________
Source: Vaccines [Injections] News
BOMBSHELL: Pfizer's own documents admit covid vaccines will shed infectious particles to others
May 3, 2021 | By Ethan Huff
The latest "conspiracy theorist" to come forward and warn about particulate shedding from those who were recently "vaccinated" for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is none other than Pfizer itself.
DARPA Hires Pfizer to Perform Groundbreaking Vaccine Research
At Least 9,245 Americans Tested Positive for COVID-19 After Vaccination; 132 Dead
The vaccination causes bodies to give off bio-weapons?
Source: Vaccines [Injections] News
BOMBSHELL: Pfizer's own documents admit covid vaccines will shed infectious particles to others
May 3, 2021 | By Ethan Huff
The pharma giant's own documents openly admit that people who were recently jabbed for the Chinese virus can transmit whatever is contained in the syringe to others, including through skin contact.
"An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event," the Pfizer document warns.
"These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant."
In other words, there is something contained in the injections that cause the injected to become "superspreaders." Pfizer does not indicate what this is, however it does warn that the culprits are people who were recently injected.
Such transmission might occur from a simple handshake or a hug. It will almost certainly happen during sexual activity, which means those who are wanting to avoid contracting whatever poison is inside these things should be sure that their partner did not receive an injection.
The document goes on to reveal that vaccinated women who are pregnant could suffer spontaneous abortions and other reproductive problems – and unvaccinated people who come into contact with them could as well.
Vaccinated mothers can also pass whatever is contained in the Pfizer injection to their babies through tainted breast milk as well.
Pfizer: Coronavirus vaccine shedding can occur through "inhalation or skin contact"
Pfizer further admits that vaccinated men can transmit viral components to women at the time of conception, meaning both women and their unborn babies could become infected with the poisons through outside contact.
A pregnant woman who is unvaccinated could also pick up the viral components from her doctor or another family member who was vaccinated. According to Pfizer, this can occur "by inhalation or skin contact."
Oh, but the vaccines are not actually shedding, the media and the establishment claim. This is just a wild "conspiracy theory," we are being told. Why, then, is Pfizer warning quietly in its informational materials that being in close proximity to a vaccinated person could cause health problems?
"If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting?" asks Taps Newswire.
"If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?"
Pfizer wants clinical trial participants who believe they might have been exposed "environmentally" to chemical shedding from someone who was jabbed for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) to report the incident via the company's Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form.
Please go to Vaccines [Injections] News to read more.
"An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event," the Pfizer document warns.
"These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant."
In other words, there is something contained in the injections that cause the injected to become "superspreaders." Pfizer does not indicate what this is, however it does warn that the culprits are people who were recently injected.
Such transmission might occur from a simple handshake or a hug. It will almost certainly happen during sexual activity, which means those who are wanting to avoid contracting whatever poison is inside these things should be sure that their partner did not receive an injection.
The document goes on to reveal that vaccinated women who are pregnant could suffer spontaneous abortions and other reproductive problems – and unvaccinated people who come into contact with them could as well.
Vaccinated mothers can also pass whatever is contained in the Pfizer injection to their babies through tainted breast milk as well.
Pfizer: Coronavirus vaccine shedding can occur through "inhalation or skin contact"
Pfizer further admits that vaccinated men can transmit viral components to women at the time of conception, meaning both women and their unborn babies could become infected with the poisons through outside contact.
A pregnant woman who is unvaccinated could also pick up the viral components from her doctor or another family member who was vaccinated. According to Pfizer, this can occur "by inhalation or skin contact."
Oh, but the vaccines are not actually shedding, the media and the establishment claim. This is just a wild "conspiracy theory," we are being told. Why, then, is Pfizer warning quietly in its informational materials that being in close proximity to a vaccinated person could cause health problems?
"If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting?" asks Taps Newswire.
"If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?"
Pfizer wants clinical trial participants who believe they might have been exposed "environmentally" to chemical shedding from someone who was jabbed for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) to report the incident via the company's Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form.
Please go to Vaccines [Injections] News to read more.
________
COVID: Vaccinated people shedding and spreading genetic disaster to unvaccinated women?
by Jon Rappoport | May 3, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
MANY women are posting reports of disrupted and unusual menstrual cycles, heavy bleeding, and miscarriages.
What's more, some of these women haven't received the COVID vaccine, but they've been in close contact with others who have been vaccinated—leading to the question:
Can the COVID vaccine (which is actually an experimental genetic treatment) “shed” something harmful that can be passed from person to person?
Perhaps that sounds impossible, but in the world of genetics, much can go wrong.
