________
Part 1 – Agriculture and Land-Holding
October 8, 2025 | By Larry Romanoff
Introduction
There are several thoughts I would ask that you keep in mind when reading this article:
1. It is always a mistake to believe that other people don't know what they are doing.
2. It is always a mistake to believe that government leaders or corporate executives were "uninformed", or acting on "bad intelligence", or were somehow misled by their advisors or inferiors.
3. It is always a mistake to believe that the results produced by the actions of government leaders or corporate executives were a surprise, that they were "unexpected” or "unpredictable". The reality is that the results obtained from actions and policies by any Western government or corporation – however strange those results may appear to you – were precisely those results that were desired, planned and expected. In this category as in no other, there are no "accidents".
October 8, 2025 | By Larry Romanoff
Introduction
There are several thoughts I would ask that you keep in mind when reading this article:
1. It is always a mistake to believe that other people don't know what they are doing.
2. It is always a mistake to believe that government leaders or corporate executives were "uninformed", or acting on "bad intelligence", or were somehow misled by their advisors or inferiors.
3. It is always a mistake to believe that the results produced by the actions of government leaders or corporate executives were a surprise, that they were "unexpected” or "unpredictable". The reality is that the results obtained from actions and policies by any Western government or corporation – however strange those results may appear to you – were precisely those results that were desired, planned and expected. In this category as in no other, there are no "accidents".
Now, it is true that there is something called "the law of unintended consequences", where sometimes a plot will backfire from something unexpected and actually unpredictable, but these situations in real life are so exceedingly rare that we can discount them. One example was the US government (the international Jews, actually) launching their attack on Tik-Tok to prevent the world's young people learning of the Jewish atrocities in Palestine. [1] Tik-Tok was shut down, and that drove all those same young people to China's Little Red Book where they learned that everything their (Jewish-controlled) government and (Jewish-controlled) media had told them about China was a lie. But again, in real life, these serendipitous events are exceedingly rare, and are very obvious when they occur.
The US Agricultural Sector
I was moved to write this article by the proliferation (in late 2025) of videos on Tik-Tok, YouTube, Douyin and other platforms, recordings by American farmers and agricultural experts on the sorry plight of US farmers. The videos present in quite depressing terms the apparent consequences for American agriculture of Donald Trump's "trade war". Briefly, US farmers have lost China as an export market for their grains and field crops, primarily soybeans and corn. The USDA quotes the total of US agricultural exports at nearly $200 billion, [2] while various media tell us China has typically accounted for at least $50 billion of that total. However, as of late 2025, China's purchases of these US products have amounted to precisely zero.
The cause is not, as some would try to tell you, a response in vengeance to Trump’s tariffs, but rather from China’s recognition that the US is not a stable or dependable (or trustworthy) supplier – of anything. China’s leaders have seen this coming for some time, and took aggressive action to diversify their food suppliers to eliminate any dependence on the US. You can hardly blame them for that. Today, the US curtails shipments of technology such as computer chips to China, in hopes of crippling China’s progress. But tomorrow it could very easily be restrictions on food products in an attempt to starve the Chinese to death if they don't stop developing. Lest you take this lightly, it wouldn’t be the first time that the Khazar Jews, using the US as enforcer, have initiated a worldwide food embargo on China – with the obvious intention of starving the Chinese to death. You might care to read this brief article: China's 1959 Famine. [3] The Jews have done the same to India and other nations, much as they are doing in Gaza in 2025. Food embargoes and attacks on a nation's food supply have for centuries been standard operating procedures of the Khazar Jews.
Nevertheless, it is truly heart-breaking to watch some of these videos, with American farmers detailing their financial predicaments, some literally in tears. With the export markets gone and no possibilities for large-scale storage, the videos show many farmers foregoing harvesting and literally plowing their crops into the ground. We now have, on a very large scale, hundreds of thousands of farms with the accumulation of a year’s expenses coupled with zero revenue. Moreover, the collapse in demand has meant that the prices of farm produce have fallen by as much as 40% even for the crops that can be sold. The result is that farm bankruptcies are already increasing alarmingly, with predictions that these could hit an all-time high in 2025 and 2026. There are many stories of farmers committing suicide, and farm experts say at least one-third of US farmers will go bankrupt this year.
