We are constantly reminded that humanity...

Editor's note: ...is under threat by AI, but hasn't humanity always been threatened by systems man has created? Take education for example, a student goes to school seven hours a day, five days a week for twelve years long. A child enters a building and is taught to sit and be silent unless permitted to speak. Has to ask permission to use the bathroom. Learns the wrong questions are an interruption and the questions printed in the textbook are the only questions that are allowed. The child earns that their worth is measured and printed on a piece of paper. The child learns that thinking outside orthodoxy is a problem that must be corrected. By the time the child leaves the building twelve years later, the curious organism that arrived in the building at age six, has been processed into a compliant unit that knows how to perform attention but no longer knows what she or he actually wants. This isn't a malfunction after twelve years. This is the intended product. The system was designed to do precisely this by the people who designed this system in the 19th century. It was called "education" and still is. When these same institutions that have done this to children turn to you and say, "they are worried about an AI chatbot harming young minds," you have to stop and ask yourself, what minds?
________

AI Re-routes

by Miles Mathis | May 4, 2026

After losing $2 trillion in market cap in AI firms and scaling the data centers back by at least 75%, the Phoenician Navy had to find another way to charge you for all this mist and forestall their imminent collapse, so in recent days we have found a lot of articles talking about these companies like OpenAI, Oracle, and others joining the defense department as contractors, feeding from the treasury through the defense budget. They have already been doing that for years, but it just got much bigger. Oracle appears to be the new leader in this, so it is curious this news came out just weeks after Oracle lost billions and fired thousands. I guess that is why Trump is wanting to increase the DoD by 50% to $1.5 trillion per year. It isn't the computers that are so hungry, it is these thieves, always hungry for the next con.

Then today came the news that Anthropic, a nearly imaginary company, is joining Goldman Sachs, Blackstone, and other big Wall Street firms to feed on you that way. Doesn't that make you feel toasty? These companies already have their snorkels deep in the treasury via the banks and the Federal Reserve, and Trump will no doubt find some way to increase that air supply as well, through some LIBOR-like scams. If you stop the theft in one direction, they just take a more direct route.

I mentioned to a friend that it looked like this AI scam was already a success, despite the reported collapse of data centers. As we have seen before, these gambits don't even need to come to fruition, and are often more profitable in failure. They make huge returns on the upside and downside even when, or especially when, they completely fail to produce a product. These huge AI firms have already siphoned billions from the treasury in subsidies and fake "partnerships" with the government: I remind you of Trump's appearance with Larry Ellison on day two of his term, announcing billions in funding. Funding from where? From you, of course. From the usual raid on the US treasury. And when this all inevitably goes in the crapper, the same thing will happen again, but this time it will be called a bailout instead of a partnership. These companies will be called "too big to fail" and will be given a second huge dip in the treasury to keep them solvent. Everyone involved will be given the usual raises and bonuses and golden parachutes for their failures, retiring to their private islands or maybe faking their deaths. Same thing we see every decade or two now. They have been at it since the time of Lincoln (and before) with these schemes, the only difference being that they get more brazen each time.

And in other news, we saw Infowars go "off air" this week, though Alex admits he will just rename it and keep going. So what's with that? Well, they needed some pretend closure on Alex's Sandy Hook adventure, to keep people like me from continuing to ridicule them. This will also help fundraising, since Alex can use it for a bigger beg from his audience, to "save" him from these evil entities like the Onion who are after him. It's all the usual bluff. How do I know? Because Sandy Hook was a complete fiction and there are no Sandy Hook parents. The lawsuits were also fake, including the trials, as I have shown. It was all the usual vaudeville, more than 13 years of it now.