biopsies on hundreds of thousands of healthy women each year. Lee pointed out (personal communication) this passage from Schiffman and colleague:
"Most HPV infections are benign, and over-reacting clinically to HPV positivity can cause psychological and possible iatrogenic physical (e.g., obstetrical) harm. We describe the built-in false positives in current tests, and the real harm that can result when the meaning of such false positive HPV tests is misunderstood. We suggest steps that could reduce harm being done by flawed tests and excessive clinical responses to positive HPV testing."We're already poised for hyperinflation due to the harmful effects of the repeated stimulus payments based on printed money. When the economic shit hits the fan due to worklosses across the companies, well, I tried. Again, I've been at this since March, 2020, and others quickly followed suit. It is with no pleasure that I report to the skeptics: We tried to warn you.
I cannot convey the urgency with which we all must act to stop the OSHA rule from dropping. CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW.
Also, what you can do:
Help fund the IPAK NAATEC Consortium Study. It's IRB Approved. We've done our part. Now it's time for you to do your. Click here for details.
________
Watch out for OSHA:
DO NOT consent and do not tolerate this from OSHA. Your best defense is to use the laws against this intrusion. If you do not know how to so this then take a course on how you can win in the courts and knock this medical tyranny down. OSHA is a federally subcontracted out corporation with an estimated $600 million yearly budget and over 2,300 employees.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.