Latest update for 25 March 2024 suggesting the shooting in Moscow was staged: Current Events
Wolfgang Eggert - Zionists are Behind Moscow Terror Attack
March 23, 2024
World War Three is a replay of WW2 with the Right & Left wings of Freemasonry fighting each other.
Israel and the Zionist West is reprising the Nazis (Israeli gov't is racist & genocidal, Ukraine fosters Nazism) while Freemasons in Russia, China, Iran, radical Islam and the BRICS assume the Communist role.
German historian Wolfgang Eggert raises questions about the official Russian narrative. 15 Suspicious Things about the Moscow Terror Attack:
What you need to know about the site of the Moscow terrorist attack
News update for 24 March 2024: US destroyed anti-terrorism cooperation – Moscow
________
Wolfgang Eggert - Zionists are Behind Moscow Terror Attack
March 23, 2024
Israel and the Zionist West is reprising the Nazis (Israeli gov't is racist & genocidal, Ukraine fosters Nazism) while Freemasons in Russia, China, Iran, radical Islam and the BRICS assume the Communist role.
German historian Wolfgang Eggert raises questions about the official Russian narrative. 15 Suspicious Things about the Moscow Terror Attack:
by Wolfgang Eggert
"Russia is supporting the enemies of Israel. Russia is supporting Nazi people who want to commit genocide on us and Russia will pay the price," Weitmann said. "We're gonna win this war. Afterwards, we're not forgetting what you're doing, we're not forgetting, we will come, we will make sure Ukraine wins. We will make sure that you pay the price for what you have done, you as Russia."
The waves of emotions were rising again when, on February 16th, Putin invited Hamas and other Palestinian groups for talks to Moscow. Just one week later, on February 22nd, Biden's representative for Ukraine, Israel-firster Victoria Nuland promised an "acceleration of the asymmetric warfare" against Russia.
Putin would be "sure to face some nasty surprises", said Nuland, who had her hand in the terrorist shootings on Maidan and, as is said, in the bombing of the eurasian pipeline "Northstream".
Being Jewish - knows its meaning: February 22nd matches in the Hebrew calendar with the 13. adar/ta'anit Esther, a holy day, that marks Israel's triumph over its enemies.
Two weeks later Nuland announced her political "retirement" as Deputy Secretary of State. Hardly anyone expected this move which was confirmed by the Biden Adminstration on March 6th.
Only 24 hours later Russia's secret service FSB announced it had thwarted a planned terrorist attack on a Moscow synagogue.
2. The embassies of the US and Great Britain warned their citizens on March 7th that there was an imminent danger of terror attacks on mass gatherings in moscow - in this context "concerts" being underlined.
3. Why did the terrorists choose to drive a conspicuous car (foreign licence plate)?
4. Video suggests that there had been more than 4 persons active in the shooting. The getaway car is quite small, so: where is the second vehicle?
5. Why did the terrorists enter the building. A drive-by shooting in front of the building - before or after the concert, would have been far easier for them to manage. All would have been over in a minute, there would have been no hiding grounds for the crowd being targeted (=more casualties, higher anonymity for themselves..) the decision against the "easy performance" looks like a demonstration of power. "we strike the way we want to."
6. The terrorists planned to flee from the scene. for this not being identified is a precondition. why didn't they use balaclavas then? again they behaved as if they had diplomatic passports in their pockets. and helpers in the management of the concert hall, who switched off all cctv cams.
7. The terrorists didn't look like typical is-islamists. None of them had a beard, no suicide bombing, no "alahu akbar" shouts were heard.
8. The massive stone building caught fire like tinder. Only fire accelerators and lots of gasoline make it ignite that quickly. According to reports by eyewitnesses, the terrorists were carrying large plastic bags with them, that were filled with fluid. Mobilphone videos of the terrorists entering the building are in contrast to these "statements".
