Prequel 1:
Marine Links British Bankers' Libor Canada to Bombardier Underground Bomb
Prequel 2:
London Underground Bombing
“Sky News London Bombings Actors & Agents”
Soc Gen short, snuff swap coordinated through U.K. MoD PKI root key (sold by Bettina Jordan Barber) to Rupert Murdoch and Sky News
“New support for Canary Wharf story
October 22, 2010 NK56 comments
On 11th October (the day the 7/7 Inquest began), ‘Huggles’ recalled how he had been at King’s Cross station when it all happened:
I was in Kings Cross right after the Piccadilly line blast and there was no problem calling into work to tell my boss that I would be late [a propos of whether mobile phones were working]. I then went into cafe to wait for the hubbub to die down. Over the radio we discovered that it was more than one bomb.
Just over an hour and a half later, there was a report on Radio 5 that some of the bombers were shot by armed response units in the Docklands. When I got home that evening, the news reports said that all the bombers died in the explosions.
The site owner Kevin Boyle asked him whether he had personally heard that Radio 5 news announcement, and ‘Huggles’ replied:
Kevin,
I heard it on the radio but when I got home and I sat in front of the tv for the rest of that evening, it was not repeated. It was in the cafe I heard the news report.
Is this the first mention of a Radio 5 news-announcement, on the 11 o’clock news that morning, of this shooting, at Canary Wharf in the Docklands, of maybe three young men? For comparison, British philosopher Rory Ridley-Duff at Sheffield compiled 17 accounts from the media of this event at Canary Wharf having happened. In addition there are a few more in Appendix 3 of my book. Does anyone else recall such a news-announcement that morning?
If you’re new to the Canary Wharf story, maybe watch the fifth chapter of Muad’Dib’s Ripple Effect.The story often comes with dramatic accounts of how the entire Wharf was ‘locked down’ and 8000 workers in the 44-storey tower were told to stay away from windows and remain in the building for ‘at least six hours.’ By the evening the police were trying to dismiss the whole thing.
For comparison, here is a fairly well-known version of the story, reported Down Under:
A New Zealander working for Reuters in London says two colleagues witnessed the unconfirmed shooting by police of two apparent suicide bombers outside the HSBC tower at Canary Wharf in London. The New Zealander, who did not want to be named, said the killing of the two men wearing bombs happened at 10.30am on Thursday (London time). If it happened, it was an operation ‘Kratos’ job, whereby certain senior police officers are (shockingly) permitted to shoot a member of the public in the head, if they are deemed to be a ‘suicide bomber’ and about to blow themselves up. Thus the above report has the two people shot because they were ‘wearing bombs’ – that judgement is necessary for a Kratos shooting to take place – compare the De Menezes shooting where early accounts had him with a ‘bulging’ raincoat as if they were trying to make out they thought he might be ‘wearing bombs’ as their excuse for shooting him in the head on 22 July 2005 at Stockwell tube station.
Danish News Report on the Day
The search by Ridley-Duff using Nexis UK, a database used by universities to research news stories, omitted the following. ‘TV2/News’ is a Danish national TV channel that runs their own news department, producing news for both TV and the internet. At 5 pm on 7.7.05 it published the following (in Danish): Eyewitnesses:
Two men shot in London
TV 2/NEWS have just spoken with Marianne Jørgensen who is employed by the Access Flooring Company in London. She has learned through co-workers in the company that two suspected suicide-bombers have been shot and killed at Canary Wharf.
“They called one of our presidents and told him that they have witnessed two men being shot – deliberately, by police or soldiers”, Marianne Jørgensen told to TV 2/NEWS. The police however denied at a press conference having received information about anyone being shot.
So this important news announcement gave both an eyewitness account and the subsequent denial by Brian Paddick of the Metropolitan police. (Thanks to Timothy for info) Let’s note Paddick’s careful words (at a press meeting at 1.45 GMT)- Can you tell me — the rumors that a police sniper shot dead a suicide bombter at Canary Wharf — do you know anything about that?”
Paddick responded: “We have no reports of any police sniper shooting at anybody today.” So this statement was not quite as the Danish news report had it: Paddick stated (truthfully) not that he had no information about anyone being shot, but no information about his police force shooting anyone, that morning. NB that news announcement was broadcast on CNN’s morning news in the US, but not on British news channels that day.”
“The Next Generation of Private & Corporate Banking D2-Banking - Data custody and Digital banking [In HSBC offices HQ] - is the guaranteed custody [escrow] of genomic maps and medical records; art, photo, music and video [snuff films] collections; personal files including wills, deeds and memoirs; and other intellectual property alongside traditional financial services. "Before the end of this decade every individual around the world will have the convenience and guaranteed security of one stop D2-Banking, which will become second nature to its customers as they enjoy the ability to store and access data and finances from anywhere at anytime without fear of being hacked or plagued by malicious software." DK Matai, Executive Chairman, mi2g D2-Banking™ is an holistic approach to banking, which has evolved over the last eight years from eDFi™ to create the next generation of wealth management. D2-Banking utilises mi2g's award winning Bespoke Security Architecture™ pedigree to deliver combined digital banking and data custody services with guaranteed security. The first phase of the D2-Banking™ initiative was completed on 17th December 2003, the same day as the first centenary of the Wright Brothers' powered flight from Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. The Executive Summary for D2-Banking™ in pdf format can be accessed from here. Please contact us to find out more about delivering combined digital banking and data custody services.”
“Why no criminal charges in HSBC case? Excellent report from tonight's
CBS national news broadcast.
---
(CBS News) As bank slogans go, they don't come worse than this: "The preferred financial institution of drug cartels and money launderers."
That's a quote Tuesday in a U.S. Department of Justice report about HSBC Holdings, one of the largest banks in the world. To avoid criminal prosecution, HSBC admitted Tuesday that it laundered more than $800 million for Mexican drug cartels, and covered up illegal transactions for Burma, Iran, Sudan, Cuba, and Libya.
The British bank will pay $1.9 billion to the U.S. government, the largest such fine in history.
It's a case that has everything -- everything accept an arrest. That struck some as odd, because in 80 pages of court documents, the bank admits to almost going out of its way to act as a financial clearing house for international pariahs and drug dealers.
Feds outline HSBC ties to laundering, drug money
HSBC chief apologizes for lax controls
HSBC legal costs rise by $1.1B, shares slump
Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer said: "HSBC is paying a heavy price for its conduct, and under the terms of today's agreement, if the bank fails to comply with the agreement in any way, any way at all, we reserve the right as the government to fully prosecute it."
Under the terms of Tuesday's settlement, nobody at HSBC will face criminal charges.
Notre Dame professor Jimmy Gurule, who investigated money-laundering cases for the Treasury Department, said:
"We're not talking about mere negligence. We're talking about a criminal scheme that was adopted as a policy of HSBC that involved looking the other way in regard to suspicious transactions involving money laundering."
Some would say that the message is, if you break all the laws you can, until you get caught, you may have to pay a lot of money, but you're not gonna go to jail.
U.S Attorney Lynch, who is one of the architects of Tuesday's settlement, disputed that idea, and said: "That's a very short-sighted view, I think, because in this case they're obviously paying a great deal of money, but they also have to literally had to turn their company inside out. And the message should be that that's what you have to do."
As for the lack of criminal prosecutions, the feds said that they never found one bank official, or any collection of bank officials acting together, that were doing this on purpose.
They painted a picture of a disorganized bank that was collecting all these fees either not knowing, or not wanting to know where it all came from. ”
More to follow.
PresidentialField
Abel Danger
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.