In fact, for the past 25 years, we've had an illustration of shedding right in front of our eyes: GMO crops.
If you recall, Monsanto assured one and all that these crops—genetically engineered to survive the sprayed herbicide Roundup—would flourish, while weeds would succumb to the chemical.
So what actually happened? The weeds were resistant and became super-giants. And the Monsanto genes drifted from farm to farm, contaminating crops that were never meant to be engineered.
The Monsanto genes were "shed" and they spread.
This spread was not only the result of obvious cross-pollination. Bacteria in the soil, and in human digestive systems, also picked up and incorporated the Monsanto genes.
Why couldn't "shed and spread" occur with a genetic COVID vaccine?
The COVID injection contains a piece of RNA. The RNA nanoparticles enter human cells, forcing those cells to manufacture a protein similar to a protein in the purported SARS-CoV-2 virus. The immune system mounts a neutralizing attack against that protein, thus "rehearsing" to defeat the virus if it comes along later.
That's the hypothesis.
In practice, who knows how many different dangerous and harmful processes can be detonated in the human body—plus the drifting of those genetic effects from person to person, whether vaccinated or not.
Yes, I know the experts will point out the difference between inserting genes into crops and inserting them into humans. They'll say the GMO crops are supposed to hold on to those new genes long-term, but the COVID injection only has short-lived genetic effects.
Supposedly, this is true. Supposedly.
The universe of genetic experimentation, however, is rife with problems, mistakes, unintended consequences, as well as efforts to make weapons that attack life at basic levels.
Consider, for example, gene drive technology, which asks the question: what species should we make extinct today?
Why are Bill Gates and the US military involved in forwarding that technology?
A gene-drive scientist says, "I have a plan. By manipulating genes, we can make invasive rodents extinct, on an island where humans are living."
In the next fraction of a second, a flurry of questions pops up.
The overarching question is: Does this mean genetic manipulation can make ANY species extinct?
Here is a passage from Gene Drive Files, a vital site with an enormous amount of referenced information on the subject:
"Gene drives are a gene-editing application that allows genetic engineers to drive a single artificial trait through an entire population by ensuring that all of an organism’s offspring carry that trait. For example, recent experiments are fitting mice with 'daughterless' gene drives that will cascade through mouse populations so that only male pups are born, ensuring that the population becomes extinct after a few generations."
"Proponents have framed gene drives as a breakthrough tool for eradicating pests or invasive species. However, the Gene Drive Files reveal that these 'conservation' efforts are primarily supported by military funds."
Gene drive technology could be deployed to wipe out troublesome plant-parasites, weeds, crops, animal pests, animals, and…humans. Mull that over with your morning coffee.
Several years ago, certain UN member nations were considering a recommendation to call a moratorium on the use of gene drives. However, Bill Gates showed up to try to squash the moratorium.
The Gene Drive Files reports: "Documents received under Freedom of Information requests reveal that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation paid a private agriculture and biotechnology PR firm $1.6 million for activities on Gene Drives. This included running a covert 'advocacy coalition' which appears to have intended to skew the only UN expert process addressing gene drives…"
"Following global calls in December 2016 from Southern countries and over 170 organizations for a UN moratorium on gene drives, emails to gene drive advocates received under a Freedom of Information request by Prickly Research reveal that a private public affairs firm 'Emerging Ag' received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to co-ordinate the 'fight back against gene drive moratorium proponents'."
There's more from the Gene Drive Files. It involves the military:
"A trove of emails (The Gene Drive Files) from leading U.S. gene drive researchers reveals that the U.S. Military is taking the lead in driving forward gene drive development."
"Emails obtained through a freedom of Information request by U.S.–based Prickly Research reveal that the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has given approximately $100 million for gene drive research, $35 million more than previously reported, making them likely the largest single funder of gene drive research on the planet. The emails also reveal that DARPA either funds or co-ordinates with almost all major players working on gene drive development as well as the key holders of patents on CRISPR gene editing technology."
"These funds go beyond the US; DARPA is now also directly funding gene drive researchers in Australia (including monies given to an Australian government agency, CSIRO) and researchers in the UK. The files also reveal an extremely high level of interest and activity by other sections of the U.S. military and Intelligence community."
As I've shown in past articles, the latest and greatest gene-editing tools (e.g., CRISPR), which are used for gene drives, are far from slam-dunk precise, despite official assurances.
For example, Nature Communications, May 31, 2017, "CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome." That's UNINTENDED genetic "deletions and insertions."
And how about this study? It was published in Genome Biology on June 14, 2017, and is titled, "CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing induces exon skipping by alternative splicing or exon deletion." An exon is "a segment of a DNA or RNA molecule containing information coding for a protein or peptide sequence." So you can see that exon skipping or deletion is a very bad outcome.