9. Spectators said that, when they tried to flee the concert hall, they found all doors locked. Nevertheless the terrorists (who came late) entered the building without visible problems - and they, this is even more mysterious - were able to leave, when they had finished their bloody work. This indicates, that they had a key or helpers within the security staff.
10. Police and fire-brigades were late at the scene - although there must have been hundreds of phone calls real time when the shooting started. What is the reason for this delay?
11. The terrorists did manage to leave the scene - untouched and unchased. to go into hiding in moscow would have been a quick and smart entering wedgee for a successful escape.
12. There were two men being shown arrested not too far from the Ukrainian border. They were interrogated on spot. it was said, that their car had been stopped by the police - both men fled into a forest where they were caught. This is a circumstantial evidence for an involvement of the Ukraine. But, why should a mastermind in Kiev take such a risk by telling the terrorists to come this way?
13. The first reports said, that during the arrest " a shot" had been fired. given the fact, that the Moscow terrorists were armed to the teeth, the question arises: why didn't they snow their counterparts under an avalanche of ammunition?
14. The arrests were made "in the evening of the 22th". pictures show, that this happened in daylight. this is not possible: when the shooting started, it was already past sunset in moscow. who then is/was presented to us there?
15. Why hadn't there been any letters claiming responsibility - being sent on 22th, reaching the addresses the next day? Neither had been expressive threats before, on the part of the islamic state against russia, as the direct conflict between the parties is history now, for years.
Wolfgang Eggert -- Jewish Doomsday Cult Controls West, Plots WW3
Ukrainian-sponsored terrorists arrested and are being interrogated by the Russian FSB
(henrymakow.com)
1. Russia has an alliance with Jerusalem's arch enemies Syria and Iran; Putins humanitarian support for Gaza and the Hamas after October 7th 2023 nearly crashed the diplomatic relations between the two countries.
1. Russia has an alliance with Jerusalem's arch enemies Syria and Iran; Putins humanitarian support for Gaza and the Hamas after October 7th 2023 nearly crashed the diplomatic relations between the two countries.
Amir Weitmann, the head of the libertarian caucus in Israel's ruling Likud party, promised a bloody revenge on the Kremlin - the 'Russians would pay for supporting the enemies of Israel' he shouted at a stunned reporter of the Russia tv channel RT.
"Russia is supporting the enemies of Israel. Russia is supporting Nazi people who want to commit genocide on us and Russia will pay the price," Weitmann said. "We're gonna win this war. Afterwards, we're not forgetting what you're doing, we're not forgetting, we will come, we will make sure Ukraine wins. We will make sure that you pay the price for what you have done, you as Russia."
Putin would be "sure to face some nasty surprises", said Nuland, who had her hand in the terrorist shootings on Maidan and, as is said, in the bombing of the eurasian pipeline "Northstream".
Being Jewish - knows its meaning: February 22nd matches in the Hebrew calendar with the 13. adar/ta'anit Esther, a holy day, that marks Israel's triumph over its enemies.
Two weeks later Nuland announced her political "retirement" as Deputy Secretary of State. Hardly anyone expected this move which was confirmed by the Biden Adminstration on March 6th.
Only 24 hours later Russia's secret service FSB announced it had thwarted a planned terrorist attack on a Moscow synagogue.
2. The embassies of the US and Great Britain warned their citizens on March 7th that there was an imminent danger of terror attacks on mass gatherings in moscow - in this context "concerts" being underlined.
3. Why did the terrorists choose to drive a conspicuous car (foreign licence plate)?
4. Video suggests that there had been more than 4 persons active in the shooting. The getaway car is quite small, so: where is the second vehicle?
5. Why did the terrorists enter the building. A drive-by shooting in front of the building - before or after the concert, would have been far easier for them to manage. All would have been over in a minute, there would have been no hiding grounds for the crowd being targeted (=more casualties, higher anonymity for themselves..) the decision against the "easy performance" looks like a demonstration of power. "we strike the way we want to."
