"Running amok, sometimes referred to as simply amok,[1] also spelled amuk, from the Javanese language,[2] is "an episode of sudden mass assault against people or objects usually by a single individual following a period of brooding that has traditionally been regarded as occurring especially in Malay culture but is now increasingly viewed as psychopathological behavior occurring worldwide in numerous countries and cultures".[3] The syndrome of "Amok" is found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV TR).[4] The phrase is often used in a less serious manner when describing something that is wildly out of control or causing a frenzy (e.g., a dog tearing up the living room furniture might be termed as "running amok.")"
"AirAsia Flight QZ8501: Mysterious Chinese Man Predicted [Black Hand] Disappearance Two Weeks Ago By Gopi Chandra Kharel December 29, 2014 13:18 IST In an eerie blog post about two weeks ago, a mysterious Chinese man had warned that an AirAsia plane was going to disappear or meet a tragic end. And about a fortnight later, AirAisa flight QZ8501 disappeared from the air traffic control radar system on the morning of 27 December. The post has gone viral on social media and discussion forums such as Reddit, with people reacting in astonishment on how the person could have predicted it. The man behind the post apparently explains that the same people who brought down MH370 were going to attack another Malaysian airlines flight or an AirAsiaplane. The post alleges that an organisation called "The International Black Hand" is behind the disappearance of the airplanes. Black Hand is the term that is understood to be a metaphor for the shadowy organisation that does its work behind the scenes.. "Black Hand hijacked and shot down MH370 and MH17. This has pretty much killed the 6th largest airline -- Malaysian airline," the post read, according to a loose translation by a Reddit member…"
"Daily Mail Pictured for first time, the hero pilot who tried to break down door of Germanwings cockpit Mr Sondheimer frantically tried to break down cockpit door before crash Photograph of the captain is the first to have been released since disaster It has emerged Lubitz was planning the attack online using name Skydevil Display created before staff learned Lubitz deliberately crashed the aircraft By EMILY KENT SMITH and ALAN HALL FOR THE DAILY MAIL PUBLISHED: 21:13 GMT, 6 April 2015 | UPDATED: 15:20 GMT, 7 April 2015 .. Mr Lubitz is the man who orchestrated the disaster by steering flight 9525, from Barcelona to Dusseldorf, into the mountains killing all of those on board. It has since emerged that Mr Lubitz had carefully planned the attack using the online pseudonym 'Skydevil', according to the German newspaper Bild. [Daily Mail and Bild-Zeitung are the principal co-practitioners of Serco or RCA GB Black Hand propaganda since the 1963 murder of JFK]
McConnell notes Serco (formerly RCA GB 1929 and now the world's largest air traffic controller) processed a 2 millionth patent application for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in March 2013 giving its Black Hand navigators access to the Honeywell patented devices needed either to cause or to prevent the amok Airbus crashes of AF Flight 447, QZ Flight 8501 and Germanwings 9525.
McConnell notes that the Honeywell patent to prevent Airbus amok crashes is also published in jurisdictions where Serco's Black Hand navigators have Crown rights to practise any patents issued such as DE602004010087D1, DE602004010087T2, EP1614084A1, EP1614084B1, US20040217232, WO2005004081A1.
Black Hand* – Serco navigators' using "Crown Patent Rights to Track, Film and Kill" from the City of London's Honourable Artillery Company 1537; The Master Mariners and The Air Pilots (formerly GAPAN) 1929, and The Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company of Massachusetts 1638 – whose alumni include U.S. Presidents James Monroe, Chester Alan Arthur, Calvin Coolidge and John F. Kennedy and – perhaps – Barack 'Down Low Club' Obama.
McConnell (30 year airline and 22 year military pilot with 23,000 hours of safety) is offering his services as an expert witness to the families of Andreas Lubitz and fellow victims of the amok crash of Flight 9525 who may wish to claim damages in a suit for wrongful deaths against Serco and its Black Hand shareholders including HSBC, Allianz and Her Majesty's Government.
Prequel 1: #2323: Marine Links Ad Hoc Amok Serco To Clinton Base-One Patents, Black Hand Wag of Honeywell Dog
Prequel 2: Episode #78 – SUNDAY WIRE: 'The Friendly Skies', host Patrick Henningsen with guest Field McConnell
Authorities: Plane distress call 'emergency, emergency'
Serco... Would you like to know more?
SWISSLEAKS - "HSBC developed dangerous clients: arms merchants, drug dealers, terrorism financers"
Copy of SERCO GROUP PLC: List of Subsidiaries AND Shareholders! (Mobile Playback Version) [Note that HSBC is Serco's banker and, with Allianz and Her Majesty's Government, one of Serco's major shareholders]
“Killer pilot Andreas Lubitz ACCELERATED
INTO Alps mountain, data from doomed plane's second black box recorder reveals .. By SIMON TOMLINSON and PETER ALLEN FOR MAILONLINE PUBLISHED: 09:58 GMT, 3 April
2015 | UPDATED: 12:19 GMT, 3 April 2015 Killer pilot
Andreas Lubitz accelerated the doomed Germanwings jet into the mountain,
data from the second black box recorder revealed today. French air accident
investigators said the 27-year-old used the automatic pilot to put the plane
into a descent and repeatedly adjusted the controls to speed up the aircraft.”
