Monday, February 9, 2026

"The tokenization of everything, including you" warns...

Editor's note: ...that the rapid expansion of asset tokenization, turning real-world assets into programmable blockchain tokens, could extend far beyond finance into nearly every part of life, potentially digitizing ownership of homes, vehicles, and even personal and biological data; it highlights BlackRock's CEO Larry Fink as a leading proponent of this shift, quoting him saying the financial industry is "at the beginning of the tokenization of all assets" and portraying BlackRock as a key driver of tokenized funds and markets, while raising concerns that this evolution benefits large custodians like BlackRock more than everyday people and could shift control over property and privacy into algorithmic, regulated systems. The biggest concern is that if BlackRock becomes a dominant gatekeeper of tokenized asset infrastructure, it could further concentrate financial power and influence over how ownership and access to key markets are structured and governed.
________

BlackRock is buying up the World's Infrastructure to serve Billionaire Oligarchs as part of the WEF Global Model "You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy"

The Real Deal Behind the Panama Canal & Greenland

By Cynthia Chung | April 18, 2025

There has been a great deal of criticism against the recent developments with the Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison's agreement to sell its Panama Canal ports, Cristobal and Balboa, to BlackRock. A sale that has been loudly backed by the Trump Administration.

Cristobal and Balboa ports presently owned by the Hong-Kong based CK Hutchison
company located on opposite sides of the Panama Canal.

There has been especially a great deal of criticism by Trump and his administration over the operation of the Panama Canal claiming China has taken over control of this vital trade chokepoint and is causing the US to pay more than others for the use of the canal. There have even been accusations within the Trump Administration, including by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, that they are certain China plans to block America's use of the Panama Canal completely. The accuracy of these accusations will be reviewed and discussed in detail in this series.

Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino earlier this year had made a public statement, in response to Trump’s accusations that China was controlling the Panama Canal, and published a strongly worded statement "wholly rejecting" Trump's words and saying the canal would remain Panamanian.

President Mulino added that no nation was interfering with the canal's administration and that dialogue was the best way to resolve the issues Trump raised. He also disagreed with Trump's characterisation of the US returning the canal to Panama.[1]

"The canal wasn't given by anyone, it was the result of a generational fight that culminated in 1999," Mulino wrote on X.[2]

However, after Marco Rubio's visit to Panama after less than one month as US Secretary of State (Panama was first on the list of visits by Rubio, followed by El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala and the Dominican Republic) he proudly stated in his interview with FOX News that Panama was the first country to exit from China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and that he expects other Latin American countries to follow suit. Trump has repeatedly stated that the US built the Panama Canal and thus has the right to "reclaim it". These developments and the history of US-Panamanian relations will be discussed in this series.

China has been heavily criticized for the deferral of the BlackRock purchase, who has filed an anti-monopoly investigation launched by China's State Administration of Market Regulation. This move has ignited accusations that China is overreaching in its legal reach. The accuracy of such accusations will be reviewed in this series.

BlackRock's role globally as well as domestically will also be reviewed in detail, and especially its direct role in influencing the economy and well-being of Americans. In addition, BlackRock's role along with Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) will be reviewed in what they are in fact proposing as a counter to China's Belt and Road Initiative, along with an overview of BRI's activities thus far.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...