________
Source: Hexzane527
'Covid-19' and World War III
mercredi 4 août 2021 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)
At the beginning of the Covid-19 case, I quickly saw the most obvious goals of the elite. Namely:
Source: Hexzane527
'Covid-19' and World War III
mercredi 4 août 2021 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)
At the beginning of the Covid-19 case, I quickly saw the most obvious goals of the elite. Namely:
To continue to maintain the fear of microbial diseases.Introduce even more tyrannical laws.Sell a vaccine.Justify a drop in the stock market, then a rise in it.
But well, it was the run of the mill regarding conspirationism. So, it wasn't very exciting.
But in the last few months, some interesting developments have taken place.
All of a sudden, there was negative information about vaccines that came out in the official media. Normally, such a thing should never have happened. The rule in the mainstream media is not to talk about dissident information, except possibly to challenge it.
So, suddenly, we can understand other, more important purposes of the case for the elite.
All of a sudden, there was negative information about vaccines that came out in the official media. Normally, such a thing should never have happened. The rule in the mainstream media is not to talk about dissident information, except possibly to challenge it.
So, suddenly, we can understand other, more important purposes of the case for the elite.
Note: regarding the medical aspect of the case, I consider that the Covid-19 virus does not exist and that no virus exists. And the epidemic is obviously completely bogus. The deaths were stolen from other diseases or caused by the doctors. I won't go into that because it's obvious to advanced conspiracy theorists. And quite a few sites have studied the problem. It's the political side that is interesting to analyze in this case.
Note 2: here is the french version of this text, in pdf.
1) Increasing the number of conspirationists and strengthening the opposition between conspirationists and non-conspirationists
As we have seen in this blog, World War III will oppose the "anti-illuminati/Muslim" conspirationist camp to the "ordinary people/nationalists" camp. For that to happen, the conspirationist camp has to become important. At present, it is still a small group. So the elite must bring many people to conspirationism by making it more mainstream. If only sites labeled as conspirationists disseminate information of this kind, the movement will remain embryonic. Therefore, in order to develop it, the official media and even the governments must become relays of conspirationism.
So, the different information spread in the official media questioning the safety of this or that vaccine will allow the conspirationist camp to be reinforced. The same goes for certain governmental decisions. This brings the anti-vaccine movement, and therefore the conspirationist movement, out of its marginality.
It will also create an additional source of opposition between the two camps. The conspirationists will refuse the vaccine, and as a result, the "normal people" will resent them and consider them dangerous. After all the restrictions and the relatives who died or got sick from the covid, it will seem unacceptable to them that people refuse the vaccine.
On the other hand, tyrannical measures will be taken against those who refuse the vaccine, which will lead to strong opposition from the conspirationists. Opposition against the government, but also against the people who approve of the government.
So, it's going to escalate on both sides.
Here are some examples of the information that has appeared in the official media.
After the introduction of the first vaccines, the newspapers started to talk about the side effects. Before, they hardly ever did so. For example, an article in Futura Science on March 3, 2021 was entitled "Vaccines against Covid-19: the true and false of side effects". An article in Femme Actuelle on March 2, 2021 was titled "Side effects, how to get vaccinated: everything you need to know about the Covid-19 vaccine". Another on Marie-Claire of February 25, 2021: "Covid-19: what possible side effects with AstraZeneca's vaccine?". And there were dozens of them in the mainstream newspapers. There was even a government portal in France for reporting side effects for anti-covid vaccines. The portal was widely publicized at the time of its creation. This is something that, to all appearances, had never been done before for vaccines. This is presented as a sign of openness. But in reality, it is to favor the opposition between pro and anti vaccines. If even the government recognizes that there are side effects, it obviously does not encourage confidence in the safety of the vaccine.
It is done with subtleties of course. It is meant to be reassuring, but the elite knows that the simple fact of talking about side effects will push many people towards a beginning of questioning, and thus a beginning of conspirationism. That's why the rule, until now, was not to talk about it, except sometimes, to make people who question the harmlessness of vaccines feel guilty to death.
And it worked well. The general public was totally in line with the official word. And those who questioned the safety of vaccines were considered by almost everyone as conspirationist nuts. Now, all of a sudden, by publishing articles everywhere about the dangers of this or that anti-covid vaccine, this conspirationism is spreading to a part of the general public, feeding the anti-illuminati camp with future troops.
And the dangerousness of some of these vaccines has been magnificently confirmed by the withdrawal of the AstraZeneca vaccine from 11 countries in Europe in early March 2021. If that doesn't confirm the conspirationist narrative, what does?
Why would governments that are known to be entirely in favor of the elite introduce a vaccine and then withdraw it? On the face of it, it doesn't make sense. Unless it was planned from the start and the reason for this action was to develop the conspirationist clan by gradually pushing a part of the ordinary people towards this movement.
And the fact that the vaccines were released in a very short time also led to doubts about their safety. This too was intentional.
Also, the story that some of the vaccines are of a new kind, with RNA, was specifically designed to worry ordinary people about possible side effects. And this is also exploited on the conspirationist side to make people believe that it will cause mutations.
Regarding the anti-democratic measures, there has been the obligation to wear masks in the open air and in meeting places. The same goes for the confinement and the curfew. But most people didn't mind because they knew it was temporary.
But, more importantly, we now have the vaccine or health pass. This too will create a major source of opposition between ordinary people and the skeptics. It is either an infringement of the freedom to dispose of your own body, or an infringement of the freedom of movement and the freedom of assembly. And in any case, it is an attack on the equality of citizens, a real health apartheid. And it looks like it's going to be around for quite a while. So there's really something to push the pro and the anti against each other.