Part of the tragedy in the current situation is that US farmers appear to believe they are "caught in the middle" and are the real – though unintended – victims of Trump's policies. In most, if not all, of the videos, farmers appear to believe they are accidental "collateral damage" of mysterious and opaque economic policies (Trump's tariffs), which they (incredibly) believe were necessary and which might produce unspecified "beneficial results" to the US in the long term. It seems that political faith dies hard. It is astonishing to me that Americans generally, but here specifically American farmers, are unable to see what is right in front of their eyes. They simply cannot bring themselves to see that events are unfolding precisely as Donald Trump and the US (Jewish) Deep State [4] [5] intended. For one thing, the effect and results in 2025 on US farmers are similar to those in the agricultural area during Trump's first term with his first pathological series of tariffs. US agriculture suffered very heavily then, and it was a foregone conclusion the same would occur again.
This agricultural disaster never had to occur. Most readers will recall the negotiations that took place in Geneva after Trump’s tariffs reached an astonishing nearly 200%, with a similar Chinese retaliation. But there was one thing that no one seemed to notice – agriculture was not a part of this negotiation. The US was frantically interested in free trade in rare-earth magnets and metals, since these are critical to both the auto industry and the US defense contractors. But there was no mention of Scott Bessent and the American negotiators discussing China's purchases of US farm crops. It would have been very easy in that context for the US to include a request that China continue its purchases of US agricultural products, to protect farmers from precisely the outcome that has obtained. The American negotiators were certainly aware of the potential devastation to the agricultural sector, having seen the result during the previous tariff war. But the matter wasn't even raised, and we need to ask why.
Recall my earlier admonitions that there are no "accidents" resulting from government policy and that it is always a mistake to believe that other people don’t know what they are doing. In this case, it is glaringly obvious that the US Administration was (1) fully aware of the looming catastrophe to American agriculture and (2) made a conscious decision to take no action to mitigate it. It is impossible to argue otherwise.
The question still remaining is "Why?", and the answer becomes very clear when we begin to connect the dots. The first thing we need to do is consider land holdings in the US. It is not a secret that wealthy individuals (primarily Jewish) and large corporations and hedge funds (also primarily Jewish) have been accumulating US farmland at an astonishing rate. Bill Gates, for one, is now revealed as the largest landholder in America. Further, all the huge "factory farms" that raise livestock for food are proliferating geometrically, and are nearly exclusively owned, financed, or controlled, by Jews. (And yes, Bill Gates qualifies as a Jew. I will discuss this elsewhere.) Included in this list are the hidden Jews like the Rothschilds, Sassoons, Warburgs, and many similar, often names you wouldn't recognise.
We are all vaguely aware that during the Great Depression (and other subsequent recessions or depressions), the very large (again, Jewish-owned) banks gobbled up all the smaller ones, with tens of thousands of banks disappearing from the financial landscape in the US. The result of course is that control of finance and the economy has been concentrated in only a few Jewish hands – literally. We dimly see this and vaguely understand it in the world of US banking or petroleum, but somehow fail to make the connection that the identical process occurs in agriculture.
The enormous landholdings by wealthy individuals and corporations were primarily accumulated during times of severe agricultural distress. You cannot be so naive as to believe Rothschild is so enthralled with "farming" that he went around the world during the best of times and paid top dollar for every bit of farmland he purchased. As every wise investor will tell you, "the time to buy is when blood is running in the streets". This wisdom extends to crop farmland and to the production of livestock.
The theory is simple: either cause an agricultural calamity or take advantage of a natural one, and do your purchasing when farmers everywhere are filing for bankruptcy. The issue here, I'm sorry to say, is the part about "causing the agricultural calamity". It should already be obvious to you that the countless tens of thousands (at least) of American farms going bankrupt in 2025 is in no way a "natural event", but one deliberately caused by a vicious government policy where the result was known and foreseen. And that means it was also wanted and planned. You may not like this conclusion, but you cannot avoid it. The logic cannot be escaped.
