_________
by Miles Mathis
First published June 5, 2022
Before we get started, I need to do my biannual fundraising appeal. It's been about six months since my last reminder. As you know, I don't have any ads, don't sell any products except four science books, and only post these reminders twice a year. I know times are tough for us all, since personally I have no underwriting, grants, or institutional affiliations of any kind. I have zero investments and don't even have a savings account, living pretty much hand-to-mouth. But I prefer it that way, since if I had any assets, I would just get sued immediately by about 50 parties. The only way I can do what I do is by having nothing. Some think that due to my self-confidence—which has been an issue lately—I must have private wealth or major support of some kind. Nope. I am currently renting two small rooms from a friend in his house, with more than half my stuff in storage, including all my painting supplies. I write these papers on a 15-year-old mac mini and a 17" screen, which everyone who visits comments on with wonder, as if I am greatly to be pitied. My printer is broken and has been for many years. My iphone is a gift from a reader and I rarely use it, forgetting to charge it about half the time. I am trying to get back on a ground line. I have no health insurance and don't really want any. Even so, I am not fishing for your sympathy, since I basically have just the life I always wanted—in most ways. I have absolute freedom, which is first on the list, and I have a huge and varied pile of artifacts with my name on them, to stand for me in the future. Which is just to say I wanted to be a real artist and scientist and writer and I am, so all the rest is trivial.
That said, reader support has helped keep me afloat over the past five years or so, and I really am grateful for it. It nicely fills in the rather large gaps between art sales, giving me a small, novel sense of security. So if you can continue to pitch me a few dollars in return for supplying you with reading material you cannot get anywhere else, I will continue to provide it. Paypal is the easiest way, using the kitties on my site, but you can also send me a check or anything else of value that occurs to you. Just email me for a POBox.
Now, a few more prefatory remarks before we get to the main course. Infowars just republished a piece from Dylano at Substack on deplatforming, which I have to admit I found somewhat amusing. Why? Because he is selling you deplatforming as something new, as if it just erupted along with Covid. But I suffered my first major deplatforming way back in 2006, when Yahoo Geocities dumped my website with no warning and no explanation. That was 16 years ago. I built my first website by hand on Geocities in about 2004, teaching myself to write html code, and it quickly gained a readership from those who had followed me at the Artrenewal Center. I had a few physics papers up, but most popular content in the beginning was art related. So why did Yahoo censor me? Possibly because I had recently attacked Wikipedia two months earlier, as far as possible blowing their cover. I had also attacked the NEA and the National Portrait Gallery, as well as the Museum of Modern Art, the McArthur Foundation and the Wall Street Journal. Yes, I was very busy even then.
On the physics side, I was blitzing Richard Feynman and many other people, having written 40 papers in 2005, my first big year in physics. I was already attacking Bohr and had recently solved the superposition problem. My simplification of the calculus was also published just two months before Yahoo censored me, so pinning down the single cause is not easy. At any rate, that was just the first of many site rebuilds forced upon me by the Phoenicians. I have been under heavy attack from the start, so the new round of censorship seems like just more of the same to me.
I learned very early on that these platforms like Yahoo, Facebook, and Twitter were not to be trusted. They had been created for just that purpose: control. People still tell me I should join substack or some such place and I just laugh. I learned my lesson in 2006 and am not likely to make the same mistake twice. If you are an independent writer, you need to build your own website on a private server and forget about these platforms, no matter what or where they are. "Platforms" are redundant. You don't need a platform. You just need a site. Your ability to speak freely is your most valuable asset, and it should trump all other considerations. Unless you are in it to make money, in which case I have nothing to say to you. In that case you aren't a journalist, you are just a hack, and you might as well be working for the man directly. He will provide you with a platform, you can be sure.
Now, let's briefly look at some of the headlines at Infowars and Zerohedge today. Infowars tops its page with a big fake picture of a nuclear explosion, and the story that Putin has now officially threatened to nuke Western cities, including US cities, if NATO continues to support Ukraine. Fake. US bankers created post-Revolution Russia*, and we have owned them ever since. They were our allies up to 1946 and still are, the whole Cold War thing being staged from the get-go. Putin is just another one of our actors, pulled out of some international actors equity composed of worldwide peers. Same goes for Zelensky, one of the worst actors ever. Orwell told us exactly how it would be in 1984, and everyone claims to have read it, so where is the mystery here? The entire conflict is staged to create fear and destabilization, and to get eyes off the vaccine crime against humanity. So how does Alex Jones, who sells himself as revolutionary #1, not know this? He hasn't read 1984?
Same thing with the lead story on Russia hitting a tank depot in Kiev with cruise missiles. As proof of that we get a picture of some smoke from a great distance.
