May 3, 2010
Dear Lord Pearson:
UKIP – Cameron Crony Saboteurs – Boot on Neck of BP
Hawks CAFE asks you to investigate the role of David Cameron and his crony associates in HM Treasury, the European Union and the U.S. Senior Executive Service, following the apparent sabotage of BP's Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico.
Our KSM agents have evidence that Mr. Cameron and Norman Lamont, a former N.M. Rothschild banker and Cameron's former boss in HM Treasury, transferred Met Office / MOD assets into the custody of the crony members and their customers in the Legal Sector Alliance and authorized the use of the assets to sabotage the Deepwater Horizon, trigger cat-bond insurance frauds and launch a naked short-selling attack on BP's shares.http://www.legalsectoralliance.com/about/members
"1970: British Prime Minister Edward Heath makes Lord Victor Rothschild the head of his policy unit. Whilst he is in that role Britain enters the European Community .. N. M. Rothschild & Sons British Newfoundland Corporation, Churchill Falls project in Newfoundland, Canada, is completed. N. M. Rothschild & Sons also create a new asset management part of the company which traded worldwide. This eventually became, Rothschild Private Management Limited .. 1980: The global phenomenon of privatisation starts. The Rothschilds are behind this from the very beginning in order to seize control of all publicly owned assets worldwide. 1981: Banque Rothschild is nationalised by the French government. The new bank is called, Compagnie Européenne de Banque. The Rothschilds subsequently set up a successor to this French bank, Rothschild & Cie Banque (RCB), which goes on to become a leading French investment house .. N. M. Rothschild & Sons advise the British government on the privatisation of British Gas. They subsequently advise the British government on virtually all of their other privatisations of state owned assets including: British Steel; British Coal; all the British regional electricity boards; and all the British regional water boards. A British MP heavily involved in these privatisations is future Chancellor of the Exchequer, Norman Lamont, a former Rothschild banker."
""Let me be clear: BP is responsible for this leak. BP will be paying the bill," said Obama as he visited the area and pledged a "fully coordinated, relentless relief effort" in the region where the coastlines of four Gulf states are being menaced. The oil firm said it was doing its best to shut off the well nearly one mile (1.6 km) underwater on the floor of the Gulf of Mexico, but described an extraordinarily complicated operation that could take weeks or months. It was like performing "open heart surgery at 5,000 feet in the dark with robot-controlled submarines," BP America Chairman and President Lamar McKay told ABC News .. "We a dealing with a massive and potentially unprecedented environmental disaster," Obama said. Many of the coastal communities in the path of the oil slick, including Venice on the west bank of the Mississippi River, were devastated by Hurricane Katrina in 2005. "It's just like Katrina, catastrophic," Frances Lacross, a local resident, told Reuters. Desperate efforts above and below the ocean surface -- using boats, planes and even an underwater robotic vehicle -- to check the oil flow and disperse and contain the spreading slick were being hampered by high winds and rough seas. "BOOT ON THE NECK" OF BP A team of government agencies is working on relief, but Obama and his deputies made it clear BP would be on the hook for what could be billions of dollars in cleanup costs. "Our job basically is to keep the boot on the neck of British Petroleum," Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said on CNN. The final bill for cleaning up the spill could be $7 billion (4.6 billion pounds), said Neil McMahon, analyst at investment firm Bernstein in London. Analysts at Morgan Stanley put the figure at $3.5 billion .. Attorneys-general from five U.S. Gulf states met in Mobile, Alabama on Sunday and said they would draft letters to Obama and to BP, seeking the swiftest possible delivery of federal aid and compensation to those affected. The officials said they wanted clarification from BP on the firm's commitment to cover the cost of the cleanup and paying legitimate compensation to those affected. "We need to make sure if BP is picking up the check, they do so in a pretty big hurry," said Louisiana Attorney General Buddy Caldwell."
As to our allegations re Mr. Cameron and the Legal Sector Alliance's role in generic carbon-footprint and cat-bond insurance frauds, please refer to the lawsuit "Hawks CAFE v. Global Guardians" and related links below.
http://www.hawkscafe.com/107.html
http://abeldanger.blogspot.com/
If we can be of any assistance, let us know.
The Vatic Project: From an eyewitness to the BP explosion
ReplyDeleteRadio Interview with Someone whose was an eye witness to BP explosion
Comments by Mike Kemp and added knowledge from working in the business
2nd interview where he talks about what ignited the gas and first explosion
OK, here goes. I am told that the casing at the sea floor was concreted in-- with 20 feet of concrete-- 24 hours before the event on the rig-- by Halliburton. And that to do that, the blowout preventers (I understand that they use two, like inboard and outboard isolation--I'm not dead certain of that). were closed. That this rig was being prepared to be moved off and a production rig brought in. At that point, they would 'core' the concrete plug, hook up, and the blowout preventers opened and production established.
This means that there was no pathway for nat gas to fill the rig to cause an explosion.
I am told that the blowout preventers are fail-closed hydraulically actuated, with monster actuators. I understand that they essentially function like excess flow check valves. Too much flow starts going through, the valves automatically close without manual intervention.
If you recall, it was reported that the 'acoustically operated blowout preventers' would not respond to a close signal after the explosions and fire on the rig. I am told that this means they have been disabled, one way or another. By explosion, by something. THEY ARE FAIL CLOSED.
I am told that the sea was calm, and that a service boat in near vicinity to the rig heard what they interpreted to be an undersea explosion, and the boat was rocked a short time afterward by a 'surge' on the surface. And then the stuff began to hit the fan. I am led to believe that there are layer upon layer upon layer of redundant fail-safes on this rig, and that the rig is state of the art.
I am told that Boots and Coots, as well as Red Adair's companies (there have been some ownership shuffling in the last years--Halliburton now owns Boots and Coots, as I understand) were point blank refused after the event occurred and these companies offered their services.
And I am told that the word 'bomb' is never, ever used in any respect in the oil b[usi]ness. The guy on the radio interview used the word at least twice.
-Mike Kemp
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Anonymous, here is what has come to light since your very good post.
ReplyDeleteThe first one shows how the lawyers for BP (owned in part by Goldman sachs and company)got this guy out there with the "Levin" show. We think it was to mitigate the damages. Remember, he would not give his name or who he was, and yet he neglected to mention that the lawyers for BP asked him to do the talk show.
Did BP Transocean Lawyers spin James?
This one shows one of the owners of BP, GOLDMAN SACHS, that hired those lawyers who got that guy to come on and talk, also shorted stock on the company THAT OWNS the rig (TransOcean) hours before the "accident". They made a bundle of money on the accident.
No Joke, Goldman Sachs Shorted the Gulf Of Mexico
Then this one shows that Halliburton who did the "plug" that didn't work Bought a rig fire fighting company April 12 for 240 million dollars. Hmmmmmmm all of these coincidences????
Halliburton buys oil fire fighting co April 12
If this was sabotage, it was likely done by environmental extremists. These people have a real "the ends justify the means" mentality. They would do this if they thought it would lead to greater restrictions on drilling.
ReplyDeleteswjslj, yes, you would like that unlikely event that no one has any eye witness to including the survivors on the deck, to be the case wouldn't you?
ReplyDeleteThank about what you just said? If would mean that they had the gear to dive down more than 5,000 feet and had the expertise to literally plant the charges to blow it up and had the money to hire someone who did who wouldn't squeal on them.
read the links above your post and come back and speak again, like a "thinking" human being, PLEASE.
I dont' want to think about what they are not teaching our children in school. This is a good example, no critical thinking skills. No deductive reasoning, simply emotionally, uninformed thoughtless outbursts... amazing.