2025 is Only the Latest Crisis
Now take this a step further. There have been many occasions in the US and other Western countries where an agricultural calamity arose – most often a claimed disease outbreak where vast numbers of poultry and livestock farms were forced to kill millions of animals. I have researched this topic extensively, and have covered it in detail in two previous articles which I urge you in all earnestness to read. One covered a particular outbreak of bird flu in the US [6], and the other the outbreak of foot and mouth disease in the UK. [7] In both of these instances, the "official story" of the disease outbreak was clearly fraudulent. There was not the slightest plausibility, much less possibility, that events could have transpired as stated. In spite of the "conspiracy theory" optics, the only reasonable conclusion is that these two events (and many others similar) were deliberate attacks on small agriculture perpetrated with the connivance of the respective governments. And yes, I know how preposterous that might sound to an uninformed reader. For my part, I would have to say I approached these two specific events with utter disbelief until examination of the evidence forced a change of mind. I suggest you read the articles and learn the details before forming a conclusion. I will include here a summary of these two events, to provide some context for the topic of this essay.
The US Bird Flu Outbreak
In 2015, the US experienced an outbreak of bird flu viruses that affected domestic poultry and, while a few birds died, more than 50 million birds were euthanised to supposedly prevent the spread of the virus. This was the first time that domestic poultry in the US had been infected with these particular strains of bird flu – H5N2 and H5N8. [8] [9] The virus first emerged in Minnesota, appearing almost exclusively in commercial turkey farms, infecting several dozen locations almost simultaneously, but eventually including millions of turkeys and chickens in smaller establishments. [10] It then spread to about 25 other states, the NPR at the time claiming the outbreak was being driven by "farm-to-farm transmission" (a meaningless phrase), [11] though others blamed the outbreak on wild birds.
Another strain of avian flu, (H5N1), emerged in the US in early 2022 and affected tens of millions of commercial poultry and backyard flocks. This was the worst avian-flu outbreak in US history. [12] [13] Flocks in 42 states were infected by the 2022 outbreak, twice as many as in 2015, and again blamed on "wild birds". Nearly 55 million birds were killed in this outbreak, some dying from the disease itself, but the vast majority being killed to stop the virus from spreading. This strain of the avian flu spread nearly worldwide, with outbreaks reported in North and South America, Europe, Asia and Africa. [14] The USDA said turkey farms accounted for more than 70% of the commercial poultry farms infected in the outbreak. [15]
For these apparent infections, the US media were flooded with what were clearly fraudulent claims and deliberate misinformation. Everyone participated in the scam. Wikipedia told us that "Migratory waterfowl brought the disease to the Midwest". [16] The IBI Times told us that "migrating ducks and geese are carrying a deadly flu and sickening millions of turkeys and chickens". [17] Reuters doubled down on this theory, stating, "Wild birds like ducks transmit the virus through their feces, feathers or direct contact with poultry … [spreading the virus] throughout the country as they migrate.” Further, that "85% of the cases were traced directly to wild bird origins". [18] The NPR continued to push this theory: "Scientists believe that wild migratory birds brought this virus to North America." [19] [20] The WHO was also front and center in promoting the theory that "Migratory wild birds, especially waterfowls, are the responsible parties". [21] The US CDC echoed that "the virus "appears well-adapted to spread efficiently among wild birds". [22] I laughed out loud when Reuters reported that "wind blew the virus in from nearby fields where [wild] geese defecated". And so on. The claims didn't stop.
However, after the crisis passed, the same media were full of disclaimers, unanimously telling us "it's not clear how the virus spread". "The majority of birds struck by the flu have been kept indoors on commercial farms and … indicates that wild birds are not the culprit." The reason was simple and obvious: the authorities needed to back off because few believed their "official narrative". The reasons for this are two, and are not only simple but irrefutable:
The first reason is that migratory waterfowl avoid humans and domestic fowl as they would a plague. Migrating ducks and geese search for grain fields with a pond, looking for food and water, and will stay as far as possible from humans and domestic animals. The possibility of wild birds coming into proximity, much less contact, with domestic fowl is approximately zero. This is not speculation. I grew up on a farm, and I can testify that wild birds always avoid any mingling with domestic fowl. Ask any farmer. The official story was not only implausible, but impossible, and thus a huge lie knowingly propagated.
