Middle Temple Patent - Matrix 5 Mistress of the Revels - Femme Comp Inc. Extortionists - Hacked Sky News Ku-Band Satellite Link - Snuff-Film Images

To whom it may concern

August 4, 2011

Rebekah Middle Temple patent for FC-Ku Gareth contract hit

Abel Danger believes that Crown Agents’ Sister Rebekah Wade used a Middle Temple patent to legitimize (?) a Matrix 5 Mistress of the Revels role in which she allegedly authorized Femme Comp Inc. extortionists to hack a Sky News Ku-band satellite link and backhaul snuff-film images of the FC-Ku contract hit of Gareth Williams in August of 2010.

Matrix 5 MitM = Banker + Anglophone + Francophone + Lesbian + Pedophile attacks

Rebekah Sky Hack Aug 25, 2010
MI6 Murder: Post-Mortem Cannot Explain Death

Rebekah Sky Hack Aug 27, 2010
MI6 Worker Seen Eight Days Before Body Found

Rebekah Sky Hack Aug 28, 2010
MI6 Worker Seen Eight Days Before Body Found

Rebekah Sky Hack Dec 22 2010
Police: Bondage Link To Secretive Spy's Death

Prequel
PwC’s beTrusted and Entrust Public Key Infrastructure - Decoyed Crime Scenes - Investigators Diverted - Matrix 5 Man-In-The-Middle Attacks

Kindle
New Captain Sherlock eBook

See #65
Abel Danger Mischief Makers - Mistress of the Revels - 'Man-In-The-Middle' Attacks

Clues and more!!


“Sir George Buck (or Buc) (1560–1622) was an antiquarian who served as Master of the Revels to King James I of England. George Buck was educated at the Middle Temple, and served on the successful Cádiz expedition of 1596 under Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex. He had some connection with the powerful William Cecil, Lord Burghley. In the mid-to-late 1590s Buck was in competition with playwright John Lyly for the reversion of the office of the Master of the Revels, then held by Buck's relation Sir Edmund Tilney ("reversion" meaning that the candidate would obtain the office when the present office-holder vacated it — usually by death). Many sources, depending on the Dictionary of National Biography, identify Tilney and Buck as uncle and nephew, but their true familial relationship seems to have been more distant. Lyly was vocal in his distress at facing competition for an office he thought he'd been promised; his letters of protest and supplication to Queen Elizabeth and to Cecil are still extant. Heartfelt thought they may have been, Lyly's complaints had no effect. Sometime in this period, Buck also obtained the office of Esquire of the Body (likely an honorary distinction for him); it was an office he held when Elizabeth died in 1603. Upon the start of the new Stuart dynasty in 1603, Buck was knighted (on 23 July) and formally received the reversion to the office of Master of the Revels with an appointment as Deputy Master, by a royal patent (on 23 June). He worked as Tilney's assistant until his predecessor's death in 1610, when Buck assumed the office. Unfortunately for posterity's knowledge of English Renaissance theatre, neither Tilney nor Buck kept the detailed records that would be produced by their successor, Sir Henry Herbert. Buck did record that he consulted Shakespeare about the authorship of one old anonymous play, George a Greene. Shakespeare could only remember that it was written by a clergyman. The Master of the Revels was responsible for supervising and censoring the plays performed in the public theatres, and for arranging performances of those plays at Court. (Curiously, he had relatively little to do with the sumptuous performances of masques that were such noteworthy features of the Stuart court.) Scholars have disagreed about Buck's role during the years he was Tilney's assistant, 1603–10. It has been argued that Buck had no role in censoring plays prior to 1610. Yet starting in 1606, Buck licensed plays for publication, a function that had not previously been the responsibility of the Master's office. George Chapman's The Conspiracy and Tragedy of Charles, Duke of Byron (1608) was censored when it appeared on the stage, and caused a scandal when the players violated that censorship; Buck has been associated with the scandal, and it is certainly true that Buck licensed the publication of the censored text later in that year. Once he assumed the full office in 1610, Buck clearly was the primary censor for public drama. The extant manuscript for The Second Maiden's Tragedy (1611) shows censorship notes in Buck's hand, as do a few other surviving manuscripts from the era, like that of Sir John van Olden Barnavelt (1619). Buck was also a minor poet and prose writer. He published "A Discourse or Treatise of the third universitie of England" (1615), an account of the Inns of Court. His major work, his History of the Life and Reign of Richard III, would not be published until 1646. As an antiquary, Buck was noted for his discovery of the copy of the act of Parliament, Titulus Regius, which brought Richard III to the throne. He found it in the Croyland Chronicle, one of the sources for his History of King Richard III. (Sir George was a descendant of Sir John Buck, an adherent of Richard III who had been executed following the Battle of Bosworth Field.) Buck also claimed to have seen a letter written by Elizabeth of York to John Howard, 1st Duke of Norfolk, shortly before the death of Queen Anne Neville, in which Elizabeth declared her love for Richard III and her hope of becoming his wife. In Buck's words, the letter asks Norfolk "to be a mediator for her to the King, in behalf of the marriage propounded between them", who, as she wrote, was her "onely joy and maker in this world", and that she was his in heart and thought: "withall insinuating that the better part of February was past, and that she feared the Queen would never die." The letter, if it ever existed, is now lost. Buck fell from favour, was overwhelmed by debt, and died insane.”