In any case, on the one hand, we have official information that makes many ordinary people become conspirationist, and that makes those who were already conspirationist become even more so. We also have dictatorial measures that lead a part of the population to revolt and push them towards conspirationism. And on the other hand, we have ordinary people who are being panicked and turned against conspirationists. This will be one more source of opposition between the two camps that will face each other in the third world war.
We also understand why there were 3 waves, the containment and the various variants of the so-called virus. This was necessary to impose the idea of a health pass. If there had been only one wave, a large part of the population would have been against it. If there had not been the containment and therefore the catastrophe of the blocking of the economy for a long time, it would have been the same thing. And if there had not been the threat that the situation would continue because of the variants, ditto. All of this has helped to put the population in the right psychological situation to accept the health pass, that is to say, the new restriction of freedom that will participate in the opposition between the pro and the anti.
2) Limiting travel between countries, in order to limit immigration?
Another important element that comes with Covid-19 is the limitation of travel, and even the closing of borders.
The problem is that if the elite allow immigration to continue into Europe and the US, the white race will eventually disappear as miscegenation spreads. Or, without disappearing, the number of white people will be greatly impacted. But the objective of the elite is the opposite.
What we can think is that, either in the plan of the elite, the increase in the number of immigrants and of mixed-race people is perfectly calculated so that at the current rate of immigration and of mixing, there will be the exact number of both types of populations wanted by the elite just at the time of the outbreak of the war. Or there is a time lag. The number of mestizos will be optimal at the time of the war but the number of immigrants will be optimal before (thus, they will be in excess at the time of the war), or the opposite. A priori, it is rather the immigration that will be too high at the beginning of the war. Besides, immigration can be easily controlled, whereas miscegenation is more difficult. If we are in this second configuration, it is rather on this parameter that the elite will play, and thus the plan contains a moment where there will be a blockage of immigration.
Now, a priori, the closure of the borders following covid19 is only temporary. So, if such a tool is used to limit immigration, it will not be used now, since it is necessary to have a measure that lasts several years for it to be effective against immigration. But the idea is there and the thing has already been done during covid. So, in the future, the elite may close the borders because of a pandemic around 2030 or 2040. And in the media, the doctors who are under control are already preparing us for other pandemics.
If Ebola has been localized in Africa, it is perhaps for this reason. That said, whether it is Ebola or another disease, the elite will certainly not limit the epidemic to Africa. That would be too obvious a blow. There will be other areas involved so that no one will suspect that it is African immigration that is targeted.
The health pass and the variant story can also be used for this. The elite could say that Africa, which has been relatively unaffected by Covid-19 until now, has experienced a very strong resurgence of the epidemic because of a Covid variant. Or they can use another disease. And since fraud is an extremely widespread problem in these countries, it will seem logical to reject a large number of applicants for immigration because of invalid vaccination certificates. In this variant of the scenario, there will be no need to close the borders. It will be enough to reject individuals on a case-by-case basis. Except that, in reality, more than 90% of the immigrants will be refused. But, with this way of doing things, the rejection rate will remain hidden from the people and it will be more difficult for them to oppose this policy.
Besides, the Elite could hunt down illegal immigrants for pandemic reasons. They could put them in camps before deporting them, all because of the lack of a health pass or an invalid pass.
And since this is not a political problem, but a medical one, people will not think that it is in fact done to limit immigration. Especially since this decision will be taken by governments from the right as well as from the center or from the left (as it was the case for Covid-19).
Now, this is only one of the solutions found by the elite to limit immigration. The election of right-wing populists is also a solution in some countries. In the US, Trump's wall is a step towards that. It's true that with the election of Biden, there is a risk that it will be dismantled. But, apparently, Biden just wants to stop building it. He's not talking about destroying what's already been done. And we saw that for Britain, the solution was Brexit.
But a pandemic is a much more global solution, usable by many more countries, and that without people being able to link it to a global policy change regarding immigration.
Now, it is also possible that the elite's plan is perfectly calibrated regarding immigration (no lag) and therefore they don't use fake epidemics to restrict population movements before WW3. But this is a possibility to watch.
3) The elimination of the elderly
It is a fact that the elderly accounted for the largest number of deaths in Covid-19.
So, question: "Did the elderly die more than in a normal year?" Given that anything can be doubted with the elite, it is also possible that most of the elderly in question would have died very quickly anyway without Covid-19.
But, on the face of it, I don't think so. In my opinion, there was an over-mortality of old people because of the hysteria instilled in the medical profession. Besides, this is not something that should put off the elite. They kill tens of millions of people every year with the cancer scam, the diabetes scam, the hypertension scam, the treatment of various microbial diseases, etc. So if they don't have any qualms about doing it, adding a few million more around the world must not have been a problem. Of course, I could be wrong. But whether or not this is true is not the main point of this analysis. What is important is that at least a part of the people believes it. Again, this is related to the third world war. Indeed, it seems clear to me that the goal here is to give an additional reason to the anti-illuminati to oppose the power in place.
This can be seen from the reactions of the elite-controlled anti-illuminati sites. A few have suggested that Covid-19 has led to the slaughter of the elderly. It hasn't been the most prominent thing. But it was brought up.
This is what happened, for example, on the Bouddhanar site, a French anti-illuminati site set up by the elite. We have for example the following article from April 12, 2020:
Or this one, from September 1, 2020:
Now, one could say that as epidemics do not occur very often, the usefulness of massacring a part of the elderly via the covid19 scam is rather limited. It's a bit of a one-shot gun. If the rise to power of the anti-illuminati/Muslim alliance happens in 25 years, the killing of old people during covid19 will no longer be an important issue by then. It will be a thing of the past.
That's true. But, it may be part of a larger and more ongoing plan.
Indeed, we have seen for a little over 10 years that the elite is pushing the concept of euthanasia very strongly. They are pushing through laws on this subject at full speed. And they are using all their propaganda to make it look progressive and to make it look like everybody wants to be euthanized and that at the moment, most people who are about to die are undergoing therapeutic harassment and have to struggle to get doctors to agree to pull the plug.
And this is not limited to a few countries. Laws allowing euthanasia have been passed in most Western countries. By 2021, almost all of Western Europe accepts passive euthanasia (see Wikipedia). This is also the case in North America, Australia, Argentina, Colombia and India.
The reason for the euthanasia project is once again the third world war. Because, in the same way as with Covid-19, it will allow the oppositions between conspirationists and ordinary people to be stirred up. Indeed, even at fairly low levels of conspirationism, it looks very much like a dystopian and even a Satanist project. Of course, for ordinary people, it seems like progress, because it avoids the supposedly therapeutic harassment. But, for people who are a little more advanced, it is quite clear that it will mainly allow the extermination of old people. And if that's not obvious enough for them, the conspirationist sites run by the elite will "enlighten" them.
And so the anti-illuminati will oppose it.
In fact, the subject has been discussed by elite-controlled anti-illuminati sites and agents of influence for a long time. For example, in 2008, the agent of influence Alain Soral spoke about it in France (here, on radio Ici et Maintenant, March 29, 2008):
And on his site "Egalité et Réconciliation", we find about fifteen or twenty articles on the subject since 2013. There were:
So, the purpose of the euthanasia project is not to slaughter old people per se; it is to give an additional motivation to the anti-illuminati to fight against the power in place.
From there, we can think of the following. Maybe the slaughter of the elderly is very secondary in the Covid-19 project, maybe not. It all depends on whether it is part of a larger project of inventing diseases that largely target the elderly. If other epidemics are invented by the elite in the next 25 or 30 years, with the objective of massacring the old, and if eventually these diseases are not transient (no vaccine or drug), then this project will have almost as much importance as the euthanasia project regarding the elimination of the old and the denunciation of this project by anti-illuminati. And it will mean in retrospect that the killing of the elderly was important in the Covid-19 project.
Even if these diseases are only temporary because they are "cured" by a vaccine or a drug, it will still be of interest to the elite. Indeed, epidemics will allow to have a peak of killings of old people (and euthanasia will allow to have a permanent project). Placed at the right time, a false epidemic could be the element or one of the elements that will turn opinion to the conspirationist/Muslim side, and bring this one to power. And of course, the fact that there are new liberticidal laws like the ones we had with Covid-19 will participate in this.
And it would be surprising that the massacre of the elderly was mentioned for Covid-19 if it was not destined to be followed by other diseases targeting the elderly. If euthanasia was the important project in relation to the elimination of the elderly and Covid-19 was just a one-off, the elite-controlled conspirationist sites would not have mentioned this issue in the last few months. If they did, it is probable that in won't be an isolated affair.
The main explanation that will be given to the conspirationists at the beginning is the fact that for the elite, an old person is a useless person, a financial burden. And with the aging of the population, there are more and more of them. So, the elite would seek to kill the elderly to pay for their retirement for as little time as possible and to reduce end-of-life care expenses.
The problem is that the elite can achieve the same result by forcing people to work longer and reducing the amount of their retirement. And then they can easily erode pensions through inflation and other indirect means. Finally, if it had been a financial problem, the elite simply would not have created a pension system in the first place, 60 or 70 years ago, or else a much less advantageous system.
So financial motivation is clearly not the reason here.
Moreover, what must be considered, regarding euthanasia, is that in reality, it has already been practiced on a large scale for at least 100 years in hospitals. Indeed, if the doctors consider that the patient is terminally ill, they kill him with the following triptych: massive administration of opiates, stop of feeding, stop of hydration. And medicine is already reducing life expectancy through false diagnoses and harmful treatments. So the elite don't really need to formalize it to practice it.
By making it official, it will kill people a little earlier, but not much earlier: maybe a year, two at the most. If a person has cancer, two years before death, he or she is usually still well enough not to ask for euthanasia. A priori, the interest of making euthanasia legal is limited to shortening life expectancy. Therefore, the real goal is not to shorten the life of the elderly. If it were, the elite would seek to reduce it much more.
The other explanation offered for euthanasia in conspirationist circles will be that the elite are Satanists and want to create a kind of hell on earth. But this will be reserved for the more advanced conspirationists at first. Then it will filter down to a more moderate part of the conspirationists, so that the union with the Muslims can take place.
A reflection that one can make is that, in fact, it is rather the epidemic, or more generally the disease that is interesting to shorten the life of the elderly in a relatively important way, not really euthanasia, since the latter only allows to shorten life by 1 or 2 years on average. Whereas you can very well have bogus diseases that supposedly affect mainly the elderly and shorten their life expectancy by 4 or 5 years or even more, this without official euthanasia (but with unofficial euthanasia). Of course, it is even better with both together. But it can very well be done with diseases only.