In other words, ANY gene editing done on ANY species opens the door wide to all sorts of errors and unforeseen consequences. Doomsday genetic warfare and mutually assured destruction are the far shore of insanity…but closer in, where more limited experiments are taking place, there is no safety zone, either. Insanity reigns there as well.
Read what adorers of genetic experimentation have gushed:
"I went to Monsanto, and I spent a lot of time with the scientists there, and I have revised my outlook, and I'm very excited about telling the world. When you're in love, you want to tell the world." (Bill Nye, the Science Guy)
"I know it's a long shot and people would say it's 'too absurd'… but I'm doing this with hopes of making a Mickey Mouse some day." (Arikuni Uchimura, quoted in "Japan bio-scientists produce 'singing mouse'", The Independent, 21 December 2010.)
On the other hand, there is this: "Genetic engineering is to traditional crossbreeding what the nuclear bomb was to the sword." (Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of Center for Food Safety)
So…we have a new COVID vaccine, based on experimental technology that delivers genetic instructions to cells of the body—instructions to create a protein that would otherwise never be created.
We're told nothing can go wrong.
We have many examples of genetic technology going very wrong.
Please go to Jon Rappoport's blog to continue reading.
COVID: Vaccinated people shedding and spreading genetic disaster to unvaccinated women?
by Jon Rappoport | May 3, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
MANY women are posting reports of disrupted and unusual menstrual cycles, heavy bleeding, and miscarriages.
What's more, some of these women haven't received the COVID vaccine, but they've been in close contact with others who have been vaccinated—leading to the question:
Can the COVID vaccine (which is actually an experimental genetic treatment) “shed” something harmful that can be passed from person to person?
Perhaps that sounds impossible, but in the world of genetics, much can go wrong.
In fact, for the past 25 years, we've had an illustration of shedding right in front of our eyes: GMO crops.
If you recall, Monsanto assured one and all that these crops—genetically engineered to survive the sprayed herbicide Roundup—would flourish, while weeds would succumb to the chemical.
So what actually happened? The weeds were resistant and became super-giants. And the Monsanto genes drifted from farm to farm, contaminating crops that were never meant to be engineered.
The Monsanto genes were "shed" and they spread.
This spread was not only the result of obvious cross-pollination. Bacteria in the soil, and in human digestive systems, also picked up and incorporated the Monsanto genes.
Why couldn't "shed and spread" occur with a genetic COVID vaccine?
The COVID injection contains a piece of RNA. The RNA nanoparticles enter human cells, forcing those cells to manufacture a protein similar to a protein in the purported SARS-CoV-2 virus. The immune system mounts a neutralizing attack against that protein, thus "rehearsing" to defeat the virus if it comes along later.
That's the hypothesis.
In practice, who knows how many different dangerous and harmful processes can be detonated in the human body—plus the drifting of those genetic effects from person to person, whether vaccinated or not.
Yes, I know the experts will point out the difference between inserting genes into crops and inserting them into humans. They'll say the GMO crops are supposed to hold on to those new genes long-term, but the COVID injection only has short-lived genetic effects.
Supposedly, this is true. Supposedly.
The universe of genetic experimentation, however, is rife with problems, mistakes, unintended consequences, as well as efforts to make weapons that attack life at basic levels.
Consider, for example, gene drive technology, which asks the question: what species should we make extinct today?
Why are Bill Gates and the US military involved in forwarding that technology?
A gene-drive scientist says, "I have a plan. By manipulating genes, we can make invasive rodents extinct, on an island where humans are living."
In the next fraction of a second, a flurry of questions pops up.
The overarching question is: Does this mean genetic manipulation can make ANY species extinct?
Here is a passage from Gene Drive Files, a vital site with an enormous amount of referenced information on the subject:
"Gene drives are a gene-editing application that allows genetic engineers to drive a single artificial trait through an entire population by ensuring that all of an organism’s offspring carry that trait. For example, recent experiments are fitting mice with 'daughterless' gene drives that will cascade through mouse populations so that only male pups are born, ensuring that the population becomes extinct after a few generations."
"Proponents have framed gene drives as a breakthrough tool for eradicating pests or invasive species. However, the Gene Drive Files reveal that these 'conservation' efforts are primarily supported by military funds."
Gene drive technology could be deployed to wipe out troublesome plant-parasites, weeds, crops, animal pests, animals, and…humans. Mull that over with your morning coffee.
Several years ago, certain UN member nations were considering a recommendation to call a moratorium on the use of gene drives. However, Bill Gates showed up to try to squash the moratorium.
