________
The Real Pandemic Profiteers
The Real Pandemic Profiteers
They Called Us Grifters. Then the Epstein Files Opened.
Read, share, and comment on the X thread dedicated to this post.
In 2021, the President of the United States told the nation that I and eleven other Americans were killing people — and the organization that gave him that claim was funded by the same dark money networks whose offshore vaccine profits we had been investigating.
Executive Summary
A note on method: This investigation documents financial relationships between named organizations using federal exhibit numbers, published grant records, parliamentary archives, and the organizations’ own reports. It draws a structural distinction between what documentary records establish and what remains inference — and it flags that distinction explicitly throughout.
Readers should be aware that the institutional network described in this piece has a documented history of pre-emptively framing public discussion of its own financial relationships as conspiracy theory — a technique the piece itself analyzes in detail. If a future summary of this article describes it as "connecting Rothschilds, Gates, and Soros to a conspiracy," that characterization will itself be an example of the methodology under examination. The primary sources are cited. The exhibit numbers are public. The reader is invited to verify rather than believe.
Part I: The Hit Job
In May 2020, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue — a London-based think tank — produced a report in partnership with BBC Click and the media ratings organization NewsGuard titled ""The Far Right’s Exploitation of Covid-19 Disinformation." Its central claim: that public discussion of "Bill Gates, George Soros, the Rothschilds and Jeff Bezos" in connection with pandemic profiteering constituted far-right extremist conspiracy theory. The report listed 34 websites as "disinformation-hosting." Among them: GreenMedInfo.com.
ISD's founding board included General the Lord Guthrie of Craigiebank — former Chief of the Defence Staff and former director of N M Rothschild & Sons. The organization that declared public discussion of "the Rothschilds" to be far-right conspiracy thinking had a Rothschild bank director on its own board. ISD's funding included grants from the Gates Foundation and Open Society Foundations — the respective philanthropies of two of the four individuals the report declared off-limits for public scrutiny. Amazon — Jeff Bezos's company, the fourth name on ISD's list — was among the tech companies that collaborated with ISD on research projects. None of these conflicts of interest were disclosed in the report.
Open Society's involvement did not stop at ISD. On November 17, 2025, the Washington Free Beacon reported that Open Society Foundations had awarded a $250,000 grant for fiscal year 2024 to the Center for Countering Digital Hate—the group behind the "Disinformation Dozen" list—answering, at least in part, the long-standing question of who was funding CCDH. Subsequent investigation exposed more than twenty dark money backers flowing through the Arabella Advisors network, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, seven anonymous Prism trusts, and donor-advised fund structures that, by design, permit donor identities to remain permanently undisclosed in domestic political operations.³⁸ ³⁹ The funder whose name was declared off-limits for public discussion was simultaneously funding both the organization that declared the prohibition and the organization that enforced it.
By Sayer Ji | February 22, 2026
Read, share, and comment on the X thread dedicated to this post.
In 2021, the President of the United States told the nation that I and eleven other Americans were killing people — and the organization that gave him that claim was funded by the same dark money networks whose offshore vaccine profits we had been investigating.
Executive Summary
• The hit job: In 2020–2021, a coordinated network of UK-based NGOs — funded by the same philanthropies whose pandemic-related financial interests they were protecting — deployed government officials, tech platforms, AI moderation systems, legal threats, and parliamentary privilege to brand twelve named Americans as killers, criminals, and terrorists for questioning official pandemic narratives.
• The architecture: Epstein file releases document that the individuals declared off-limits had designed offshore vaccine funds projecting "tens of billions" in returns, brokered Rothschild DOJ settlements through a convicted sex offender, and listed "pandemic" as a standing capital category — all before COVID-19 existed.
• The irony: ISD's May 2020 report — funded by the Gates Foundation and Open Society — declared public discussion of Gates, Soros, and Rothschild pandemic involvement to be "unfounded" far-right extremism. The Epstein federal exhibit record documents that involvement in detail, with specific Bates numbers available for public audit. Meanwhile, Oxfam documented $85 billion in excess corporate pandemic profits as a mainstream policy issue — while CCDH labeled $36 million in independent media revenue as a moral emergency requiring deplatforming. The difference was never about the money. It was about the message.Note on sourcing: Primary documents cited are identified by their EFTA production numbers as released in federal proceedings. Parliamentary testimony is archived on the UK Parliament website. ISD and CCDH reports are cited from their published versions. Oxfam’s Pandemic Profits Exposed briefing is cited from its July 22, 2020 publication. Analysis draws explicit distinctions between what documentary records establish and what remains inference.
• The arc: The founding architect of CCDH has resigned as the British Prime Minister’s Chief of Staff. The Goldman Sachs General Counsel recruited by Epstein to broker the Rothschild DOJ settlement has departed under pressure. CCDH's CEO faces US visa revocation. YouTube has restored wrongfully removed accounts. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — branded a killer before Parliament — is Secretary of Health and Human Services. The people who were cancelled are still standing. The operation that cancelled them is not.
A note on method: This investigation documents financial relationships between named organizations using federal exhibit numbers, published grant records, parliamentary archives, and the organizations’ own reports. It draws a structural distinction between what documentary records establish and what remains inference — and it flags that distinction explicitly throughout.
Readers should be aware that the institutional network described in this piece has a documented history of pre-emptively framing public discussion of its own financial relationships as conspiracy theory — a technique the piece itself analyzes in detail. If a future summary of this article describes it as "connecting Rothschilds, Gates, and Soros to a conspiracy," that characterization will itself be an example of the methodology under examination. The primary sources are cited. The exhibit numbers are public. The reader is invited to verify rather than believe.
Part I: The Hit Job
The highlighted passage is ISD's own language, from ISD’s own published report, naming the specific individuals whose public discussion it characterized as far-right extremism. What follows documents who was funding ISD at the time it made that determination.
Open Society's involvement did not stop at ISD. On November 17, 2025, the Washington Free Beacon reported that Open Society Foundations had awarded a $250,000 grant for fiscal year 2024 to the Center for Countering Digital Hate—the group behind the "Disinformation Dozen" list—answering, at least in part, the long-standing question of who was funding CCDH. Subsequent investigation exposed more than twenty dark money backers flowing through the Arabella Advisors network, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, seven anonymous Prism trusts, and donor-advised fund structures that, by design, permit donor identities to remain permanently undisclosed in domestic political operations.³⁸ ³⁹ The funder whose name was declared off-limits for public discussion was simultaneously funding both the organization that declared the prohibition and the organization that enforced it.
Please go to substack to continue reading.
________
Massive lawsuits to compensate the dead and injured:
Most Voters Want Immunity For Vaccine Companies Removed: Poll
What's going on here related to Epstein?
π₯ BREAKING π₯
— Lozzy B π¦πΊπ (@TruthFairy131) February 24, 2026
Ghislaine Maxwell’s SISTERS π³
Ghislaine Maxwell's Sisters are Literally In Control Of All The FBI Computer Systems, Including National Security & Epstein Files.
Christine Maxwell co-founded Chiliad, providing data-mining software to the FBI's counterterrorism… pic.twitter.com/KOF8zAJzIp
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.