This One Needs To Be Nipped in the Bud

Editor's note: We've got a PSYOP going on here with Princess Diana's death described in the following clip that needs to be nipped in the bud. First, watch the clip if you haven't already, then continue your intelligence debriefing with the partially republished essay to make sure the PSYOP hasn't stolen your brain. We are surprised so many sites continue posting this PSYOP without bringing it into serious question.

__________

Yes, Diana Faked Her Death

by Miles Mathis

First published December 13, 2019

As usual, this is just my opinion, based on internet research anyone could do.

I have been looking for a way into this one for years, but could never find an easy path—though I didn't look very hard. I had read the basic Wikipedia story several times, but it has been scrubbed of most useful information. The alternative theories are also trash. Yes, I found the usual numerology in the mainstream story, with aces and eights everywhere, indicating a fake, but no easy hook beyond that. But for some reason today I found the door.

That door is Trevor Rees-Jones, the bodyguard who survived the car crash. He was in the front passenger seat and was allegedly saved by the airbag. I saw that name as a peerage name immediately, so I followed that clue. Plus, if you look up Trevor Rees-Jones, you find not one but two. There is also a billionaire Texas oil and gas man with the exact same name, including the hyphen. He is said to be about 18 years older, but they could have changed the dates. Besides, you can still have children at 18, so the Texan could be the bodyguard's uncle, cousin, or even father. Since one is British and the other American, I will assume cousins for now. They even look somewhat alike, with very square faces.

This other Trevor Rees-Jones has recent ties to the UK, including a grandfather from Wales and a grandmother Holmes who was secretary for William Lever, 1st Viscount Leverhulme from Cheshire. She was probably related to him, since his wife was a Hulme. We probably have a fudge from Hulme to Holmes, you see. Lever was not only a Freemason, he founded many lodges. If the name Lever looks familiar, it should. He was the founder of Sunlight soaps, which also links us to Lever Brothers in the US (Lifebuoy, Lux, Vim) as well as to Unilever—now a huge multinational conglomerate. Lever was a groundbreaker in saturation advertising at the end of the 19th century. He even had Sir Walter Besant working for him, linking us to Annie Besant and the whole Theosophy nest. They were all spooks. Lever was a billionaire and acted like one, setting up monopolies and then suing those who tried to break them. He won a huge suit against the newspapers after they blew the whistle on his monopoly—though the case may have been manufactured.

The Texan Rees-Jones is also involved in the Perot Museum in Dallas, which is sold as philanthropy from H. Ross Perot, Rees-Jones, and others, but which includes a walloping dose of pro-oil propaganda and science propaganda, including Big Bang. The Rees-Jones wing has also promoted Sherlock Holmes, which we can now read as a red flag—since Rees-Jones was a Holmes/Hulme. That can't be a coincidence. So it appears Rees-Jones learned well from his rich ancestors the value of saturation advertising.

Anyway, I got to the AHA moment pretty quickly after that, since I went to thepeerage.com to look up these Rees-Jones. They are listed, but are extremely well scrubbed. Only two are listed, and they come out of nowhere and go nowhere. Nothing is known of them, although they are recent. We already see signs of heavy pawing, and we know why. The only information we can tease out is that these ReesJones were related to the Sandilands in one line, and through them to the Stirlings, Douglases, Murrays and Grahams. So this line takes us to Scotland, not Wales. Those names link us to the fake Dunblane event, as you will remember. But we do quickly hit the Livingstons, Stewarts, and Hamiltons as well, the last name linking us to Princess Diana. See below, where I show you Diana was closely related to the Hamilton dukes.

So the natural thing to do is look at the name Rees instead of Rees-Jones. The bodyguard Trevor ReesJones' bio at Wikipedia tells us his father was a Rees, not a Rees-Jones, and refuses to tell us how ReesJones picked up the second name. [But we do find Rees-Jones was born on March 3. That is 3/3.] The Rees baronets are scrubbed as well, with the 1st baronet being given no parents. That is unusual. 1st baronets are normally listed with parents. However, we are given the 1st baronet's wife, and she is enough to give up the farm here. She was Mary Catherine Dormer, daughter of Lieutenant General Honorable James Charlemagne Dormer. His father was a baron. He became Commander-in-Chief of the Madras army in 1891. His son Charles Dormer, 14th Baron, married Caroline Clifford, daughter of Sir Robert Cavendish Spencer Clifford, 3rd baronet.

