The Phoenicians are at it again...

Editor's note: ...so for people who watched the Joe Rogan interview with the British Douglas Murray, the first aspect to take into consideration is that Israel is Britain's forward fire base in the Middle East. The second aspect is, "Murray is part of the long Phoenician plan to obliterate the Gentiles, a plan Murray — as a Phoenician — is in on." The pompous Murray is "hiding the real puppet masters" with all this showmanship coming down from the trillionaire bankers and aristocrats who create class warfare. As is suggested look carefully at how unskillfully they always push you away from that and this is what the actors Rogan and Murray are part of. Murray is British peerage and this explains a lot especially the utter perfunctory contempt the Phoenicians have for the working class. Read the essay republished below this video clip to understand clearly what is going on here:

________

Contra Douglas Murray

and Niall Ferguson

by Miles Mathis

First published April 11, 2025

Somewhat surprisingly, this all came from comments Murray made on Joe Rogan. Why is that surprising? Because I don't watch Rogan and never have. I have never sat through even one show. I never last more than a minute before moving on. I just can't take it seriously. So I had to learn about the current fracas from The Gateway Pundit, which I do scan every couple of days or so. I don't take the Pundit seriously either, but it is a good way to find new topics to comment on, as now.

British peerage writer Murray was complaining that Rogan invites people like Darryl Cooper and Ian Carroll on his show, saying that they aren't historians and don't know what they are talking about. Well, that's mostly true but it isn't really to the point, since Murray is not a historian, either, and only parrots what is in his script. My guess is Cooper and Carroll are covert military ops paid to keep eyes off me. They hit my topics and get about halfway in, stalling out before telling you any of the good stuff. Sort of like Dave McGowan used to do, but these guys do it on Youtube. Which is another red flag, of course. If either man were causing The Man any real problems, they wouldn't be allowed on Youtube. Cooper's lack of a bio tends to confirm that. Like the rest of these bozos, he stays in the shade, but we do know he came out of the Navy.

But I am here today for Murray and Ferguson, who are slightly bigger fish. Murray pretends he is an expert, but his bio is actually very slender and unimpressive: if he weren't highly promoted no one would have ever heard of him, and in a few years they won't. We are told he has a degree in English from Oxford, but that doesn't make you an expert on anything. He is only 45 and is known mainly for being gay and writing several books no one has read. The first one—on Oscar Wilde's boytoy Alfred Douglas (no doubt an ancestor) — came out when he was just 19, so you see the incredible promotion he has always had.

It is hard to understand how Alfred merited an entire book, since other than sleep with the monstrous Wilde he did nothing memorable. They have to pad out his life at Wikipedia to even make a page of it.

In 2006 at age 27 Murray published the book Neoconservatism, but again nobody knows why or on what credentials. Had he since become a distinguished professor of anything at Oxford or Cambridge or anywhere else? Not that we know of. I guess all peerage Murrays are guaranteed a major publisher and promotion from all the mainstream outlets, no matter what they choose to do, as long as they toe the party line. Which of course Murray did. The book was promoted by the newly conservative Christopher Hitchens, which should have been enough to damn it for anyone who had learned to see through a glass wall.

In 2011 he wrote a book on the Savile inquiry — which we may assume was some sort of smokescreen — everything Murray touches is; and in 2017 he wrote The Strange Death of Europe, about unchecked immigration. This last is roughly correct, since he argues against it (brave argument that), but the book is misdirection nonetheless, since he avoids the central problem like the plague: this isn't caused by birthrates, crusading Muslims or weak officials, it is part of the long Phoenician plan to obliterate the Gentiles, a plan Murray—as a Phoenician—is in on. When Murray addresses this, he always deflects into "the left". Like all his pals in the alternative press, Murray assures us that Western Civilization is being undermined by The Left. Which again is true in a way, but which hides the real puppet masters. The left in the US and Europe isn't self-propelled, and it isn't propelled by leftist politicians like Obama or Biden, either. Those people are just actor/fronts like Murray and Rogan. This is all coming down from the trillionaire bankers and aristocrats, and I beg you to notice how unskillfully they always push you away from that.

And, I remind you it is also coming from the right, since the trend has never reversed under Republican Presidents or Conservative Prime Ministers. This trend has steadily advanced over the past century no matter which party was in charge. For some reason, the conservatives are pretending to just become aware of it, promising to make a run at it, but whether or not they will is yet to be seen. Did the US magically become whiter or more European during Trump's first term? No, all major trends continued. Only the banter changed a bit.

