________
Source: Real Currencies
Capitalism Is Jewish Usury
by Anthony Migchels | June 5, 2014
(Left: William III of Orange, who made the migration of Jewish Capitalism from Amsterdam to Britain possible.)
Capitalism is Usury. Its defining belief is 'return on investment'. This is an extension of the 'time value' of money, which is the central tenet of modern economics. Capitalism is unthinkable without banking and banking is institutionalized Usury.
Usury is Plutocracy. Compound interest makes it unavoidable that the very richest own everything in generations.
And this is indeed what happened: Capitalism is one huge global monopoly. All the major banks own each other and most Transnationals plus a huge chunk of land. This juggernaut was built with the plunder of Usury.
Source: Real Currencies
Capitalism Is Jewish Usury
by Anthony Migchels | June 5, 2014
Capitalism is Usury. Its defining belief is 'return on investment'. This is an extension of the 'time value' of money, which is the central tenet of modern economics. Capitalism is unthinkable without banking and banking is institutionalized Usury.
Usury is Plutocracy. Compound interest makes it unavoidable that the very richest own everything in generations.
And this is indeed what happened: Capitalism is one huge global monopoly. All the major banks own each other and most Transnationals plus a huge chunk of land. This juggernaut was built with the plunder of Usury.
We have all seen that Rothschild was worth 50 billion in 1850. At 5% per year, this fortune would now be a trillion, at 8% per year Rothschild would now be worth hundreds of trillions.
This is why it has been said that 'compound interest is the strongest force in the Universe'.
This is Usurious Usurpation.
The Rise of Capitalism
Modern Capitalism was first clearly visible in the Dutch Republic, where Italian Banking, expelled Iberian Jews, the Reformation, naval power and the acquisition of huge trade fortunes came together in the Amsterdam Empire, which would outshine its much bigger Spanish, British and even French competitors until the mid seventeenth century.
Everything that defines modern Capitalism was either invented or came to fruition in Amsterdam. The first Stock Exchange, Multinationals (the East Indies Company, which would rule over Indonesia with unrestrained Corporatocracy for centuries), and most importantly, a Central Bank, the 'Amsterdamsche Wisselbank'. And of course a huge pile of money, that would be the envy of Europe even long after its 'glory' had subsided.
Up to 2500 guilders (estates could be bought for that kind of money) were paid for a single Viceroy Tulip bulb at the peak . "A Satire of Tulip Mania' depicts speculators as brainless monkeys.
Up to 2500 guilders (estates could be bought for that kind of money) were paid for a single Viceroy Tulip bulb at the peak . "A Satire of Tulip Mania" depicts speculators as brainless monkeys.
Amsterdam also saw the first bubble: the Tulip mania, 1637. This typical banker device, blowing bubbles with easy credit and then popping them by calling in loans, would haunt Western economies for centuries to come.
The Dutch Republic resulted from a Calvinist rebellion against Catholic Spain. Calvin is considered by many to have been Jewish. He openly defended Usury. This was in an era that the Medieval era of Usury prohibition was in terminal decline.
Calvinist thought was also infected by the typically Jewish notion that wealth is a sign of God's favor.
Notwithstanding Usury prohibition, Jewish Usury had been a huge issue throughout the Middle Ages and it does not require a great leap of the imagination to see that Capitalism is in fact the modern equivalent of what was once known as Jewish Usury.
Jewish fortunes and their methods played a large part in Amsterdam. Their ships would also dominate the growing slave trade on America. They had come from Spain, after being expelled in 1492. Holland was known at the time for its 'tolerance'.
Amsterdam was the first great star of high finance. Opulence acquired through trade became Capital, looking for returns. And here we see that Capitalism is about finance, not production or consumption. Finance rules over producers, workers, consumers, farmers, craftsmen and industrialists alike.
They lend to those they control or want to control and withhold credit to those for whom they have no purpose. Usury gives them their take of any venture. By keeping money scarce, they keep labor cheap. This is how money rules.
Moving on to Britain
Amsterdam peaked in 1648, when the peace of Westphalia ended both the 80 year war for independence with Spain and the 30 year war in Germany. But after the peak comes the decline and already in the fifties problems began to mount when Cromwell landed a blow on Dutch naval supremacy with the Acts of Navigation.
The Jews had been expelled from Britain in 1290. This was a few decades after the Magna Carta, which clearly points at Jewish Usury as a huge problem at the time.
Cromwell, who was a calvinist Puritan, negotiated extensively with Amsterdam Jews about resettlement. He probably was a tool of Jewish/Amsterdam finance to begin with.
Resettlement came with the promise of making London a better Amsterdam. And while British merchants (and many others too) were against the readmittance of the Jews, Cromwell went ahead anyway. The Puritans were optimistic and naive and thought they could 'redeem' the Jews. But while Jewish Capital indeed pushed Britain's Empire to unprecedented heights, there was no redemption: by the end of the 19th century the British Aristocracy had been entirely Judaized.
While Cromwell, as a tool of Amsterdam Imperialism, ultimately failed, the Jews did not relent and they had a second shot at London with the Glorious Revolution, when William III of Orange, Stadtholder of Holland, became William III of Britain and the Dutch Republic and England were united in a personal union.
He repaid his financial backers by chartering the Bank of England in 1694 and this was the official entry of Capitalism in Britain. It came with the end of sovereign money and the ascent of Gold: until then the British economy had been financed with Talley Sticks, simple pieces of wood issued by the King. British partners in the Bank paid for their shares with them, but the first thing the Bank did was take them out of circulation. The Bank of England is only the eighth bank in history and is the second oldest to survive today.
The United States
The real history of the United States is not about the War of Independence and the Constitution. It's about banking.
The United States did not revolt over 'taxes without representation'. According to Benjamin Franklin the real reason for the War of Independence was that Whitehall forced scarce money through Britain's Gold Standard on the Colonies, who had thrived with their own Colonial Scrip. A depression was the inevitable result.
Only a few years after nominal independence, Hamilton's first Bank of the United States brought Capitalism to the United States. It was closed in 1800, but in 1816, in the aftermath of the war with Britain, a second Bank of the United States (a privately owned corporation) was opened with a 20 year charter.
The heroic President Andrew Jackson did not renew this charter and miraculously survived an attempt on his life. His last words, 'I killed the Bank' still ring triumphantly through the ages. Unfortunately, he failed to replace it with a decent monetary system and the country was plunged in a depression because of a tanking money supply.
This left the Whigs, Abraham Lincoln prominently among them, plenty of scope to campaign for a new 'National' Bank, which came in the aftermath of the Civil War.
In 1913 the Federal Reserve Bank was founded. This privately owned corporation is owned by primarily Jewish 'member banks'. The presidents of the Federal Reserve are always Jewish and by far most of its board members are too. It's no secret Wall Street is run by the Jews and is now the global standard bearer of Jewish Usury with derivatives being the scam du jour.
Please go to Real Currencies to read the entire essay.
________
Patrick O'Carroll -- Biden Admin is Proxy for Jewish Supremacism (Communism)
June 23, 2021
Latest - Biden will let rejected asylum seekers to return to US
by Patrick O'Carroll
Patrick O'Carroll -- Biden Admin is Proxy for Jewish Supremacism (Communism)
June 23, 2021
"The "job" or "fate" of Zionist Jews has always been to genocide their host nation. And although this usually failed until 1917, the Jews have had their most successful genocides since then, and they are now preparing to cull the goyim-gentiles of North America and Europe."
(DISCLAIMER- O'Carroll uses the term Zionist. I believe Communist, Freemason and Satanist would apply as well. The problem with this analysis is that Israelis and Jews in general, have been among the first to take the jab. This only makes sense if Satanist Jews were trying to genocide the non-Satanist Jews. On the other hand, cancel culture, critical race theory, censorship, BLM and Antifa, gender dysphoria and migration all suggest the Communist Jews behind Biden do have a genocidal agenda.)
Latest - Biden will let rejected asylum seekers to return to US
by Patrick O'Carroll
(henrymakow.com)
Child-Sniffing Biden, the alleged serial-child-rapist, claims to be overtly "Catholic" but often confirmed that he is in fact a Satanist, whenever he stated "I Am A Zionist" at least a hundred times. If he had not said this, the Zionists would never have had him "elected".
