Alexander Hamilton and Abraham Lincoln advanced a...

Editor's note: ...centralized financial and political system modeled on British practices that ultimately served the interests of the City of London. Hamilton created a funded national debt, a national bank patterned after the Bank of England (BoE), and policies favoring industrial development and federal power, while Lincoln used wartime authority to establish the National Banking System, greenbacks, high tariffs, and measures that broke the power of Southern agrarian interests. These actions permanently shifted the America away from a decentralized Jeffersonian republic of sovereign states toward a credit-based, New York-centered commercial and financial order with this same architecture continuing to underpin modern American finance. The British are consummate adepts at the black arts of news reporting and PSYOP operations. Considering Aaron Burr who shot Hamilton fled back to London and that it is alleged Abraham Lincoln's "assassination" was staged (a manufactured event), could these events be considered PSYOPS to create "martyrs" in order to attach the British central banking model to America?
________

Hamilton and Lincoln Were the Bad Guys?

By E.M. Burlingame | August 22, 2026

This is an unpopular opinion I am reluctantly coming to more and more—namely, that Hamilton and Lincoln were working for the City of London and were, in fact, bad guys, traitors to the Republic even:

Look at the actions and the structures they left standing. The official stories emphasize necessity, patriotism, and later success. The ledger of what they actually did, and what those acts produced, is different.

Hamilton's program was not abstract theory. He funded the Revolutionary and Confederation debts at (or near) par, assumed the state debts, and created a class of public creditors whose fortunes were now tied to the federal government's solvency and expansion. Speculators who had bought the paper cheap from original holders—often soldiers and farmers—were made whole. He then chartered the First Bank of the United States on the Bank of England model: privately directed, government-linked, issuer of notes, fiscal agent. He invoked implied powers to get it done. He pushed tariffs and a Report on Manufactures that treated industrial development as a national project requiring federal direction.

The immediate results were creditworthiness and liquid securities markets. Foreign capital, much of it from London and Amsterdam, flowed in. New York began its rise as a financial center. The longer results were a permanent funded national debt treated as an instrument of state power, a banking system that concentrated influence among a relatively small group of urban financiers, and a federal government with the fiscal machinery to act like a European great power. Jefferson's agrarian, state-centered republic lost the economic contest. The "national blessing" of funded debt became the template. Later central banking, from the Second Bank through the National Banking System to the Fed, sits on that foundation.

Lincoln's actions completed the shift. He used war to prevent secession and then used the war's emergency to enact the National Banking Acts. National banks were required to hold U.S. bonds as the basis for their note issue. A prohibitive tax was placed on state-bank notes. The old decentralized state-banking system was subordinated or crushed. Greenbacks introduced government-issued fiat. Protective tariffs were raised and kept high. Massive federal land grants went to railroads. An income tax and internal-revenue machinery appeared. The Southern planter class—the last major competing power base of landed wealth and state-sovereignty claims—was broken by invasion, emancipation without compensation, and Reconstruction.

What followed was not restoration of the pre-1861 compact. It was a more centralized fiscal-military state, a national currency and debt market, and financial power increasingly routed through New York. The National Banking System created a reserve hierarchy that funneled funds toward Wall Street. Panics continued (1873, 1893, 1907), but the architecture now favored national banks and federal debt. The political economy that emerged was industrial, protectionist, and credit-based. The Jeffersonian/Jacksonian alternative—limited federal power, state banking, low tariffs, agrarian weight—did not recover. By the Gilded Age the United States was operating as a Hamiltonian commercial republic. The later Federal Reserve was an evolution, not a rupture.

The City of London connection is structural, not a spy novel. The techniques Hamilton copied—funded debt, a privileged bank of issue, a market in government securities—were British. Early American credit depended on European (heavily British and Dutch) buyers. After 1865 British capital financed much of the railroad and industrial expansion that the new national system enabled. The United States adopted the playbook, scaled it, on behalf of the City of London. That is how financial systems actually own and control all: by imitation of working machinery and by capital flows, not by secret commissions.