There is one reason why the elite should use only diseases, and that is discretion. Normally, the elite should want to shorten people's lives discreetly, so that the people don't object (because here we are talking about a massacre that concerns everyone in the long run). Now, as much as with euthanasia, the will to eliminate old people is quite easy to see (especially in the current context of the rise of conspirationism), as much as with diseases, it can go very unnoticed, even in this context. So, logically, they should only have recourse to inventions of diseases, and not at all to euthanasia. But this is not what they do. They emphasize euthanasia as well as diseases. And currently, they are even emphasizing euthanasia more than diseases (Covid-19 being an isolated case for the moment). So they obviously want their goal of slaughtering old people to be seen. Then, either it's because they feel so powerful that they are not afraid of people noticing. But even then, it's quite dangerous, because it concerns everyone. Or it is because the real goal is that some people (here, the anti-illuminati) realize that this is a will to massacre the aged and oppose the project.
And even for the only disease aimed mainly at the elderly that it has so far launched (Covid-19), the elite has ensured that its desire to eliminate them is seen in certain countries (especially in France, apparently). Indeed, in France, it was the Ritrovil affair (a drug of the benzodiazepine class) that sparked things off, with decree 20-20-360 (of March 28, 2020). In short, the government temporarily authorized Ritrovil to be used in EHPADs for the sedation of elderly people at the end of life, whereas normally it could only be used in hospitals. Of course, this facilitated the elimination of the elderly via lethal sedation, since they did not need to be transported to hospitals to do so. And immediately, the conspirationist sites under control talked about it and denounced a will to euthanize the old. And the mainstream sites responded to the conspirationists, thus informing the non-conspirationist masses of the controversy. But the elite could have killed the elderly en masse without this decree. So, the purpose of the decree was really to make the elite's desire to kill the old visible, and to provoke a reaction.
Anyway, even without Ritrovil, this desire to kill old people was put forward by several conspirationist sites which are under control. Indeed, since many have taken up the theories that there is no Covid-19 virus and therefore no epidemic, the logical conclusion was necessarily that it was a conspiracy and that one of the goals was the elimination of a part of the old people. So, since these sites are under the control of the elite, it means once again, that the elite wanted people to be aware of this will to eliminate the old people.
In short, if the elite is not trying to eliminate the elderly in a hidden way, although it could very well do so, it shows that its objective is to make a part of the people aware of it, and then to oppose it.
Another detail, euthanasia will be presented as an idea brought by the Jews and the Freemasons. That's why in France, the Jew Jacques Attali, the eminence grise of the left, presented the idea of euthanasia as something normal and even desirable (since it was presented as a fundamental freedom), at the beginning of the 80s. This can be read in his book "The Future of Life", published in 1981, pages 274-275:
Last detail, euthanasia has to involve many countries for it to give the impression to the anti-illuminatis that it is part of the conspiracy. If euthanasia only involved two or three countries, it would not be consistent with the idea of a world conspiracy.
On the other hand, Muslim countries will not normally adopt this measure. It will make it look like the elite is not in control of the whole world and that there is a real opposition between the West and the Muslim world. When in reality, all sides are controlled by the same elite.
Please go to Hexzane527 to read the entire essay.
So, suddenly, we can understand other, more important purposes of the case for the elite.
All of a sudden, there was negative information about vaccines that came out in the official media. Normally, such a thing should never have happened. The rule in the mainstream media is not to talk about dissident information, except possibly to challenge it.
So, suddenly, we can understand other, more important purposes of the case for the elite.
Note: regarding the medical aspect of the case, I consider that the Covid-19 virus does not exist and that no virus exists. And the epidemic is obviously completely bogus. The deaths were stolen from other diseases or caused by the doctors. I won't go into that because it's obvious to advanced conspiracy theorists. And quite a few sites have studied the problem. It's the political side that is interesting to analyze in this case.
Note 2: here is the french version of this text, in pdf.
1) Increasing the number of conspirationists and strengthening the opposition between conspirationists and non-conspirationists
As we have seen in this blog, World War III will oppose the "anti-illuminati/Muslim" conspirationist camp to the "ordinary people/nationalists" camp. For that to happen, the conspirationist camp has to become important. At present, it is still a small group. So the elite must bring many people to conspirationism by making it more mainstream. If only sites labeled as conspirationists disseminate information of this kind, the movement will remain embryonic. Therefore, in order to develop it, the official media and even the governments must become relays of conspirationism.
So, the different information spread in the official media questioning the safety of this or that vaccine will allow the conspirationist camp to be reinforced. The same goes for certain governmental decisions. This brings the anti-vaccine movement, and therefore the conspirationist movement, out of its marginality.
It will also create an additional source of opposition between the two camps. The conspirationists will refuse the vaccine, and as a result, the "normal people" will resent them and consider them dangerous. After all the restrictions and the relatives who died or got sick from the covid, it will seem unacceptable to them that people refuse the vaccine.
On the other hand, tyrannical measures will be taken against those who refuse the vaccine, which will lead to strong opposition from the conspirationists. Opposition against the government, but also against the people who approve of the government.
So, it's going to escalate on both sides.
Here are some examples of the information that has appeared in the official media.
After the introduction of the first vaccines, the newspapers started to talk about the side effects. Before, they hardly ever did so. For example, an article in Futura Science on March 3, 2021 was entitled "Vaccines against Covid-19: the true and false of side effects". An article in Femme Actuelle on March 2, 2021 was titled "Side effects, how to get vaccinated: everything you need to know about the Covid-19 vaccine". Another on Marie-Claire of February 25, 2021: "Covid-19: what possible side effects with AstraZeneca's vaccine?". And there were dozens of them in the mainstream newspapers. There was even a government portal in France for reporting side effects for anti-covid vaccines. The portal was widely publicized at the time of its creation. This is something that, to all appearances, had never been done before for vaccines. This is presented as a sign of openness. But in reality, it is to favor the opposition between pro and anti vaccines. If even the government recognizes that there are side effects, it obviously does not encourage confidence in the safety of the vaccine.
It is done with subtleties of course. It is meant to be reassuring, but the elite knows that the simple fact of talking about side effects will push many people towards a beginning of questioning, and thus a beginning of conspirationism. That's why the rule, until now, was not to talk about it, except sometimes, to make people who question the harmlessness of vaccines feel guilty to death.
And it worked well. The general public was totally in line with the official word. And those who questioned the safety of vaccines were considered by almost everyone as conspirationist nuts. Now, all of a sudden, by publishing articles everywhere about the dangers of this or that anti-covid vaccine, this conspirationism is spreading to a part of the general public, feeding the anti-illuminati camp with future troops.
And the dangerousness of some of these vaccines has been magnificently confirmed by the withdrawal of the AstraZeneca vaccine from 11 countries in Europe in early March 2021. If that doesn't confirm the conspirationist narrative, what does?
Why would governments that are known to be entirely in favor of the elite introduce a vaccine and then withdraw it? On the face of it, it doesn't make sense. Unless it was planned from the start and the reason for this action was to develop the conspirationist clan by gradually pushing a part of the ordinary people towards this movement.
And the fact that the vaccines were released in a very short time also led to doubts about their safety. This too was intentional.
Also, the story that some of the vaccines are of a new kind, with RNA, was specifically designed to worry ordinary people about possible side effects. And this is also exploited on the conspirationist side to make people believe that it will cause mutations.
Regarding the anti-democratic measures, there has been the obligation to wear masks in the open air and in meeting places. The same goes for the confinement and the curfew. But most people didn't mind because they knew it was temporary.
But, more importantly, we now have the vaccine or health pass. This too will create a major source of opposition between ordinary people and the skeptics. It is either an infringement of the freedom to dispose of your own body, or an infringement of the freedom of movement and the freedom of assembly. And in any case, it is an attack on the equality of citizens, a real health apartheid. And it looks like it's going to be around for quite a while. So there's really something to push the pro and the anti against each other.
In any case, on the one hand, we have official information that makes many ordinary people become conspirationist, and that makes those who were already conspirationist become even more so. We also have dictatorial measures that lead a part of the population to revolt and push them towards conspirationism. And on the other hand, we have ordinary people who are being panicked and turned against conspirationists. This will be one more source of opposition between the two camps that will face each other in the third world war.
We also understand why there were 3 waves, the containment and the various variants of the so-called virus. This was necessary to impose the idea of a health pass. If there had been only one wave, a large part of the population would have been against it. If there had not been the containment and therefore the catastrophe of the blocking of the economy for a long time, it would have been the same thing. And if there had not been the threat that the situation would continue because of the variants, ditto. All of this has helped to put the population in the right psychological situation to accept the health pass, that is to say, the new restriction of freedom that will participate in the opposition between the pro and the anti.
2) Limiting travel between countries, in order to limit immigration?
Another important element that comes with Covid-19 is the limitation of travel, and even the closing of borders.
The problem is that if the elite allow immigration to continue into Europe and the US, the white race will eventually disappear as miscegenation spreads. Or, without disappearing, the number of white people will be greatly impacted. But the objective of the elite is the opposite.
What we can think is that, either in the plan of the elite, the increase in the number of immigrants and of mixed-race people is perfectly calculated so that at the current rate of immigration and of mixing, there will be the exact number of both types of populations wanted by the elite just at the time of the outbreak of the war. Or there is a time lag. The number of mestizos will be optimal at the time of the war but the number of immigrants will be optimal before (thus, they will be in excess at the time of the war), or the opposite. A priori, it is rather the immigration that will be too high at the beginning of the war. Besides, immigration can be easily controlled, whereas miscegenation is more difficult. If we are in this second configuration, it is rather on this parameter that the elite will play, and thus the plan contains a moment where there will be a blockage of immigration.
Now, a priori, the closure of the borders following covid19 is only temporary. So, if such a tool is used to limit immigration, it will not be used now, since it is necessary to have a measure that lasts several years for it to be effective against immigration. But the idea is there and the thing has already been done during covid. So, in the future, the elite may close the borders because of a pandemic around 2030 or 2040. And in the media, the doctors who are under control are already preparing us for other pandemics.
If Ebola has been localized in Africa, it is perhaps for this reason. That said, whether it is Ebola or another disease, the elite will certainly not limit the epidemic to Africa. That would be too obvious a blow. There will be other areas involved so that no one will suspect that it is African immigration that is targeted.
The health pass and the variant story can also be used for this. The elite could say that Africa, which has been relatively unaffected by Covid-19 until now, has experienced a very strong resurgence of the epidemic because of a Covid variant. Or they can use another disease. And since fraud is an extremely widespread problem in these countries, it will seem logical to reject a large number of applicants for immigration because of invalid vaccination certificates. In this variant of the scenario, there will be no need to close the borders. It will be enough to reject individuals on a case-by-case basis. Except that, in reality, more than 90% of the immigrants will be refused. But, with this way of doing things, the rejection rate will remain hidden from the people and it will be more difficult for them to oppose this policy.