To prove it, Brother Nathanael says here that because over 70 percent of the Biden Regime is comprised of Zionist Jews, Biden really means business with his "I Am A Zionist" motto. Brother Nathanael names the following as the "Slew Of Jews" in the Biden Regime:
Alejandro Mayorkas (Secretary of Homeland "Security");
Child-Sniffing Biden, the alleged serial-child-rapist, claims to be overtly "Catholic" but often confirmed that he is in fact a Satanist, whenever he stated "I Am A Zionist" at least a hundred times. If he had not said this, the Zionists would never have had him "elected".
To prove it, Brother Nathanael says here that because over 70 percent of the Biden Regime is comprised of Zionist Jews, Biden really means business with his "I Am A Zionist" motto. Brother Nathanael names the following as the "Slew Of Jews" in the Biden Regime:
Alejandro Mayorkas (Secretary of Homeland "Security");
Andy Slavitt (Senior "Advisor" to the COVID "Response" "Coordinator");
Anne Neuberger (Deputy National "Security" "Advisor" for Cyber and Emerging Technology);
Annie Petsonk (Assistant Secretary of Transportation for Aviation and International "Affairs");
Antony Blinken (Secretary of State);
Avril Haines (Director of National "Intelligence");
David Cohen (Deputy Head of the Central Lack-Of-Intelligence Agency (CIA));
David Kessler (Chief "Science" Officer of the COVID "Response" Team);
Douglas Emhoff (the next "First Lady"? Husband of Kamala Harris);
Elena Kagan (Supreme Court "Justice");
Gary Gensler (Chairman of the SEC);
Janet Yellen (Secretary of the Treasury);
Jared Bernstein (Council of Economic "Advisors");
Jeffrey Zients (COVID "Response" "Coordinator");
Jennifer Klein (White House "Gender Policy" Council);
Jessica Rosenworcel (Head of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC));
Kamala Harris (next US president? Harris told one camera she celebrated Hanukkah as a child, but later told a second camera she celebrated Kwanzaa as a child, but that is by no means a problem given how Americans absolutely expect their president to talk out of both sides of her orifice);
Merrick Garland (US Attorney General);
Polly Trottenberg (Deputy Secretary of Transportation);
Rochelle Walensky (Director of the CDC);
Ron Klain (White House Chief of Staff);
Sonia Sotomayor (Supreme Court "Justice", who was raised by her Jewish mother);
Stephanie Pollack (Deputy Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration);
Stephen Breyer (Supreme Court "Justice");
Victoria Nuland (Undersecretary of State for Political "Affairs");
Wendy Sherman (Deputy Secretary of State);
"Rachel" Levine (cross-dressing degenerate pervert and Assistant Secretary for "Health").
Biden's regime is like a Huge Zionist Muppet Show with plenty of hook-noses. The goyim-gentiles will be very relieved to know that Zionist plans to lead the USA into WW3 in the coming years is now "very safe" in the hands of the Zionist Biden Regime, meaning "very safe" in the hands of Satan.
Brother Nathanael says: "It is DOWNRIGHT OPPRESSIVE seeing Jews every time you look at the news" but the goyim-gentiles must either get used to this or else take the first step to change it. This "Slew of Jews", as Brother Nathanael calls it, is now in charge of genociding the goyim-gentiles of the USA, as commanded by the "holy" books of Zionism (Talmud, Kabbalah, Zohar, "Protocols").
After they stole the election from Zionist Donald Trump, who only ever served to just slow them down a little but still managed to gift them Jerusalem and the Golan Heights although those were not his to give, the Zionists will NEVER AGAIN permit unrigged elections in the USA. Also, most of the regimes of future presidents will look very like the Biden Regime with over 70 percent Jews in charge of genociding the USA's goyim-gentiles.
Brother Nathanael adds: "With goons like 'Rachel' Levine in charge of the nation's 'health', America will soon have no testicles at all".
Then he asks: "What's a goy gonna do? Say there are too many Jews in high places? SHUT YOUR MOUTH, GOY, AND LET THE YIDS WHIP YOU INTO SUBMISSION".
Alas, Brother Nathanael, left, may well be right. Alas, the goyim-gentiles of the USA may now have to ask WHAT TO DO if they did not vote for any of that.
