April 24, 2021
FILE PHOTO. © Global Look Press / Ute Grabowsky
American health officials have encouraged "pregnant people" to get vaccinated against coronavirus, saying shots are safe for them. However, it's not just the scientific credibility of the guidance that has been questioned.
"Pregnant people experienced the same side effects as others following vaccination," the director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Rochelle Walensky said at a White House briefing on Friday. "Importantly, no safety concerns were observed for people vaccinated in the third trimester or safety concerns for their babies," the health official added.
The go-ahead statement is based on a recent study by CDC researchers published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Titled 'Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons', it suggested that Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines have not proved more harmful for those who are expecting a child. During the vaccines' preauthorization process, "pregnant persons" were excluded from clinical trials. The updated guidelines for "pregnant people" have been widely reported by US media.
Offering 'Information about COVID-19 Vaccines for People who Are Pregnant or Breastfeeding', the CDC has previously cautiously advised people to make a personal choice about receiving a jab, following a consultation with a doctor. The recent "no safety concerns" recommendations are based on preliminary findings from self-reported data. More than 35,000 "persons … identified as pregnant," from 16 to 54 years old participated in the research, using a smartphone-based tool for US vaccine safety monitoring systems. Over 800 of them had a completed pregnancy.
More frequent injection-site pain was reported among possible vaccine-related complications, "whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently," according to the study.
Saying that pregnancy outcomes for the vaccinated patients were "similar" to pre-pandemic results, the study concluded: "Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines."
US health officials have warned before that those who are pregnant during the new coronavirus pandemic, are "at increased risk" for more severe suffering from the illness, as well as being endangered to adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth.
On the same day as good news for "pregnant people" was delivered at the White House, British politician and RT host George Galloway expressed his apparent concern with the same choice of wording in the UK. The former MP shared a poster from an English hospital offering information for "pregnant people and their support partner."
The tweet sparked a heated argument. Last year, a similar trans debate on Twitter got British writer JK Rowling into hot water. The Harry Potter author questioned the use of the term "people who menstruate," evoking harsh criticism from transgender rights activists, as well as from actors featured in the popular series.
Please go to RT News to read more.
This is absolutely ridiculous 😂
— Joey (@JJMG_33) April 24, 2021
The world is ignoring basic science just because it offends some people!
Women get pregnant, men can not get pregnant!! https://t.co/yCbCPHgxy0
The go-ahead statement is based on a recent study by CDC researchers published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Titled 'Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons', it suggested that Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines have not proved more harmful for those who are expecting a child. During the vaccines' preauthorization process, "pregnant persons" were excluded from clinical trials. The updated guidelines for "pregnant people" have been widely reported by US media.
New CDC guidance recommends pregnant people get the COVID-19 vaccine https://t.co/I9G0iUHIdr
— CBS News (@CBSNews) April 23, 2021
Offering 'Information about COVID-19 Vaccines for People who Are Pregnant or Breastfeeding', the CDC has previously cautiously advised people to make a personal choice about receiving a jab, following a consultation with a doctor. The recent "no safety concerns" recommendations are based on preliminary findings from self-reported data. More than 35,000 "persons … identified as pregnant," from 16 to 54 years old participated in the research, using a smartphone-based tool for US vaccine safety monitoring systems. Over 800 of them had a completed pregnancy.
More frequent injection-site pain was reported among possible vaccine-related complications, "whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently," according to the study.
Saying that pregnancy outcomes for the vaccinated patients were "similar" to pre-pandemic results, the study concluded: "Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines."
US health officials have warned before that those who are pregnant during the new coronavirus pandemic, are "at increased risk" for more severe suffering from the illness, as well as being endangered to adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth.
On the same day as good news for "pregnant people" was delivered at the White House, British politician and RT host George Galloway expressed his apparent concern with the same choice of wording in the UK. The former MP shared a poster from an English hospital offering information for "pregnant people and their support partner."
The tweet sparked a heated argument. Last year, a similar trans debate on Twitter got British writer JK Rowling into hot water. The Harry Potter author questioned the use of the term "people who menstruate," evoking harsh criticism from transgender rights activists, as well as from actors featured in the popular series.
What are "pregnant people"? What madness is this? https://t.co/fh5lfj7p20
— George Galloway (@georgegalloway) April 23, 2021
Please go to RT News to read more.
________
After listening to the following discussion carefully you will be able to know immediately why this aggressive almost war-like world-wide drive to inject including now pregnant women.
The people at the European Commission have this all planned out years in advance. Time to start taking apart their policy papers to plan our own future - without them.
The people at the European Commission have this all planned out years in advance. Time to start taking apart their policy papers to plan our own future - without them.
More news related to the criminal enterprise (commercial warfare) of injection manufacturing. The bottom line is if you are prepared to take one of these Covid injections, or multiple injections, are you FULLY informed? People are going to have to be making very hard decisions about these Covid injections because from what we have seen so far this is a commercial war on you.
Johnson & Johnson shareholders urged to reject CEO's $30 million payday after year of lawsuits
French Vaxx Center 'Mistakenly' Injects 140 People With Normal Saline Solution
The Israeli People Committee's April Report on the lethal impact of vaccinations
French Vaxx Center 'Mistakenly' Injects 140 People With Normal Saline Solution
The Israeli People Committee's April Report on the lethal impact of vaccinations
Doctors starting to break ranks (pathogenically priming these injections as a bioweapon?):
Did readers happen to see this alleged Freudian slip by a news anchor?
Source: http://82.221.129.208/.uo6.html
"They are running out of people who want to be euthanized"
April 25, 2021
UPDATE: I got attacked so bad when trying to post this that I had to do a "pull the power cord" shut down and just hope this survived. It did. And it is stunning:
WATCH HERE: http://82.221.129.208/euthanized.mp4
Aaand I thought to myself, "Get that safe on the server QUICK.
Served from here: News anchor freudian slips during a corona vax report that "They are running out of people who want to be euthanized".
This is bad folks, he said it straight and you can damn well bet he knows. Served from here because this won't survive where I found it, click to play, right click to save.
And remember, according to Sir John Irving Bell, the vaccine will only Sterilize 60-70 percent of the population. Another freudian slip.
"Sterilize the population...." Wtf?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.