Speaking of Zelensky and Putin, am I the only one who has noticed that everyone hired by Jones seems to be Jewish? Tax expert Tyler Bennett was on today, not only looking and sounding very Jewish, but with the name Bennett as a huge clue as well. The Bennetts are closely related to the Queen and we have seen them in hundreds of top events over the centuries. Same for agent Kaitlyn Bennett, married to admitted Jew Justin Moldow. How can people not see through these people, just from their names and faces? Owen Shroyer is obviously Jewish, again just from his name and face. I don't have to dig any deeper than that. Rob Dew is probably Jewish, since Dew is a Jewish name, translated from the Hebrew Talia. See the Dews in the peerage related to the Breretons, Bonapartes, Talbots, and the Smiths of Nottingham (bankers). Also Josh Owens, former employee, Jewish. Also see Millie Weaver**, with Weaver being a Jewish name. Harrison Smith's name is not obviously Jewish, but his face is. So perhaps he links to the Nottingham bankers as well. You will say these people can't link to British lines, but you are forgetting Infowars strange British contingent, including the brothers Watson, who pretend to be from council flats but are actually from wealth. So how did a red-faced screaming man on cable public access in Austin morph in just a few years into this multi-million-dollar enterprise with international correspondents, most of them Jewish? I think you are starting to see how. By the way, Jones admitted his wife is Jewish on the Howard Stern show.
Next we find an ex-judge was allegedly killed in a targeted assassination, by someone who also had Mitch McConnell on his list. Fake. We are actually supposed to believe that some guy named Douglas Uhde, previously sentenced by Judge John Pier Roemer, broke into his home and shot him gangland style in bed, but somehow got caught in the house? Uhde had never heard of a silencer? Who called police, the wife? If so, why didn't Uhde shoot her and walk? Actually, couldn't have been his wife, since her name is given as Vivian and they admit she died in 2018. Her maiden name was Schroeder. According to tombstones, they are related to surnames Hamilton and Pier. As in Pierpont.
Oh, and Judge Roemer was also a Lt. Colonel in the Army. What are the odds? We could have predicted it coming in. The police allegedly arrived and trapped Uhde in the basement, where they shot him. Because when you hear sirens, you don't flee out the back door, you flee into the basement. Uhde had a paper list on his person with McConnell's name on it! Yeah, because that is just how it works. All hitmen now carry paper lists in their jean's pockets as they hide in the basement hoping to get trapped. Another way we know this is fake is that the list also included Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Gov. Tony Evers. You really have to be kidding me! Wasn't the FBI just outed by mainstream sources for faking the last Whitmer assassination attempt? The news on that has hardly cooled and they expect us to believe a new one? But I guess Alex Jones didn't know that, so he just reprinted this story without comment.
Douglas Uhde is blanketed in red flags, of course, since a people search on him finds he is related to Nancy Uhde, possibly a sister or wife. About the same age. Instantcheckmate takes us to Sheila A. Heiss when we search on this Nancy Uhde, which you have to admit is singular. The computer thinks it is the same person. She is also a Higgins and a Besonen. She also links to Lusky, Owens, and Carroll. Her father may be Brian Besonen of Brambleton, VA, which is just a stone's throw from Langley, about five miles north of Chantilly. Sharon Lusky on these pages has many red flag locations, including Minot, ND. She also has last names Higgins, Johnson, and Stricker, so she either liked to get married or she had aliases. Also related to George and Perry surnames. Her husband Julius Lusky has Livermore, CA, on his list. He links us to the name Kronmal, also of Livermore, including Greg Kronmal at Illumina, a gene sequencing lab—connecting us to today's headlines in another way. The Kronmals link us to the Rosenbergs, just so you know. So we have the Jewish link again, as usual. All these people are Jewish, including Douglas Uhde. Heiss is a Jewish name. So is Roemer, so I was looking for a link between Uhde and Judge Roemer. I didn't find it on a quick search, but I bet they are related. We do link to an Andreas Weiger of Alexandria, VA. But wait, it appears they are linked through the Owens. We find a Cletus John Owens of Fond du Lac, WI, related to John Pier Roemer, b. 1901 (so probably our judge's father?) of the same town. We find Judge Roemer's mother was Eliza Canby Darneille. We just found these same Owens linked to Douglas Uhde through his wife Nancy, real name Sheila Heiss. As indication we are on the right track, we find that the elder John Pier Roemer's page is missing at ancestry.com, as if was recently deleted or blocked. The wayback machine has also been scrubbed of that page.
See how Cletus is indented? That means that page is linked to the one above it, so we are being told by the computer that Cletus is related to John Pier in those pages at Ancestry. But if you click on John Pier, you get nothing. Just a white page.
Next we have two stories on red flag gun laws supposedly targeting conservatives or Republicans. But of course those will never pass. Boebert already admitted these new events are only used to sell MORE guns, and she was right on that one. Second Amendment threats are only manufactured to make people think they should buy while they still can, since the usual suspects now own all the gun companies. Their profits have gone through the roof in the past twenty years, and Uvalde is just a repeat of 2012's Sandy Hook—which caused record gun sales and no gun grabbing. We have more proof of that next day, as a lead story is that gun shops in Canada sold out the week after Trudeau announced he would be freezing sales.
Speaking of Uvalde, today's story is funeral home worker and moonlighting pastor Gilbert Limones, who is now claiming to be one of the first shot at by Ramos.
Please go to Updates to read the entire essay that offers solutions to our circumstances.
Note to readers: Google censors this blog. Google also manipulates elections: WATCH: How Google Swings Elections
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.