Both men died before the full settlement was visible. Hamilton was killed in 1804 while Jeffersonians still held the presidency and the system remained contested. Lincoln was killed in 1865 as Reconstruction and the Gilded Age industrial-financial order were only beginning. Martyrdom made it easier to treat the new structures as sacred rather than as the product of specific policy choices that transferred power from states and landed interests to the federal government and its allied financiers and industrialists. Reputation campaigns built on the story of a martyred man were proliferated by British-backed publishers and press, both direct to the public and through control of schoolhouse curriculums.

The Revolution's political independence was real. The financial and federal order that replaced the old republic of relatively sovereign states was Hamiltonian, then Lincolnian. That is what the actions produced. And now our masters seek to not restore to us what our Founding Fathers gave us, but to refinance this imperial system embedded by two dead men and many others since.

And this: Stop looking at what the official histories say and start looking at what actually happened. The two are rarely the same. Our enslavement is in what happened, not in what has been written about it. PsyOps did not begin in this century or the last. They began long ago.
________


Alexander Hamilton: British Pilgrim Spy and Saboteur

Alexander Hamilton: British Spy No. 7 Betrayed America's Fledgling Banks to His Bank of England / Monarch's Privy Council Back-Channels

May 20, 2022 | By AIM

Fig. 1—Alexander Hamilton, Esq. (b. 1757, d. 1804) conspired with his British Crown handlers to ensure that America's first banks were copies of the Bank of England regarding usury, debt-slavery and fiat currency. Then, as the banks were funded, he organized 80% of the stock of the First Bank of the United States to be owned by foreign banks—mostly British, including Rothschilds, but also including Baring Bros., Hope Co., and Hottinguer Cie. America has never controlled her banks

British debt slavery was hardwired into American banking from 1781

Hamilton's opium-human trafficking co-conspiracy has been blacked out of American banking history; they include: Cruger, Church, Carter, Schuyler, Manning, Vaughan, Baring, Bevan, Barclays, King's College (Columbia), Johnson, the Inner Temple (London), Rothschilds and Laurens

At this same time M.A. Rothschild was funding Hessian mercenaries, the Illuminati and Sabbatian Frankism.

Hamilton copied the Bank of England charter in the First Bank of the United States (1791)

Did Washington, Jefferson and Adams know about Hamilton's extensive British banking back-channels? Not likely. His Bank of England handlers pre-dated his move to America.

Anglophile Hamilton secretly coordinated U.S. bank charters with the Bank of England

80% of his First Bank of the United States investors were British-controlled: Rothschilds, Baring & Sons, Hope & Co., Hottinguer & Co.

Only now—as 300-year old historical databases are being liberated from library stacks—is this sinister picture emerging.

See also previous post: AFI. (Apr. 22, 2022). Why is the musical Hamilton so popular with the radical communist left? Americans for Innovation.

Alexander Hamilton was British Spy No. 7

Fig. 2—Major (later General Sir) George Beckwith's agent cipher. Beckwith was the British spy chief during the American Revolution and afterwards; Douglas Brymner (1823-1902), Archivist. (1890). Report on Canadian archives, 1890, 325 pgs., pp. xli, xlii, urn: oclc: record: 262476117, published 1904. Public Archives of Canada.

See also S. Tomokiyo. (Aug. 26, 2009). Rotating Grille for Alexander Hamilton. Cryptiana.

May 20, 2022 — The foundation of the American republic's first banks were largely delegated to Alexander Hamilton.

Hamilton became the first U.S. Secretary of the Treasury (Sep. 11, 1789 to Jan. 31, 1795) under George Washington and oversaw the first four banks that he created.

Despite these conflicts of interest—highlighted at the time—Hamilton plowed through, silencing and sidelining his critics, bolstered by the most powerful British bankers and human-opium trafficking sycophants of the age.

Please go to AIM to review images and to learn more.
________


Related:

Americans are going to have to converge...

The Pirate City of London and the Central Banking Apparatus Ripping America Apart Today - What Is Hillary Clinton Up to?

Facing the financial consequences with Scott Bessant of what has just been republished above: