by Miles Mathis
First published October 28, 2022 Just my opinion as usual, based on internet research of mainstream sources.
How do I know? I looked up the alleged attacker, David Depape, above. He has only three photos on the internet, including the one above, and they are all from a 2013 CIA event. He is listed at Instantcheckmate, but his profile has been scrubbed, meaning the CIA got there first in preparation for this current event. There are no relatives listed, because they don't want people like me linking him to top families or to the CIA. But of course I am going to do it anyway.
You see how easy that was? That is the first thing a private investigator would do when presented with this "news". Do you really think the big computers don't know anything about this white guy from Berkeley? The mainstream media has already tracked down his relatives and interviewed them, but the big computer doesn't know anything about them? How did the papers find them within hours?
I also know because the very first thing the San Francisco Chronicle tells us—in the lead sentence—is that Depape is a 911 Truther. He also posted on social media, questioning the 2020 election. He questioned vaccine safety. I guess he also questioned whether there is a Santa Claus and a Great Pumpkin, the brute. So the story is scripted through and through. Why? Not only to blackwash 911 Truth and various kinds of deniers, but mainly to try to create sympathy for Pelosi, and through her for the Dems. It is an obvious sign of desperation, since the Dems can see they are about to get waxed. It is akin to Katie Hobbs breaking into her own office in Phoenix.
But we can drive around this block easily. I just searched on "John Depape" of California, to figure out who these people are. That led me immediately to a Ronald Depape, and we are told in current stories that Ron Depape is one David's relatives. Ron is supposed to be from British Columbia, but Instantcheckmate has him age 67, from San Jose. Since Ron is David's uncle, the ages match. And this is another way I know the story is fake. They try to hose us by making it hard to track these people in Canada, but as I showed you, it is easy to walk around that as well. Also, they tell us David is Ron's brother's stepson. Then why do they have the same name? A stepson would not have the same name unless he was later adopted. So they are claiming this David Depape was adopted, I guess, which would mean he wasn't born David Depape. That's convenient for the story, isn't it? So who was he? David Stanley? David Rockefeller? Unfortunately for that story, the computer should have his birth name, but doesn't. So as usual, this alleged perp is just a ghost.
Another mainstream source tells us David's stepfather is Gene Depape. This would appear to be Eugene Depape of Washington, who then links us directly to Peter Orlowski of McLean, VA. CIA headquarters.
Just a coincidence? Maybe.
These Depapes of Washington then link us through Teresa Depape to the Forbes and Wallaces. Oboy! Yeah, she is also Teresa Forbes, though she has been scrubbed of any links to the Forbes. However, it looks like she is nee Forbes, later marrying both a Depape and a Wallace.
Please go to Updates to continue reading.
________
News update for 4 November 2022 on the fake hammer attack on that guy who is married to that old bag discussed above:
I also know because the very first thing the San Francisco Chronicle tells us—in the lead sentence—is that Depape is a 911 Truther. He also posted on social media, questioning the 2020 election. He questioned vaccine safety. I guess he also questioned whether there is a Santa Claus and a Great Pumpkin, the brute. So the story is scripted through and through. Why? Not only to blackwash 911 Truth and various kinds of deniers, but mainly to try to create sympathy for Pelosi, and through her for the Dems. It is an obvious sign of desperation, since the Dems can see they are about to get waxed. It is akin to Katie Hobbs breaking into her own office in Phoenix.
But we can drive around this block easily. I just searched on "John Depape" of California, to figure out who these people are. That led me immediately to a Ronald Depape, and we are told in current stories that Ron Depape is one David's relatives. Ron is supposed to be from British Columbia, but Instantcheckmate has him age 67, from San Jose. Since Ron is David's uncle, the ages match. And this is another way I know the story is fake. They try to hose us by making it hard to track these people in Canada, but as I showed you, it is easy to walk around that as well. Also, they tell us David is Ron's brother's stepson. Then why do they have the same name? A stepson would not have the same name unless he was later adopted. So they are claiming this David Depape was adopted, I guess, which would mean he wasn't born David Depape. That's convenient for the story, isn't it? So who was he? David Stanley? David Rockefeller? Unfortunately for that story, the computer should have his birth name, but doesn't. So as usual, this alleged perp is just a ghost.
Another mainstream source tells us David's stepfather is Gene Depape. This would appear to be Eugene Depape of Washington, who then links us directly to Peter Orlowski of McLean, VA. CIA headquarters.
Just a coincidence? Maybe.
These Depapes of Washington then link us through Teresa Depape to the Forbes and Wallaces. Oboy! Yeah, she is also Teresa Forbes, though she has been scrubbed of any links to the Forbes. However, it looks like she is nee Forbes, later marrying both a Depape and a Wallace.
Please go to Updates to continue reading.
________
News update for 4 November 2022 on the fake hammer attack on that guy who is married to that old bag discussed above:
More:
It doesn't make sense because it was staged:
More on the hammer hoax:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.