________
Source: FDA
FDA In Brief: FDA Advises Against Use of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test Results to Evaluate Immunity or Protection From COVID-19, Including After Vaccination
For Immediate Release May 19, 2021
The following quote is attributed to Tim Stenzel, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health in the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health
"The FDA is reminding the public of the limitations of COVID-19 antibody, or serology, testing and providing additional recommendations about the use of antibody tests in people who received a COVID-19 vaccination.
Source: FDA
FDA In Brief: FDA Advises Against Use of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test Results to Evaluate Immunity or Protection From COVID-19, Including After Vaccination
For Immediate Release May 19, 2021
The following quote is attributed to Tim Stenzel, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health in the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health
"The FDA is reminding the public of the limitations of COVID-19 antibody, or serology, testing and providing additional recommendations about the use of antibody tests in people who received a COVID-19 vaccination.
Antibody tests can play an important role in identifying individuals who may have been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and may have developed an adaptive immune response. However, antibody tests should not be used at this time to determine immunity or protection against COVID-19 at any time, and especially after a person has received a COVID-19 vaccination.
The FDA will continue to monitor the use of authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for purposes other than identifying people with an adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 from a recent or prior infection."
The FDA will continue to monitor the use of authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for purposes other than identifying people with an adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 from a recent or prior infection."
Additional Information
• Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a safety communication informing the public that results from SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should not be used to evaluate immunity or protection from COVID-19 at any time, and especially after the person received a COVID-19 vaccination.
• The authorized vaccines for prevention of COVID-19 induce antibodies to specific viral protein targets; post-vaccination antibody test results will be negative in individuals without a history of previous natural infection if the test used does not detect the type of antibodies induced by the vaccine.
• Currently authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests are not validated to evaluate immunity or protection from COVID-19 infection. SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should be ordered only by health care providers who are familiar with the use and limitations of the test.
Related Information
• Antibody Testing Is Not Currently Recommended to Assess Immunity After COVID-19 Vaccination: FDA Safety Communication
• In Vitro Diagnostics EUAs - Serology and Other Adaptive Immune Response Tests for SARS-CoV-2
• Antibody (Serology) Testing for COVID-19: Information for Patients and Consumers
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Guidelines for Antibody Testing
# # #
The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation's food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.
________
Source: The Liberty Daily
'Uniquely Designed to Attack Humans': Stunned Researchers Accidentally Discover Covid-19 is a Man-Made Abomination
By J.D. Rucker • June 29, 2021
When a team of researchers in Australia from Flinders University and La Trobe used powerful computers to model the protein receptors in a number of animal species, their goal was to see how the coronavirus's spike protein attached itself to them. What they discovered shocked them.
Unlike anything that could have developed over time in nature and jumped to humans, Covid-19 demonstrates a unique design that was intended to attack humans specifically. This is, of course, impossible if one were to believe everything (anything) the Chinese Communist Party has said about the coronavirus. But considering all the evidence is pointing to the theory that Covid-19 was artificially produced through gain-of-function research as either a way to develop defenses against biological weapons or a biological weapon itself, we should heed this report's findings.
According to Daily Telegraph:
One can argue that if it was accidentally released, that this was a blessing because they were likely trying to make it more virulent and deadly. The "Biological Weapons Playbook" is pretty straight forward. Step one is to develop a disease that's under their control. Step two is to make it a mass killer. Step three is to develop a treatment or vaccine to protect China's own people while killing others. It would appear the coronavirus leaked out somewhere between steps one and two.
Nature didn't take bat soup and skip hundreds of generations of mutations to make Covid-19 tailor-made for humans. This was manufactured with intent. The only question is whether it was released intentionally or leaked prematurely.
Source: The Liberty Daily
'Uniquely Designed to Attack Humans': Stunned Researchers Accidentally Discover Covid-19 is a Man-Made Abomination
By J.D. Rucker • June 29, 2021
When a team of researchers in Australia from Flinders University and La Trobe used powerful computers to model the protein receptors in a number of animal species, their goal was to see how the coronavirus's spike protein attached itself to them. What they discovered shocked them.
Unlike anything that could have developed over time in nature and jumped to humans, Covid-19 demonstrates a unique design that was intended to attack humans specifically. This is, of course, impossible if one were to believe everything (anything) the Chinese Communist Party has said about the coronavirus. But considering all the evidence is pointing to the theory that Covid-19 was artificially produced through gain-of-function research as either a way to develop defenses against biological weapons or a biological weapon itself, we should heed this report's findings.
According to Daily Telegraph:
The theory was that if the coronavirus attached itself readily to an animal like a bat or a pangolin, it would have likely been the species that the bug used to make its leap into the human population. However, the modelling found that the coronavirus's spike protein was best suited to attacking protein receptors in humans.What the article doesn't say is what many, particularly in the intelligence and conspiracy communities, have been speculating about for a while. This appears to be a designer coronavirus. In other words, it was made to do exactly what it's doing now, namely spread across the human race at an alarming speed.
"The computer modelling found the virus's ability to bind to the bat ACE2 protein was poor relative to its ability to bind human cells," said Flinders University epidemiologist and vaccine researcher Professor Nikolai Petrovsky. "This argues against the virus being transmitted directly from bats to humans."
One can argue that if it was accidentally released, that this was a blessing because they were likely trying to make it more virulent and deadly. The "Biological Weapons Playbook" is pretty straight forward. Step one is to develop a disease that's under their control. Step two is to make it a mass killer. Step three is to develop a treatment or vaccine to protect China's own people while killing others. It would appear the coronavirus leaked out somewhere between steps one and two.
Nature didn't take bat soup and skip hundreds of generations of mutations to make Covid-19 tailor-made for humans. This was manufactured with intent. The only question is whether it was released intentionally or leaked prematurely.
________
This is how the war is falling out in Australia with mandatory masks and likely Covid injections. There are mass testing sites in Australia. The Australians are being ambushed with the Delta variant. This is CNN which is a non-linear enemy hierarchy combatant so use discernment:
Sydney in lockdown, borders shut and hardly anyone vaccinated. How long can Australia go on like this?
Warfare related news:
Howard Stern Obeys His Masters, Targets Stew Peters Show, Attempts to Discredit Jab Victims
Horowitz: CDC admits to heart problems among young vaccinated. Solution? More vaccination!
Warfare related news:
Howard Stern Obeys His Masters, Targets Stew Peters Show, Attempts to Discredit Jab Victims
Horowitz: CDC admits to heart problems among young vaccinated. Solution? More vaccination!
We've been ambushed in a deadly cross fire and now it is time to shoot back. When caught exposed in an ambush, the last thing enemy hierarchies shooting at you expect is to move rapidly in many different unpredictable directions directly at enemy fire. This is the last thing ambushers would anticipate.
Non-linear hybrid warfare brought to your doorstep:
We are in a war of attrition. The idea that the mRNA Covid injections do not alter the genes or DNA and that this was put out to cover up the idea that graphene in the injections is linked to 5G technology.
These people are shooting at us from many different directions:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.