________
EXPOSÉ: Supreme Court Scandal Unleashes a Diabolical Plot to Crush American Innovation and Surrender Sovereignty to British Elitists
By Anonymous Patriots | May 1, 2025
In the hallowed halls of the United States Supreme Court, where justice should reign supreme, a sinister conspiracy festers, threatening to obliterate the American dream! At the heart of this treachery is Jane Sullivan Roberts, wife of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., whose shadowy dealings as a legal recruiter have spun a web of corruption that ensnares the nation's highest court. But the betrayal runs deeper—a chilling scheme to plunder a revolutionary American invention, the social networking technology birthed by Leader Technologies in Columbus, Ohio, and repurpose it for global surveillance, propaganda, and obscene profits.
This gripping exposé unveils a sinister coalition of corrupt judges, shadowy government entities, and elite groups like the Highlands Forum (Five Eyes [Britain], DoD, DARPA) and the British Pilgrims Society, all determined to undermine American sovereignty while enriching a select few. From the Supreme Court to the Pentagon, from the Patent Office to the core of Silicon Valley, it reveals how justice was subverted and innovation turned into a weapon against the American public.
The U.S. Supreme Court, once a beacon of justice, now a fortress of betrayal.
JANE SULLIVAN ROBERTS: THE PUPPET MASTER BEHIND THE GAVEL
Jane Sullivan Roberts isn't just the spouse of a Chief Justice—she's a power broker orchestrating a multimillion-dollar empire that taints the very core of judicial integrity. As managing partner at Macrae's Washington, D.C., office, she's raked in over $10.3 million in commissions from 2007 to 2014, placing high-flying attorneys at Big Law giants like WilmerHale, Gibson Dunn, Cooley Godward, Hogan Lovells, Davis Polk, and Robins Kaplan Jane Roberts' Commissions. These firms, dripping with influence, routinely argue blockbuster cases before the Supreme Court, placing Jane's financial empire in direct conflict with her husband’s sacred duties.
Take the 2019 case Dutra Group v. Batterton—WilmerHale, represented by legal thug Seth P. Waxman, swaggered into court, and Chief Justice Roberts, ignoring his wife's $350,000 commission from placing Ken Salazar at the firm in 2013, joined the 6-3 majority favoring their client Dutra Group v. Batterton. Waxman, who's argued over 80 cases before the Court, thrives in a world where Jane's deals fuel his firm's dominance Seth P. Waxman. Gibson Dunn, Hogan Lovells, Davis Polk, and others on Jane's client list also haunt the Court's docket, yet Roberts refuses to recuse himself, flouting the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which demands judges avoid even the appearance of impropriety Code of Conduct.
Consider Leader Technologies' 2012 Writ of Certiorari in Leader v. Facebook at the Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Roberts mentored Facebook's appellate attorney, Thomas G. Hungar of Gibson Dunn. Hungar's firm represented Jane Sullivan's client, as did Cooley Godward (Facebook's trial counsel), Facebook itself, and Fenwick & West (one of Leader's attorneys). Roberts held substantial stock in Microsoft, Fidelity, Vanguard, and BlackRock—entities that profited significantly from Facebook's IPO and continue to benefit. Newly uncovered ties to the British Pilgrims Society and the Knights of Malta, English Priory, suggest that any judge adhering to the Code of Judicial Conduct should avoid affiliations with firms or companies linked to such groups, including those with Rhodes Scholars. John Roberts' actions indicate a disregard for this code.
Jane's financial disclosures, labeling her millions as mere "salary" instead of commissions, are a blatant dodge, slammed by legal ethics expert Bennett Gershman as "legally incorrect" Jane Roberts Ethics Red Flags. This deception spits in the face of Canon 2's call for transparency, eroding public trust in a Court already teetering on the brink
Chief Justice Roberts' Wife Ethics Concerns. The rot spreads beyond Roberts—Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson are entangled in elitist networks that dance to the tune of these large corporations, threatening the very soul of justice Jane Roberts' Business Ties.
Please go to AIM to Continue Reading.