The second reason is more pronounced; migrating wild birds follow very distinct flight paths (we call them fly-ways), and these paths are followed from Northern Canada all the way to Mexico or Central America. Birds do not deviate from these, and they seldom stop. Even hummingbirds and Monarch butterflies will travel hundreds of miles on each leg of their migration journey, and Canada geese will travel 1,500 miles non-stop. This means the opportunities for cross-contamination are slight at best to non-existent at worst.
Again, wild migrating birds follow a few set flyways and do not deviate from those. But with the bird flu in the US, farms that were hundreds or even thousands of miles from a major flyway, still experienced total contamination of their domestic fowl. That is simply impossible. The geographical distribution of outbreaks relative to flyways is a crucial piece of evidence that totally undermines the official story and wild bird theory. The reasoning is compelling, and produces a "death knell" for the "official narrative". Scientific knowledge of migratory patterns is precise. Major flyways are well-documented and predictable. The assertion that a bird from the Atlantic Flyway would deviate thousands of miles to infect an isolated farm in the middle of a continent, and do so with the precision required to start an outbreak, moves from implausible to scientifically ridiculous. This geographical impossibility exposes the "wild bird" vector for what it is: a convenient, untraceable, and false scapegoat. It is a story designed for public consumption because it accuses a culprit that cannot be cross-examined.
But let's not lose the main point here. At the initiation of this crisis, and all through it, the print media and airwaves were literally flooded with “evidence” that wild birds were the culprit. We were so inundated with these claims that few questioned them at the beginning. And the inundation was provided by the most "respected" of sources: the WHO, the US CDC, the NYT and all the rest. Then suddenly, when the official story was finally exposed as being ridiculous, those very same sources were claiming they actually had "no idea" how the virus might have been spread and that "wild birds" were not the culprit after all. But it was too late; the crisis had passed, all the birds had been killed, the farmers bankrupted, and Big Agra had already filled the void. The answers no longer mattered.
The "Wild Bird" Vector: A Deliberately Flawed Narrative
The “wild bird” explanation wasn't just weak; it was scientifically inconsistent, and contradicted all knowledge of established animal behavior. Wild animals, especially birds, generally exhibit neophobia (a fear of new things) and avoid human settlements and domestic animal concentrations due to the associated activity, noise, and perceived threat. The official narrative that wild birds -which instinctively avoid chicken coops, barns, and large commercial poultry operations – were the primary vector for introducing deadly pathogens into these isolated environments requires us to believe the following: That a wild bird, against all its natural instincts, would not only approach but successfully enter a modern commercial poultry facility, which is designed precisely to keep such intruders out; That this same bird would be capable of transmitting a pathogen in sufficient quantity to ignite a massive outbreak, a process far more complex than simple proximity; That this improbable scenario would then repeat itself, with clockwork regularity, at thousands of farms across not only the entire US but other countries as well – while always benefiting the same entities. When examined through the lens of real-world experience, the narrative isn’t just unlikely; it is biologically and behaviorally impossible. It is also fraudulent.
Please go to Blue Moon of Shanghai to continue reading.
The US Agricultural Sector
I was moved to write this article by the proliferation (in late 2025) of videos on Tik-Tok, YouTube, Douyin and other platforms, recordings by American farmers and agricultural experts on the sorry plight of US farmers. The videos present in quite depressing terms the apparent consequences for American agriculture of Donald Trump's "trade war". Briefly, US farmers have lost China as an export market for their grains and field crops, primarily soybeans and corn. The USDA quotes the total of US agricultural exports at nearly $200 billion, [2] while various media tell us China has typically accounted for at least $50 billion of that total. However, as of late 2025, China's purchases of these US products have amounted to precisely zero.
The cause is not, as some would try to tell you, a response in vengeance to Trump’s tariffs, but rather from China’s recognition that the US is not a stable or dependable (or trustworthy) supplier – of anything. China’s leaders have seen this coming for some time, and took aggressive action to diversify their food suppliers to eliminate any dependence on the US. You can hardly blame them for that. Today, the US curtails shipments of technology such as computer chips to China, in hopes of crippling China’s progress. But tomorrow it could very easily be restrictions on food products in an attempt to starve the Chinese to death if they don't stop developing. Lest you take this lightly, it wouldn’t be the first time that the Khazar Jews, using the US as enforcer, have initiated a worldwide food embargo on China – with the obvious intention of starving the Chinese to death. You might care to read this brief article: China's 1959 Famine. [3] The Jews have done the same to India and other nations, much as they are doing in Gaza in 2025. Food embargoes and attacks on a nation's food supply have for centuries been standard operating procedures of the Khazar Jews.
