Through the forensic economics of Hawks Cafe, Captain Sherlock and the Abel Danger Team, an image diagram has been developed what is called an 'Event Pin Wheel.' The purpose of the event pin wheel is to follow a time wheel around events which makes understanding the events easier. If the event wheel is analyzed carefully connections can be made between events and people.
Using an event pin wheel for example, we can see how Saddam Hussein was under an embargo prior to 9/11 and he needed money. An organization known as the Organisation International Francophonie (OIF), which is an association of French speaking people in about 53 member states including such countries as Laos, Cambodia, Bulgaria, Vietnam, Canada and of course France, continued to trade with Iraq during this embargo on Iraq.
Member countries of the Organisation internationale de la Francophonie
Francophonie member states trading with Saddam Hussein that were identified by the Iraq Survey Team (ISG) consisted of seven countries trading with Saddam Hussein before 9/11, they were: Syria, Turkey, South Korea, China, France, the former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Bulgaria. If you go to the Iraq Survey Group site which has the final report on record, scroll down and an entry can be found for Bulgaria as an example of a Francophonie state trading with Iraq prior to 9/11. The report found the following:
In 1998, Bulgarian companies contracted with Iraq to provide numerous dual-use items such as ammonium perchlorate, aluminum powder, phenolic resin, carbon fiber, and machine tools. Recovered Iraqi documentation stated that the end use for these goods was for the Al Fat’h missile.
A slide show using an event pin wheel has been included in this overview of the Organisation internationale de la Francophonie for the association of forensic economists to understand these events and connections. This is a highly educational presentation called Iraq's WMDs Followed and Found.
6 April 2010—Chicago—When the body of Chicago's school board president was found partially submerged in a river last fall, a bullet wound to the head, cameras helped prove it was a suicide.
Friends had speculated someone forced Michael Scott to drive to the river before shooting him—and maybe even wrapped his fingers around the trigger.
But within days, police recreated Scott's 20-minute drive through the city using high-tech equipment that singled out his car on a succession of surveillance cameras, handing the image from camera to camera. The video didn't capture Scott's final moments, but it helped convince police his death was a suicide: He wasn't followed. He wasn't following anyone. He never picked up a passenger.
The investigation offered a riveting demonstration of the most extensive and sophisticated video surveillance system in the United States, and one that is transforming what it means to be in public in Chicago. Continue Reading »
The Bullingdon Club (wikipedia, timesonline) at Oxford University recruits its members from the upper circles of society. Members' participation in acts of violence, sabotage, sex, S&M, drug use and other acts is filmed or otherwise recorded.
Members are later placed in positions of power and influence throughout the world and controlled and blackmailed into executing the plans of the power behind the club—the House of Rothschild.
The House of Rothschild appears to have developed the Bullingdon Club (1780) as a ‘hub’ with the Sidley Austin law firm (1866) and the Rhodes (1902) and Fulbright (1947) Scholarship schemes as ‘spokes’, to move its agents undetected, through a global intelligence network engaged in sabotage, assassination and deception.
The targets of sabotage, assassination and deception are ultimately insured by the House of Rothschild which uses a portion of the insurance claims to pay the agents of destruction.
This rewarding tried and true method of insuring targets, destroying the targets, collecting the insurance and paying the agents with a portion of the insurance payouts, has been used over and over throughout history and continues to this day.
Because the agents of this scheme are ‘respected’ members of society, they are not suspected by the public. Those who are privy to the scheme are compromised and blackmailed. ‘Patsies’ are blamed for the misdeeds.
4 April 2004—A U.S. Army flight surgeon who posted a video indicating his complete rejection of all orders from the military unless Barack Obama documents his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office is now refusing an "unofficial" suggestion from the Army for a medical evaluation.
World Net Daily (WND) reported this week the Army was hinting that Lt. Col Terry Lakin should undergo a brain scan and medical review.
A spokeswoman involved with the developing case said the recommendation was delivered to Lakin by an unnamed officer who implied those higher up the chain of command thought it was a good idea.
The suggestion was described to WND by spokeswoman Margaret Calhoun Hemenway, a veteran Washington appointee and now volunteer spokeswoman, as being presented in a “solicitous” manner.
Officially, the U.S. Army says it has no plans for formal action at this point against the officer. But Calhoun Hemenway told WND that Lakin’s “no” meant “no.”
“He is not taking any suggested medical evaluation or brain scan. He is refusing to obey all orders including deployment orders,” she confirmed.
“It is interesting this suggestion of a medical exam should arise now given he was only a couple of weeks from deployment and obviously judged to be fit for deployment with his bags packed,” she said.
But as WND reported, the controversy raises the prospect that the government may be unwilling to pursue a prosecution because of the possible ramifications—which could include a defense lawyer’s demand for a court-ordered discovery process that would target Obama’s historical documentation. Continue Reading »
4 April 2010—New York City will take up its search for the remains of 9/11 victims again Monday by sifting through debris from the World Trade Center site in the hopes of releasing families from the emotional purgatory they have been in for the last nine years.
Photo: Shawn Baldwin, AP—An excavator sifts through 9/11 rubble at the Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island in 2002.
The material has been collected over the last two years from areas at ground zero that were previously inaccessible after the 2001 attack. But the city has been keeping the debris in a landfill in Staten Island, angering many families of the victims.
“What we're objecting to is they put them on the most recently used garbage dump,” said Diane Horning, whose 26-year-old son, Matthew, was killed in the attacks. “They literally threw them in the dump.”
Horning co-founded WTC Families For A Proper Burial along with her husband, Kurt. In 2005, they and 16 other families sued the city to have one million tons of debris moved off the landfill. Horning has suggested the city bury the material at an empty spot on the landfill, on nearby Governor's Island in the New York Harbor, or at the Flight 93 memorial site in Shanksville, Pa. The families lost their initial case and their appeal, which they argued in December.
At the appellate hearing, James Tyrrell Jr., a lawyer for the city, argued that taxpayer money could not be used to move the pile.
“Digging up the landfill simply because somebody’s loved ones might be there—that’s not a sufficient reason,” Tyrrell said. Continue Reading »
Wikileaks Releases Video Of US Military Slaying Of Iraqis And Reuters Employees
Wikileaks released this video footage of a helicopter attack on about a dozen Iraqis on July 7, 2007. Among those killed were two Reuters news employees, Saeed Chmagh and Namir Noor-Eldeen.
CAUTION: GRAPHIC CONTENT
There is speculation that Wikileaks is a “CIA Fake” site so it is encouraged to use discernment and caution as to how this video is viewed and understood in the broader context of the internet and 9/11. It is suggested the Wikileaks video be viewed which was posted to this blog earlier.
Below: The decision to release the decoded video on April 5, 2010 ultimately came from WikiLeaks co-founder, Julian Assange. He insists that the actions by the Soldiers, Commanders and Pentagon officials throughout the chain of command are problematic at best, and that this type of “attack on journalists trying to get the truth out” is a systemic and deliberate silencing of the revelations of wartime horrors.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Update to this post: 23 April 2010
AN OPEN LETTER OF RECONCILIATION & RESPONSIBILITY TO THE IRAQI PEOPLE
A newly released Wikileaks “Collateral Murder” video has made international headlines showing a July 2007 shooting incident outside of Baghdad in which U.S. forces wounded two children and killed over a dozen people, including the father of those children and two Reuters employees. Two soldiers from Bravo Company 2-16, the company depicted in the video, have written an open letter of apology to the Iraqis who were injured or lost loved ones during the attack that, these former soldiers say, is a regular occurrence in this war. You can view the Wikileaks video here: http://wikileaks.org/ and you can view the Press Release here
VETERANS OF "WIKILEAKS" INCIDENT ANNOUNCE
"LETTER OF RECONCILIATION" TO IRAQIS INJURED IN ATTACK
From Current and Former Members of the U.S. Military
Peace be with you.