“ELIZABETH THE SECOND by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Our other Realms and Territories Queen Head of the Commonwealth Defender of the Faith: WHEREAS on the thirteenth day of August in the sixth year of the Reign of Our Royal Predecessor King James the First of England and in the year of Our Lord one thousand six hundred and eight, Our said Royal Predecessor “being desirous of perpetuating, so far as in us lies, the happy estate of this realm of England, which has flourished throughout so many ages by the administration of the said laws, and earnestly seeking not only the continuance of the ancient renown of the said Inns but also the accession of new glory, and that we may leave behind to all posterity clear evidence of our good will and bounty towards the profession of the said laws and those professing the same” caused his Letters to be made Patent GRANTING amongst other things to the Treasurer and Masters of the Bench of the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple and to the Treasurer and Masters of the Bench of the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple by their proper names the land, messuages and buildings “called or known by the name or names of the Inner and the Middle Temple, or the New Temple, London, or any of them, being in the suburbs of our City of London, and within the Temple Bar of London” and all the gardens, courts, lanes, passages, yards, ways and so forth within the precincts of the Temple, the bridge called Temple Bridge, and the Church called Temple Church, together with various liberties and franchises therein specified, strictly commanding that the same should serve “for the accommodation and education of those studying and following the profession of the aforesaid laws, abiding in the same Inns for all time to come” EXCEPTING nevertheless to Our Royal Predecessor, his heirs and successors “the free disposal of and the nomination and donation to the office of Master or Keeper of our aforesaid House and Church of the New Temple, London, and of the rectory of the aforesaid Church” AND SUBJECT TO covenants and undertakings by the said grantees that they would pay an annuity of Seventeen Pounds Six Shillings and Eight Pence to the Master or Keeper of the Temple Church and would “well and sufficiently maintain and keep up the aforesaid Church, the chancel and the belfry of the same for ever for the celebration of Divine Service and the Sacraments in so far as it is befitting and has until now been accustomed” AND WHEREAS since the date of the said Letters Patent the Masters of the Bench of the aforesaid Societies have held the said lands and property and have complied with the command of Our Royal Predecessor and have observed and performed the said Exception, Covenants and Undertakings and continue to do so to this day AND WHEREAS it has pleased Us now, in the year of the four hundredth anniversary of the grant of the said Letters Patent, to confirm their original purpose and effect and it is Our Will and Pleasure that the said purpose and effect should continue in manner heretofore used and accustomed AND WHEREAS a translation of the said Letters Patent from the original Latin into English is annexed hereto, which translation is complete save that the proper names of all the grantees are not repeated beyond their first occurrence NOW THEREFORE We do by these Presents confirm Our Royal Will and Pleasure that the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple and the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple do continue to hold the land and other property granted to the said Masters of the Bench of the said Honourable Societies by the said Letters Patent of Our Royal Predecessor in manner heretofore accustomed and subject to the same Command, Exception, Covenants and Undertakings PROVIDED nevertheless that the said Honourable Societies of the Inner Temple and the Middle Temple shall not be incorporated or deemed to have become a corporation or corporations by virtue of these Presents IN WITNESS WHEREOF We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patent WITNESS Ourself at Westminster this second day of June in the fifty-seventh Year of Our Reign”

