November 26, 2011
Did Sister Airlie Star Chamber use Clipper key to trigger WTC #7 bomb?
We believe that Crown Agents’ Sister Virginia Ogilvy, Countess of Airlie, procured ultra vires authorities and Clipper encryption devices for an illegal Star Chamber to conceal evidence of Matrix 5 propaganda attacks and the bombing of [Permira-Schroders] Salomon Smith Barney offices in World Trade Center Building 7 in New York on 9/11.
“World Trade Center Building 7 The Evidence”
“6:45 - First impact eyewitness David Black (?), works for [Permira - Schroders] Salomon Smith Barney in WTC7. Interviewed by Phil Hirschkorn. Greenwich Street. “NIST FOIA: Release #10 - WTCI-329-I-#18, Video #1 (WTC2 Collapse, 9:59am)”
Prequel:
Hired Extortionists - Clipper Ripper Guilds - Air Pilots and Air Navigators and Professional Home Services - Boeing Headquarters - Chicago Insiders
See #78
Abel Danger Mischief Makers - Mistress of the Revels - 'Man-In-The-Middle' Attacks
Airlie’s Star Chamber allegedly procured exclusive access to AT&T’s Clipper chip production through SES founder Kristine Marcy and Sidley Austin’s Michelle Obama in 1991.
Arms of Richard Luce – an allegedly extorted man-in-the-middle of Airlie’s Star Chamber – and the former Lord Chamberlain who allegedly used Clipper encryption devices to conceal the staging of the 'first live broadcast mass snuff film in human history' on 9/11 (cf. Queens' Guard merger with Pershing Rifles' General Shelton on the Speckled Trout!) .
BBC Jane Standley announces that the [Permira - Schroders] Salomon Smith Barney building (WTC7) has collapsed by reading from Airlie’s alleged Star Chamber script.
“It is popularly supposed that the star chamber, after an existence of about fifty years, disappeared towards the end of the reign of Henry VIII, the powers obtained by the Act of 1487 being not lost, but reverting to the Council as a whole. This may have been so, but it is more probable that the Star Chamber continued to exist side by side with the Council, and the two bodies were certainly separate during the latter part of Elizabeth's reign. The Act of 1540, which gave the King's proclamation the force of law, enacted that offenders against them were to be punished by the usual officers of the council, together with some bishops and judges "in the Star Chamber or elsewhere." It is difficult, if not impossible, to draw a clear distinction between the duties of the Privy Council and the duties of the Star Chamber at this time, although before the abolition of the latter there was a distinction "as to their composition and as to the matters dealt with by the two courts." During the reign of Elizabeth Sir Thomas Smith remarks that juries misbehaving "were many times commanded to appear in the Star Chamber, or before the Privy Council for the matter." The uncertain composition of the court is well shown by Sir Edward Coke, who says that the Star Chamber is or may be compounded of three several councils: (i) the Lords and others of the Privy Council; (2) the judges of either bench and the barons of the Exchequer; (3) the Lords of Parliament, who are not, however, standing judges of the court. William Hudson (d. 1635), on the other hand, considers that all peers had the right of sitting in the court, but if so they had certainly given up the privilege in the 17th century. The jurisdiction of the Star Chamber was as vague as its constitution. Hudson says it is impossible to define it without offending the supporters of the prerogative by a limitation of its powers, or the lawyers by attributing to it an excessive latitude. In practice its jurisdiction was almost unlimited. It took notice of riots, murder, forgery, felony, perjury, fraud, libel and slander, duels and acts tending to treason, as well as of some civil matters, such as disputes about land between great men and corporations, disputes between English and foreign merchants, and testamentary cases; in fact, as Hudson says, "all offences may be here examined and punished if the King will." Its procedure was not according to the Common Law. It dispensed with the encumbrance of a jury; it could proceed on rumour alone; it could apply torture; it could inflict any penalty but death. It was thus admirably calculated to be the support of order against anarchy, or of despotism against individual and national liberty. During the Tudor period it appeared in the former light, under the Stuarts in the latter. Under the Tudors, as S. R. Gardiner says, it was "a tribunal constantly resorted to as a resource against the ignorance or prejudices of a country jury," and adds that "in such investigations it showed itself intelligent and impartial." Under James I and Charles I all this was changed; the Star Chamber became the great engine of the royal tyranny. Hateful and excessive punishments were inflicted on those brought before the court, notable among whom were Prynne, Bastwick and Burton, and the odium which it gathered around it was one of the causes which led to the popular discontent against Charles I. As it became