Saturday, September 27, 2025

Why Do Nazi Associations Still Surface in Modern Contexts?

Editor's note: In the linked essay below it is being suggested that certain surnames—Hoeppner, Waisner, Kellam, and Braun—are connected to Erika Kirk (this is a really bad production), with Braun evoking associations to Eva Braun and, by extension, Hitler (Heller/Hiller). It argues these links are unlikely to be coincidence, pointing to ties between the Hoeppner and Lyon families, and further noting that the Bowes-Lyon family is connected to British royalty. The researcher also highlights a connection to Winter Park, Florida, implying that Charlie Kirk may have married within a Jewish family line. As the author of this essay asks, did Charlie Kirk marry his cousin Erika Kirk? That would be "par for the course." In "Netanyahu and Nazism," Thierry Meyssan argues that Benjamin Netanyahu and certain "Revisionist Zionists" have ideological and historical ties to Nazi ideas and figures—claiming collaborations between Jews and Nazis, including dealings with Adolf Eichmann and shared racial nationalism. These are different sources pointing to recurring references linking prominent figures and movements back to Nazi connections. The first linked essay examines family names surrounding Erika Kirk—such as Braun, associated with Eva Braun and Hitler—along with ties to the Lyon family, British royalty, and overlapping family lines. Thierry Meyssan, explores how Netanyahu and "Revisionist Zionists" have at times been linked to Nazi figures and ideologies. Taken together, these accounts raise an open question: why do such Nazi associations continue to surface in both family histories and political narratives? In the context of the alleged murder of Charlie Kirk what are we looking at here?

The Murder of Charlie Kirk was of course STAGED
________

Netanyahu and Nazism

September 23, 2025 | by Thierry Meyssan

It is shocking to consider that a Jew could be a Nazi. Yet a few rare exceptions were, and received the title of "Honorary Aryan" from the Führer. Vladimir Jabotinsky, the leader of the "Revisionist Zionists," did not receive it, but he shared with the Nazis their racial conception of nationalism. He advocated the founding of a "Jewish Empire" alongside the Third Reich and received support from the Nazi Party. One of his disciples negotiated with Adolf Eichmann the extermination of 450,000 Hungarian Jews in exchange for the emigration of a thousand "Revisionist Zionists." They shared the spoils of their crime. Last month, Benjamin Netanyahu, just before being accused of genocide by the United Nations, claimed to be not a "Zionist," but a "revisionist Zionist."

The "Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories" submitted its report (A/79/363) to the United Nations General Assembly on September 20 [1].

It cautiously names what it observed. It writes, "The facts recorded in the present report lead the Special Committee to conclude that Israeli policies and practices implemented during the period under review display elements characteristic of genocide."

It is now clear to all: the State of Israel, under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu, is committing genocide. One-third of the Israeli population has demonstrated against him, and two-thirds oppose his current military actions. So how did the self-proclaimed "only democracy in the Middle East" get to this point?

To understand this, we must first distinguish between the various Jewish communities in the Diaspora and the Jewish population of Israel. The reactions of each vary greatly, even though Jewish communities as a whole persist in believing that Israel is potentially their "safe haven" in the event of an anti-Semitic threat.

Next, we must acknowledge that Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition government, since December 2022, bears no relation to previous governments. Only the Jews of the European Diaspora have failed to understand this, while those of the American Diaspora, for example, have already massively disassociated themselves from Benjamin Netanyahu's crimes.

Three months after his accession to power, in early March 2023, I explained in these columns [2] that the Israeli government coalition had given itself a roadmap for a gradual coup d’état, the main stages of which I outlined. I also identified the group behind this project: the Revisionist Zionists of Vladimir Jabotinsky (1890-1940) and their American Straussian allies. I explained that the Jewish supremacists Itamar Ben-Gvir (Minister of National Security) and Bezalel Smotrich (Minister of Finance), although claiming to be followers of Rabbi Meir Kahane, were themselves Revisionist Zionists since Kahane was an agent of them in the United States.

Yet, while Jewish communities have always been the scene of heated disputes, they unite in persuading themselves that none of their members ever allied themselves with Nazism. Yet Jews are like other men, and among them, some have allied themselves with the Nazis. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who attempted to address this issue during an interview on Italian television in May 2022, was forced to swallow his remarks. It is true that he had been imprudent enough to speak of Volodymyr Zelensky's Jewishness and not that of Benjamin Netanyahu. However, the two men today share the same ideology, and the remark directed at one could also be directed at the other.

The relationships between revisionist Zionists and fascists on the one hand, and the Nazis on the other, have still not been studied as such. At most, we know that David Ben-Gurion described Jabotinsky as "certainly a fascist and perhaps a Nazi."

Fascism is a cult of violence. Nazism, on the other hand, is an ideology of racial hierarchy. Fascism undertakes massacres, Nazism commits genocides.

• We still have the greatest difficulty addressing Jabotinsky’s relationship with Duce Benito Mussolini. Yet it was under the latter’s auspices that he founded Betar in the suburbs of Rome.

• The Nazis’ relations with the Jews were never completely hostile. Reinhard Heydrich took a stand in Das Schwarze Korps in May 1935 to distinguish between enemies, that is, assimilationist Jews, and friends, namely Jews who favored their emigration to Palestine. He reiterated this distinction several times, including when he organized the "final solution." His aim was not to exterminate all Jews, but only those who did not subscribe to racial theories and who did not aspire to create a "Jewish empire."

From 1933 to 1939, the Nazis allowed German Jews to emigrate to British Mandatory Palestine on the condition that they sell their property in Germany and recoup its value in the form of German exports to Palestine. Revisionist Zionists were the main promoters of this agreement (known as the "Haavara Agreement," or "Transfer Agreement"), which was reviled by most of the diaspora [3].
In 1934, SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein traveled to Palestine, where he was 
received by Ben-Gurion. This medal bears the inscription: "A Nazi goes to Palestine
and does not speak in'Der Angriff'." Von Mildenstein subsequently recruited
Eichmann to organize the "Final Solution" convoys.

• In April 1935, the Nazi authorities authorized Betar to wear black uniforms because they considered this movement the best supporter of these agreements [4].

• In an interview with Joseph Goebbels’s daily newspaper Der Angriff (The Attack) in September 1935, the Revisionist Zionist banker Georg Kareski defended the Nuremberg Racial Laws. He explained that they were in line with the laws proposed by the Revisionist Zionists: "The Nuremberg Laws of September 15, 1935, apart from their constitutional provisions, seem to me to be entirely in line with such mutual respect for the specificity of each people. The interruption of the process of dissolution of many Jewish communities, encouraged by mixed marriages, is, from a Jewish point of view, entirely welcome. For the establishment of a Jewish national existence in Palestine, these factors, religion and family, are of decisive importance."

Please go to Voltaire Network to continue reading.
________


Alex Jones does a Hitler impersonation:

Alex Jones Conducts "Becoming Hitler" Social Experiment!


This is always a possibility:

RED ALERT! Israel Plotting False Flag on US Soil to Cover Up Charlie Kirk Assassination and Ignite War


Doesn't it seem as though the reason for the existence of Israel is to remove the Islamic leadership of Iran?

'No doubt they will attack': Max Blumenthal meets Iran's President in NYC

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...