"ZWEITE BLACKBOX BESTÄTIGT: ANDREAS LUBITZ FLOG MIT ABSICHT IN DEN TOD|Amok-Pilot beschleunigte mehrfach vor dem Absturz Flugdatenschreiber zeichnet über 500 Daten
auf – was kann er noch verraten? 03.04.2015 - 14:22 Uhr Paris – Die
Auswertung der zweiten Blackbox bestätigt: Amok-Pilot Andreas Lubitz (†27) flog die
149 Menschen an Bord des Germanwings-Airbus mit Absicht in den Tod. Der
Co-Pilot hat kurz vor dem Absturz in den französischen Alpen das Flugzeug
mehrfach beschleunigt. Dies teilten die französischen Ermittler mit. Der
Co-Pilot habe den Autopiloten wiederholt so verändert, dass die Geschwindigkeit
im Sinkflug der Maschine beschleunigt wurde, erklärte die französische
Luftfahrtermittlungsbehörde BEA in Paris. Der Autopilot sei so eingestellt
worden, dass die Maschine auf 100 Fuß sinkt. Das habe eine "erste" Auswertung
des am Donnerstag geborgenen Flugdatenschreibers ergeben."
"Germanwings Flight 9525(4U9525/GWI18G[5][a])
was a scheduled international passenger flight from Barcelona–El Prat Airport in Spain
to Düsseldorf Airport in Germany, operated by Germanwings,
a low-cost airline owned by Lufthansa.
On 24 March 2015,
the aircraft, an Airbus A320-200, crashed 100 kilometres
(62 mi) northwest of Nice, in the French Alps,
after a constant descent that began one minute after the last routine contact
with air traffic control and shortly after the
aircraft had reached its assigned cruise
altitude. All 144 passengers and six crew members were killed.
The crash was intentionally caused by the co-pilot, Andreas Lubitz. Having previously been treated for suicidal tendencies and been declared "unfit to work" by a doctor, Lubitz kept this information from his employer and reported for duty. During the flight, he locked the captain out of the cockpit before initiating a descent that caused the plane to crash into a mountain."
"From the early days of the Republic, Congress and the federal courts grappled with the government’s rights to own or use patents it issued. Courts rejected the British "Crown Rights" rule that allowed the sovereign to practice whatever patents it issued. Instead, the federal government was conceptualized as a legal person on par with any other persons with regard to issued patents. But, this simple rule presented challenges as complexities arose in three intertwined patent rights scenarios. The first involved inventions by government employees. The second revolved around government and government contractor use of patents held by private citizens. And the third involved inventions by federal contractors and their employees arising under federal funding."
"System and method for automatically controlling a path of travel of a vehicle EP 1450227 A2 ABSTRACT The method and system for automatically controlling a path of travel of a vehicle include engaging an automatic control system when the security of the onboard controls is jeopardized. Engagement may be automatic or manual from inside the vehicle or remotely via a communication link. Any onboard capability to supersede the automatic control system may then be disabled by disconnecting the onboard controls and/or providing uninterruptible power to the automatic control system via a path that does not include the onboard accessible power control element(s). The operation of the vehicle is then controlled via the processing element of the automatic control system. The control commands may be received from a remote location and/or from predetermined control commands that are stored onboard the vehicle."
"US7475851
B2 … Referring to FIG. 3, a flow diagram 300 depicts operation of the first
embodiment 100 of the apparatus for preventing an unauthorized flight of an
aircraft. The flow begins when the UFD 110 senses 302 a manual trigger through
the operator control 116. At this point, the uninterruptible power supply 114
supplies 304 uninterruptible power to the UFD 110 and other elements, such as
the FBW system 104 and the AFCS 108, required for controlling the aircraft.
"Uninterruptible power" as used herein is defined as power that is
not routed through a circuit breaker or switch in the cockpit. To the extent
possible, it is preferable that the power cannot be easily interrupted from
anywhere inside the aircraft while it is in flight.
In response to the manual trigger, the UFD 110 communicates with the FBW system 104 and the AFCS 108 to carry out 306 a transfer of control of the FBW system 104 from the cockpit controls 102 to the AFCS 108. It is worth noting here that the transfer of control can be either complete or partial, depending upon what is deemed to be prudent. In the case of a transfer of complete control to the AFCS 108, all cockpit controls will cease to function, and the aircraft will be controlled exclusively by the AFCS 108, maintaining, for example, the current heading, airspeed, and altitude of the aircraft. While this might seem to be a sure way to foil a would-be-terrorist, it could have disastrous results if the aircraft were, for example, flying at a low altitude and heading toward a high mountain. An alternative, perhaps more prudent, approach would be to transfer partial control of the aircraft to the AFCS 108. For example, the cockpit controls might be allowed to initiate gentle turns, but not allowed to cause the aircraft to descend. As a further alternative, the AFCS 108 could be programmed to cause the aircraft to change to a predetermined altitude. Yet another alternative would be to allow the aircraft to descend only when coupled with an automatic landing system of an airport. Because the AFCS 108 and the UFD 110 are controlled by processors and software, the degrees of the transfer of control are virtually unlimited and thus preferably are programmable through well-known techniques, so that future changes and improvements can be implemented easily."