Besides, the Elite could hunt down illegal immigrants for pandemic reasons. They could put them in camps before deporting them, all because of the lack of a health pass or an invalid pass.
And since this is not a political problem, but a medical one, people will not think that it is in fact done to limit immigration. Especially since this decision will be taken by governments from the right as well as from the center or from the left (as it was the case for Covid-19).
Now, this is only one of the solutions found by the elite to limit immigration. The election of right-wing populists is also a solution in some countries. In the US, Trump's wall is a step towards that. It's true that with the election of Biden, there is a risk that it will be dismantled. But, apparently, Biden just wants to stop building it. He's not talking about destroying what's already been done. And we saw that for Britain, the solution was Brexit.
But a pandemic is a much more global solution, usable by many more countries, and that without people being able to link it to a global policy change regarding immigration.
Now, it is also possible that the elite's plan is perfectly calibrated regarding immigration (no lag) and therefore they don't use fake epidemics to restrict population movements before WW3. But this is a possibility to watch.
3) The elimination of the elderly
It is a fact that the elderly accounted for the largest number of deaths in Covid-19.
So, question: "Did the elderly die more than in a normal year?" Given that anything can be doubted with the elite, it is also possible that most of the elderly in question would have died very quickly anyway without Covid-19.
But, on the face of it, I don't think so. In my opinion, there was an over-mortality of old people because of the hysteria instilled in the medical profession. Besides, this is not something that should put off the elite. They kill tens of millions of people every year with the cancer scam, the diabetes scam, the hypertension scam, the treatment of various microbial diseases, etc. So if they don't have any qualms about doing it, adding a few million more around the world must not have been a problem. Of course, I could be wrong. But whether or not this is true is not the main point of this analysis. What is important is that at least a part of the people believes it. Again, this is related to the third world war. Indeed, it seems clear to me that the goal here is to give an additional reason to the anti-illuminati to oppose the power in place.
This can be seen from the reactions of the elite-controlled anti-illuminati sites. A few have suggested that Covid-19 has led to the slaughter of the elderly. It hasn't been the most prominent thing. But it was brought up.
This is what happened, for example, on the Bouddhanar site, a French anti-illuminati site set up by the elite. We have for example the following article from April 12, 2020:
"Dr. Charbonier denounces the active euthanasia of the elderly(Note: EHPADs or "établissement d'hébergement pour personnes âgées dépendantes" is a Residential care for senior citizens)
Who will stop the Talmudic-Masonic sect in power that does not shrink from crimes against humanity?"
"It is clear that these criminal politicians with the complicity of the medical profession want to take advantage of the state of emergency to grant themselves full powers and authorize by mortifying decree contrary to the spirit of the declaration of human rights which enacts the right to life, to exterminate the elderly in EHPADs; this is a plan for the mass slaughter of a category of population, that is to say, genocide falling under the crimes against humanity.""
Or this one, from September 1, 2020:
"Solidarity of the Spanish population in the face of oppression"Or this one, from January 1, 2021:
"When true Justice will be restored, as many politicians and all the corrupt in the media and medicine, police officers will incur severe penalties ranging from dismissal to prison. Indeed, there has been, especially in France, a crime against humanity: the active euthanasia of the elderly."
"2021, the year of the transformation of society?"And this one, from January 31, 2021:
"It is the year of the liquidation of the old man and the old society after heavy ordeals: sanitary dictatorship, liberticidal measures, crimes against humanity, the euthanasia of the elderly, economic crisis... There will be a mutation."
"French, the government has had your elderly parents euthanized!"The subject was also raised on the popular Egalité et Réconcilation website, created by Alain Soral (another agent of influence) on April 8, 2020, with the article "Is the decree on Rivotril a legalization of euthanasia?":
"Everything happens as if the government had chosen to "finish" the old in Ephad, in order not to send them to hospitals cruelly lacking beds in intensive care units, but also respirators. By allowing and encouraging the prescription of Rivotril for elderly and dependent people, the government seems to have chosen the option of unspoken euthanasia, under the guise of accompaniment in the end of life, and of pain management."And apparently the well-publicized documentary "hold-up" says so too. This is what we learn on this anti-conspiracy site:
"Pharmacist Serge Rader, who argues in the film that the elderly were euthanized in the Ehpads, assures that he is certain of what he says for a good and simple reason: "I have seen it, I am friends with a doctor who takes care of three Ephad." "Not only were they not taken to intensive care, but they were prepared with the syringe of Rivotril with an order to finish them off completely," he adds."Apparently, in Anglo-Saxon countries, the subject has been little discussed. The Swedish case and the French case would have been talked about a bit on some English websites. But, apart from that, it doesn't seem that the issue has been treated so much on the conspirationist sites (Henry Makow talks about it in this article). So, for the moment, this element of opposition will probably develop mainly in France. But one can think that in the future it will spread to other countries.
Now, one could say that as epidemics do not occur very often, the usefulness of massacring a part of the elderly via the covid19 scam is rather limited. It's a bit of a one-shot gun. If the rise to power of the anti-illuminati/Muslim alliance happens in 25 years, the killing of old people during covid19 will no longer be an important issue by then. It will be a thing of the past.
That's true. But, it may be part of a larger and more ongoing plan.
Indeed, we have seen for a little over 10 years that the elite is pushing the concept of euthanasia very strongly. They are pushing through laws on this subject at full speed. And they are using all their propaganda to make it look progressive and to make it look like everybody wants to be euthanized and that at the moment, most people who are about to die are undergoing therapeutic harassment and have to struggle to get doctors to agree to pull the plug.