Nevertheless, it is truly heart-breaking to watch some of these videos, with American farmers detailing their financial predicaments, some literally in tears. With the export markets gone and no possibilities for large-scale storage, the videos show many farmers foregoing harvesting and literally plowing their crops into the ground. We now have, on a very large scale, hundreds of thousands of farms with the accumulation of a year’s expenses coupled with zero revenue. Moreover, the collapse in demand has meant that the prices of farm produce have fallen by as much as 40% even for the crops that can be sold. The result is that farm bankruptcies are already increasing alarmingly, with predictions that these could hit an all-time high in 2025 and 2026. There are many stories of farmers committing suicide, and farm experts say at least one-third of US farmers will go bankrupt this year.
Part of the tragedy in the current situation is that US farmers appear to believe they are "caught in the middle" and are the real – though unintended – victims of Trump's policies. In most, if not all, of the videos, farmers appear to believe they are accidental "collateral damage" of mysterious and opaque economic policies (Trump's tariffs), which they (incredibly) believe were necessary and which might produce unspecified "beneficial results" to the US in the long term. It seems that political faith dies hard. It is astonishing to me that Americans generally, but here specifically American farmers, are unable to see what is right in front of their eyes. They simply cannot bring themselves to see that events are unfolding precisely as Donald Trump and the US (Jewish) Deep State [4] [5] intended. For one thing, the effect and results in 2025 on US farmers are similar to those in the agricultural area during Trump's first term with his first pathological series of tariffs. US agriculture suffered very heavily then, and it was a foregone conclusion the same would occur again.
This agricultural disaster never had to occur. Most readers will recall the negotiations that took place in Geneva after Trump’s tariffs reached an astonishing nearly 200%, with a similar Chinese retaliation. But there was one thing that no one seemed to notice – agriculture was not a part of this negotiation. The US was frantically interested in free trade in rare-earth magnets and metals, since these are critical to both the auto industry and the US defense contractors. But there was no mention of Scott Bessent and the American negotiators discussing China's purchases of US farm crops. It would have been very easy in that context for the US to include a request that China continue its purchases of US agricultural products, to protect farmers from precisely the outcome that has obtained. The American negotiators were certainly aware of the potential devastation to the agricultural sector, having seen the result during the previous tariff war. But the matter wasn't even raised, and we need to ask why.
Recall my earlier admonitions that there are no "accidents" resulting from government policy and that it is always a mistake to believe that other people don’t know what they are doing. In this case, it is glaringly obvious that the US Administration was (1) fully aware of the looming catastrophe to American agriculture and (2) made a conscious decision to take no action to mitigate it. It is impossible to argue otherwise.
The question still remaining is "Why?", and the answer becomes very clear when we begin to connect the dots. The first thing we need to do is consider land holdings in the US. It is not a secret that wealthy individuals (primarily Jewish) and large corporations and hedge funds (also primarily Jewish) have been accumulating US farmland at an astonishing rate. Bill Gates, for one, is now revealed as the largest landholder in America. Further, all the huge "factory farms" that raise livestock for food are proliferating geometrically, and are nearly exclusively owned, financed, or controlled, by Jews. (And yes, Bill Gates qualifies as a Jew. I will discuss this elsewhere.) Included in this list are the hidden Jews like the Rothschilds, Sassoons, Warburgs, and many similar, often names you wouldn't recognise.
We are all vaguely aware that during the Great Depression (and other subsequent recessions or depressions), the very large (again, Jewish-owned) banks gobbled up all the smaller ones, with tens of thousands of banks disappearing from the financial landscape in the US. The result of course is that control of finance and the economy has been concentrated in only a few Jewish hands – literally. We dimly see this and vaguely understand it in the world of US banking or petroleum, but somehow fail to make the connection that the identical process occurs in agriculture.