The British intend to extend their commercial proxy war into Russia ultimately to control Russia's vast resources and commodities:
Britain Admits They are in Proxy War Against Russia
EXPOSÉ: Supreme Court Scandal Unleashes a Diabolical Plot to Crush American Innovation and Surrender Sovereignty to British Elitists
By Anonymous Patriots | May 1, 2025
In the hallowed halls of the United States Supreme Court, where justice should reign supreme, a sinister conspiracy festers, threatening to obliterate the American dream! At the heart of this treachery is Jane Sullivan Roberts, wife of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., whose shadowy dealings as a legal recruiter have spun a web of corruption that ensnares the nation's highest court. But the betrayal runs deeper—a chilling scheme to plunder a revolutionary American invention, the social networking technology birthed by Leader Technologies in Columbus, Ohio, and repurpose it for global surveillance, propaganda, and obscene profits.
This gripping exposé unveils a sinister coalition of corrupt judges, shadowy government entities, and elite groups like the Highlands Forum (Five Eyes [Britain], DoD, DARPA) and the British Pilgrims Society, all determined to undermine American sovereignty while enriching a select few. From the Supreme Court to the Pentagon, from the Patent Office to the core of Silicon Valley, it reveals how justice was subverted and innovation turned into a weapon against the American public.
The U.S. Supreme Court, once a beacon of justice, now a fortress of betrayal.
JANE SULLIVAN ROBERTS: THE PUPPET MASTER BEHIND THE GAVEL
Jane Sullivan Roberts isn't just the spouse of a Chief Justice—she's a power broker orchestrating a multimillion-dollar empire that taints the very core of judicial integrity. As managing partner at Macrae's Washington, D.C., office, she's raked in over $10.3 million in commissions from 2007 to 2014, placing high-flying attorneys at Big Law giants like WilmerHale, Gibson Dunn, Cooley Godward, Hogan Lovells, Davis Polk, and Robins Kaplan Jane Roberts' Commissions. These firms, dripping with influence, routinely argue blockbuster cases before the Supreme Court, placing Jane's financial empire in direct conflict with her husband’s sacred duties.
Take the 2019 case Dutra Group v. Batterton—WilmerHale, represented by legal thug Seth P. Waxman, swaggered into court, and Chief Justice Roberts, ignoring his wife's $350,000 commission from placing Ken Salazar at the firm in 2013, joined the 6-3 majority favoring their client Dutra Group v. Batterton. Waxman, who's argued over 80 cases before the Court, thrives in a world where Jane's deals fuel his firm's dominance Seth P. Waxman. Gibson Dunn, Hogan Lovells, Davis Polk, and others on Jane's client list also haunt the Court's docket, yet Roberts refuses to recuse himself, flouting the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which demands judges avoid even the appearance of impropriety Code of Conduct.
Consider Leader Technologies' 2012 Writ of Certiorari in Leader v. Facebook at the Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Roberts mentored Facebook's appellate attorney, Thomas G. Hungar of Gibson Dunn. Hungar's firm represented Jane Sullivan's client, as did Cooley Godward (Facebook's trial counsel), Facebook itself, and Fenwick & West (one of Leader's attorneys). Roberts held substantial stock in Microsoft, Fidelity, Vanguard, and BlackRock—entities that profited significantly from Facebook's IPO and continue to benefit. Newly uncovered ties to the British Pilgrims Society and the Knights of Malta, English Priory, suggest that any judge adhering to the Code of Judicial Conduct should avoid affiliations with firms or companies linked to such groups, including those with Rhodes Scholars. John Roberts' actions indicate a disregard for this code.
Jane's financial disclosures, labeling her millions as mere "salary" instead of commissions, are a blatant dodge, slammed by legal ethics expert Bennett Gershman as "legally incorrect" Jane Roberts Ethics Red Flags. This deception spits in the face of Canon 2's call for transparency, eroding public trust in a Court already teetering on the brink
Chief Justice Roberts' Wife Ethics Concerns. The rot spreads beyond Roberts—Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson are entangled in elitist networks that dance to the tune of these large corporations, threatening the very soul of justice Jane Roberts' Business Ties.
Please go to AIM to Continue Reading.
________
Here's some interesting reporting on another Crown Agent Sister:
Does this include the wives of judges who are Crown Agent Sisters?
Continuation:
The British intend to extend their commercial proxy war into Russia ultimately to control Russia's vast resources and commodities:
Britain Admits They are in Proxy War Against Russia
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.