6. The terrorists planned to flee from the scene. for this not being identified is a precondition. why didn't they use balaclavas then? again they behaved as if they had diplomatic passports in their pockets. and helpers in the management of the concert hall, who switched off all cctv cams.
8. The massive stone building caught fire like tinder. Only fire accelerators and lots of gasoline make it ignite that quickly. According to reports by eyewitnesses, the terrorists were carrying large plastic bags with them, that were filled with fluid. Mobilphone videos of the terrorists entering the building are in contrast to these "statements".
9. Spectators said that, when they tried to flee the concert hall, they found all doors locked. Nevertheless the terrorists (who came late) entered the building without visible problems - and they, this is even more mysterious - were able to leave, when they had finished their bloody work. This indicates, that they had a key or helpers within the security staff.
10. Police and fire-brigades were late at the scene - although there must have been hundreds of phone calls real time when the shooting started. What is the reason for this delay?
11. The terrorists did manage to leave the scene - untouched and unchased. to go into hiding in moscow would have been a quick and smart entering wedgee for a successful escape.
12. There were two men being shown arrested not too far from the Ukrainian border. They were interrogated on spot. it was said, that their car had been stopped by the police - both men fled into a forest where they were caught. This is a circumstantial evidence for an involvement of the Ukraine. But, why should a mastermind in Kiev take such a risk by telling the terrorists to come this way?
13. The first reports said, that during the arrest " a shot" had been fired. given the fact, that the Moscow terrorists were armed to the teeth, the question arises: why didn't they snow their counterparts under an avalanche of ammunition?
14. The arrests were made "in the evening of the 22th". pictures show, that this happened in daylight. this is not possible: when the shooting started, it was already past sunset in moscow. who then is/was presented to us there?
15. Why hadn't there been any letters claiming responsibility - being sent on 22th, reaching the addresses the next day? Neither had been expressive threats before, on the part of the islamic state against russia, as the direct conflict between the parties is history now, for years.
More:
________
Source: South Front Press
Video 18+: Paid Out Terrorists Filmed Their Attack In Moscow
March 24, 2024
Amaq news agency of ISIS published new video filmed by the terrorists during the terrorist attack in the crocus City Hall in Moscow. The footage was provided with the following comment:
The terrorists, who later will not be able to respond a single question during their interrogation, literally posed in front of the camera. Before their detention, the militants managed to share the footage with their customers while driving to the Ukrainian border to receive an award.
Go to South Front Press to view video (Warning: Graphic).
The terrorists are seen cutting the throat of a wounded man. This is too banal. This is one of the most commonly known methods of ISIS terrorists to kill their victims. It seems that the militant was especially ordered to film this move and it was the first moment published online.
The comment by Amaq does not confirm that the terrorist attack was launched by the true ideological ISIS followers. The comment says that this is the 'exclusive footage' shared with the agency. Thus, the footage was likely obtained by Amaq which simply published the ‘exclusive video’; but, ISIS was not behind the organization of this operation, otherwise, the whole coverage format of the operation would be completely different. It seems that the employees of Amaq themselves are a bit in a hurry to fulfill the orders, but they are forced to present the necessary agenda. This is another indirect signal that ISIS is just a smoke screen for the real organizers of the terrorist attack.
The comment claims that the footage shows the bloody "attack on Christians". This is another nonsense since dozens of Muslims were wounded and killed in the concert hall. This is confirmed by the lists of victims released by the Russian Health Ministry and other official sources. The concert had no link to any religion. From time immemorial, Russia has been a country of cohabitation of Orthodox, Muslims, Buddhists and representatives of other faiths. This attack had nothing to do with ideology. The attackers simply fulfilled the order, then earned money. The militants were not jihadists but usual poorly trained mercenaries.
Go to South Front Press to view video (Warning: Graphic).
