Monday, June 7, 2021

JonBenet Ramsey Case Solved

by Miles Mathis

First published June 4, 2021

As usual, this is just my opinion, come to by internet research anyone could do, but doesn't.

This is by request. Many readers have supposed I could see something others haven't here, and they were right. As usual, we will start at Wikipedia and move out from there. A lot of attention was focused on JonBenet's mother Patricia, but for me the red flags immediately pile up on her father, John Bennett Ramsey. Why? Because we have seen that name Bennett hundreds of times in my papers, linked to many of the top hoaxes over many centuries. The Bennetts are top British peers, linked to all the big names. If we do a genealogy search on John Bennett Ramsey, we find his Bennett line conspicuously scrubbed in all places, including Wikipedia, Findagrave, Geni, and Geneanet. That is very suspicious, since the other lines aren't scrubbed—indicating something important is being hidden from us. Confirming that suspicion is JonBenet's older brother's full name: Burke Hamilton Ramsey. The Hamiltons are at the top of the Scottish peerage and are linked in the peerage to the Bennetts, so we may assume we are looking at peers here. Which already indicates this murder was a fake, being another event of Operation Chaos. The peers like nothing better than faking events, and they have been doing it for thousands of years. 
  
Before we hit the Bennetts harder, it is worth reminding you that John Bennett Ramsey also has lots of other spook markers on him, such as his link to Lockheed Martin and the Navy. Ramsey was with the Navy/Army for at least 11 years, from 1966 to 1977. We aren't given a rank and are led to believe he retired in 1977, although that's all as maybe. We know he was head of Access Graphics, the computer subsidiary of Lockheed Martin, but he could have remained Office of Naval Intelligence in that position. Access Graphics grossed over $1 billion in 1996, the year of JonBenet's death, which is highly suspicious in itself. In 1997 it was sold to General Electric. Also suspicious is that JonBenet's name is the same as her father. JonBenet=John Bennett. The scriptwriters seem to be toying with us, as usual.

OK, now back to the genealogy. Through the mother, JonBenet comes from the Webbs of Salem, Massachusetts, linking us to the Salem Witch Hoax. See the Hayden line, and Peter Webb, d. 1717, of the merchants of Boston, Salem, and Braintree, related to Bass, Adams, Allen, and Scott. So these families have been at it a long time, on both sides.

The Haydens are also a clue, since Tim Dowling at Geneanet admits he is a cousin in that line— meaning, JonBenet's mother is related to the royal Stuarts. The Haydens take us to the Suttons in the 1700s, where Tim Dowling is a 4th cousin. That is because the Suttons then take us to the Tildens, in the direct line of Dowling. The Tildens take us to the Bigges of Canterbury. They were linked to the Nevilles back to the 1500s, and of course the Nevilles take us back to our old friend John of Gaunt.

But let's check the Ramseys in the peerage related to the Hamiltons. They actually spell it Ramsay, and they were baronets in several places. The 9th of Bamff, Scotland, died in 1871. Do you want to guess who he was married to? Emily Lennon, scrubbed. His grandson died in 1953, being the son of a Graham and the husband of a Stuart-Menteth. The Stuart-Menteth was the daughter of a Hamilton. Her sister was Sarah Hamilton Stuart-Menteth. They were also related to Drummonds, Noels, Gordons, and Middletons. Strangely, thepeerage.com scrubs the Bamff baronets after the 9th, but Wikipedia admits they existed until the 12th, in 1986. Their escutcheon was a Phoenix:
Which is no coincidence here. The Ramsays were also baronets of Balmain, marrying the Whitneys of Australia in 1935.

The Ramsays were also Earls of Dalhousie, with the 13th Earl marrying. . . Lady Ida Bennet. Their son was Admiral Hon. Sir Alexander Ramsay, and who do you think he married? Only Victoria SaxeCoburg and Gotha, Princess of Connaught and Strathearn. She was born in Buckingham Palace in 1886, the daughter of Duke Arthur and the Princess of Prussia. Arthur was the son of Queen Victoria. So that's who these Ramsays and Bennets are.

Lady Ida Bennet's father was the 6th Earl of Tankerville and her grandfather was George Montagu, 6th Duke of Manchester. This links us to the Hamiltons and Gordons once again, as well as to the Maxwells and Blairs. This Princess of Prussia was the granddaughter of Friedrich Wilhelm III, King of Prussia, and also the granddaughter of Maria Romanov, Grand Duchess of Russia. Admiral Ramsay was Commander-in-Chief of the East Indies in the 1930s. He became Fifth Sea Lord in 1938. Sea Lord=Phoenician Navy.

I also remind my US readers of Gordon Ramsay, famous British chef knighted for his cooking. He is related to all these people as well. You don't think he got famous on merit, do you?

So anyway, I think you can see why my antennae quivered when I saw the names Bennett, Hamilton and Ramsey all in JonBenet's immediate family. What about the name Burke? That's also a transported surname, of course, and it links us to the same families in the peerage. There are 642 in the peerage, and they are also baronets. The current baronet Burke of Marble Hill was born in 1956, and his name is James Stanley Burke. The Burkes link us to the Nugents, Earls of Westmeath, and the de Burghs, Marquesses of Clanricarde. This links us to the Scots and Hays, who link us to the Grahams again, who link us to the Hamiltons, Drummonds and Stuarts. One big happy family, you know.

Knowing what you now know, go back to the name Burke Hamilton Ramsey, JonBenet's brother. Do you still think that name is just a coincidence? I don't.

