Saturday, March 10, 2012

McConnell Links Clinton Rubin Sister To Free Flight Patent 9/11

The Abel Danger White House Group announced today that it has linked Field McConnell’s sister Kristine Marcy and her Clinton Rubin associates to the use of Free Flight patented devices for the 9/11 attacks.

Abel Danger’s Global Operations Director, Field McConnell, claims that his Crown Agents’ Sister Kristine Marcy used Clinton Rubin 8(a) companies to modify Con Air planes with Free Flight patented devises and jam Pentagon responses to ‘al-Qaeda 9/11’.

See #1
Abel Danger Mischief Makers - Mistress of the Revels - 'Man-In-The-Middle' Attacks


Spoliation inference that Clinton Rubin sister jammed Free Flight first responders in Pentagon and then killed them!

“Free flight is a developing air traffic control method that uses no centralized control (e.g. air traffic controllers). Instead, parts of airspace are reserved dynamically and automatically in a distributed way using computer communication to ensure the required separation between aircraft. This new system may be implemented into the U.S. air traffic control system in the next decade .. In 1991 the International Civil Aviation Organization created the Future Air Navigation System Panel. The Panel produced descriptions of satellite-based technology applications and their use in air traffic management. A larger role emerged for "user define trajectory" that became known as "free flight" by the mid-1990s. The first hearings on implementing free flight were held in August 1994 by Representative Collin Peterson (D-Minnesota), chair of the House subcommittee with investigative jurisdiction over the FAA. In 1995 David Hinson, the FAA administrator, organized a task force to draw up detailed plans to implement free flight. The report, issued in October that year called for three phases; phase I ended at the end of 2002, the others have not been started. Free flight was patented by the FAA in 2001 [in a treasonous initiative sponsored by patent lawyers at Sidley Austin with input from Hillary Clinton] Free flight is a new concept being developed to take the place of the current air traffic management methods through the use of technology. True free flight eliminates the need for Air Traffic Control (ATC) operators by giving the responsibility to the pilot in command. This gives the pilot the ability to change trajectory in mid-flight. With the aid of computer systems and/or ATC, pilots will be able to make more flight path decisions independently. As in most complex systems, distributed yet cooperative decision making is believed to be more efficient than the centralized control characterized by the current mode of air traffic management .. Approaches of Free Flight There are several approaches that free flight can move towards. Airborne In the airborne approach, the separation responsibility is entirely with the pilots, operating under self separation conditions. In its truest form this is the fundamental nature free flight. The pilot is responsible for detecting and resolving problems while in flight. Computers will help aid the aircrew in this matter. Information, such as weather reports or other aircraft position, is forwarded from ATC to the aircraft so the pilots can decide the best course of action to take. The surveillance system can either be on the ground or on-board the aircraft. Problems with this method include complete surveillance information assurance, communication with different equipment, smaller aircraft incapable of carrying the equipment, and the possibility of a system malfunctioning. It is extremely difficult to have total assurance of all air traffic. If two aircraft flying with different equipment encounter each other, the equipment’s data will have to be sent to the receiving equipment as well as the normal information such as speed. Larger planes will have no problems with the equipment but smaller aircraft will have problems communicating to each other if it lacks an essential component. Surely if this was a one on one scenario it would be easy to solve but if multiple aircraft were involved the difficulty of finding a solution compounds. Lastly, if a system fails or the software has a programming error the aircraft and other aircraft will be flying blind.”

Please visit links below and support a PresidentialField election campaign in which Field will explain how a McConnell administration will deal with his sister and her Clinton Rubin associates for their alleged use of FAA Free Flight patent-pool devices on 9/11.

Youtube Abel Danger Videos



Presidential Field

http://www.abeldanger.net/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...