THE COMMUNIST/ZIONIST RECORD OF GENOCIDE
The Zionist genocide of Orthodox Russians and other Eastern Europeans after 1917 was done by over 80 percent Zionist Jews in various communist regimes.
Robert Wilton was the correspondent to Russia for the Times of London during the Zionist Freemasonic coups d'état of 1917, which the official-"truth" narrative still falsely refers to as the Russian "revolution". In his 1919 book "Russia's Agony", he stated: "Bolshevism is not Russian; it is essentially non-national, its leaders being almost entirely Jewish, the race that lost its country and its nationhood long ago."
This was because the Zionists wanted the 85% Jews to genocide 100 million Orthodox Christians in Russia and East Europe. The Zionists did not want to entrust this massive genocide to anyone other than "right-thinking" Jews.
Next, by pure "coincidence", 85 to 90% of the foreigners who "helped" China at the time of the communist takeover on 1 Oct 1949 were Jewish. This included the daughter of the founder of the brokerage firm Goldman Sachs (which still rules China today), who left the comfort of her Park Avenue home as a "tireless Bolshevik-Zionist soldier" to "assist" China. Sidney Rittenberg, from a Jewish family in Charleston SC, was the only US citizen ever admitted to the Chinese communist party.
At the end of WW2, the US Army sent Mandarin-speaker Rittenberg to China, where he became an influential advisor to Mao Zedong and to Zhou Enlai, who was the first prime-minister of communist China.
Rittenberg worked for China's brainwashing broadcaster where he "explained" the communist Chinese viewpoint to listeners in the US and Canada.
Biden's regime is like a Huge Zionist Muppet Show with plenty of hook-noses. The goyim-gentiles will be very relieved to know that Zionist plans to lead the USA into WW3 in the coming years is now "very safe" in the hands of the Zionist Biden Regime, meaning "very safe" in the hands of Satan.
After they stole the election from Zionist Donald Trump, who only ever served to just slow them down a little but still managed to gift them Jerusalem and the Golan Heights although those were not his to give, the Zionists will NEVER AGAIN permit unrigged elections in the USA. Also, most of the regimes of future presidents will look very like the Biden Regime with over 70 percent Jews in charge of genociding the USA's goyim-gentiles.
Then he asks: "What's a goy gonna do? Say there are too many Jews in high places? SHUT YOUR MOUTH, GOY, AND LET THE YIDS WHIP YOU INTO SUBMISSION".
THE COMMUNIST/ZIONIST RECORD OF GENOCIDE
The Zionist genocide of Orthodox Russians and other Eastern Europeans after 1917 was done by over 80 percent Zionist Jews in various communist regimes.
Robert Wilton was the correspondent to Russia for the Times of London during the Zionist Freemasonic coups d'état of 1917, which the official-"truth" narrative still falsely refers to as the Russian "revolution". In his 1919 book "Russia's Agony", he stated: "Bolshevism is not Russian; it is essentially non-national, its leaders being almost entirely Jewish, the race that lost its country and its nationhood long ago."
This was because the Zionists wanted the 85% Jews to genocide 100 million Orthodox Christians in Russia and East Europe. The Zionists did not want to entrust this massive genocide to anyone other than "right-thinking" Jews.
Next, by pure "coincidence", 85 to 90% of the foreigners who "helped" China at the time of the communist takeover on 1 Oct 1949 were Jewish. This included the daughter of the founder of the brokerage firm Goldman Sachs (which still rules China today), who left the comfort of her Park Avenue home as a "tireless Bolshevik-Zionist soldier" to "assist" China. Sidney Rittenberg, from a Jewish family in Charleston SC, was the only US citizen ever admitted to the Chinese communist party.
At the end of WW2, the US Army sent Mandarin-speaker Rittenberg to China, where he became an influential advisor to Mao Zedong and to Zhou Enlai, who was the first prime-minister of communist China.
Rittenberg worked for China's brainwashing broadcaster where he "explained" the communist Chinese viewpoint to listeners in the US and Canada.
Please go to makow.com to read the entire article.
