Thursday, September 24, 2026

The British Engineers Helping Ukraine Hit Russia — While NATO Says It's "Not Involved"

Editor's note: Louis Mosley is CEO of Palantir UK, a role he took after working in finance, including at Santander UK, before joining Palantir in 2016. He previously served as a Conservative councillor for Kensington and Chelsea from 2011 to 2014, and is the grandson of Oswald Mosley, founder of the British Union of Fascists. As Palantir UK's chief, he has become a prominent defender of the company's contracts with British institutions like the NHS and Ministry of Defence, work that has drawn scrutiny over privacy, deportations, and military operations. Why is Loius Mosey as CEO of Palantir being mentioned? Because it is Palantir running the software for targeting data for drones being launched off of civilian trucks inside Ukraine close to the Russia border. This is probably why the Russian military has been destroying gas stations in Ukraine. Those civilian trucks are being fueled up at those gas stations and then after launching drones can be easily hidden inside garages and warehouses. British engineers from Palantir, working alongside Ukrainian counterparts, reportedly developed software that maps drone routes to evade Russian air defenses, using commercial satellite imagery and signals intelligence. These offensive drone strikes have fueled speculation that factors into Russia's continued strikes on Ukrainian data infrastructure. Now we come to this report by El Mundo claiming "the CIA warned European governments that Russia might hide drones aboard merchant ships to strike Spain, France, or Italy and other European countries." This is another fabricated story by western sources likely meant to target Russia's "shadow fleet."
________

"Geranium Apocalypse" Courtesy of the CIA

September 24, 2026 | By Islander Reports

Europe has apparently found its next Russian horror story: drones hidden aboard merchant ships, sailing quietly into the Mediterranean before suddenly striking Spain, France or Italy. And right on cue comes the CIA, with El Mundo reporting that US intelligence has "warned" European governments of precisely such a Russian plan. One small problem: even Italy's defence minister says the supposed alert has not been confirmed. The bigger question is even simpler — why would Russia risk turning civilian shipping into disposable drone platforms when it already possesses far more effective ways of hitting anything it actually wants to hit?

The headline practically writes itself: CIA reveals Moscow’s secret plan to attack Europe from the sea.

Read beyond it, however, and the whole thing starts looking like dollar store propaganda.

According to the reporting, small Russian Gerbera drones could supposedly be concealed inside shipping containers aboard commercial vessels, carried into the Mediterranean under normal civilian cover, and then launched toward targets in southern Europe.

Technically possible? Of course.

But operationally, the logic is much less obvious.

Why would Moscow take merchant vessels that need access to ports, insurance, narrow straits and international shipping lanes and turn them into military launch platforms?

The moment a tanker or container ship becomes associated with drone strikes, it stops being merely commercial shipping. Every port becomes a potential inspection point. Every chokepoint becomes a problem. Every Russian linked vessel becomes a candidate for detention.

And that includes the Bosporus.

For Russia, keeping commercial shipping moving is strategically valuable in its own right. Putting drone launchers aboard those vessels would hand Europe an argument for treating the entire fleet as a security threat rather than simply a sanctions issue.

Which is precisely why the timing of this story is so interesting.

Europe is already saturated with reports of "mysterious drones," sabotage plots, Russian intelligence operations and hybrid warfare. At the same time, pressure on Russia’s so-called shadow fleet is intensifying, with the latest US sanctions legislation explicitly targeting the tanker network used to keep Russian energy exports moving.

Then, almost perfectly on cue, comes another ingredient:

Russian commercial ships may actually be floating drone bases.

How convenient.

A sanctioned tanker can still be argued over as an economic question.

A tanker presented to the public as a potential weapons platform is something else entirely.

And suddenly the pieces begin fitting together rather neatly.

Kaliningrad is portrayed as the threat from the east.

The "shadow fleet" becomes the threat from the sea.

Every unidentified drone feeds the atmosphere.

And now the CIA reportedly supplies the grand finale: Gerberas hidden inside cargo containers somewhere in the Mediterranean.

There is an even more uncomfortable scenario.

Suppose tomorrow a false flag Gerberas or simply a suddenly appears after being launched from a vessel somewhere off the European coast.

The political consequences would arrive before investigators had even finished collecting the wreckage.

Europe would instantly have a powerful justification for stepping up searches, seizures and restrictions against Russian linked merchant shipping. Governments could present an intensified campaign against the shadow fleet not merely as sanctions enforcement, but as a basic national defence pretext.

Please go to substack to continue reading.
________


Cutting off the logistics for drone warfare on Russia:



Russia is not negotiating with the west:



Get used to it. Drone warfare is the future:


It should be obvious by now that...


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...