The fact that the offenders have nothing to do with Islam, with religion in general, is also confirmed by numerous videos of how they were detained, how they behaved during interrogations. The terrorists did not commit suicide during arrest. They didn’t even try to fight but tried to run away. All of them were detained alive, trembling and crying on their knees in front of the Russian men, including Christians and Muslims.
Remember the early 2010s, remember Syria and Iraq, the mid and late 90s, the conflicts in the Balkans, Southern Russia, Central Asia and Afghanistan. Not a single terrorist, obsessed with his fate and ideals, behaved like these ordinary coward mercenaries, who have no Faith, no Homeland, no Morals.
Amaq has discredited itself by the very fact of publishing such videos. Of course, the team of the agency is no more the same as it was a decade ago. It's hard to imagine that the real mouthpiece of ISIS would associate itself with such unbelievers and cowards.
Amaq news agency of ISIS published new video filmed by the terrorists during the terrorist attack in the crocus City Hall in Moscow. The footage was provided with the following comment:
"Exclusive footage for Amaq Agency shows moments from the bloody attack on Christians yesterday in the city of Krasnogorsk in Moscow."The release of the video by ISIS source corresponds to the ongoing informational campaign aimed to hide those responsible for the horrific terrorist attack; but the more evidence is revealed, the more they point to the perpetrators in Kiev and in the West.
The terrorists, who later will not be able to respond a single question during their interrogation, literally posed in front of the camera. Before their detention, the militants managed to share the footage with their customers while driving to the Ukrainian border to receive an award.
Go to South Front Press to view video (Warning: Graphic).
The terrorists are seen cutting the throat of a wounded man. This is too banal. This is one of the most commonly known methods of ISIS terrorists to kill their victims. It seems that the militant was especially ordered to film this move and it was the first moment published online.
The comment by Amaq does not confirm that the terrorist attack was launched by the true ideological ISIS followers. The comment says that this is the 'exclusive footage' shared with the agency. Thus, the footage was likely obtained by Amaq which simply published the ‘exclusive video’; but, ISIS was not behind the organization of this operation, otherwise, the whole coverage format of the operation would be completely different. It seems that the employees of Amaq themselves are a bit in a hurry to fulfill the orders, but they are forced to present the necessary agenda. This is another indirect signal that ISIS is just a smoke screen for the real organizers of the terrorist attack.
The comment claims that the footage shows the bloody "attack on Christians". This is another nonsense since dozens of Muslims were wounded and killed in the concert hall. This is confirmed by the lists of victims released by the Russian Health Ministry and other official sources. The concert had no link to any religion. From time immemorial, Russia has been a country of cohabitation of Orthodox, Muslims, Buddhists and representatives of other faiths. This attack had nothing to do with ideology. The attackers simply fulfilled the order, then earned money. The militants were not jihadists but usual poorly trained mercenaries.
Go to South Front Press to view video (Warning: Graphic).
The fact that the offenders have nothing to do with Islam, with religion in general, is also confirmed by numerous videos of how they were detained, how they behaved during interrogations. The terrorists did not commit suicide during arrest. They didn’t even try to fight but tried to run away. All of them were detained alive, trembling and crying on their knees in front of the Russian men, including Christians and Muslims.
Remember the early 2010s, remember Syria and Iraq, the mid and late 90s, the conflicts in the Balkans, Southern Russia, Central Asia and Afghanistan. Not a single terrorist, obsessed with his fate and ideals, behaved like these ordinary coward mercenaries, who have no Faith, no Homeland, no Morals.
Amaq has discredited itself by the very fact of publishing such videos. Of course, the team of the agency is no more the same as it was a decade ago. It's hard to imagine that the real mouthpiece of ISIS would associate itself with such unbelievers and cowards.
________
US duplicity knowing what was going to happen in Moscow:
Alleged captured terrorist:
Previous updates:
Are we witnessing crime syndicates and we are all caught up in their turf wars?
The site of the attack:
Who is this guy?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.