more unpopular its jurisdiction was occasionally questioned. An example of this kind occurred in 1629, but the barons of the Exchequer who heard the case declared that the Star Chamber was created many years before the statute of Henry VII and that it was "one of the most high and honourable courts of justice." It was abolished by an act of parliament of July 1641. In 1661 a committee of the House of Lords reported "that it was fit for the good of the nation that there be a court of like nature to the Star Chamber"; but nothing further was done in the matter [Abel Danger believes the functions of the Star Chamber were unlawfully transferred by extortionist-Ladies in Waiting to joint ventures ‘staged’ by the Lord Chamberlain and the Treasury Solicitor which, for the purposes of 9/11, would have been the allegdly-treasonous Richard Luce and Juliet Wheldon]”
“The Licensing Act 1737 gave the Lord Chamberlain the statutory authority to veto the performance of any new plays: he could prevent any new play, or any modification to an existing play, from being performed for any reason, and theatre owners could be prosecuted for staging a play (or part of a play) that had not received prior approval. This act was replaced by the Theatres Act 1843, which restricted the powers of the Lord Chamberlain so that he could only prohibit the performance of plays where he was of the opinion that "it is fitting for the preservation of good manners, decorum or of the public peace so to do". This duty was abolished under the Theatres Act 1968; the first London performance of the musical Hair was delayed until the act was passed after a licence had been refused”
“Virginia Fortune Ogilvy, Countess of Airlie [Matrix 5 principal and Lady of the Bedchamber since 1973 to an allegedly-extorted woman-in-the-middle, Queen Elizabeth II whom she attends on major occasions and overseas tours; on 23 October 1952, she married an allegedly-extorted David Ogilvy, who in 1968 became Earl of Airlie; he is the 8th (or 13th) Earl of Airlie and the eldest son of David Ogilvy, 7th (or 12th) Earl of Airlie and Lady Alexandra Coke; David Ogilvy was born in London, educated at Eton, and served in the Scots Guards during the Second World War; he remained in the army until 1950, when he attended the Royal Agricultural College in Cirencester, in order to learn more about estate management; she maintains two homes on the family's 69, 000 acre (280 km²) estate in Angus: Cortachy Castle and Airlie Castle and a home in Chelsea, London; she was a presumed associate of the late Jack Profumo, the former Bullingdon Club Secretary for War who allegedly developed a Star Chamber strategy with Airlie for the MitM attack on America of 9/11; she is the daughter of John Barry Ryan, an American multi-millionaire, and Margaret, daughter of financier Otto Kahn; David Ogilvy took up merchant banking, joining J. Henry Schroder in 1953 where he was appointed a director of the company in 1961 and chairman in 1973; she allegedly forced her husband to resign from Schroders and engineered his appointment as Lord Chamberlain in 1984 where he allegedly tricked Queen Elizabeth II into handing over an ultra vires ‘Star Chamber’ authority to run HMG as his wife’s and her Crown Agents Sisters’ personal fiefdom; David Ogilvy’s late father was appointed Lord Chamberlain to Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, in 1937 where he allegedly provided backdoor intelligence to Nazi sympathizers in the court of the former Bullingdon Club alumnus, the late King Edward VIII; she allegedly arranged for David Ogilvy to remain in his Lord Chamberlain’s post until 1997 to authorize the infiltration of LGBT agents into GCHQ, the adoption of Clipper PKI for MitM propaganda and the privatization of Crown Agents to support the Star Chamber attacks on the USS Cole in Aden Harbour and the American government on 9/11; in 1997 she arranged for the appointment of Richard Luce as Lord Chamberlain; she allegedly placed Luce in the unlawful Star Chamber and forced him to adopt Clipper encryption technologies needed to conceal the staging of the ‘first live broadcast mass snuff film in human history’ on 9/11 and the demolition of WYC#7; in May 2007, she accompanied Queen Elizabeth II on her trip to the United States to commemorate the 400th anniversary of England's first American settlement at Jamestown, Virginia and attended a state dinner at the White House, hosted by President George W. Bush and Mrs. Bush.”
We invite Grand Juries to test the alibis needed by Airlie and her alleged Lord Chamberlain / Star Chamber associates to prove they did not use Clipper devices to conceal the bombing of the [Permira - Schroders] Salomon Smith Barney offices in WTC7 in New York on 9/11.
Open Demand for a [Runaway] Grand Jury Investigation - Apparent Spoliation of Evidence - Destruction of Boeing 757–222 Aircraft - UA Flt 93 - 9/11
See again
Abel Danger Mischief Makers - Mistress of the Revels - 'Man-In-The-Middle' Attacks
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.