________
Source: index.html#vaxxed
Reprise: Some notes towards understanding 'Jews':
Paper money/ e-money as the root of Jewish influence of the last few centuries 'Money' traditionally was something fairly portable, fairly durable, fairly subdivisible, fairly rare, and fairly valuable: metals, thin gold sheets, 'precious' stones, shells, flint. The usual view is that prehistoric societies had not invented money, and that barter necessarily preceded money, assuming there wasn't simple theft or purely local tradition. Money may have been suggested by barter—amber, ermine, copper, traded at the margins of two geographical zones. Any form of money must have social affects, which have to be liked, or tolerated: for example, owners of gold or silver mines had obvious advantages, but also problems, of wealth and security respectively. There would have to be people, and their equipment, technically competent to make, analyse, cast etc gold. And the distribution and physical control of money must have had consequences: counting-houses, secret security locations, etc. And no doubt there were strange consequences: large accumulations of money to some groups, with probable redistributive counter-measures; mercenaries and hired killers; interest payments where time periods were important—large-scale buildings, ships, seasonal food.
Paper money needs some form of trust, and some form of legal or other enforcement. The usual histories say it was a development from goldsmiths issuing promises to pay. Another claimed influence was China. Probably kings, landowners, bishops and generally any prominent person would be tempted to issue such notes; with the possibility of failure to repay—King Charles I was well-known to have failed to pay debts. The Fuggers seem to have been the last people to incur huge losses of real money.
However, the important point here is that money as a large-scale enterprise has a different feel from small-time, ordinary everyday money. Most people don't realise this; they are not personally involved with big transactions. It's obvious that a company paying 1,000 employees must have what seems like a huge amount to pay out every week or month. A billionaire may only own the equivalent of one street in a capital city. Pensions to an entire country, student loans, taxes from transport look very different considered in aggregate from the individual view. Britain had until the 1960s a money system perhaps reflecting part of this—pennies being used for small transactions, shillings being 12 pence, and pounds being 240 pence, with a guinea adding another 5%. Indian princes used a 'crore'.
Paper money in its modern form (security printed many special features; and the electronic versions - let's call them 'e-money') is not valueless, as may seem the case; if a government or group can enforce payment, its promises take on a value. This may not last: Russian peasants clutching their roubles after the Jewish coup in 1917, and middle Europeans and African under hyper-inflation, illustrate possible problems. The value is purely a measure of legal strength, itself related to military power.
Problems with Jewish control of paper money/ e-money occur because most people have no understanding of what happens. For example, borrowing by governments is traditionally at interest. This is understandable when they borrow gold; but with the Fed and 'Bank of England', where the cost of manufacturing money is small, there's a huge revenue which gives the controllers of paper money enormous power, which may be abused. (Suppose a security printer can make $10 notes for 10 cents in bulk. Then 3% of face value of $10 is 3 cents, paid every year. But this is about a third of the true cost of printing them—33% ish return each year. This is why Jewish controllers of paper money love to rack up more and more debt). Another example is illustrated by the chart: M3 is a well-known definition of 'money supply', covering cash and balances and fairly liquid types of 'money'. Varying M3 has subtle effects on entire economies. The figures were deliberately discontinued (as a 'cost cutting' measure; the blue line is a later estimate) by Jews in the USA to make tracking M3 difficult.
Typical consequences are that Jews, by selectively giving money to other Jews, allow them to take over media, and profitable businesses, in an unstoppable way. They simply have too much financial power. There is therefore a two-tier system of capitalists: most people think of business in the way it would apply to themselves—borrowing from a bank, selling something at more than it cost, and hoping to take a profit. They don't consider printing money, because they can't do it. People conflate 'capitalists' without ever noticing that some are a great deal more equal than others. The same sort of unnoticed consequence applies to e.g. think-tanks, universities, trading in currencies, etc: Jewish cheap money drives out money which has to be earned, and hack writers, hack academics, other currencies can easily be bought. When Soros is reported to be very calm when dealing in money, this is the reason.
Let me draw parallels with Christian organisations: Roman Catholicism has a tradition of hairsplitting and Jesuitry, not unlike Jewish pilpul, and in neither case has anything much resulted. The Church of England historically was fed entirely by Oxbridge graduates in ancient languages; about half these graduates went into the Church, where they were given 'livings', but did little work. Jewish money-funded media hacks (such as the BBC and general 'newspapers') are equally undistinguished and unoriginal.
