Garcetti: Los Angeles County Is Not Going To Be On Lockdown For 3 Months
DEEP-STATE FOILED: Wisconsin Ends Covid-19 Tyranny – Supreme Court Tosses Lockdown Order
________
Source: CBS Los Angeles
Garcetti: Los Angeles County Is Not Going To Be On Lockdown For 3 Months
May 13, 2020 | CBS Los Angeles | Under: Coronavirus, Los Angeles, Mayor Eric Garcetti
LOS ANGELES (CBSLA) — Mayor Eric Garcetti Wednesday reiterated that the city and county would not be shut down for another three months in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, again clarifying statements made Tuesday by Public Health Director Dr. Barbara Ferrer.
"That's not what I heard, that's not what I expect and that's not what I hope," he said.
Starting Wednesday, beaches in Los Angeles County reopened for active recreational use, joining a list of other public outdoor spaces — such as golf courses and trails — that have recently been allowed to reopen.
"That gives us that spiritual nourishment that we need, that gives us the material prosperity that so many of us miss and gives us hope that our economy and our health can both recover in the days ahead,” Garcetti said.
And, on Wednesday, Garcetti announced that all retail locations — from electronics to beauty stores — would be allowed to reopen for curbside or door-side pickup and delivery. He also said that all manufacturing that supports retail stores would also be allowed to reopen, at a reduced capacity, in accordance with ongoing health orders.
“These are great steps, Garcetti said.
The mayor also announced that tennis and pickleball courts, archery ranges, equestrian centers, model airplane areas and community gardens will open Thursday. Full guidance for local businesses can be found online.
And, starting Saturday, neighborhood streets will temporarily close to cars as part of the city’s Slow Streets Program, allowing for safer pedestrian traffic.
“These are big steps, but they also come with big responsibility," Garcetti said. “But I'm confident in you that we can make these changes and meet head on, not just the threat of this virus, but the hope of this moment with these new permissions."
Please go to CBS Los Angeles to read the entire article.
________
COVID: Going to the root of the poisonous tree
by Jon Rappoport | May 13, 2020
(To join our email list, click here.)
I've just finished recording part-5 of "The Creation of a False Pandemic with Catherine Austin Fitts. You can listen to it it here. Catherine covers the vital global economic consequences of this covert op, and we discuss the 'new normal' and what it means for people who value their freedom."
Before I jump in, I want to point to a film that hacks away the leaves, the branches, the trunk and the roots of the poisonous tree of vaccination all at once: VAXXED II, directed by Brian Burrowes. I urge you to watch it. "Urge" is too light a word. What is coming down the pipeline at us, in terms of attempts at vaccine mandates…this film will only strengthen your resolve, even if you're quite sure you don't need strengthening. The film contains many interviews with parents of vaccine-devastated children, and the children are there, too. The children who have died are there as well. Nobody has ever made a film like this.
A month or so ago, a reader made a crucial point: researchers and writers should make it clear whether they are operating from WITHIN the official paradigm of the epidemic, in order to reveal gross inconsistencies and internal contradictions; or whether they are standing OUTSIDE that paradigm and attacking its basic foundations.
Going further, we need to drill down to the roots of the poisonous tree.
Some people make this calculation: "I don't want my view to appear too radical. That would drive the audience away. So I'll cut myself off at a certain point and try to give the audience pieces of the puzzle they can digest…”
For example, they would assert: "I'm not against vaccines. I just want to make them safer."
They would say: "We have to agree there is a new virus spreading around the world. If we don't, people will reject everything we say. So let's focus on whether the virus is as dangerous as health officials claim it is."
They would say: "We have to accept official case numbers as a starting point, even if untold numbers of people are being diagnosed with COVID by a casual glance at their symptoms, and even if the tests are inaccurate…"
Bit by bit, and piece by piece, people would be accepting the official COVID story, until there is very little to argue about.
Let's take the issue of safer vaccines. How are they going to be made safer? Manufacturers are going to throw in the towel and just eliminate the toxic adjuvants? They'll eliminate the injected germs which are the very basis of the exercise? They'll make vaccines in outer space, where, hopefully, contamination with random viruses would be avoided?
Deeper still, why do immune systems need a "rehearsal for the real thing"—which is the foundational hypothesis underlying vaccination. Nature isn't sufficient? We must fight off every conceivable germ with a shot in the arm?
Please go to Jon Rappoport's blog to read the entire article.
________
What in the hell is Trump talking about? The military will deliver the vaccines? Who are these people trying to kid? There will not be any mandatory vaccine. Does anyone actually think that if you die from coronavirus because you refused a vaccine they really give a shit about you?
Trump just announced in an interview he has "MOBILIZED" the military and "OTHER FORCES" NOW in order to be positioned to give vaccines to "most" of the American population! #NoVaccine #coronavirus pic.twitter.com/Y2IhMxWvo4— Jackie (@risetoflyy) May 14, 2020
Related:
Trump says he would mobilize military to distribute coronavirus vaccine when it's ready
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The "Corona Test" Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus
The Transformation of Societies on the Occasion of Covid-19 Heralds the Militarisation of Europe
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.