“[Femme Comp Inc C4 Technologies] Our Mission is to Ensure Your Success. FCI is a customer-focused organization. Our business is focused on providing innovative and high quality SETA (System Engineering and Technical Assistance) services and solutions to DoD and other Federal Government clients. We strive to meet and consistently exceed our client's goals. One of FCI's greatest strengths is its commitment to Ethical Business and Engineering Practices. As SETA Support Contractors to the DoD and other Federal Agencies, FCI Personnel are often asked to act on behalf of the Government or to represent the Government in some capacity. This position, ultimately, represents the highest form of trust that a client can bestow upon a SETA contractor.” ... “Stanford Telecommunications, Inc., protests the Defense Communications Agency's (DCA) award of a contract to Femme Comp, Inc., under request for proposals (RFP) No. DCA 100-86R-0174, a small business set-aside. Stanford contends that the award was improper because Stanford had provided DCA with proof that Femme was not a small business and, therefore, not eligible for award of the contract. We dismiss the protest. The RFP was issued to acquire system engineering and technical assistance for the Defense Satellite Communications System. Stanford and Femme each certified that it was a small business. DCA notified the unsuccessful offerors of its intent to award the contract to Femme in a letter dated February 9, 1987, and Stanford, in a February 13 letter, protested Femme's status as a small business to the Small Business Administration (SBA). DCA awarded the contract to Femme on March 6. The SBA determined that Femme was other than a small business on March 13; Femme has appealed this determination to the SBA. Stanford contends that it was improper for DCA not to wait until the SBA had determined Femme's size status before awarding the contract. In this regard, Stanford asserts that SSA issued its determination within 10 days of receipt of the size protest and Femme's response, as required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), 48 C.F.R. Sec. 19.302(g) (1986), and argues that the FAR prohibits award of the contract during this period. The FAR, however, provides that the contracting officer may award a contract on which there is a size protest after (1) the SBA has made a size determination or (2) 10 business days have expired since the SBA's receipt of the protest, 48 C.F.R. Sec. 19.302(h) (1), and does not require that the contracting officer wait 10 days from SBA's receipt of the response to the protest. After the 10 business days have passed without a determination by the SEA, the contracting officer may continue to withhold award, but is not required to do so. Since it is apparent that DCA waited more than the required 10 business days after Stanford's size protest was filed with the SBA before awarding the contract to Femme, we have no legal basis on which to object to the award. The protest is dismissed.”

“The Astra satellites at 19.2°East provide for services downlinking in the 10.70 GHz-12.70 GHz range of the Ku band. Astra 19.2°E is one of the major TV satellite positions serving Europe, transmitting over 1,150 TV, radio and interactive channels to more than 93 million direct-to-home (DTH) and cable homes in 35 countries (the other major satellite positions being at 13° East, 28.2° East, 23.5° East, and 5° East). The satellites at the Astra 19.2°E position primarily provide digital TV, digital radio and multimedia services to Europe and North Africa, principally to Algeria, Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Morocco, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, and Tunisia. Astra 19.2°E provides both free-to-air and a number of pay-TV services in networks such as ARD Digital, ArenaSat, CanalDigitaal, CanalSat, Digital+, ORF Digital, Premiere, ProSiebenSat.1, UPC Direct, and ZDF and is the market leader for DTH and communal dish reception in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland The relatively close proximity of Astra 19.2°E to one of SES Astra’s other orbital positions, Astra 23.5°E, allows the use in target countries of a single small dish fitted with a monoblock Duo LNB to receive channels from both positions .. Launched in 1988, Astra 1A was the first satellite in the Astra 19.2°E group. With 16 transponders, Astra 1A was the first satellite intended for DTH reception of satellite TV across Europe. From the start of transmissions in 1989, Astra 1A carried four channels for Sky Television plc, the world's first commercial multi-channel DTH service, on transponders leased before the satellite was completed. Early channels broadcasting from 19.2°East included those primarily intended for the UK, Germany, the Benelux countries, and Scandinavia, and so-called pan-European channels such as MTV, CNN International, and Super Channel.”

Those who may be concerned have a moral obligation to think hard.

http://abeldanger.net