How to study the effects of control of money ... At the start of this piece I've tried to outline some of the ways in which control of money produces its own special psychology, of which most people are completely ignorant. Examples include: inflation as something wanted because it means more printing of more money; wish to control entire countries to extract money from their bank system; generation of scares by control of the media; buying up of real assets with paper, especially if it is likely to be seen as of reduced value; manipulating stock exchange prices, as in the well-known case of Rothschild at the end of the 'Napoleonic' wars; squeezing money supply; controlling raw materials so that the costs incurred are far higher than the value of materials.
It takes some mental effort to think oneself into the frame of mind of these rather few people. I wouldn't claim to have complete insight; but it must come to seem fairly natural to them, presumably based on what they think of as sacred books. Non-Jews are in the position of people trying to play chess, or bridge, or poker with experts. I'd like to see puzzles in newspapers replacing crosswords and chess problems with real-world equivalent problems. And I think Jews should be specially studied—it's amazing that their tenets are simply unknown to most people, even those professionally dealing with religions. And I'd like to see abstract consideration of sets, and the way numbers of people interact, to produce results abstract to remove natural biases. There have been some attempts to analyse power logically, 'socionomy' rather than sociology, attempting to flesh out the skeletal material of official statistics. But names such as Pitirim Sorokin and Lewis Fry Richardson and Quincy Wright, now seem ancient, and are in any case pre-date computers. It may well be found that Jews (and/or Muslims) per head were the most deadly people who ever lived, so it's predictable they will oppose such studies.
Source: index.html#vaxxed
Reprise: Some notes towards understanding 'Jews':
Paper money/ e-money as the root of Jewish influence of the last few centuries 'Money' traditionally was something fairly portable, fairly durable, fairly subdivisible, fairly rare, and fairly valuable: metals, thin gold sheets, 'precious' stones, shells, flint. The usual view is that prehistoric societies had not invented money, and that barter necessarily preceded money, assuming there wasn't simple theft or purely local tradition. Money may have been suggested by barter—amber, ermine, copper, traded at the margins of two geographical zones. Any form of money must have social affects, which have to be liked, or tolerated: for example, owners of gold or silver mines had obvious advantages, but also problems, of wealth and security respectively. There would have to be people, and their equipment, technically competent to make, analyse, cast etc gold. And the distribution and physical control of money must have had consequences: counting-houses, secret security locations, etc. And no doubt there were strange consequences: large accumulations of money to some groups, with probable redistributive counter-measures; mercenaries and hired killers; interest payments where time periods were important—large-scale buildings, ships, seasonal food.
Paper money needs some form of trust, and some form of legal or other enforcement. The usual histories say it was a development from goldsmiths issuing promises to pay. Another claimed influence was China. Probably kings, landowners, bishops and generally any prominent person would be tempted to issue such notes; with the possibility of failure to repay—King Charles I was well-known to have failed to pay debts. The Fuggers seem to have been the last people to incur huge losses of real money.
However, the important point here is that money as a large-scale enterprise has a different feel from small-time, ordinary everyday money. Most people don't realise this; they are not personally involved with big transactions. It's obvious that a company paying 1,000 employees must have what seems like a huge amount to pay out every week or month. A billionaire may only own the equivalent of one street in a capital city. Pensions to an entire country, student loans, taxes from transport look very different considered in aggregate from the individual view. Britain had until the 1960s a money system perhaps reflecting part of this—pennies being used for small transactions, shillings being 12 pence, and pounds being 240 pence, with a guinea adding another 5%. Indian princes used a 'crore'.
Paper money in its modern form (security printed many special features; and the electronic versions - let's call them 'e-money') is not valueless, as may seem the case; if a government or group can enforce payment, its promises take on a value. This may not last: Russian peasants clutching their roubles after the Jewish coup in 1917, and middle Europeans and African under hyper-inflation, illustrate possible problems. The value is purely a measure of legal strength, itself related to military power.
