by Miles Mathis
First published October 17, 2022
This is in response to a piece by C. J. Hopkins republished at Zerohedge today. It is entitled "Gaslighting of the Masses". Funny, because Hopkins is gaslighting you while teaching you about gaslighting. I want to use his article as a game for us. A teaching aid, if you will. You need to start by reading it. It is short and goes fast. As you read, look for the almost buried disinfo. I will tell you what it is in a moment, but first I want you to try to spot it yourself. It will be good practice. It may be slightly difficult for some of you, because Hopkins is pretty good at his job. I have said before that controllers of the opposition generally tell at least 80% truth while spinning you the other 20%. Hopkins and his group (who we will look at in a moment) know their audience is pretty smart, since they were specifically assigned the project of trying to capture my audience—which includes some of the smartest people out there. So in this particular piece, Hopkins is nearer 95% truth. There are only a few buried lies here, though they are big ones. Hopkins hides them not only within a field of truths, he hides them beneath his authoritative voice and self assurance. So go give a look-see and then come back. I will meet you down below.
OK, did you find them? Here is the first big one:
Among the best-known and most dramatic examples are the Patty Hearst case, Jim Jones' People's Temple, the Manson family, and various other cults. . .
Hopkins is selling those events as real, as you see. I will be told, "No, he is showing those events are example of the government gaslighting you." No he isn't. He is using those events as examples of where the leaders gaslight the cult members internally. He is not implying the greater world was gaslit by events that were totally fake. As you are seeing, his webs are pretty complex and subtle. So he is selling the events as real. That is his main job here, and all the rest is just frosting. The thesis of gaslighting is just a frame for that. Everything else in the paper is just him telling you what you already know. There is no new information there, though he wants you to think he is being revolutionary. So he talks like a tough guy and includes some of the juiciest bits of the past years. But that isn't what the article is really about. The article is about almost invisibly reselling those three events as real. He is replying to my papers on those events without responding to me directly. He can't approach me or my papers head-on, since they are way too strong. So instead he takes the events as given in the interior of a paper that seems to be about something else.
He does it again on something even bigger:
They sound exactly like Holocaust deniers pathetically asserting that there is no written proof that Hitler ordered the Final Solution … which, there isn't, but it doesn't fucking matter. Of course Hitler ordered the Final Solution, and of course they lied about the "vaccines."
That one should have been even easier to spot, since Hopkins does a very poor job of cloaking it. He needs to just work it in almost invisibly, but he has failed to do that. It sort of leaps off the page, since nothing really leads into it or out of it. He doesn't sew it into the garment, he just sort of glues it on like a ragged patch. He doesn't just tip his hand to us there, he actually drops all the cards on the floor and allows himself a frustrated curse as he does so. As if he isn't happy he was ordered to include that here. But I'll tell you a secret: he would be even less happy having to counter my papers on Hitler directly. That is out of his pay grade, and anyone else's.
I had never heard of Hopkins, but you can see how I knew he was an agent immediately. So I went to the linked website The Consent Factory, Inc. for more proof. It wasn't hard to find. The title was the first clue. Is is another obvious example of gaslighting, since he is just admitting to your face he is working at a Consent Factory. We saw a similar project under the title OBEY. You are supposed to think these titles are tongue-in-cheek, I guess, or directed at their opposition, but it is much simpler than that. They actually want you to make that excuse for them going in, when you first read the title, since if you make an excuse for them to start, you will keep doing it. You are being trained to look away.
Right under title, we get the all-seeing eye. It was that or a delta or a phoenix or something. Then we click on "about" to find this:
Consent Factory, Inc. is a market-leading provider of post-ideological consulting services to private and public sector clients throughout the developed (and in some cases developing) world. Experts in the fields of behavioral and psychological conditioning, we offer an extensive range of individually-customized strategic-planning and projectimplementation services . . .
Wow. Talk about in-your-face. They are "experts in behavioral conditioning". Are you really going to just pass by that? Are you going to buy the hedge this is just satire, when it clearly isn't. It is the old double-fake. He is basically admitting he is CIA and then going, "Oop, just kidding!"
Then we check who is recommending Hopkins' books. Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone is a big fan. That is the Matt Taibbi who argued 911 was not a false flag and that conspiracy theorists were insane. Max Blumenthal is another supporter. He has worked for The Nation, Alternet, Daily Beast, The New York Times and Media Matters (David Brock's baby). If you think he is a revolutionary or dissident, you need serious help from Mars.
Then we check the links out of that page to "other interesting websites". Hopkins links you directly to DARPA and CIA and RAND and WEF, but you didn't think that was suspicious? He links you to James Delingpole, who I only had to read for about 30 seconds before he began selling Ole Dammegard as "the world's greatest expert on false flags". So we have James pegged. See here, where I out Dammegard as one of the world's most transparent frauds. His misdirection is some of the clumsiest I have come across. Besides, everyone knows Dammegard isn't the world's greatest expert on false flags. I am. In that last link you will see Dammegard selling the Breivik event in Norway as real, while I prove it is a false flag. So does this web of agents that include Hopkins and Delingpole ever link to me? Of course not. They have to pretend I don't exist.
Please go to Updates to continue reading.
Among the best-known and most dramatic examples are the Patty Hearst case, Jim Jones' People's Temple, the Manson family, and various other cults. . .
Hopkins is selling those events as real, as you see. I will be told, "No, he is showing those events are example of the government gaslighting you." No he isn't. He is using those events as examples of where the leaders gaslight the cult members internally. He is not implying the greater world was gaslit by events that were totally fake. As you are seeing, his webs are pretty complex and subtle. So he is selling the events as real. That is his main job here, and all the rest is just frosting. The thesis of gaslighting is just a frame for that. Everything else in the paper is just him telling you what you already know. There is no new information there, though he wants you to think he is being revolutionary. So he talks like a tough guy and includes some of the juiciest bits of the past years. But that isn't what the article is really about. The article is about almost invisibly reselling those three events as real. He is replying to my papers on those events without responding to me directly. He can't approach me or my papers head-on, since they are way too strong. So instead he takes the events as given in the interior of a paper that seems to be about something else.
He does it again on something even bigger:
They sound exactly like Holocaust deniers pathetically asserting that there is no written proof that Hitler ordered the Final Solution … which, there isn't, but it doesn't fucking matter. Of course Hitler ordered the Final Solution, and of course they lied about the "vaccines."
That one should have been even easier to spot, since Hopkins does a very poor job of cloaking it. He needs to just work it in almost invisibly, but he has failed to do that. It sort of leaps off the page, since nothing really leads into it or out of it. He doesn't sew it into the garment, he just sort of glues it on like a ragged patch. He doesn't just tip his hand to us there, he actually drops all the cards on the floor and allows himself a frustrated curse as he does so. As if he isn't happy he was ordered to include that here. But I'll tell you a secret: he would be even less happy having to counter my papers on Hitler directly. That is out of his pay grade, and anyone else's.
I had never heard of Hopkins, but you can see how I knew he was an agent immediately. So I went to the linked website The Consent Factory, Inc. for more proof. It wasn't hard to find. The title was the first clue. Is is another obvious example of gaslighting, since he is just admitting to your face he is working at a Consent Factory. We saw a similar project under the title OBEY. You are supposed to think these titles are tongue-in-cheek, I guess, or directed at their opposition, but it is much simpler than that. They actually want you to make that excuse for them going in, when you first read the title, since if you make an excuse for them to start, you will keep doing it. You are being trained to look away.
Right under title, we get the all-seeing eye. It was that or a delta or a phoenix or something. Then we click on "about" to find this:
Consent Factory, Inc. is a market-leading provider of post-ideological consulting services to private and public sector clients throughout the developed (and in some cases developing) world. Experts in the fields of behavioral and psychological conditioning, we offer an extensive range of individually-customized strategic-planning and projectimplementation services . . .
Wow. Talk about in-your-face. They are "experts in behavioral conditioning". Are you really going to just pass by that? Are you going to buy the hedge this is just satire, when it clearly isn't. It is the old double-fake. He is basically admitting he is CIA and then going, "Oop, just kidding!"
Then we check who is recommending Hopkins' books. Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone is a big fan. That is the Matt Taibbi who argued 911 was not a false flag and that conspiracy theorists were insane. Max Blumenthal is another supporter. He has worked for The Nation, Alternet, Daily Beast, The New York Times and Media Matters (David Brock's baby). If you think he is a revolutionary or dissident, you need serious help from Mars.
Then we check the links out of that page to "other interesting websites". Hopkins links you directly to DARPA and CIA and RAND and WEF, but you didn't think that was suspicious? He links you to James Delingpole, who I only had to read for about 30 seconds before he began selling Ole Dammegard as "the world's greatest expert on false flags". So we have James pegged. See here, where I out Dammegard as one of the world's most transparent frauds. His misdirection is some of the clumsiest I have come across. Besides, everyone knows Dammegard isn't the world's greatest expert on false flags. I am. In that last link you will see Dammegard selling the Breivik event in Norway as real, while I prove it is a false flag. So does this web of agents that include Hopkins and Delingpole ever link to me? Of course not. They have to pretend I don't exist.
Please go to Updates to continue reading.
_________
Off Guardian ran with Hopkins' gaslighting article. It is easy to get caught up in the events without carefully taking the time to analyze what is being uploaded on the internet to vector you into oblivion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.