The enormous landholdings by wealthy individuals and corporations were primarily accumulated during times of severe agricultural distress. You cannot be so naive as to believe Rothschild is so enthralled with "farming" that he went around the world during the best of times and paid top dollar for every bit of farmland he purchased. As every wise investor will tell you, "the time to buy is when blood is running in the streets". This wisdom extends to crop farmland and to the production of livestock.
The theory is simple: either cause an agricultural calamity or take advantage of a natural one, and do your purchasing when farmers everywhere are filing for bankruptcy. The issue here, I'm sorry to say, is the part about "causing the agricultural calamity". It should already be obvious to you that the countless tens of thousands (at least) of American farms going bankrupt in 2025 is in no way a "natural event", but one deliberately caused by a vicious government policy where the result was known and foreseen. And that means it was also wanted and planned. You may not like this conclusion, but you cannot avoid it. The logic cannot be escaped.
2025 is Only the Latest Crisis
Now take this a step further. There have been many occasions in the US and other Western countries where an agricultural calamity arose – most often a claimed disease outbreak where vast numbers of poultry and livestock farms were forced to kill millions of animals. I have researched this topic extensively, and have covered it in detail in two previous articles which I urge you in all earnestness to read. One covered a particular outbreak of bird flu in the US [6], and the other the outbreak of foot and mouth disease in the UK. [7] In both of these instances, the "official story" of the disease outbreak was clearly fraudulent. There was not the slightest plausibility, much less possibility, that events could have transpired as stated. In spite of the "conspiracy theory" optics, the only reasonable conclusion is that these two events (and many others similar) were deliberate attacks on small agriculture perpetrated with the connivance of the respective governments. And yes, I know how preposterous that might sound to an uninformed reader. For my part, I would have to say I approached these two specific events with utter disbelief until examination of the evidence forced a change of mind. I suggest you read the articles and learn the details before forming a conclusion. I will include here a summary of these two events, to provide some context for the topic of this essay.
The US Bird Flu Outbreak
An outbreak of a strain of avian flu has affected as many as 24 million birds in the U.S. Midwest, and officials say they don't know how it’s spreading. Above, an egg-producing chicken farm in Iowa, April 23, 2015. Source
In 2015, the US experienced an outbreak of bird flu viruses that affected domestic poultry and, while a few birds died, more than 50 million birds were euthanised to supposedly prevent the spread of the virus. This was the first time that domestic poultry in the US had been infected with these particular strains of bird flu – H5N2 and H5N8. [8] [9] The virus first emerged in Minnesota, appearing almost exclusively in commercial turkey farms, infecting several dozen locations almost simultaneously, but eventually including millions of turkeys and chickens in smaller establishments. [10] It then spread to about 25 other states, the NPR at the time claiming the outbreak was being driven by "farm-to-farm transmission" (a meaningless phrase), [11] though others blamed the outbreak on wild birds.
Another strain of avian flu, (H5N1), emerged in the US in early 2022 and affected tens of millions of commercial poultry and backyard flocks. This was the worst avian-flu outbreak in US history. [12] [13] Flocks in 42 states were infected by the 2022 outbreak, twice as many as in 2015, and again blamed on "wild birds". Nearly 55 million birds were killed in this outbreak, some dying from the disease itself, but the vast majority being killed to stop the virus from spreading. This strain of the avian flu spread nearly worldwide, with outbreaks reported in North and South America, Europe, Asia and Africa. [14] The USDA said turkey farms accounted for more than 70% of the commercial poultry farms infected in the outbreak. [15]
For these apparent infections, the US media were flooded with what were clearly fraudulent claims and deliberate misinformation. Everyone participated in the scam. Wikipedia told us that "Migratory waterfowl brought the disease to the Midwest". [16] The IBI Times told us that "migrating ducks and geese are carrying a deadly flu and sickening millions of turkeys and chickens". [17] Reuters doubled down on this theory, stating, "Wild birds like ducks transmit the virus through their feces, feathers or direct contact with poultry … [spreading the virus] throughout the country as they migrate.” Further, that "85% of the cases were traced directly to wild bird origins". [18] The NPR continued to push this theory: "Scientists believe that wild migratory birds brought this virus to North America." [19] [20] The WHO was also front and center in promoting the theory that "Migratory wild birds, especially waterfowls, are the responsible parties". [21] The US CDC echoed that "the virus "appears well-adapted to spread efficiently among wild birds". [22] I laughed out loud when Reuters reported that "wind blew the virus in from nearby fields where [wild] geese defecated". And so on. The claims didn't stop.