The Gene Drive Files reports: "Documents received under Freedom of Information requests reveal that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation paid a private agriculture and biotechnology PR firm $1.6 million for activities on Gene Drives. This included running a covert 'advocacy coalition' which appears to have intended to skew the only UN expert process addressing gene drives…"
"Following global calls in December 2016 from Southern countries and over 170 organizations for a UN moratorium on gene drives, emails to gene drive advocates received under a Freedom of Information request by Prickly Research reveal that a private public affairs firm 'Emerging Ag' received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to co-ordinate the 'fight back against gene drive moratorium proponents'."
There's more from the Gene Drive Files. It involves the military:
"A trove of emails (The Gene Drive Files) from leading U.S. gene drive researchers reveals that the U.S. Military is taking the lead in driving forward gene drive development."
"Emails obtained through a freedom of Information request by U.S.–based Prickly Research reveal that the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has given approximately $100 million for gene drive research, $35 million more than previously reported, making them likely the largest single funder of gene drive research on the planet. The emails also reveal that DARPA either funds or co-ordinates with almost all major players working on gene drive development as well as the key holders of patents on CRISPR gene editing technology."
"These funds go beyond the US; DARPA is now also directly funding gene drive researchers in Australia (including monies given to an Australian government agency, CSIRO) and researchers in the UK. The files also reveal an extremely high level of interest and activity by other sections of the U.S. military and Intelligence community."
As I've shown in past articles, the latest and greatest gene-editing tools (e.g., CRISPR), which are used for gene drives, are far from slam-dunk precise, despite official assurances.
For example, Nature Communications, May 31, 2017, "CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome." That's UNINTENDED genetic "deletions and insertions."
And how about this study? It was published in Genome Biology on June 14, 2017, and is titled, "CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing induces exon skipping by alternative splicing or exon deletion." An exon is "a segment of a DNA or RNA molecule containing information coding for a protein or peptide sequence." So you can see that exon skipping or deletion is a very bad outcome.
In other words, ANY gene editing done on ANY species opens the door wide to all sorts of errors and unforeseen consequences. Doomsday genetic warfare and mutually assured destruction are the far shore of insanity…but closer in, where more limited experiments are taking place, there is no safety zone, either. Insanity reigns there as well.
Read what adorers of genetic experimentation have gushed:
"I went to Monsanto, and I spent a lot of time with the scientists there, and I have revised my outlook, and I'm very excited about telling the world. When you're in love, you want to tell the world." (Bill Nye, the Science Guy)
"I know it's a long shot and people would say it's 'too absurd'… but I'm doing this with hopes of making a Mickey Mouse some day." (Arikuni Uchimura, quoted in "Japan bio-scientists produce 'singing mouse'", The Independent, 21 December 2010.)
On the other hand, there is this: "Genetic engineering is to traditional crossbreeding what the nuclear bomb was to the sword." (Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of Center for Food Safety)
So…we have a new COVID vaccine, based on experimental technology that delivers genetic instructions to cells of the body—instructions to create a protein that would otherwise never be created.
We're told nothing can go wrong.
We have many examples of genetic technology going very wrong.
Please go to Jon Rappoport's blog to continue reading.
________
Source: http://82.221.129.208/.un9.html
RENSE POSTED A DOOZIE: Self-Spreading Vaccines Are No Myth...It's Hard Science Johns Hopkins Confirmed Them - Covid Genocide Is Here
May 2, 2021
May 2, 2021
Summary: The father of Bill Gates established the Gates foundation and passed it on to his kid, who changed the name. Under the former name, the foundation funded work in self-spreading vaccines for the purpose of triggering massive die-offs, which was tested successfully on rabbits. The people who developed these "vaccines" erected the Georgia Guidestones AND paid for the development of the covid "vax". Quote:
"Jeff,
Self spreading vaccines are no myth. Johns Hopkins University confirms it. See attached page down below. I have their original document.
You'll get the vaccine whether you like it or not.
Self propagating vaccines were conceived by Australian Nobel Virologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet. You know about him. As you know, my interest arose when I bought his former house in 2013 and strange things happened. I looked into his life. I was so shocked, I proposed getting a priest in to do an exorcism the house. No joke.
Burnet with his protege Sir Gustav Nossal, and the CSIRO, developed the Myxomatosis virus. First used in Australia on rabbit plagues. It was the world's first self-propagating virus that recognized - self, and acted as a vaccine which caused immune suppression. AIDS for rabbits!
Australia is ground zero for the unfolding Covid genocide.
Burnet and William Gates were friends.