Problems with Jewish control of paper money/ e-money occur because most people have no understanding of what happens. For example, borrowing by governments is traditionally at interest. This is understandable when they borrow gold; but with the Fed and 'Bank of England', where the cost of manufacturing money is small, there's a huge revenue which gives the controllers of paper money enormous power, which may be abused. (Suppose a security printer can make $10 notes for 10 cents in bulk. Then 3% of face value of $10 is 3 cents, paid every year. But this is about a third of the true cost of printing them—33% ish return each year. This is why Jewish controllers of paper money love to rack up more and more debt). Another example is illustrated by the chart: M3 is a well-known definition of 'money supply', covering cash and balances and fairly liquid types of 'money'. Varying M3 has subtle effects on entire economies. The figures were deliberately discontinued (as a 'cost cutting' measure; the blue line is a later estimate) by Jews in the USA to make tracking M3 difficult.
Typical consequences are that Jews, by selectively giving money to other Jews, allow them to take over media, and profitable businesses, in an unstoppable way. They simply have too much financial power. There is therefore a two-tier system of capitalists: most people think of business in the way it would apply to themselves—borrowing from a bank, selling something at more than it cost, and hoping to take a profit. They don't consider printing money, because they can't do it. People conflate 'capitalists' without ever noticing that some are a great deal more equal than others. The same sort of unnoticed consequence applies to e.g. think-tanks, universities, trading in currencies, etc: Jewish cheap money drives out money which has to be earned, and hack writers, hack academics, other currencies can easily be bought. When Soros is reported to be very calm when dealing in money, this is the reason.
Let me draw parallels with Christian organisations: Roman Catholicism has a tradition of hairsplitting and Jesuitry, not unlike Jewish pilpul, and in neither case has anything much resulted. The Church of England historically was fed entirely by Oxbridge graduates in ancient languages; about half these graduates went into the Church, where they were given 'livings', but did little work. Jewish money-funded media hacks (such as the BBC and general 'newspapers') are equally undistinguished and unoriginal.
How to study the effects of control of money ... At the start of this piece I've tried to outline some of the ways in which control of money produces its own special psychology, of which most people are completely ignorant. Examples include: inflation as something wanted because it means more printing of more money; wish to control entire countries to extract money from their bank system; generation of scares by control of the media; buying up of real assets with paper, especially if it is likely to be seen as of reduced value; manipulating stock exchange prices, as in the well-known case of Rothschild at the end of the 'Napoleonic' wars; squeezing money supply; controlling raw materials so that the costs incurred are far higher than the value of materials.
It takes some mental effort to think oneself into the frame of mind of these rather few people. I wouldn't claim to have complete insight; but it must come to seem fairly natural to them, presumably based on what they think of as sacred books. Non-Jews are in the position of people trying to play chess, or bridge, or poker with experts. I'd like to see puzzles in newspapers replacing crosswords and chess problems with real-world equivalent problems. And I think Jews should be specially studied—it's amazing that their tenets are simply unknown to most people, even those professionally dealing with religions. And I'd like to see abstract consideration of sets, and the way numbers of people interact, to produce results abstract to remove natural biases. There have been some attempts to analyse power logically, 'socionomy' rather than sociology, attempting to flesh out the skeletal material of official statistics. But names such as Pitirim Sorokin and Lewis Fry Richardson and Quincy Wright, now seem ancient, and are in any case pre-date computers. It may well be found that Jews (and/or Muslims) per head were the most deadly people who ever lived, so it's predictable they will oppose such studies.
________
Europe is gone so we would be well instructed to focus on America and maybe even Russia:
Europe is gone so we would be well instructed to focus on America and maybe even Russia:
Related:
Highly recommended follow on reading to enrich your intellectual perspective on the reality of our current circumstances:
Circumstances in Texas and Florida don't feel right with Abbott in Texas and DeSantis in Florida:
Twilight Language, Michael Hoffman's forthcoming book on occult neurolinguistic programming and the alchemical processing of humanity:
Also from Michael Hoffman:
"Mystical Toponony's "Green Witch"
Latitude and Longitude in the Occult Founding of the British Empire including:
• The Bank of England and Its Wars.• The Power that Made Possible the Israeli Conquest of Palestine.• Mrs. Rothschild.• The War on Families in Gaza.•"The Charlatans" - Islam's Ancient Tricksters.• Mr. Spock's Kabbalah Curse.• The Attack on Black Children's Mastery of Math.• Portland's Terrorist High Schoolers.• Machiavellian Tactics of Pope Francis.• Vote Fraud 2020.• The Sons of Sam.• The Most Racist Nation.• NY Times's Revelation of the Method.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.