And this is not limited to a few countries. Laws allowing euthanasia have been passed in most Western countries. By 2021, almost all of Western Europe accepts passive euthanasia (see Wikipedia). This is also the case in North America, Australia, Argentina, Colombia and India.
The reason for the euthanasia project is once again the third world war. Because, in the same way as with Covid-19, it will allow the oppositions between conspirationists and ordinary people to be stirred up. Indeed, even at fairly low levels of conspirationism, it looks very much like a dystopian and even a Satanist project. Of course, for ordinary people, it seems like progress, because it avoids the supposedly therapeutic harassment. But, for people who are a little more advanced, it is quite clear that it will mainly allow the extermination of old people. And if that's not obvious enough for them, the conspirationist sites run by the elite will "enlighten" them.
And so the anti-illuminati will oppose it.
In fact, the subject has been discussed by elite-controlled anti-illuminati sites and agents of influence for a long time. For example, in 2008, the agent of influence Alain Soral spoke about it in France (here, on radio Ici et Maintenant, March 29, 2008):
"...because there is a lobby, we know very well, the Freemason lobby, and even... well, the anti-Catholic lobby, which wants us to break this lock of the defense of life at all costs; which is a bit the symmetrical of abortion. It is the infanticide and the elimination of the elderlies. And unfortunately, it is a liberal fatality. So, we are in the process of passing off a heroic fight for the right to die with dignity as in reality an extension of the liberal logic which is basically to reduce children to the logic of the commodity "I want it, I don't want it". And to manage old people as we manage goods, well..., economic obsolescence. That is to say, old people are expensive and don't bring in anything. There are more and more of them. Kids need the money. They live too long. The ideology of the seniors makes them spend all the money in the last 5 years. So, if I want to be a little provocative, I would say right now, they are preparing, they are setting up the ideology of eliminating the old."So, as early as 2008, agents of influence began to "denounce" the euthanasia project saying that the goal was to exterminate the old people.
And on his site "Egalité et Réconciliation", we find about fifteen or twenty articles on the subject since 2013. There were:
"The College of Physicians takes a first step towards euthanasia" of February 14, 2013 (here). And also "Small steps towards the legalization of euthanasia?" of December 16, 2013 (here). Then, in 2015, "The brothers of the good death or the networks of euthanasia, by Alain Escada" of March 3, 2015 (here), which said, among other things, "In a conference for France Action Jeunesse given on Thursday, February 26, in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, Alain Escada analyzed the motivations and networks of the "brothers", partisans of the "good death" by euthanasia, who are close to succeeding once again in their diabolical task." There was also "Belgium: euthanasia out of control?" of March 30, 2015 (here). And "Freemasonry is at work behind the ideology that wants to impose euthanasia" from December 16, 2018 (here). And, in 2020, in connection with the Covid-19 pandemic, we have "Is the Rivotril Decree a Legalization of Euthanasia?" from April 8, 2020 (here).So, for now, the anti-illuminati sites are only talking about this topic fairly episodically. And the euthanasia project is still relatively light. But, we can be sure that it will grow in strength over the years, and that the opposition to the project will do the same.
So, the purpose of the euthanasia project is not to slaughter old people per se; it is to give an additional motivation to the anti-illuminati to fight against the power in place.
From there, we can think of the following. Maybe the slaughter of the elderly is very secondary in the Covid-19 project, maybe not. It all depends on whether it is part of a larger project of inventing diseases that largely target the elderly. If other epidemics are invented by the elite in the next 25 or 30 years, with the objective of massacring the old, and if eventually these diseases are not transient (no vaccine or drug), then this project will have almost as much importance as the euthanasia project regarding the elimination of the old and the denunciation of this project by anti-illuminati. And it will mean in retrospect that the killing of the elderly was important in the Covid-19 project.
Even if these diseases are only temporary because they are "cured" by a vaccine or a drug, it will still be of interest to the elite. Indeed, epidemics will allow to have a peak of killings of old people (and euthanasia will allow to have a permanent project). Placed at the right time, a false epidemic could be the element or one of the elements that will turn opinion to the conspirationist/Muslim side, and bring this one to power. And of course, the fact that there are new liberticidal laws like the ones we had with Covid-19 will participate in this.
And it would be surprising that the massacre of the elderly was mentioned for Covid-19 if it was not destined to be followed by other diseases targeting the elderly. If euthanasia was the important project in relation to the elimination of the elderly and Covid-19 was just a one-off, the elite-controlled conspirationist sites would not have mentioned this issue in the last few months. If they did, it is probable that in won't be an isolated affair.
The main explanation that will be given to the conspirationists at the beginning is the fact that for the elite, an old person is a useless person, a financial burden. And with the aging of the population, there are more and more of them. So, the elite would seek to kill the elderly to pay for their retirement for as little time as possible and to reduce end-of-life care expenses.
The problem is that the elite can achieve the same result by forcing people to work longer and reducing the amount of their retirement. And then they can easily erode pensions through inflation and other indirect means. Finally, if it had been a financial problem, the elite simply would not have created a pension system in the first place, 60 or 70 years ago, or else a much less advantageous system.
So financial motivation is clearly not the reason here.
Moreover, what must be considered, regarding euthanasia, is that in reality, it has already been practiced on a large scale for at least 100 years in hospitals. Indeed, if the doctors consider that the patient is terminally ill, they kill him with the following triptych: massive administration of opiates, stop of feeding, stop of hydration. And medicine is already reducing life expectancy through false diagnoses and harmful treatments. So the elite don't really need to formalize it to practice it.