But given the thesis of this paper, perhaps the funniest thing is the response to this book by The Economist — not exactly a liberal rag — which noted that it needed a lot more reporting and analysis, rather than just hundreds of pages of opinion. Remember that anytime Murray or Ferguson starts talking about "doing history" or "doing research". I will get to Ferguson, but Murray has never written or said anything that hadn't already been written or said a hundred or a thousand times before. His books are just a compilation of one side of broad political opinion, and you learn nothing from him you wouldn't learn more efficiently from scanning the internet for a few minutes. It is just a bunch of self-important blather, like all other mainstream books now.

He has published two more books since then, both of them said to be bestsellers, but we know what to think of that. Those bestseller lists are manufactured by CIA/MI6 like everything else. They have been doing it back to the time of F. Scott Fitzgerald and before, as I have proved. The army or CIA buys thousands of copies and uses them as toilet paper or something.

So nine books in 25 years, two of them co-authored and none containing any original research. Not academic books, just bestseller pulp. I remind you that in the same period I have published 145 volumes of material online, containing more original research than anyone has done in our lifetimes, maybe ever. Which is EXACTLY why both sides of this—Cooper and Carroll and Murray and Ferguson and everyone else—have to be so heavily promoted. It is all the attempt to blow smoke around my research and drown me out by sheer volume.

Which leads inexorably to this begged question: why has Rogan had Murray on his show ever? Like Alex Jones, Rogan pretends to be in some sort of infowar with the mainstream, especially the New Left, but most of the time he is just promoting one side of the mainstream misdirection, as with Murray. I have pointed out the same thing about Jones, who republishes mainstream science propaganda with no analysis or reply. Just straight-up reportage. Rogan does the same thing, promoting the towering frauds Neil Degrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku, among others. I wouldn't trust either of those bozos to tell me the correct time. They are just mouthpieces for the government, as we saw with Tyson promoting the vaccine. So he's just a Pfizer rep. Rogan might as well have Albert Bourla on, calling him a great great man, like Trump did.

So the primary question isn't, why would Rogan have on someone like Cooper, the question is why would he have on someone like Murray? If Rogan's audience was as keen as it thought it was, it would be able to peg Murray just from his name. It couldn't be a bigger red flag if his name was Goldie Sachs. Murray's parents are scrubbed in his bio, including at Wiki, so he is hiding something, but we are told his father is from Isle of Lewis. Interesting, since Trump's mother Mary Anne MacLeod is from that same tiny island off the coast of Scotland. At Wiki we are told Murray's mother was a schoolteacher and his father was a civil servant, but other mainstream sources say the opposite.

Some have said it is strange that Murray is gay while being a conservative. That's actually not so strange, since other things in his bio and oeuvre scream double-agent far louder than that. What is strange is him getting caught saying things like this:

I respect some opponents of gay marriage. But, it has always seemed to me that once you accept that homosexuality exists, there is no decent non-religious reason not to permit equal civil rights, including civil marriage.

Really? He doesn't know of any non-religious reason? Can't think of one no matter how hard he tries? How about this: married couples get tax deductions and write-offs, don't they? Those were originally created to help build traditional families and encourage children, but would those who created those write-offs have wanted to give them to gay couples? Absolutely not. Have we changed our minds about that? Maybe, maybe not, but seeing that this is allegedly a democracy, it should probably be put up for a vote, right? Well, that didn't work even in California, where it was voted down in 2008. That despite the best effort of people like Murray to NOT frame it as a tax issue, but rather as a rights issue. What followed was one of the greatest legal train wrecks in history (which is saying a hell of a lot), when a district judge ruled that vote was illegal, because gays had a Constitutional right to marry simply by existing. So nice to see judges ruling that voting is illegal. That was mysteriously upheld by the circuit court, and the US Supreme Court dodged on standing—the biggest and most obvious copout possible. According to the Supremes, the sponsors of Proposition 8 didn't have standing to appeal when California neglected to do so. In other words, voters are effed when up against the State and the Courts. Any vote the governors don't like can be nullified, as we are finding out even more pointedly in Europe right now, see Romania, Germany, and France.

My point there was not to dredge up that again, though I don't mind wading into whatever is at hand. My point was to show you what a slippery eel Murray really is. He can't ever just come at you straight on like I do, he has try to hypnotize you with some Sith mind trick like this, trying to fool you into forgetting what you already know full well.

Murray's bio is so heavily pawed it is impossible to say who he is, but his promotion tells us he must be of the peerage Murrays. Which tells me his middle name is probably fudged to help hide that. Kear is not a peerage name, so best guess it is a fudge of Kearley, Kearney, or Kearsey. For now I will just remind you that the Murrays are top peers very closely related to the Stanleys, having taken over some of their titles via marriage. Same for the Douglases, who are basically Stuarts by another name.

Please go to Updates to continue reading.

_______

The aristocracy does not want the American people to have guns. This should be obvious with the ATF every once in awhile killing an American as a demo lesson:

Who Will Watch the Watchmen?