Are you finished hopping up and down? Yes, Diana was a Spencer, so this indicates Diana and Trevor Rees-Jones are cousins—something they never tell you. Some will say, "Oh, but maybe Spencer is just a first name, not connected to the Spencer-Churchills". No. Sir Clifford's father Admiral Sir Augustus Clifford, 1st Baronet, married a Townshend, granddaughter of the Marquess Townshend, linking us to the Compton Earls, the Shirleys, the Ferrers, and the Noels (Byrons, Gordons). The Comptons then link us to the Spencers of Suffolk. Clifford himself was the son of William Cavendish, 5th Duke of Devonshire, and Georgiana Spencer, daughter of the 1st Earl Spencer. In fact, this Earl Spencer had a daughter named. . . Diana Spencer. So we hit the Spencers twice through the Dormers. And we hit the Churchills as well, since Earl Spencer's grandmother was Lady Churchill, daughter of the 1st Duke of Marlborough. These are not some off-line Spencers. So it looks like the bodyguard in the crash wasn't really a bodyguard. He was a cousin of Diana Spencer from the peerage. Best guess at this point is he was Intelligence, maybe MI5 or 6, and that he crashed this car himself with a couple of bodies from the morgue in the back seat. They then hired a Parisian coroner to identify the bodies as Diana and Dodi. Nothing simpler. We have seen it dozens of times. MI5 and CIA specialize in stuff like this. But back to that later.

Here's another clue. Bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones' parents are given at Wikipedia as Colin Rees and Gill. Gill what? We don't know. Is that Gill a first name or a maiden name? We aren't told. Just Gill. Well, as it turns out, Diana's grandmother was named Ruth Gill, daughter of Colonel William Gill. Long pause for effect. Savor it.

The Gills link us through the Crombies to the Forbes of Boyndlie and Monymusk, thereby linking us to the Keiths, Kers, Carnegies, Arbuthnotts, and Morisons. The Morisons link us to the Maitlands, Stewarts, Duffs and Gordons. Ruth Gill married a Roche, Baron Fermoy, and the Roches were really FitzEdmunds. They link us through the O'Gradys to the Pagets, Earls of Uxbridge, which is interesting since a Paget was in control of the Diana investigation in England. See Operation Paget. We are never told where it got its name, which is curious enough, but I assume it is because a Paget was controlling its outcome. The Pagets are also the Marquesses of Anglesey, among other things. Also curious is that if you go to the Hastings Law Library online for a copy of the Paget report, upon clicking the link you are taken to an empty page at Gov.uk.

The Pagets then link us to the Hoares, which is also a clue since it again ties us to the Diana story. One of Diana's boyfriends is alleged to have been Oliver Hoare. So he was yet another cousin.

On her father's side, we find Diana's grandmother was a Hamilton, daughter of the 3rd Duke of Abercorn. So if you thought Diana was of vastly lower rank than Prince Charles, you were wrong. She is from several lines of dukes. Diana is also a Baring, of the Baring bankers, since the 6th Earl Spencer had married a Baring in 1887. This also links us to the Seymours, Fitzroys, Somersets and Walpoles. The Fitzroys are also dukes (Grafton), so that is a third dukedom in Diana's recent lines. The Somersets are Dukes of Beaufort, making four. The Hamiltons link us to the Gordon-Lennox, Dukes of Richmond, making five. They also link recently to the Russells, Dukes of Bedford, making six. The Russells quickly link us to the Leveson-Gowers and Manners, giving us two more, making eight. The Cavendishes make nine.

But let us return to Rees-Jones. His injuries also don't match the story. We are told his face was crushed, requiring total reconstruction using old photos as reference. 150 pieces of titanium were used to hold the bones together. Nonetheless, his face never looked that bad, and was "nearly back to normal with a year". Really? Does this look like someone who has had his face completely rebuilt from photos?

Please go to Updates to read more.