By making it official, it will kill people a little earlier, but not much earlier: maybe a year, two at the most. If a person has cancer, two years before death, he or she is usually still well enough not to ask for euthanasia. A priori, the interest of making euthanasia legal is limited to shortening life expectancy. Therefore, the real goal is not to shorten the life of the elderly. If it were, the elite would seek to reduce it much more.
The other explanation offered for euthanasia in conspirationist circles will be that the elite are Satanists and want to create a kind of hell on earth. But this will be reserved for the more advanced conspirationists at first. Then it will filter down to a more moderate part of the conspirationists, so that the union with the Muslims can take place.
A reflection that one can make is that, in fact, it is rather the epidemic, or more generally the disease that is interesting to shorten the life of the elderly in a relatively important way, not really euthanasia, since the latter only allows to shorten life by 1 or 2 years on average. Whereas you can very well have bogus diseases that supposedly affect mainly the elderly and shorten their life expectancy by 4 or 5 years or even more, this without official euthanasia (but with unofficial euthanasia). Of course, it is even better with both together. But it can very well be done with diseases only.
There is one reason why the elite should use only diseases, and that is discretion. Normally, the elite should want to shorten people's lives discreetly, so that the people don't object (because here we are talking about a massacre that concerns everyone in the long run). Now, as much as with euthanasia, the will to eliminate old people is quite easy to see (especially in the current context of the rise of conspirationism), as much as with diseases, it can go very unnoticed, even in this context. So, logically, they should only have recourse to inventions of diseases, and not at all to euthanasia. But this is not what they do. They emphasize euthanasia as well as diseases. And currently, they are even emphasizing euthanasia more than diseases (Covid-19 being an isolated case for the moment). So they obviously want their goal of slaughtering old people to be seen. Then, either it's because they feel so powerful that they are not afraid of people noticing. But even then, it's quite dangerous, because it concerns everyone. Or it is because the real goal is that some people (here, the anti-illuminati) realize that this is a will to massacre the aged and oppose the project.
And even for the only disease aimed mainly at the elderly that it has so far launched (Covid-19), the elite has ensured that its desire to eliminate them is seen in certain countries (especially in France, apparently). Indeed, in France, it was the Ritrovil affair (a drug of the benzodiazepine class) that sparked things off, with decree 20-20-360 (of March 28, 2020). In short, the government temporarily authorized Ritrovil to be used in EHPADs for the sedation of elderly people at the end of life, whereas normally it could only be used in hospitals. Of course, this facilitated the elimination of the elderly via lethal sedation, since they did not need to be transported to hospitals to do so. And immediately, the conspirationist sites under control talked about it and denounced a will to euthanize the old. And the mainstream sites responded to the conspirationists, thus informing the non-conspirationist masses of the controversy. But the elite could have killed the elderly en masse without this decree. So, the purpose of the decree was really to make the elite's desire to kill the old visible, and to provoke a reaction.
Anyway, even without Ritrovil, this desire to kill old people was put forward by several conspirationist sites which are under control. Indeed, since many have taken up the theories that there is no Covid-19 virus and therefore no epidemic, the logical conclusion was necessarily that it was a conspiracy and that one of the goals was the elimination of a part of the old people. So, since these sites are under the control of the elite, it means once again, that the elite wanted people to be aware of this will to eliminate the old people.
In short, if the elite is not trying to eliminate the elderly in a hidden way, although it could very well do so, it shows that its objective is to make a part of the people aware of it, and then to oppose it.
Another detail, euthanasia will be presented as an idea brought by the Jews and the Freemasons. That's why in France, the Jew Jacques Attali, the eminence grise of the left, presented the idea of euthanasia as something normal and even desirable (since it was presented as a fundamental freedom), at the beginning of the 80s. This can be read in his book "The Future of Life", published in 1981, pages 274-275:
"Euthanasia will be one of the essential instruments of our future societies in any case. In a socialist logic, to begin with, the problem is posed as follows: socialist logic is freedom and the fundamental freedom is suicide: consequently, the right to direct or indirect suicide is an absolute value in this type of society. In a capitalist society, killing machines, prostheses which will allow to eliminate life when it will be too unbearable, or economically too expensive, will be created and will be common practice. I therefore believe that euthanasia, whether it is a value of freedom or a commodity, will be one of the rules of future society.So when the anti-illuminati win, things will go badly for the Jews also because of this. This will be one of the many grievances against the Jews that will apparently make it logical for them to be persecuted and then expelled to Israel.
Last detail, euthanasia has to involve many countries for it to give the impression to the anti-illuminatis that it is part of the conspiracy. If euthanasia only involved two or three countries, it would not be consistent with the idea of a world conspiracy.
On the other hand, Muslim countries will not normally adopt this measure. It will make it look like the elite is not in control of the whole world and that there is a real opposition between the West and the Muslim world. When in reality, all sides are controlled by the same elite.
Please go to Hexzane527 to read the entire essay.
_________
This essay is a continuation of this global cosmopolitan aristocratic elite from the end of WWII:
The Leaders of Post-war Europe were also Jewish
This essay is a continuation of this global cosmopolitan aristocratic elite from the end of WWII:
The Leaders of Post-war Europe were also Jewish
More on the Jewish Jacques Attali:
Related:
Stop and consider this after reading the essay above:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.