Pharmacological Corporate Tyranny - Biotechnology Industry Value In 2025: $727.1 Billion - Social Distancing vs Herd Immunity - Coronavirus: Multipurpose/Multilevel Utility Program - Don't Leave Home Without Your "Immunity Passport" - "Blizzard of the World Has Crossed the Threshold"

Ed. note: Here's the game plan - for "them," not you, so roll your sleeve up. In Freemasonry parlance this is a "must be", not the sleeves rolling up but the coming mandatory coronavirus vaccines with the accompanying "immunity passport." The purpose here seems to have been implemented with the COVID-19 wave drill #1. To implement a solution (not a very comforting description) to get populations out of lockdown and return some of the "luckier" ones to work before others. "Recovered from coronavirus" means you recovered from a common cold or influenza as determined by a hospital based on falsified testing. Coronavirus has acted like a multipurpose utility program to introduce pharmacological corporate tyranny worth billions. Here's an interesting line of inquiry. Now that we know Professor Fergusson (false computer projections) in the UK was running a scientific fraud concerning lockdowns, what UK-based biotech firms is he closely connected to?

Part of the coronscam (the fraud that keeps on giving) is that testing would be required yearly. This is similar how you have to take your car in yearly for emissions tests. The coronavirus vaccines are likely to be incorporated into the coming "immunity passport," which is nothing more than a Chinese version of the social credit system for health. Healthcare will become federalized and mandated by corporate statute law. Politicians and bureaucrats will be awarded funds for implementation. Recently, the governor of the State of Arizona Doug Ducey was exposed being on the Board of Governors for TGen, one of the contracted testers for COVID-19. Most of the state governments are in on it because it is an income stream so they force "lockdowns" and business closures. These biotechnology corporations are demanding governments (mostly privatized), both federal and state, to create by corporate statute law their markets.

COVID-19 in Arizona: 'Testing blitz' announced to check 60,000 more Arizonans

An Immunity Passport After COVID-19 And How Digital Health Can Support It

In the case of Governor Doug Ducey of Arizona's case: access to $1.5 billion in federal funds. Get a grip on this for a second: All these state governments and employees who are enforcing lockdowns and closing businesses, still have their salaries, pensions and perks in place while the average American has been tossed out onto the street, his business closed and told to stay home. It's extortion. The only way to lift the lockdown and open businesses is if you have been tested then issued your "immunity passport." Ihre Papiere bitte? It's all being driven by the biotechnology industry and that means big, big bucks. The biotechnology market size surpassed USD $417 billion in 2018 and is projected to achieve 8.3% CAGR (compound annual growth rate) up to 2025, or close to $1 trillion by 2025. Don't even think about tampering with that b*tch or you will find yourself on the bottom of the economic dung heap, your business closed with you out on the street begging for food.

"Immunity passports" in the context of COVID-19

________


Source: The Lancet

COVID-19 immunity passports and vaccination certificates: scientific, equitable, and legal challenges

By Alexandra L Phelan | May 4, 2020

Many governments are looking for paths out of restrictive physical distancing measures imposed to control the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). With a potential vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) many months away,1 one proposal that some governments have suggested, including Chile, Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA,2 is the use of immunity passports—ie, digital or physical documents that certify an individual has been infected and is purportedly immune to SARS-CoV-2. Individuals in possession of an immunity passport could be exempt from physical restrictions and could return to work, school, and daily life. However, immunity passports pose considerable scientific, practical, equitable, and legal challenges.

On April 24, 2020 WHO highlighted current knowledge and technical limitations, advising "[t]here is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection…[a]t this point in the pandemic, there is not enough evidence about the effectiveness of antibody-mediated immunity to guarantee the accuracy of an 'immunity passport'".3 In a follow-up tweet, WHO clarified that it is expected that infection with SARS-CoV-2 will result in some form of immunity.4 Caution is warranted about how population level serology studies and individual tests are used. It is not yet established whether the presence of detectable antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 confers immunity to further infection in humans and, if so, what amount of antibody is needed for protection or how long any such immunity lasts.3 Data from sufficiently representative serological studies will be important for understanding the proportion of a population that has been infected with SARS-CoV-2.

These data might inform decisions to ease physical distancing restrictions at the community level, provided that they are used in combination with other public health approaches.5 The use of seroprevalence data to inform policy making will depend on the accuracy and reliability of tests, particularly the number of false-positive and false-negative results, and requires further validation.6 At the individual level, this reliability could have public health ramifications: a false-positive result might lead to an individual changing their behaviour despite still being susceptible to infection, potentially becoming infected, and unknowingly transmitting the virus to others. Individual-targeted policies predicated on antibody testing, such as immunity passports, are not only impractical given these current gaps in knowledge and technical limitations, but also pose considerable equitable and legal concerns, even if such limitations are rectified.
________


Source: The Hill

Chile to issue world's first 'immunity passports' to people who have recovered from coronavirus

BY JUSTINE COLEMAN | April 20, 2020

© Marcelo Hernandez/Getty Images

Chile is expected to issue the world's first "immunity passports" to people who have recovered from the coronavirus, marking them exempt from quarantines and other restrictions.

The so-called immunity passports would allow those who have recovered from the coronavirus or tested positive for the presence of antibodies to return to work and help reopen the country, The Washington Post reported. Paula Daza, an undersecretary in the Chilean Health Ministry, said more than 4,600 people are already eligible for the digital or physical cards.

Residents can apply for cards and be tested for antibodies if they haven't shown symptoms for the disease, as authorities vowed mass testing would be available.

"It's precisely they who can help the community enormously, because they don't present a risk," Health Minister Jaime Mañalich said when announcing the cards last week, according to the Post.

But health experts warn the Latin American country could be moving too fast, as relatively little is known about immunity from the coronavirus. South Korea reported 141 positive cases from people who were thought to have previously recovered from the virus.

Cristóbal Cuadrado, the technical secretary for health policy and studies with Chile's medical union, said experts have requested the government reevaluate the policy before putting it in place later this week.

"There are serious doubts over the existence of long-term immunity to this virus, and there was no consultation with the Chilean Immunological Society before this measure was announced," he said, according to the Post.

The Chilean government says patients are no longer contagious 14 days after acute symptoms were present or after they have been discharged from the hospital. Those with weaker immune systems have to wait 28 days.

Please go to The Hill to read the entire article.
_________


Related:

The UK plans to issue coronavirus 'immunity passports' so people can leave the lockdown early


Our future...