________
Source: The Epoch Times
117 Employees File Lawsuit Against Texas Hospital for Requiring COVID-19 Vaccine
Saying the COVID-19 vaccines are experimental and they don't want to be "guinea pigs," the 117 employees argued in court that it's unlawful for their employers to require them to take the shots.
"Methodist Hospital is forcing its employees to be human 'guinea pigs' as a condition for continued employment," their lawsuit (pdf) states. They wrote that the hospital's COVID-19 vaccination mandate "requires the employee to subject themselves to medical experimentation as a prerequisite to feeding their families."
They took issue receiving "experimental COVID-19 mRNA" vaccines such as ones made by Pfizer and Moderna.
"For the first time in the history of the United States, an employer is forcing an employee to participate in an experimental vaccine trial as a condition for continued employment," the lawsuit states.
The plaintiffs cited a letter—included in the lawsuit—from the CEO and president of Houston Methodist, Marc Boom, who allegedly directed employees to "please see the HR policy that outlines the consequences of not being compliant by June 7, which include suspension and eventually termination."
Meanwhile, at the top of the lawsuit, an alleged quote from David Bernard, a CEO of a Houston Methodist branch, was included. Bernard purportedly told an employee that "100 percent vaccination is more important than your individual freedom. … Everyone [sic] of you is replaceable. If you don't like what your [sic] doing you can leave and we will replace your spot."
A spokesperson for Houston Methodist disputed the quote in a statement to The Epoch Times, saying on May 30 that Bernard "did NOT say that to this disgruntled employee," and he "has respect for all his employees—we are a values-based organization with respect as one of our core values." The spokesperson did not comment on the letter from Boom.
The lawsuit also asserted that employers' mandating COVID-19 vaccines is problematic because "there is much" the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "does not know about these products even as it authorizes them for emergency use, including their effectiveness against infection, death, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that is allegedly the cause of the COVID disease." The FDA approved an emergency use authorization for the vaccines made by Moderna and Pfizer in December 2020 and gave the emergency authorization for Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine in early 2021.
The lawsuit was filed by Jared Woodfill, a Houston-area attorney, who told ABC News that the Houston Methodist mandate violates the Nuremberg Code of 1947, written after the fall of the Nazi regime in Germany.
"To promote its business and increase profits at the expense of other health care providers and their employees’ health, defendants advertise to the public that they 'require all employees and employed physicians to get a COVID-19 vaccine.' More clearly, defendants' employees are being forced to serve as human 'guinea pigs' to increase defendant' profits," Woodfill said, adding that it is a "severe and blatant" violation of Texas law and the Nuremberg Code—a set of research ethics principles relating to human experimentation.
Houston Methodist, the attorney claimed, forced employees to get the shot to "promote its business” over its "employees' health." He noted that most of the plaintiffs in the suit aren't health care providers
Please go to The Epoch Times to read more.
News update for 1 June 2021:
DR. BYRAM BRIDLE BLOWS WHISTLE ON EXTREMELY CONCERNING JAPANESE STUDY ON VACCINE LIPIDS & CLOTTING
Natural News statement on vaccine refusal, freedom of choice, due process and human rights
3 mRNA vaccines researchers are working on (that aren't COVID)
Mike Stone--Vaxxers Entice Suckers With Baubles
Source: The Epoch Times
117 Employees File Lawsuit Against Texas Hospital for Requiring COVID-19 Vaccine
Vials with Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine labels in an illustration picture taken on March 19, 2021. (Dado Ruvic/File Photo/Reuters)
BY JACK PHILLIPS | May 30, 2021
More than 100 employees at Houston Methodist Hospital filed a lawsuit against their employer for requiring all staff members to receive a COVID-19 vaccine in order to keep their jobs.
"Methodist Hospital is forcing its employees to be human 'guinea pigs' as a condition for continued employment," their lawsuit (pdf) states. They wrote that the hospital's COVID-19 vaccination mandate "requires the employee to subject themselves to medical experimentation as a prerequisite to feeding their families."
They took issue receiving "experimental COVID-19 mRNA" vaccines such as ones made by Pfizer and Moderna.
"For the first time in the history of the United States, an employer is forcing an employee to participate in an experimental vaccine trial as a condition for continued employment," the lawsuit states.
The plaintiffs cited a letter—included in the lawsuit—from the CEO and president of Houston Methodist, Marc Boom, who allegedly directed employees to "please see the HR policy that outlines the consequences of not being compliant by June 7, which include suspension and eventually termination."
Meanwhile, at the top of the lawsuit, an alleged quote from David Bernard, a CEO of a Houston Methodist branch, was included. Bernard purportedly told an employee that "100 percent vaccination is more important than your individual freedom. … Everyone [sic] of you is replaceable. If you don't like what your [sic] doing you can leave and we will replace your spot."
A spokesperson for Houston Methodist disputed the quote in a statement to The Epoch Times, saying on May 30 that Bernard "did NOT say that to this disgruntled employee," and he "has respect for all his employees—we are a values-based organization with respect as one of our core values." The spokesperson did not comment on the letter from Boom.
The lawsuit also asserted that employers' mandating COVID-19 vaccines is problematic because "there is much" the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "does not know about these products even as it authorizes them for emergency use, including their effectiveness against infection, death, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that is allegedly the cause of the COVID disease." The FDA approved an emergency use authorization for the vaccines made by Moderna and Pfizer in December 2020 and gave the emergency authorization for Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine in early 2021.
The lawsuit was filed by Jared Woodfill, a Houston-area attorney, who told ABC News that the Houston Methodist mandate violates the Nuremberg Code of 1947, written after the fall of the Nazi regime in Germany.
"To promote its business and increase profits at the expense of other health care providers and their employees’ health, defendants advertise to the public that they 'require all employees and employed physicians to get a COVID-19 vaccine.' More clearly, defendants' employees are being forced to serve as human 'guinea pigs' to increase defendant' profits," Woodfill said, adding that it is a "severe and blatant" violation of Texas law and the Nuremberg Code—a set of research ethics principles relating to human experimentation.
Houston Methodist, the attorney claimed, forced employees to get the shot to "promote its business” over its "employees' health." He noted that most of the plaintiffs in the suit aren't health care providers
Please go to The Epoch Times to read more.
________
News update for 1 June 2021:
Professor Dolores Cahill joins Fintan Dunne, editor of InformedConsent.ie and guest Cindy Connolly to chart the growing resistance to the failing Covid power grab. Fast-paced interview covering many topics including this controversy over "shedding":
Related:
This must come under extreme scrutiny:
Don't be a sucker. Know your standing in law and become informed about injections. Stop calling these "vaccines". They are a medical procedure and should be referred to as "injections."
This is criminal and these people need to be held liable:
More:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.