Sunday, January 4, 2026

María Corina Machado has taken a clearly...

Editor's note: ...pro-Israel position, sharply contrasting with Venezuela's now ex-Maduro government. She has publicly expressed support for Israel's right to defend itself, criticized Iran's regional influence, and aligned herself with Israel as part of a broader Western democratic bloc. Machado has stated that, if she comes to power, Venezuela would restore full diplomatic relations with Israel, which were severed in 2009, and strengthen political and strategic ties, potentially including recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Machado's stance has been welcomed by Israeli officials and supporters abroad, while drawing criticism from opponents who view it as a decisive geopolitical realignment. On the other hand, Nicolás Maduro (this was all negotiated in advance with Maduro "sent out the back door") has maintained Venezuela's break in diplomatic relations with Israel since 2009 and showed no intention of restoring ties. Maduro regularly used harsh anti-Israel rhetoric, accusing Israel of "war crimes and labeling its actions against Palestinians as genocide." Maduro strongly backed Palestinian statehood and framed his position as "ideological opposition to Western and Israeli influence." His hostility toward Israel aligned Venezuela closely with Iran and other anti-Israel states, who reinforced a broader anti-US, anti-Western foreign policy posture. All that is about to change as Pax Judaica (or the Bunting Map) continues taking shape.
________

The Venezuela model: Iran should know era of empty rhetoric is over

The extraction of Nicolas Maduro is more than a regime change; it is a calculated message from President Trump to the Iranian axis. This display of American power is encouraging, illustrating that the barrier of non-intervention policies has fallen – and that action against Iran is entirely within the realm of possibility.

By Danny Zaken | January 4, 2026

President Donald J. Trump has a particular fondness for the moniker "peacemaker." He brandishes the title in nearly every interview and diplomatic engagement, claiming that since securing his second term, he has brought an end to seven or eight wars – depending on who is tallying the score.

The "peacemaker" was also the legendary nickname of the Colt .45 – a revolver that was revolutionary for its 19th-century debut and particularly efficient at "conflict resolution" in the Wild West. As it turns out, making peace sometimes requires a policy of war or direct military action – precisely what Trump demonstrated in Venezuela after giving advance warning to dictator Nicolas Maduro, who had refused to honor the will of his country's voters. [Editor's note: Since when did governments "honor the will of a country's voters?"]

In doing so, Trump is reviving the Monroe Doctrine, the centuries-old policy that views Latin America as a sphere of decisive American influence – a "backyard" where rival powers are forbidden from gaining a foothold. United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio tweeted: "Maduro is not the President of Venezuela, and his regime is not the legitimate government. Maduro heads the 'Cartel de los Soles' – a drug-terror organization that took over a country, and he is accused of pushing drugs into the United States." [Editor's note: These people have come up with everything in their tool box as a pretext for removing Venezuela's Maduro including the "Monroe Doctrine."]

However, the transfer of power is not yet a fait accompli. While there is a high probability that Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Corina Machado – the opposition leader – will assume power, at least for an interim period, after her coalition won the election (despite Maduro banning her personally from the ballot), the dictator had blocked the administrative transition, but it remains possible that other elements within the Maduro regime, should they manage to retain control over power centers and the military, will attempt to cling to power.

The regime change in Venezuela carries far-reaching implications for the geo-strategic struggle between the Chinese axis, to which Iran belongs, and the US-Western alliance. Venezuela has effectively functioned as a Chinese forward base: beyond commercial ties and the steady supply of oil to Beijing (some 90% of Venezuelan oil is sold to China in exchange for investments and loans), and oil fields nationalized from American companies – it also served as an intelligence outpost in America's backyard. [Editor's note: Put this in the context of Pax Judaica.]

But of equal significance: Venezuela was the strongest and most dominant base for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Hezbollah, and even Hamas. It was a terror hub from which attacks were planned and directed. One such plot unfolded some six months ago – an assassination attempt on Israel's Ambassador to Mexico Einat Kranz-Neiger. The Mossad exposed the plot in real time, and in cooperation with local security services, the attack was thwarted. 

Beyond the terror operations of the Revolutionary Guards, Iran, and Hezbollah, international crime syndicates also operated out of Venezuela, using the country to finance their activities and launder money. These networks engaged in the fabricating and trafficking of drugs to Western Europe and the United States, as well as human trafficking, stolen vehicle trade, and arms dealing. The Venezuelan base facilitated extensive international operations for these organizations, and the hope is that the incoming regime will move against them. [Editor's note: Pax Judaica's underlying fundamental premise is to remove Islam.]

________



Venezuela under Maduro was the last country in South America that stood in opposition to Israel:



It's not about drugs, oil, or allegations of election interference using Smartmatic voting machines. This is about Venezuela's interference with the construction of Pax Judaica:



On the road to Pax Judaica over America:


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...