In response to the manual trigger, the UFD 110 communicates with the FBW system 104 and the AFCS 108 to carry out 306 a transfer of control of the FBW system 104 from the cockpit controls 102 to the AFCS 108. It is worth noting here that the transfer of control can be either complete or partial, depending upon what is deemed to be prudent. In the case of a transfer of complete control to the AFCS 108, all cockpit controls will cease to function, and the aircraft will be controlled exclusively by the AFCS 108, maintaining, for example, the current heading, airspeed, and altitude of the aircraft. While this might seem to be a sure way to foil a would-be-terrorist, it could have disastrous results if the aircraft were, for example, flying at a low altitude and heading toward a high mountain. An alternative, perhaps more prudent, approach would be to transfer partial control of the aircraft to the AFCS 108. For example, the cockpit controls might be allowed to initiate gentle turns, but not allowed to cause the aircraft to descend. As a further alternative, the AFCS 108 could be programmed to cause the aircraft to change to a predetermined altitude. Yet another alternative would be to allow the aircraft to descend only when coupled with an automatic landing system of an airport. Because the AFCS 108 and the UFD 110 are controlled by processors and software, the degrees of the transfer of control are virtually unlimited and thus preferably are programmable through well-known techniques, so that future changes and improvements can be implemented easily."
"In 2005, avionics supplier, Honeywell, was reported to be talking to both Boeing and Airbus about fitting a device aimed at preventing a 9/11-style hijack. On 16 April 2003, Honeywell filed patent US7475851 B2, Method and apparatus for preventing an unauthorized flight of an aircraft. Airbus and BAE Systems, had been working on the project with Honeywell. Development sped up after the September 11, 2001 attacks."
"How often does an autopilot update the position of the ailerons (or any other control surface) during cruise? Per second, per minute, or something else? …. This is not only an Autopilot-specific question but also a design-specific question, which will be different based on the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and the Aircraft Specification. Usually in modern aircraft, the Autopilot sends commands to Flight Control System which then sends commands to Actuators and this progression of commands happens at different rates. This update rate could be, for example, 100 Hz (10 ms), 80 Hz (12.5 ms) or may be even slower or faster, depending on the flight control system of the aircraft. So, the command is not sent per second or minute, but rather 100's of commands per second, because commands to move the control surface are the most critical commands on an aircraft."
"111 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10011
Description Base One Technologies, Ltd. is a DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION,
located in New York, NY and was formed on Feb 15, 1994. This file was obtained from the Secretary of
State and has a file number of 1795583. This business was created
7,695 days ago in the New York SOS Office and the registered agent is C T
Corporation System that does business at 111 Eighth Avenue , New York in New
York. Principals Liza R Zaneri Chief Executive Officer 15 Irving Place New
Rochelle, NY 10801 Registered Agent C T Corporation System 111 EIGHTH
AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10011"
"SOURCE: Base One Technologies September 02, 2008 09:00 ET Base One Technologies, Inc. Continues Operations in Government Space NEW ROCHELLE, NY--(Marketwire - September 2, 2008) - Base One Technologies, Inc. is pleased to announce that it has sold its affiliate, Base One Technologies Ltd., to Apptis Inc. Base One Technologies, Inc. will continue to compete in the government space as an 8(a), HubZone and Woman Owned Small Disadvantage Company. Base One Technologies, Inc. is an IT Engineering and Technical Services company founded in 1994. Base One has a Top Secret Facilities Clearance and specializes in: Enterprise Architecture, Network Infrastructure Support, Data Security, Software & Database Services, Disaster Recovery & Contingency Planning, and Independent Validation & Verification. Base One is a privately-held organization with headquarters in New Rochelle, NY. For more information visit: www.base-one.com. Contact Information: Liza R. Zaneri Base One Technologies 914 633-0200 x205 “www.base-one.com"
"Serco's Office of Partner Relations (OPR) helps facilitate our aggressive small business utilization and growth strategies. Through the OPR, Serco mentors four local small businesses under formal Mentor Protégé Agreements: Three sponsored by DHS (Base One Technologies, TSymmetry, Inc., and HeiTech Services, Inc.,) and the fourth sponsored by GSA (DKW Communications, Inc.). Serco and HeiTech Services were awarded the 2007 DHS Mentor Protégé Team Award for exceeding our mentoring goals.”
Yours sincerely,
Field McConnell, United States Naval Academy, 1971; Forensic Economist; 30 year airline and 22 year military pilot; 23,000 hours of safety; Tel: 715 307 8222
David Hawkins Tel: 604 542-0891 Forensic Economist; former leader of oil-well blow-out teams; now sponsors Grand Juries in CSI Crime and Safety Investigation
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.