However, after the crisis passed, the same media were full of disclaimers, unanimously telling us "it's not clear how the virus spread". "The majority of birds struck by the flu have been kept indoors on commercial farms and … indicates that wild birds are not the culprit." The reason was simple and obvious: the authorities needed to back off because few believed their "official narrative". The reasons for this are two, and are not only simple but irrefutable:
The first reason is that migratory waterfowl avoid humans and domestic fowl as they would a plague. Migrating ducks and geese search for grain fields with a pond, looking for food and water, and will stay as far as possible from humans and domestic animals. The possibility of wild birds coming into proximity, much less contact, with domestic fowl is approximately zero. This is not speculation. I grew up on a farm, and I can testify that wild birds always avoid any mingling with domestic fowl. Ask any farmer. The official story was not only implausible, but impossible, and thus a huge lie knowingly propagated.
The second reason is more pronounced; migrating wild birds follow very distinct flight paths (we call them fly-ways), and these paths are followed from Northern Canada all the way to Mexico or Central America. Birds do not deviate from these, and they seldom stop. Even hummingbirds and Monarch butterflies will travel hundreds of miles on each leg of their migration journey, and Canada geese will travel 1,500 miles non-stop. This means the opportunities for cross-contamination are slight at best to non-existent at worst.
Again, wild migrating birds follow a few set flyways and do not deviate from those. But with the bird flu in the US, farms that were hundreds or even thousands of miles from a major flyway, still experienced total contamination of their domestic fowl. That is simply impossible. The geographical distribution of outbreaks relative to flyways is a crucial piece of evidence that totally undermines the official story and wild bird theory. The reasoning is compelling, and produces a "death knell" for the "official narrative". Scientific knowledge of migratory patterns is precise. Major flyways are well-documented and predictable. The assertion that a bird from the Atlantic Flyway would deviate thousands of miles to infect an isolated farm in the middle of a continent, and do so with the precision required to start an outbreak, moves from implausible to scientifically ridiculous. This geographical impossibility exposes the "wild bird" vector for what it is: a convenient, untraceable, and false scapegoat. It is a story designed for public consumption because it accuses a culprit that cannot be cross-examined.
But let's not lose the main point here. At the initiation of this crisis, and all through it, the print media and airwaves were literally flooded with “evidence” that wild birds were the culprit. We were so inundated with these claims that few questioned them at the beginning. And the inundation was provided by the most "respected" of sources: the WHO, the US CDC, the NYT and all the rest. Then suddenly, when the official story was finally exposed as being ridiculous, those very same sources were claiming they actually had "no idea" how the virus might have been spread and that "wild birds" were not the culprit after all. But it was too late; the crisis had passed, all the birds had been killed, the farmers bankrupted, and Big Agra had already filled the void. The answers no longer mattered.
The "Wild Bird" Vector: A Deliberately Flawed Narrative
The “wild bird” explanation wasn't just weak; it was scientifically inconsistent, and contradicted all knowledge of established animal behavior. Wild animals, especially birds, generally exhibit neophobia (a fear of new things) and avoid human settlements and domestic animal concentrations due to the associated activity, noise, and perceived threat. The official narrative that wild birds -which instinctively avoid chicken coops, barns, and large commercial poultry operations – were the primary vector for introducing deadly pathogens into these isolated environments requires us to believe the following: That a wild bird, against all its natural instincts, would not only approach but successfully enter a modern commercial poultry facility, which is designed precisely to keep such intruders out; That this same bird would be capable of transmitting a pathogen in sufficient quantity to ignite a massive outbreak, a process far more complex than simple proximity; That this improbable scenario would then repeat itself, with clockwork regularity, at thousands of farms across not only the entire US but other countries as well – while always benefiting the same entities. When examined through the lens of real-world experience, the narrative isn’t just unlikely; it is biologically and behaviorally impossible. It is also fraudulent.
Please go to Blue Moon of Shanghai to continue reading.
________
There are predators and there are prey:




No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.