So, can we link these peerage Ramsays to the US? We can. Admiral Ramsay's brother Patrick married a Surtees and their son David ended up in Chicago, where he married the daughter of Leonidas Arvanitidis, of the Greek shippers and merchants. An Arvanitidis is currently a senior producer at CNN.

But back to John Ramsey. There is a big gap in his bio. He got an MBA in 1971, at age 28, and didn't start his computer company until 1989, eighteen years later. He was Army Reserve for part of that time, but what was he doing otherwise? We aren't told. My guess it is something to do with Intelligence.

Curiously, Ramsey had another daughter who died in tragic circumstances. This daughter from a previous marriage, Elizabeth Pasch Ramsey, allegedly died in a car crash at age 22, in a car driven by her boyfriend Matthew Derrington. But if we look him up at InstantCheckmate, we find two of him, one who died in Burr Ridge at age 22, and one from the same locations still alive at age 51. That just happens to match the age he would be today.
So the big computers think Derrington is both alive and dead.

We have the same problem with Elizabeth Pasch Ramsey, who is listed as being 51. Meaning, the computer has no death record for her and thinks she is still alive as well.
Even worse, notice the computer thinks she is married to someone named Parker. According to her mainstream bio, she never married. And look at all her locations. Do you think she lived in all those places by the time she died at age 22? If we check Intelius, we find a lot of those locations scrubbed, including the most suspicious ones like Charlottesville, VA. And why does the computer think there is some link between Elizabeth Ramsey and Lisa Pippio? Could that be one of her aliases? Just for fun I searched on Elizabeth Parker of Fairfax, VA, age 51. Guess what, I got a hit. There is an Elizabeth M. Parker at Intelius, age 51, of Arlington, Fairfax, Falls Church, and Charlottesville.
This tells me that Elizabeth Ramsey and Matthew Derrington faked their deaths, probably to go into the CIA. Which is more indication Elizabeth's father was also CIA. And if Elizabeth Ramsey faked her death, JonBenet likely did, too. You see how that works?

When did Elizabeth Ramsey and Matthew Derrington allegedly die? January 8, 1992. That's 1/8/92. Aces and eights, Chai.

Speaking of Chai, you will remember a fake ransom note was left in the house, asking for $118,000. Why that number? Now you know. We know the note was fake since JonBenet was found in the house a few hours later. But the question was always who faked it. You are seeing that John Ramsey probably faked it, but not because he or his wife had killed JonBenet, on purpose or accidentally. The fake note was part of the larger fake, and now our question becomes. . . did JonBenet exist at all?

You will remind me that John Ramsey allegedly found JonBenet himself. And we assume the police and coroner confirmed that. Except that. . . we know the CIA can very easily control both the local police and the coroner. So we actually have no proof JonBenet or anyone else was ever found dead. None of the corpse photos are convincing at all, and as usual looked faked. Most are close-ups of the neck, but that could be the neck of any young corpse, borrowed from the morgue. They prove nothing.
That's so fake it requires no comment. If it were real, they wouldn't be publishing it. But none of the edges make any sense, especially along the profile, so we know it is manufactured and manipulated.

In fact, there are very few pictures of JonBenet with her family, and they are all poor fakes.
That's a truly horrible paste-up, one you can't even make sense of. I defy you. The three lower people appear to be sitting on something, but what? A floating tea table? A magic frisbee? You can see the standing woman's foot beneath JonBenet, but whatever they are sitting on has no legs. And none of the feet even appear to be resting on the carpet. Plus, JonBenet is mis-sized. If she stood up she would be way too tall for six. Also, we can tell this was shot with a flash, not only because the eyes are red, but because the bodies are outlined. But with a flash, the bodies would be casting shadows backwards. The standing people should be casting shadows on the back wall. They forgot to add those in, which is another reason this looks so strange. Another problem is that the father is too dark. Why is the flash making everyone bright white in the face except him?

Here's another horrible paste-up.
The biggest problem is the black thing behind her. What is that? She is supposed to be holding a black phone, and then the phone sort of merges into this black cape between her and her father. It is also under her hand. It makes no sense, so I will just tell you what it is. It was added to hide the seam between the two figures. That is always a problem area in these pastes, and here the faker thought the best solution was that black blob. And again, the lighting is inconsistent, since she is lit from the front by a flash, having no shadows on her face, while his face is lit less harshly from your right.
That's supposed to be JonBenet with her brother Burke. Except that it is very obvious he was pasted in there. Look how cut-out he looks! I can't believe they still publish that.
That, too, is a paste, using a bluescreen. The technology is more advanced, but it is still an obvious fake. We didn't get that one until later, when computer tech allowed them to fake this better. Here's one of the really bad older ones:
Look at the edge of her hair! That's just awful.

Plus, notice anything else weird? Compare her there to the previous one. Look closely at her bangs and at the shape of her lips. They used the same photo of her for both composites! The giveaway is that straight white line of hair in her bangs, which is exactly the same in both photos. That is impossible. Busted. Once you realize that, you realize his face is also the same. They just reversed his image and changed his bangs a bit.

Please go to Updates to tread the entire essay. 
________


What is going on here? This interview does not sound right at all. The demeanor and script here is all wrong.



More:



CIA hubris:

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ~ Former CIA Director William Casey


This needs to be amplified (governments use of applied behaviorial psychology):



Related:


CIA (Dis)Information Operations Come Home to the US


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...