William Gates started the William Gates foundation, later renamed the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Burnet's prot辿g辿, Gustav Nossal went on to work for the foundation and WHO after Burnet died in 1985. He carried forth the Burnet-Gates Senior plan for genocide.
Gates, Sr. and Burnet conceived and financed the genocidal message on the Georgia Guide stones. Think about that.
The two were friends with the eugenists William Shockley who engaged a friend Dr Herman Kermet to undertake the works incognito. I trust you watched the doco, Dark Clouds over Elberton.
The US bio weapons lab at Fort Detrick commissioned Burnet who proposed unleashing an Influenza Carona Virus on China in 1947. The technology of the time couldn't guarantee no virus blowback, so it was shelved. He was also working for the British equivalent. Burnet was seriously connected.
In the late 1970s, the Australian government CSIRO developed CRISPR gene editing for Myrtleford, Victoria tobacco farmers. They originally called it Gene Shears. The science minister of the time, Barry Jones, stated the technology would change the world. It has. We've seen none of the full horrors yet of chimera humans and ethic DNA targets bioweapons which was Burnet's dream.
The CRISPR biotech is being used for the Covid Myxoma self-spreading 'vaccine' bioweapon.
Melbourne, Australia is ground zero for Covid technology and the Gates family plan. It was also ground zero for curfews, lockdowns, freedom of movement denial and mask wearing. The techniques spread around the globe.
Both Burnet and Gates were eugenists connected to the London Eugenics society (rebranded the Gaulton institute to drop the term 'eugenics'). Bill Gates has been marinated in this stuff from his childhood. He is executing the plans of his father and the maniacal Sir Macfarlane Burnet.
More at this link
"Jeff,
Self spreading vaccines are no myth. Johns Hopkins University confirms it. See attached page down below. I have their original document.
You'll get the vaccine whether you like it or not.
Self propagating vaccines were conceived by Australian Nobel Virologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet. You know about him. As you know, my interest arose when I bought his former house in 2013 and strange things happened. I looked into his life. I was so shocked, I proposed getting a priest in to do an exorcism the house. No joke.
Burnet with his protege Sir Gustav Nossal, and the CSIRO, developed the Myxomatosis virus. First used in Australia on rabbit plagues. It was the world's first self-propagating virus that recognized - self, and acted as a vaccine which caused immune suppression. AIDS for rabbits!
Australia is ground zero for the unfolding Covid genocide.
Burnet and William Gates were friends.
William Gates started the William Gates foundation, later renamed the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Burnet's prot辿g辿, Gustav Nossal went on to work for the foundation and WHO after Burnet died in 1985. He carried forth the Burnet-Gates Senior plan for genocide.
Gates, Sr. and Burnet conceived and financed the genocidal message on the Georgia Guide stones. Think about that.
The two were friends with the eugenists William Shockley who engaged a friend Dr Herman Kermet to undertake the works incognito. I trust you watched the doco, Dark Clouds over Elberton.
The US bio weapons lab at Fort Detrick commissioned Burnet who proposed unleashing an Influenza Carona Virus on China in 1947. The technology of the time couldn't guarantee no virus blowback, so it was shelved. He was also working for the British equivalent. Burnet was seriously connected.
In the late 1970s, the Australian government CSIRO developed CRISPR gene editing for Myrtleford, Victoria tobacco farmers. They originally called it Gene Shears. The science minister of the time, Barry Jones, stated the technology would change the world. It has. We've seen none of the full horrors yet of chimera humans and ethic DNA targets bioweapons which was Burnet's dream.
The CRISPR biotech is being used for the Covid Myxoma self-spreading 'vaccine' bioweapon.
Melbourne, Australia is ground zero for Covid technology and the Gates family plan. It was also ground zero for curfews, lockdowns, freedom of movement denial and mask wearing. The techniques spread around the globe.
Both Burnet and Gates were eugenists connected to the London Eugenics society (rebranded the Gaulton institute to drop the term 'eugenics'). Bill Gates has been marinated in this stuff from his childhood. He is executing the plans of his father and the maniacal Sir Macfarlane Burnet.
More at this link
________
Doesn't it just make you feel all warm and fucking fuzzy inside to know DARPA and the US military have been working on injections for the general population because they care about your health? Then when the world is being traumatized by a fake global Covid pandemic, the pharmaceutical cartels along with Pfizer introduce by their own admission "experimental" Covid injections.
More:
Related to the above material:
If you get Covid injected and you are damaged or injured you are shit out of luck on your insurance coverage:
Vaccine (injection) wars:
Related:
The vaccination causes bodies to give off bio-weapons?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.