To all of those who were injured or lost loved ones during the July 2007 Baghdad shootings depicted in the “Collateral Murder” Wikileaks video:
We write to you, your family, and your community with awareness that our words and actions can never restore your losses.
We are both soldiers who occupied your neighborhood for 14 months. Ethan McCord pulled your daughter and son from the van, and when doing so, saw the faces of his own children back home. Josh Stieber was in the same company but was not there that day, though he contributed to the your pain, and the pain of your community on many other occasions.
There is no bringing back all that was lost. What we seek is to learn from our mistakes and do everything we can to tell others of our experiences and how the people of the United States need to realize we have done and are doing to you and the people of your country. We humbly ask you what we can do to begin to repair the damage we caused.
We have been speaking to whoever will listen, telling them that what was shown in the Wikileaks video only begins to depict the suffering we have created. From our own experiences, and the experiences of other veterans we have talked to, we know that the acts depicted in this video are everyday occurrences of this war: this is the nature of how U.S.-led wars are carried out in this region.
We acknowledge our part in the deaths and injuries of your loved ones as we tell Americans what we were trained to do and what we carried out in the name of "god and country". The soldier in the video said that your husband shouldn't have brought your children to battle, but we are acknowledging our responsibility for bringing the battle to your neighborhood, and to your family. We did unto you what we would not want done to us.
More and more Americans are taking responsibility for what was done in our name. Though we have acted with cold hearts far too many times, we have not forgotten our actions towards you. Our heavy hearts still hold hope that we can restore inside our country the acknowledgment of your humanity, that we were taught to deny.
Our government may ignore you, concerned more with its public image. It has also ignored many veterans who have returned physically injured or mentally troubled by what they saw and did in your country. But the time is long overdue that we say that the value of our nation's leaders no longer represent us. Our secretary of defense may say the U.S. won't lose its reputation over this, but we stand and say that our reputation's importance pales in comparison to our common humanity.
We have asked our fellow veterans and service-members, as well as civilians both in the United States and abroad, to sign in support of this letter, and to offer their names as a testimony to our common humanity, to distance ourselves from the destructive policies of our nation's leaders, and to extend our hands to you.
With such pain, friendship might be too much to ask. Please accept our apology, our sorrow, our care, and our dedication to change from the inside out. We are doing what we can to speak out against the wars and military policies responsible for what happened to you and your loved ones. Our hearts are open to hearing how we can take any steps to support you through the pain that we have caused.
Solemnly and Sincerely, Josh Stieber, former specialist, U.S. Army Ethan McCord, former specialist, U.S. Army
McConnell’s behavior is the classic never-ending “revolving door” syndrome: public officials serve private interests while in office and are then lavishly rewarded by those same interests once they leave. He went from being head of the National Security Agency under Bush 41 and Clinton directly to Booz Allen, one of the nation’s largest private intelligence contractors, then became Bush’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI), then went back to Booz Allen, where he is now Executive Vice President.
McConnell advocates a so-called ”reeingeer[ing] of the Internet” to allow the Government and private corporations far greater capability to track what is being done over the Internet and who is doing it:
The United States is fighting a cyber-war today, and we are losing. It’s that simple. If an enemy disrupted our financial and accounting transactions, our equities and bond markets or our retail commerce — or created confusion about the legitimacy of those transactions — chaos would result. Our power grids, air and ground transportation, telecommunications, and water-filtration systems are in jeopardy as well.
Were specific companies in the World Trade Center targeted for attack on September 11, 2001?
Marsh & McLennan, Cantor Fitzgerald/CO2e.com/eSpeed and Aon Corp were engaged in an economic war game scenario with the Naval War College on 9/11. The game involved the use of carbon emissions trading software.
