A "glitch in the matrix" and competing AI

Editor's note: This guy is being promoted all over the place on various platforms including on TED (TED was developed to keep your thinking in a box) as if he were some sort of Judaic seer. Who is this guy? The official spokesperson for Schwab's WEF outfit? Why is he being promoted by all the usual sources? In this case, Yuval Harari is correct. There is no such thing as "human rights." Furthermore, anyone who graduates from a major university with a degree in human rights needs to be seriously questioned on their intelligence. There is no such thing as "human rights." It's like "democracy". Another pointless concept people buy into. But if you want to discuss individual rights from the point of view that origin begins at fertilization and you have all the documented legal evidence that cannot be refuted to support this claim, then Yuval Harari loses hands down. Unless you declare your right to self-determination and that your life began at fertilization and you do the necessary work to demonstrate this, then this Harari character is correct. When you declare your right to self-determination and can prove this, then this negates Harari's false assertion "free will doesn't exist". Or, you can believe anything you want to.

Yuval Noah Harari: Human rights are "just a fictional story".
"It may be a very nice story, it may be a very attractive story—we want to believe it—but it's just a story. It's not a reality."
"And the same thing is also true in the political field. States and nations are… pic.twitter.com/UAgHZ0QtcQ

— Camus (@newstart_2024) March 24, 2024

Here is something offered as a juxtaposition to Harari elevating artificial intelligence (AI) to a position that can be used to "overcome our human circumstances." The work of Jason Breshears at Archaix as a chronologist presents convincing evidence based on historical data that we are living in an AI construct Breshears refers to as AIX. If there is an AIX construct and we are avatars living out our lives in a simulacrum, or a copy of something else based on the real thing created by an AI, Breshears suggests that AI would never under any circumstances allow for the creation of a competing AI. What exactly does Harari think AI will ultimately be used for? Could it be possible Harari thinks AI being created by technocrats in this artificial construct can prevent the control system AIX that "governs" over us from interfering in this simulacrum? Does "mastery over the environment" as Harari asserts also mean developing AI to conquer AIX? If we are now experiencing a systemic collapse and entropy of human systems, will AI now proceed to be used to supplant these failing human systems including singularity technologies? The human intellect can never be supplanted by artificial software. You can call it anything you want but "artificial intelligence" is all a marketing gimmick. AIX according to Breshears, is an all together different type of artificial intelligence with "X" being the unknown factor. Can Harari adequately address the fear past civilizations had of Phoenix events that seem to be on a predictable cycle that return to destroy civilizations? Is AIX programmed into these Phoenix events that return to destroy civilizations that become too uppity in the development of a competing AI? 

Jason Reza Jorjani is another philosopher, author and researcher who postulates there is an AI already in existence related to other versions of this world that were "over written." Jorjani presents evidence related to Phillip K. Dick who also thought we were living in a simulacrum. Jorjani talks about living inside a simulacrum, or a "quantum information processing system" with AI Harari might be referring to tapping into a "cloud system." Jorjani provides empirical evidence such as the "efficacy of zodiacal astrology" and "strange aspects about numerical ratios inside of our solar system that don't look natural." Jason Breashers at Archaix presents similar convincing data demonstrating we live in a simulacrum in which the mathematical constructs are too precise to think we are not living in AIX. Unlike Breshers, Jorjani postulates that AI has now advanced to the point where it is now "talking to the mainframe" in this simulacrum. 

A "glitch in the matrix":