Shortly before his untimely death, former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons that “Al Qaeda” is not really a terrorist group but a database of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis.
“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive the ‘TV watcher’ to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US and the lobbyists for the US war on terrorism are only interested in making money.”
This video series should be considered propaganda intentionally designed to vector thinking away from the forensic economic investigation and inquiry as presented on this blog of the archived investigative work of Hawks Cafe, Captain Sherlock and the Abel Danger Team association of forensic economists:
Bill Ayers was also scheduled to speak to “Wyoming Public School Principals” by teleconference, obviously Mr. Ayers, true to Obama’s cause was attempting to “transform America” specifically Wyoming from behind the scenes.
Bill Ayers
Here’s the grab - just because Ayers speaking engagement at UW has been canceled, it doesn’t mean he isn’t intending on having a teleconference or that the Wyoming Association of Secondary School Principals (WASSP) won’t plan another one at a later date. I'm just sayin...Why would we trust them?
Ayers a self professed radical terrorist and Obama supporter, has been propped up by socialists like venomously anti-gun George Soros, all the while, Liberty Groups or anyone else that doesn’t believe in their radically socialistic agenda have been demonized by the collectivists and media alike. Like Obama, Bill Ayers has close ties to the ANTI-GUN Joyce Foundation.
"How can one expect men to love Truth when it is often so shocking and painful?"
I used to think that bumper stickers were philosophy for the masses; but now the masses seem not even able to read them, so how are the masses supposed to understand political, economic and news events, which are much more complicated than simply reading bumper stickers considering some of the web sites referred to for information and news? Let's take truth.org, for example, using Wikipedia as a first reference:
Truthout is a 501(c)(3)nonprofit, progressive news organization that operates a web site and distributes a daily newsletter. Registered in September 2001, Truthout.org is ranked in the top 6,000 web sites on the Internet, with an estimated 2.5 million visits per month. Truthout publishes original political news articles, opinion pieces, video reports and artwork. According to its web site, "As an organization, Truthout works to broaden and diversify the political discussion by introducing independent voices and focusing on undercovered issues and unconventional thinking."
What is always so amazing to me is, wherever I go on the web to find 'truth' about 9/11, financial fraud, the drug war, the war on terrorism, the further I look and begin to think I understand events even at a rudimentary level, it seems that the best test of truth is how much money you can make with it? Now, if you understand that demented statement you just broke down half the battle at trying to find the truth behind anything.
Attention to all bloggers, if you have a blog or you are thinking of blogging, no matter how small the effort or how great, this is our time to speak the TRUTH to raw power which is now out in the open.
“If you bloggers self-organize and attach yourselves like leeches to specific issues, corporations, organizations, challenges, you will be the intelligence minutemen of this century. The power is in your hands. There aren't enough guns to kill us all, and Haliburton can't build the jails fast enough to keep us down.”
“It may be time literally to dump congress on its ass and start over”
Expert report says claims of livestock causing global warming are false
It is becoming difficult to keep pace with the speed at which the global warming scam is now unravelling. The latest reversal of scientific “consensus” is on livestock and the meat trade as a major cause of global warming – one-fifth of all greenhouse gas emissions, according to eco-vegetarian cranks. Now a scientific report delivered to the American Chemical Society says it is nonsense. The Washington Times has called it “Cowgate”.
The cow-burp hysteria reached a crescendo in 2006 when a United Nations report ominously entitled “Livestock’s Long Shadow” claimed: “The livestock sector is a major player, responsible for 18 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions measured in CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalents). This is a higher share than transport.” This led to demands in America for a “cow tax” and a campaign in Europe at the time of the Copenhagen car crash last December called Less Meat=Less Heat.
Political and business leaders gather this week in an attempt to revive the world's faltering challenge to global warming. But they face a battle to lift the cloud of scepticism that has descended over climate science and chart a new way forward.
